‘8 lakh' strays, no govt shelters, Delhi has to redraw its plan
According to a senior Delhi government official, the current practice, as per the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023, is to pick up the stray dogs, take them to hospitals for sterilisation, and then release them back on the streets from where they were picked up.
'We have been focusing on the stray dog menace and have held several meetings but now, with the apex court's order, that becomes irrelevant as the context completely changes… The government will implement the order but it is not possible to pick up the dogs and move them out of the city or to the shelters right now,' the official said.
The official said that as the government does not have any shelter of its own, the implementation of the court order may take longer than eight weeks. While the government has hospitals, all the shelters are currently run by non-governmental organisations (NGOs).
In its order on Monday, the Supreme Court asked the authorities to make shelters to house stray dogs, saying they should first start work on a shelter for 5,000-6,000 dogs in the next six to eight weeks. It sought a report within eight weeks on the creation of infrastructure.
Meanwhile, hours after the Supreme Court's directions, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) ordered that dogs admitted to its hospitals and other animal sterilisation centres should not be released after recovery. The corporation has also ordered an audit of the existing facilities to house dogs temporarily.
'We have asked the centres not to release the dogs there for sterilisation. We are discussing plans regarding building additional shelters, but this will take time. As of now, we have asked the centres to submit how many dogs they can accommodate. Dogs will also be housed in 77 units of vet hospitals run by the MCD. We will start picking up the dogs according to the available facility,' said Dr S K Yadav, project in-charge, Animal Programme, MCD.
He said the corporation picked up 200 dogs from the Red Fort area ahead of Independence Day celebrations, and these would not be released now. 'The estimated population of stray dogs in the city is around 8 lakh. We will follow the SC's orders,' he said, adding that they would first focus on vulnerable areas like schools, colleges, hospitals and public spaces.
Delhi Development Minister Kapil Mishra is scheduled to hold a meeting with the concerned departments and officials on Wednesday to discuss the matter. 'We are fully committed to abide by the orders and directions issued by the Supreme Court. We have been working on this issue proactively, to address it on the ground from day one, studying the legal and technical obstacles that existed in the previous system,' he said.
He said the government would implement the order in a planned manner, keeping both the public as well as the dog lovers in mind. 'Our focus, while implementing this order, will be the welfare of animals,' he said.
Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, meanwhile, said the 'stray dog menace' had assumed 'gigantic proportions' and assured that her government would bring in a policy soon. 'The people of Delhi have been worried about the stray dog menace for years… our only duty is to give them relief… Today, this problem has taken a gigantic form… it is very important for the government to resolve it with honesty and integrity,' she said.
'… we are looking into what the previous governments did… Since our government was formed, it is continuously discussing the issue and holding meetings to provide relief to the people,' the CM said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
3 minutes ago
- Indian Express
SC's verdict on street dogs generates more questions than answers, provides no solutions
The growing number of street dogs in the country, especially in big cities, threatens to rupture, for many, the traditional unanimity on canines being best friends of humans. Stray dogs continue to be cared for by a large, and often vocal, section of the population. But as the animal adapted to the modern urban ecosystem, many people started to regard it as a menace. If animal welfare groups reiterated the dog's traditional ecological roles — as protector, scavenger and predator that keeps pests in check — the arguments of their critics have also been unassailable. Government records show 37 lakh dog bite cases across the country in 2024. The street dog has come to be seen as a public health risk, a carrier of rabies, and a threat to the safety of children, the elderly and working-class people, especially those who work near garbage dumps. So, when the Supreme Court took suo motu cognisance of the matter last month, after a child died of rabies in Delhi, expectations were raised that the two-judge Bench would take a measured view to help resolve an ecological predicament that tends to ignite passions. However, its order, issued on Monday, generates more questions than answers. The SC has ordered civic authorities in Delhi to move eight lakh dogs from the streets. It has asked them to start work on shelters for 5,000-6,000 dogs in six to eight weeks. By all accounts, that will be a tough ask in a city where resource constraints and lack of executive will have made the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules — they mandate in situ sterilisation and vaccination of stray dogs — a virtual non-starter. The costs of building such centres, acquiring land, and training professionals to look after the animals were apparently not serious concerns for the Bench. 'How to do it is for the authorities to look into,' it said. At least two SC verdicts have upheld the ABC Rules. Its critics, however, complain that these rules get in the way of public safety. By engaging with such arguments, analysing its earlier verdicts and giving a patient hearing to the ABC supporters, the Court could have paved the way for a less polarised debate — and ultimately laid the ground for more effective street dog management protocols. It also did not cast its eye on glaring data discrepancies on annual rabies cases in the country — 20,000, according to the WHO; about 50, according to government replies in Parliament. The Bench, instead, chose to dismiss the ABC Rules summarily. The furore following the verdict suggests that the Court may have stoked many more fires than it extinguished.
Hans India
3 minutes ago
- Hans India
SIR appears to be trust deficit issue: SC
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday called the Bihar special intensive revision (SIR) row "largely a trust deficit issue' as the Election Commission of India (ECI) claimed roughly 6.5 crore people of the total 7.9 crore voting population didn't have to file any documents for them or their parents featured in the 2003 electoral roll. The top court is hearing a batch of pleas against the Election Commission electoral roll revision exercise in Bihar. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi during the hearing remarked it "largely appears to be a case of trust deficit, nothing else' as it questioned the petitioners challenging the EC's June 24 decision of conducting the SIR on the ground that it would disenfranchise one crore voters. "If out of 7.9 crore voters, 7.24 crore voters responded to the SIR, it demolishes theory of one crore voters missing or disenfranchised," the bench told senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for petitioner and RJD leader Manoj Jha. The top court also agreed with the EC decision to not accept Aadhaar and voter cards as conclusive proof of citizenship in the ongoing exercise and said it has to be supported by other documents. Sibal contended that despite residents holding Aadhaar, ration and EPIC cards, officials refused to accept the documents. "Is it your argument that people who have no documents but are in Bihar and therefore he should be considered as a voter of the state. That can be allowed. He has to show or submit some documents (sic)," the bench said. When Sibal said people were struggling to find birth certificates and other documents of their parents, Justice Kant said, "It is a very sweeping statement that in Bihar nobody has the documents. If this happens in Bihar, then what will happen in other parts of the country?" Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi and advocate Prashant Bhushan, who were representing different political parties, also questioned the timeline for the completion of the exercise and the data of 65 lakh voters who were declared as dead or migrated or registered in other constituencies. Political activist Yogendra Yadav, who addressed the court in person, questioned the data given by the poll panel and said instead of 7.9 crore voters there was total adult population of 8.18 crore and the design of SIR exercise was to delete the voters. "They (EC) were not able to find any individual whose name was added and the booth level officers visited house to house for deletion of names," Yadav said, calling it a case of "total disenfranchisement". Sibal during the hearing said while in one constituency, contrary to the poll panel's claims, 12 people declared dead were found alive, in another instance alive persons were declared dead. Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, appearing for the poll panel, said the exercise of such a nature was "bound to have some defects here and there at the draft stage" and to claim dead persons were declared alive and alive as dead could always be corrected as it was only a draft roll. The bench in the beginning of the hearing told the ECI to "be ready" with facts and figures for it would be question over the number of voters before the exercise commenced; number of dead before and now aside from other relevant details. The hearing would resume on Wednesday. On July 29, terming the election commission a constitutional authority deemed to act in accordance with law, the top court said it will step in immediately if there is "mass exclusion" in the SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar. The draft roll was published on August 1 and the final roll is scheduled to be published on September 30 amid Opposition claims that the ongoing exercise will deprive crores of eligible citizens from their right to vote. On July 10, the top court asked the EC to consider Aadhaar, voter ID and ration cards as valid documents as it allowed the poll panel to continue with its exercise in Bihar. The EC affidavit has justified its ongoing SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar, saying it adds to the purity of the election by "weeding out ineligible persons" from the electoral rolls. Beside RJD MP Jha and Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra, Congress' K C Venugopal, Supriya Sule from the Sharad Pawar NCP faction, D Raja from Communist Party of India, Harinder Singh Malik from Samajwadi Party, Arvind Sawant from Shiv Sena (Uddhav Thackeray), Sarfraz Ahmed from Jharkhand Mukti Morcha and Dipankar Bhattacharya of CPI (ML) have jointly moved the top court challenging the June 24 decision of the election commission. Several other civil society organisations like PUCL, NGO Association of Democratic Reforms and activists like Yogendra Yadav have moved the top court against the EC order.
Hans India
33 minutes ago
- Hans India
Prioritise women empowerment this I-Day
Every citizen will have a sense of pride on August 15 when India commemorates its 79th Independence Day on Friday. It is a day when we must remember the struggle and sacrifice of our freedom legends, show a sincere expression of gratitude for our freedom fighters with a spirited display of national pride as a measure of celebrating Independence. Freedom is a basic human right that comes with obligation and compulsion. It is not about being for or against an ideal but creating one's own existence from scratch. This privilege to me means freedom to choose and act and fulfill my desires according to my will, if my freedom does not trespass and impinge upon somebody else's. Freedom to me is annihilation of caste and creating a nation where fellow human beings are treated equally. It is to live and let others live. Being liberated neither means licence to unleash mayhem and carry out anti-national or anti-social activities nor show disrespect to others' sentiments or emotions. Your freedom ends where that of the others' starts. Indians are all seven-day wonders; when a new issue crops up, we conveniently forget the old and move on. We chase shadows, comforts and ephemeral pleasures. It's time we give a clarion call to find meaning, purpose, goals and dreams for ourselves. However, despite significant progress since achieving independence, the country's women still face various challenges. Their slogans stress the importance of freedom from patriarchy. The Indian woman irrespective of her class, caste and society suffer discrimination under the garb of culture. Women-abuse, physical, mental and sexual harassment is everyday headlines in the media. Dowry deaths, honour killings and parading women in a humiliating way to take revenge has become a daily affair in recent times. They are victimized even after crimes against them and suffer silently as they lack support from society and even family members. People should raise a collective voice against all every sort of indiscrimination. The fact of the matter is that freedom for women is still a long way to go. Even today, stepping out of homes, seeking employment or dealing with domestic issues has remained a bigger hurdle for them. Governments change but women still need to think twice before stepping out regarding their safety. Improved safety and security, with stricter enforcement of laws against gender-based violence, harassment and discrimination, is the need of the hour. Access to quality healthcare, including reproductive health care, menstrual health, hygiene and nutrition and mental health support, support for caregivers and working mothers such as childcare facilities and flexible work arrangements need to be addressed by the government. Access to digital literacy, technology and online safety, skill development and entrepreneurship opportunities need priority. It is the responsibility of all of us to bring women power to the fore in the form of national power. Every obstacle that prevents them from progressing needs to be removed. Over the last decades, women voters have turned into a decisive force that can make or break the fate of the electoral contenders. The gap between female voter turn- out and male voter turn -out has not only closed but reversed. After 18 general elections since independence women voter participation now outshines male participation. This is because of self-empowerment, gaining more political knowledge, literacy and media exposure. It is essential to acknowledge the progress made towards women's empowerment, while also recognizing the ongoing challenges and needs. Addressing these will help create a more inclusive and equitable society for all. Let women not be caged birds whose freedom is clipped despite being gifted with wings. The greatness of a country totally depends on the undying ideals of love and sacrifice that inspire the women of the race. A roof over every head, food in every household plate, basic health care and amenities and education for all is what we all want. Respect for women, love and care and educational opportunities for every girl should be the priority of all. Modi's Amrit Kal vision and Viksit Bharat-2047 aim to shape India's future and transform it into a developed entity. Addressing these needs is crucial for women empowerment and inclusive nation building will continue to be the primary focus.
