New Funding from The Rideau Hall Foundation Expands Access to Indigenous-Led Teacher Education Across Canada Français
UNCEDED ANISHINAABE ALGONQUIN TERRITORY, OTTAWA, ON, July 17, 2025 /CNW/ - The Rideau Hall Foundation (RHF) is honoured to announce 12 new Indigenous-led partnerships focused on recruitment and retention of Indigenous teachers. Spanning from Labrador to Yukon, the projects reflect diverse, locally grounded approaches to education—from land-based degree programs and new language revitalization tools to digital mentorship platforms and in-community teacher education.
This year's investments by RHF, made possible with support from the Mastercard Foundation, total $8.6 million and will accelerate progress toward a shared goal of supporting 10,000 First Nations, Inuit, and Métis teachers across Canada. The RHF is helping to build an education system where Indigenous educators are supported, valued, and equipped to lead in their communities through innovative initiatives led by Indigenous peoples and allies.
"These partnerships continue to show what's possible when Indigenous communities and institutions lead the way," says Roberta Jamieson, RHF Board Director and Co-Chair of the National Advisory Committee on Indigenous Teacher Education (NACITE). "Indigenous teachers bring strength to their students, schools, and Nations, and this initiative is one way we honour their impact."
The RHF is grateful for the guidance of NACITE and the work of an independent Indigenous adjudication committee who evaluated submissions and selected the successful projects.
These awards are being granted to the following recipients:
First Nation School Board and Save the Children Canada (Yukon)
Nunavut Bilingual Education Society and Inhabit Education (Nunavut)
Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (ITK) - Inuit Nunangat University (Inuit Nunangat)
Sk ̱wx ̱wú7mesh Úxwumixw (Squamish Nation) (British Columbia)
Aboriginal Teacher Education Program, University of Alberta (Alberta)
Faculty of Education (NITEP), University of British Columbia and Lax Kw'alaams First Nation (British Columbia)
First Nations University of Canada (National)
Louis Riel Institute (Manitoba)
Manitoba Indigenous Teacher Education Partnership, University of Manitoba and Frontier School Division (Manitoba)
Matawa Education, Achieving the Dream Through Education (Ontario)
Endaayan Indigenous Language Teacher Education Program, Gakino'amaage: Teach For Canada (Ontario)
Indigenous Teacher Education Program-Labrador, Nunatsiavut Government, Mamu Tshishkutamashutau Innu Education, and Memorial University (Labrador)
Collectively, these 12 projects will:
Prepare and certify hundreds of Indigenous teachers
Reach and support thousands of students and educators
Strengthen instruction in Inuktitut, Innu-aimun, Michif, Ojibwe, Oji-Cree, nêhiyaw Cree, and Sḵwx̱wú7mesh sníchim
Reinforce Indigenous-led education systems across Canada
"Indigenous youth are telling us loud and clear: they want to learn from educators who reflect their communities and worldviews," says Dr. Annette Trimbee, RHF Board Director and NACITE co-chair. "We are investing in projects where Indigenous values, languages, and knowledge systems shape the learning experience. This is about supporting educators who carry cultural wisdom into classrooms and creating spaces where all students can thrive."
"Supporting Indigenous teacher education means much more than training teachers — it's about nurturing Indigenous knowledge, language, and cultural continuity," says Rachel Mishenene, RHF Director of the Indigenous Teacher Education Initiative and an Indigenous educator herself. "These projects are led by Indigenous communities who know best how to positively impact the next generation of educators to teach in ways that are deeply connected to identity, and honour distinct worldviews and practices."
"We've heard from Indigenous youth and communities that more Indigenous teachers are needed to ensure safe, culturally grounded and positive learning environments," says Jennifer Brennan, Senior Director, Canada Programs at the Mastercard Foundation. "This initiative reflects a commitment to creating real pathways for Indigenous students to see themselves as educators and leaders in their own schools and lands. We are excited to see these new partnerships confirmed as tangible steps towards the realization of 10,000 new Indigenous teachers for Canada."
About the Projects:
Projects were submitted for funding through two distinct streams: Reinforce and Retain. These streams reflect a commitment to both scaling effective approaches in Indigenous teacher education, and improving teacher retention, strengthening the impact and sustainability of Indigenous teacher education across Canada.
Projects Funded through the 'Reinforce Stream':
The Reinforce stream, offering up to $1 million per initiative, supports long term innovation and expansion of teacher education programs.
Inuit Nunangat – Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (ITK) - Faculty of Silatusarniq, Inuit Nunangat University
Funding: $1,000,000 | 4 years
The development of a new education program will prepare Inuit for diverse education roles, grounded in Inuit knowledge and Inuktut, to strengthen language, identity, and self-determination.
Alberta – Aboriginal Teacher Education Program (ATEP), University of Alberta
Funding: $999,285 | 4 years
Enhancing community-based delivery, ATEP will support Indigenous teacher candidates and school administrators with a strong focus on land-based and relational learning.
British Columbia – Faculty of Education (NITEP), University of British Columbia and Lax Kw'alaams First Nation
Funding: $998,666 | 4 years
Opening a new field centre in Prince Rupert, NITEP will allow local Indigenous teacher candidates to complete their degrees while staying connected to their communities.
Manitoba – Manitoba Indigenous Teacher Education Partnership (MITEP), the University of Manitoba and Frontier School Division
Funding: $1,000,000 | 4 years
Delivering a community-based B.Ed. in 11 northern Manitoba Indigenous communities, significantly increasing the number of qualified First Nation, Inuit and Métis educators in northern Manitoba.
Ontario – Endaayan: A First Nations-Led Bachelor of Education, Gakino'amaage: Teach For Canada
Funding: $1,000,000 | 4 years
A First Nations-led teacher education program that supports in-community B.Ed completion through language-embedded, locally governed training in partnership with accredited institutions.
Labrador – Indigenous Teacher Education Program-Labrador (ITEP-Lab), Nunatsiavut Government, Mamu Tshishkutamashutau Innu Education and Memorial University
Funding: $1,000,000 | 4 years
This culturally grounded teacher education program will train Inuit and Innu educators to serve their communities using dual-culture and community-led approaches.
Projects Funded through the 'Retain' Stream:
The Retain stream, with funding up to $500,000, focuses on projects that explore and enhance the conditions needed for First Nations, Inuit, and Métis educators to stay and thrive in the profession.
Yukon – First Nation School Board and Save the Children Canada: Cultural Education Resources
Funding: $433,457 | 2 years
In partnership with three Yukon First Nation communities, this project will co-create culturally grounded classroom resources with Elders and Knowledge Keepers, supporting educators and students.
Nunavut – Nunavut Bilingual Education Society and Inhabit Education: Inuktitut Literacy Sequence Resource Package
Funding: $479,000 | 2 years
A comprehensive Inuktitut literacy toolkit—teaching guide, sound wall cards, decodable texts—will enhance Inuktitut reading instruction for educators and students.
British Columbia – S ḵwx ̱wú7mesh Úxwumixw (Squamish Nation): Cultural Education Resources
Funding: $498,000 | 2 years
This initiative supports educators and students through the development of language and culture-based classroom tools in Sḵwx̱wú7mesh sníchim.
National – First Nations University of Canada: National Indigenous Educator Resource Hub
Funding: $499,000 | 2 years
A national mentorship and knowledge-sharing platform will connect 500+ Indigenous educators through research-informed resources and professional networks.
Manitoba – Louis Riel Institute: Red River Métis Circle of Educators Resources
Funding: $251,806 | 2 years
This project supports Red River Métis educators with leadership training and curriculum development rooted in Red River Métis identity and the Michif language.
Ontario – Matawa Education, Achieving the Dream Through Education: Ojibwe, Oji-Cree, and Cree Language Resources
Funding: $500,000 | 2 years
The development of language resources to support educators across 9 Matawa First Nation member communities, strengthening community-based language instruction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
City of Ottawa ending free dumping of wastewater from RV drivers
The City of Ottawa says this year will be the last year RV users can freely drop off wastewater for disposal at the Robert O. Pickard Environmental Centre. The RV waste disposal program operates from May to November, allowing people to bring their liquid waste to the water treatment plant and dispose of it at no charge. The City of Ottawa says the program oversees approximately 500 RV waste disposals per year. But now, following a review of operations at the Robert O. Pickard Environmental Centre, city staff say the RV waste disposal program will be discontinued at the end of the 2025 season on Nov. 30. Staff say security issues, labour costs, and construction are all factors in the decision to stop accepting waste from RV drivers. 'The audit identified that the program poses safety risks to both the public and staff, as well as to the City's critical infrastructure. In addition, ongoing construction and site upgrades are impacting access to disposal areas and contributing to already high vehicle traffic volumes,' a memo from General Manager of Infrastructure and Water Services Tammy Rose said. Rose says the city incurs an annual cost of approximately $2,000 to dispose of RV waste and $43,500 to oversee the program. 'Though it is difficult to precisely quantify the cost savings or the value of improved efficiency at the site, it is estimated that over $450,000 in savings on combined FTE and disposal costs will be realized over the next 10 years by canceling the program.' The city says RV owners have access to alternative local dumping sites where they can manage their wastewater independently.
CBC
6 hours ago
- CBC
Search for B.C.'s Best Symbol: Championship final — Totem Poles vs. Orcas
Social Sharing Symbols don't change all that much — but our connection to them does. One hundred years ago, British Columbia was a land of mountains and trees, salmon and bears, Ogopogos and Okanagan fruit, an Indigenous past with a diverse array of First Nations histories, and a settler present spurred by the gold rush and railways. Then, the orca was seen by many as a criminal of the waters that competed with fishermen for valuable resources. Totem poles were famous pieces of art, but often taken from First Nations whose lands were dispossessed, put in far-off museums or tourist attractions as "ethnographic curios," as one Musqueam art curator put it. A century later, orcas and totem poles are the two finalists in the Search For B.C.'s Best Symbol, our fun summer competition to unofficially find out what best represents this province. It's reflective of more than 400,000 votes that have eliminated 62 of the 64 original entries in our competition. It's also reflective of how British Columbia has changed. "Totems symbolize, I think, what's the best and the worst of British Columbia history sort of all wrapped in that one symbol," said John Lutz, a University of Victoria historian who wrote the chapter on totem poles in the book Symbols of Canada. Why totem poles are such iconic B.C. symbols 14 days ago "Our relationship to iconic species like orcas is really not extraction. It's about approaching and experiencing nature in a very different way," said Jason Colby, a UVic historian who wrote Orca: How We Came to Know and Love the Ocean's Greatest Predator. Two iconic symbols of this province — which one will British Columbians vote as the best? Symbols of the past, stories of the future Talk to people who directly engage with totem poles or orcas on a regular basis, and you'll get all sorts of answers why they make for an interesting symbol. On Saturna Island, dozens of volunteers are involved with the Southern Gulf Islands Whale Sighting Network, an organization that monitors and provides data to the federal government about the movements of orcas, in hopes of better preserving their habitat. WATCH | What orcas mean to B.C.: How orcas became such a big symbol of British Columbia 16 days ago "If we can learn to save the orcas, if we can learn to understand the orcas, we can learn to understand many other things in this province," said Richard Blagborne, a volunteer who helped organize a symposium last decade on Moby Doll — an orca captured off the Saturna coast in 1964 whose plight helped changed the perception of the cetacean. "The more we learned, the more we started to love them. And I think that's a positive indication about British Columbians." 'Namgis and Squamish master carver Xwalacktun, who has created more than 30 totem poles in his career, is more circumspect when asked if the totem should be B.C.'s best symbol. "If we were to use totem poles, the reason is to represent a story, and that story is the new beginning of where we want to go with this symbol of British Columbia," he said. "You always can't forget what's happened in the past. So we remember what happened in the past, but we continue on moving forward." The past and present both inform what symbols matter most to British Columbians. But the one known in the future as the province's best — at least, according to a highly scientific series of online votes — is now up to you. Voting closes at 10 p.m. PT Wednesday, and we'll reveal the winner Friday morning on The Early Edition. Until then, may the best symbol win.
Canada News.Net
20 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Canadian cities are unprepared for climate-driven migration - here's what they can do
This summer, wildfires have caused evacuations across Canada and recently forced thousands of people to flee their homes in Newfoundland and Labrador. Some of the biggest impacts are being felt in the Prairies. In Manitoba, authorities recently issued evacuation orders for 15,000 people, mostly in the province's north. Many evacuees are brought to larger cities like Winnipeg, overwhelming hotels and emergency housing. In Canada, climate-driven migration is often imagined as a distant threat that affects others in the world. But these evacuations foreshadow a future where internal displacement becomes a regular feature of Canadian life - and where cities must rethink how they plan for disruption. Events like the 88,000-person evacuation from Fort McMurray, Alta. in 2016 and the destruction of Lytton, B.C. in 2021 show how fast rural populations can be displaced. Manitoba's evacuations are among largest in recent memory, and many evacuated communities are remote and poorly connected to infrastructure. For them, evacuation may soon become an annual reality. At the University of Hong Kong's District Development Unit research lab (DDU), we develop architectural and urban strategies for rapidly urbanising regions in the Global South, where settlements are already experiencing the impacts of climate change. We've seen how post-disaster migration reshapes cities. These shifts are predictable in places where infrastructure and governance haven't kept pace with climate volatility. Across Canada, services and infrastructure are already under stress. Housing is increasingly unaffordable, including in rural areas. Many rural regions, especially those with large Indigenous populations, struggle to access basic services. Though these areas are home to 18 per cent of the population, they are served by only eight per cent of Canada's physicians. More than one quarter of rural school districts report closures or consolidations due to underfunding. These structural weaknesses form the backdrop to a slow-moving crisis - one that climate events are accelerating. Elsewhere in the world, disasters regularly drive rural-to-urban migration and permanent urban change. In countries like Nepal and the Philippines - where our lab works - these movements are often rapid, informal and far beyond the scope of traditional planning. In Kathmandu, the 2015 earthquake struck a city already marked by informal housing and fragile services. It accelerated a haphazard urban transformation characterized by uncontrolled sprawl, unsafe informal construction and overstretched infrastructure. In the Philippines, typhoon recovery is often driven by necessity, with residents rebuilding informally. This results in growing slums and increasing vulnerability to future disasters. These dynamics create new urban landscapes. In some cases, local governments are taking the lead, for example, by establishing local evacuation centres in the Philippines. Elsewhere, informal encampments, home extensions and land occupations take hold. These are responses that reflect not only survival, but governance: provisional infrastructures are built through necessity, negotiation and collective care. Canada is not exempt from these dynamics. When disaster strikes, evacuees often seek refuge in cities, where better public infrastructure offers some stability. As climate change fuels ever-larger wildfires, this trend will grow, with smaller urban centres absorbing more people fleeing climate-stressed regions. Yet policy remains far behind. There is no national framework for climate-induced displacement. Canada's immigration and housing policies have no category for internal climate migration. Disaster response remains reactive, coordinated mainly by municipalities and provinces through short-term tools like 211 or temporary shelters. Interjurisdictional planning is minimal. Municipal climate plans rarely anticipate population surges or extended pressure on housing. Displacement is still treated as an occasional event, not as an enduring part of Canadian urban life. Canada must begin to learn from places already living this future. In Taiwan, civic centres double as emergency shelters, equipped with backup power, water tanks and seismic isolation systems. In Japan, disaster-prevention parks embed solar lighting, cooking stations and toilets into public green spaces. And in Mongolia, our lab has developed incremental urban strategies for Ulaanbaatar's ger districts - clustering growth, infrastructure and housing to adapt to rapid, uncertain settlement patterns. These examples reflect a model of urbanism in which emergency response and long-term development are not separate, but part of a continuous, negotiated process. Canada's geography, governance and urban forms demand their own set of protocols and prototypes. While lessons from elsewhere can guide us, they cannot be copied wholesale. This means it is vital to develop a national framework for internal climate migration that integrates climate displacement into the National Housing Strategy. All orders of governments should focus of developing multi-use resilience infrastructure, such as community centres and schools equipped for emergency response, and advancing adaptive housing policies that can expand or contract with demand. Canada once helped shape global thinking on the transformation of urban areas. The 1976 United Nations Habitat Conference in Vancouver, catalyzed by the efforts of architects and planners, called for new models of settlement and development grounded in equity, participation and awareness of our planet's limits. Nearly 50 years later, that unfinished legacy has a new urgency. Today, climate displacement calls for a shift in how architects engage with the built environment - moving toward coordinated action with communities, policymakers and allied fields, and embracing models of practice that move beyond the traditional role of service provider - to actively initiate change. Architects must engage not only with buildings, but with the frameworks that govern land, infrastructure and migration itself. This means challenging the professional neutrality that too often aligns design with extractive systems, and instead welcoming practices capable of working across institutions, jurisdictions and communities. A national summit could mark the beginning of this shift by creating a forum to discuss climate migration and design the tools, policies and partnerships that will shape its outcomes. The question is not whether climate movement will occur, but whether we will be prepared to meet it with intention, care and foresight.
