Uttarakhand High Court vacates stay on panchayat elections
The pleas, which prompted the stay on June 23, were by a clutch of petitioners arguing that the government's decision to nullify the existing reservation rotation for the panchayat polls and bring about a new rotation has prevented them from being able to contest.
Under the reservation rotation system, constituencies are reserved for various categories for three terms, after which the quota goes to other seats. With a new rotation starting this year, the petitioner had said a seat that had been reserved for the last three terms would again be reserved this year, preventing him from contesting the election.
The division bench of Chief Justice G Narender and Justice Alok Mahra heard the counsel for the government who argued that the repetition was conducted on the recommendations of a report by a committee and was in compliance with the provisions of Article 234 D of the Constitution (pertaining to the reservation of seat in Panchayati Raj system).
While arguing, the counsel for the state had relied on the Supreme Court's verdicts on withholding elections.
'The apex court has held that withholding election is a breach of constitutional mandate, for any reason, and even the SC cannot do it, even under article 142. This constitutional mandate that elections should proceed at any cost is inviolable,' the Advocate General had said.
On Friday, the HC said that the rulings of the Supreme Court that the counsel relied on elucidated one invariable rule that the constitutional courts may stall the election process where there is no compliance with the constitutional mandate regarding reservation under Article 243-D of the Constitution of India.
Aiswarya Raj is a correspondent with The Indian Express who covers South Haryana. An alumna of Asian College of Journalism and the University of Kerala, she started her career at The Indian Express as a sub-editor in the Delhi city team. In her current position, she reports from Gurgaon and covers the neighbouring districts. She likes to tell stories of people and hopes to find moorings in narrative journalism. ... Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
a minute ago
- The Hindu
Draft Kerala Film Policy to be finalised in three months, State government informs Kerala High Court
The State government informed the Kerala High Court on Wednesday (August 10, 2025) that a draft of the Kerala Film Policy would be finalised in three months' time. This would be followed by a legislation in this regard, the government informed a Division Bench of Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar and Justice C.S. Sudha hearing the petitions on the K. Hema Committee report. It further submitted that suggestions made at a recently held Kerala Film Policy Conclave have been posted in the website of the the Kerala Chalachitra Akademi, among others. People from different sectors can post their suggestions on this before August 25. The proposed film policy will be readied after taking into account these suggestions as well. The policy would subsequently be placed before the Legislative Assembly. The court observed that the policy must also take into account intersectional aspects within the community of women. The situation is such that women face discrimination on the basis of caste and economic strata. For them, any action by the State or by others could have varying degrees of effect. The Women in Cinema Collective demanded that the draft policy that was readied by the Centre for Public Policy Research be submitted before the court in a sealed cover. The court directed the government to submit the draft policy in a sealed cover. The case has been posted for hearing on September 17.
Indian Express
a minute ago
- Indian Express
‘Toll on citizens' purse and patience': Supreme Court slams NHAI, upholds Kerala HC order suspending toll
The Supreme Court Monday upheld the Kerala High Court's view that the public cannot be forced to pay user fee for roads which are in a state of disrepair, and pointed out that citizens bear the brunt of such roads, which also affects the environment and leads to a wastage of fuel. A bench of Chief Justice of India B R Gavai, K Vinod Chandran, and N V Anjaria said this while dismissing the appeal filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) against the Kerala High Court's August 6 judgement. In the judgment, the high court suspended the toll collection for four weeks at Paliyekkara in Thrissur district along the stretch of the National Highway 544, where the roads are in a poor condition. 'We cannot but agree with the reasoning of the High Court that the 'obligation of the public to pay a user fee under statutory provisions is premised on the assurance that their use of the road will be free from hindrances',' the bench said, citing the HC order. The bench added from the August 6 order, which also said, 'When the public is legally bound to pay a user fee, they simultaneously acquire a corresponding right to demand unhindered, safe, and regulated access to the road. Any failure on the part of the National Highways Authority or its agents to ensure such access constitutes a breach of the public's legitimate expectations and undermines the very basis of the toll regime'. The bench said the cost of constructing roads under the Build, Operate, Transfer (BOT) model is collected from people using it, despite having already paid motor vehicle tax. 'In a democracy, roads are laid on Build Operate and Transfer contracts to ensure that the cost is collected from the users, when motor vehicle tax is remitted for their use on roads, it is a sad reflection of the free market. That the successful bidder extracts much more than what is spent on construction and maintenance is a comedy of errors,' Justice Chandran said, writing for the bench. 'That the roads fall into disrepair due to vagaries of nature and often rank neglect, is the stark reality. That the toll collectors at the booths, often due to understaffing and overwork, behave like satraps, is a fact of life. That the poor citizen is bound to wait for hours, in a queue, and in a cramped space, with the engine running but hardly moving, is a tragedy. That the toll is really on the purse and the patience of the citizen, as also the environment, is the downside,' said Justice Chandran. On the condition of the said stretch of National Highway 544, the bench said, 'We are also surprised that the further constructions on the road, constructed on BOT basis is entrusted to another Contractor, when the obligation to maintain the entire stretch is on the Concessionaire under the BOT agreement; on which we speak no further, since it is the commercial wisdom of the NHAI.' Refusing to interfere with the Kerala HC order, the top court said, 'We are convinced not only that the order be sustained, but the Division Bench also be requested to monitor the situation to ensure ease of traffic' It asked the high court's division bench to also implead the contractor who is carrying out the work on the black spots. The Supreme Court noted that NHAI had assured that the maintenance work on the service roads is proceeding on a war footing and smooth traffic would be ensured soon. 'The minute smooth traffic is resumed, the NHAI or the Concessionaire would be entitled to pray for lifting the prohibitory order, even before the four weeks as ordered by the High Court.'
Scroll.in
a minute ago
- Scroll.in
US pressure on India for Russian oil purchase ‘unjustified', energy cooperation to continue: Moscow
Russia's diplomatic mission in India on Wednesday said that the United States pressuring New Delhi against purchasing and reselling oil from Moscow was unjustified, The Indian Express reported. Roman Babushkin, the chargé d'affaires at the Russian embassy in Delhi, said that Moscow was confident that the energy cooperation with India would continue 'notwithstanding the external pressure'. The comments came amid diplomatic tensions between New Delhi and Washington after the Donald Trump administration on August 6 doubled the tariffs on goods imported from India to 50% for purchasing Russian oil amid the war in Ukraine. Trump has repeatedly alleged that India's purchases of Russian oil were 'fuelling the war machine'. The doubling of the levies came a week after Trump announced a 25% levy on Indian goods as part of the so-called reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries that have not finalised separate trade agreements with the US. Babushkin said on Wednesday that if Indian goods 'cannot go to the US market, they can head to Russia'. 'If the West criticises you, it means you are doing everything right...' ANI quoted Babushkin as saying. The Russian diplomat said that Moscow does not expect New Delhi to stop buying Russian oil. Russia has a 'very, very special mechanism ' to continue oil supplies to India, Reuters quoted him as saying, adding that New Delhi's fuel imports from Moscow will remain at the same level. 'We know about the challenging circumstances for India,' he was quoted as saying. 'This is the true strategic partnership we are enjoying. Whatever happens, even during challenges, we are committed to removing any problems...' Babushkin added that Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Delhi by the end of the year. On Monday, White House trade adviser and economist Peter Navarro, in a column for The Financial Times, alleged that India's increase in Russian oil imports was driven by 'profiteering by India's Big Oil lobby' and not 'domestic oil consumption needs'. On Tuesday, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reiterated the claim that some of India's richest families were profiteering from New Delhi buying and reselling cheap Russian oil. In an interview with CNBC, Bessent also claimed that India's imports of Russian oil had jumped from less than 1% before the Ukraine war, which began in February 2022, to 42%. The transactions have resulted in Indian businesses earning an estimated $16 billion in excess profits, he claimed. Bessent defended Washington's decision not to impose a penalty on China, claiming that Beijing's purchases from Russia had risen modestly from 13% to 16% since the war started, as opposed to India. Stating that it was a 'completely different thing', the US treasury secretary noted that China had been consistently buying oil from Russia before the war as well, whereas India had set up what he described as an 'arbitrage' system during the conflict. In response to Trump's doubling of tariffs, New Delhi had said that it was 'extremely unfortunate' that the US had chosen to impose additional levies on India 'for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest'. The Ministry of External Affairs said that India 'will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests'.
