
Hornbill design on Affin Bank card not an issue, says Abdul Karim
Affin Bank has clarified that the Kenyalang debit card design was inspired by the Sarawak state crest and state flag.
KUCHING: The hornbill design on Affin Bank's Kenyalang debit card for Sarawakians should not have become an issue, says Datuk Seri Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah.
The state Tourism, Creative Industry and Performing Arts Minister said the bank had good intentions in displaying a hornbill on the card, regardless of the species depicted.
"I think what Affin has done is something good. Why must you narrow it down to this hornbill or that hornbill?
"This is making a mountain out of a molehill," he said after the opening ceremony of the Sarawak Legislative Assembly sitting on Monday (May 19).
The card's design was criticised by DAP's Pending assemblyman Violet Yong last week, who claimed it did not depict the rhinoceros hornbill, Sarawak's state bird.
Instead, she said it showed a great hornbill, which is not found in Sarawak.
However, Abdul Karim said there was no need to call attention to the hornbill species as the bird generally represents Sarawak.
"The bird on the card is a hornbill, so what is the issue? Personally, I see no need to change the design," he said.
Earlier on Monday, Affin clarified that the Sarawak state crest - which features a hornbill and the state flag - inspired the Kenyalang debit card design.
"The design featured is a symbolic creation, thoughtfully blending elements of the state crest as a tribute to Sarawak's rich cultural legacy," it said in a statement.
The bank also thanked the public for their support and interest in the Kenyalang card.
"Our priority is to ensure that our creativity and designs genuinely reflect what matters to the community we serve. Your feedback guides us and we remain committed to celebrating Sarawak with authenticity, pride, and respect," it added.
The card was introduced last month as part of Affin's Kenyalang savings account for Sarawakians.
The Sarawak government currently holds a 31.25% stake in the bank following its acquisition of shares from the Armed Forces Fund Board (LTAT) and Boustead Holdings Berhad last year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Borneo Post
3 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Gawai Dayak: Tiong joins festive celebrations at longhouses in Bintulu
BINTULU (June 3): Minister of Tourism, Arts and Culture Datuk Seri Tiong King Sing, together with his delegation from the Progressive Democratic Party (PDP), celebrated the first day of Gawai Dayak by visiting six longhouses in Kemena and Suai. The six longhouses visited were Rumah Inggol Ak Ranggong, Rumah Changgai Ak Dali, Rumah Joe Ak Merudi, Rumah Clarence Ak Unjun, Rumah Ngalantar Ak Sengaling and Rumah Tulie Ak Aji. Tiong, who is also Bintulu MP, described each visit as vibrant with tradition, music and heartfelt hospitality, which made the guests feel like part of the longhouse family. 'Gawai Dayak, while symbolising the harvest, also serves as a heartfelt reunion. Many Dayak individuals working or living in other regions return home to celebrate with family and friends. 'Visitors were treated to traditional delicacies, homemade tuak (rice wine), and langkau (distilled rice spirit), accompanied by the melodious sounds of the sape, a traditional Sarawakian lute that added to the captivating cultural ambiance,' he said. One of the highlights of the visit was the officiation of the Women's Bureau at Rumah Inggol. Throughout the journey, he also made time to engage directly with longhouse residents, listening attentively to the challenges they face, including issues related to livelihoods and daily living. He noted each concern and pledged to follow up on them, urging the community to maintain close contact with his team based in Bintulu for further collaboration and resolution. 'Despite my limited presence in the Bintulu office due to ministry commitments, I remain in constant communication with my officers to stay informed on local developments and issues,' he added. He emphasised that he would continue coordinating, following up, and making decisions to address concerns as efficiently as possible. 'This year's Gawai celebration was also made more special by the presence of friends from Peninsular Malaysia, especially those of Chinese descent who came to experience Sarawak's unique cultural festivities firsthand. 'It not only deepens understanding and mutual recognition between different regions but also fosters a harmonious coexistence of cultures. 'Additionally, it supports the growth of related sectors such as tourism, which contributes to national prosperity and economic progress,' he said.


Malay Mail
8 hours ago
- Malay Mail
With welcome mat half-rolled, Europeans rethink US travel under Trump
PARIS, June 3 — President Donald Trump's hardline immigration tactics, sweeping tariffs and nationalist policies may be a turn-off for many would-be European tourists to the United States, but the data paints a more nuanced bigger picture. The number of visitors to the United States from Western Europe in March fell by 17 per cent from the same month a year earlier, but then picked up 12 per cent in April, according to the US tourism office. The German Travel Association (DRV) said the number of Germans going to the United States dropped 28 per cent in March, but then bounced back by 14 per cent in April. The association's spokesperson, Torsten Schaefer, said that Easter holidays fell later this year than in 2024, which might have impacted the figures. 'There're practically no requests in recent months to change or cancel reservations,' Schaefer said. However, he noted 'a rise in queries about entry requirements into the United States'. At the end of March, several European countries urged their nationals to review their travel documents for the United States, following several mediatised cases of Europeans being held on arrival then deported. Anecdotally, there are signs of Europeans opting not to visit Trump's America. 'The country I knew no longer exists,' said Raphael Gruber, a 60-year-old German doctor who has been taking his family to Cape Cod in Massachusetts every summer since 2018. 'Before, when you told the immigration officer you were there for whale-watching, that was a good reason to come. But now, they are afraid of everything that comes from outside,' he told AFP. Referring to invasive electronic checks at the US borders, he added: 'I don't want to buy a 'burner' phone just to keep my privacy'. In Britain, Matt Reay, a 35-year-old history teacher from Northamptonshire, said he had scratched the United States off his list, preferring to go to South America, where his 'money would probably be better spent'. 'It feels like, to be honest, that there's a culture that's built in the US in the last kind of 12 months, where as a foreign visitor, I don't really feel like I'm that welcome anyway,' he said. Reay said he felt 'insulted' by both Trump's tariffs on British exports to the United States and comments by Trump's vice president, JD Vance, about Britain as 'a random country'. Trump's public belittling of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during a White House visit in February was also 'outrageous', he said. According to the US tourism office, however, the number of British visitors to the United States in April rose 15 per cent year-on-year, after a 14 per cent drop in March. Oxford Economics, an economics monitoring firm, attributed the March decline partly to the Easter dates this year, along with a stronger US dollar at the time that made the United States a more costly destination. But it mainly pointed to 'polarising rhetoric and policy actions by the Trump administration, as well as concerns around tighter border and immigration policies'. Cheaper flights Didier Arino, head of the French travel consultancy Protourisme, said April traffic to the United States might have picked up because European airlines were offering discounted flights. 'You can find flights, especially for New York, at 600 euros (US$680),' he said. In Germany, Muriel Wagner, 34, said she was not putting off a summer trip to Boston to see a friend at Harvard – a US university in a legal and ideological struggle with Trump's administration. 'I've been asked if the political situation and trade war with the US has affected our trip,' the PhD student said in Frankfurt. But 'you can't let yourself be intimidated', she said, adding that she was keen to discuss the tensions with Americans on their home turf. Protourisme's Arino said that, as 'the mood has sunk' regarding the United States, potential tourists were rethinking a visit. On top of the 'the financial outlay, being insulted by the US administration for being European, that really robs you of the desire' to go there, he said. He estimated that the 'Trump effect' would cut the number of French tourists going to the United States this year by a quarter. A body representing much of the French travel sector, Entreprises du Voyage, said the number of French visitors to America dropped eight per cent in March, and a further 12 per cent in April. It estimated that summer departures to the United States would drop by 11 per cent. According to the World Travel and Tourism Council, covering major tourism operators, the US tourism sector – already reeling from Canadians and Mexicans staying away – could lose US$12.5 billion in spending by foreign visitors this year. — AFP


Borneo Post
2 days ago
- Borneo Post
The O&G story: What next after the joint declaration?
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim (left) and Premier of Sarawak uk Patinggi Tan Sri Abang Johari Tun Openg exchanging the documents on the joint declaration, signed in Putrajaya recently. — Photo courtesy of the Office of Premier of Sarawak WILLIAM Shakespeare's famous line, 'All's well that ends well', from the play of the same name, takes on a complex meaning when applied to the oil and gas (O&G) joint declaration. Still, Sarawakians are proud and delighted to commemorate this milestone as a significant turning point in the state's O&G story. While it might appear to acknowledge a satisfactory resolution, the agreement also implicitly acknowledges the disturbing procedures and compromises, leading to this so-called 'positive outcome' or 'happy ending'. And so, what next? The declaration's 'happy ending' might mask a path of questionable decisions and compromises before the two contending parties arrived at the joint declaration. The line, thus, becomes a point of debate and discussion, prompting audiences to consider what truly constitutes a successful resolution and the ethical costs involved in achieving it. Challenging question Imagine being presented with a challenging question on a Cambridge HSC General Paper examination that requires careful consideration of the possible long-term effects of the newly-signed O&G agreement between Sarawak and Kuala Lumpur. The question challenges us to analyse the ramifications of this agreement and to provide an analytical trajectory of the potential paths for the state and the O&G sector. Students in Form 6 and university undergraduates in public policy and government should engage in this exercise to assess their understanding of the subject content, and their ability to critically connect it to the current socio-political context. They should be up for the challenge! This makes us question if we really understand the intricacy of the issue at hand. In retrospect, it compels us to examine if our sentiments and limited viewpoints have impeded our capacity to conduct a fair and impartial analysis of the situation. Setting the context is obviously the right starting point and proceeding from there to view rising expectations and interlocking implications that would follow, is a natural course to expect. Complicated bargains The recently-inked agreement establishing operational jurisdiction for O&G activities between Petroliam Nasional Bhd (Petronas) and Petroleum Sarawak Bhd (Petros) is a start in the right direction, but it is unlikely to entirely fulfil both entities' objectives and expectations. It is anticipated that ongoing negotiations and adjustments will be necessary to reach a truly mutually agreeable operating framework. The agreement demonstrates a willingness to collaborate and share resources, but the complexities surrounding revenue-sharing, operational control, and future exploration rights may still pose challenges. Generally speaking, resource agreements with high political and financial stakes – like the one aimed at resolving the O&G dispute between Sarawak and Kuala Lumpur – are complicated bargains. Even though the signed declaration may include crucial issues like income-sharing, regulatory power, and production-sharing, we need to acknowledge that Petronas and Petros may have inherent differences in priorities. For example, Petros would want a higher proportion of the revenue from O&G for Sarawak's development, while Petronas is devoted to striking a balance between national duty and profitability. The ink is dry on the joint declaration, but expectations are high on how soon the O&G would truly turn a page. The line of enquiry raises the question – what happens next? This pact might be a landmark, but it is also the starting line. Navigating shifting power politics, volatile prices, and the ever-present pressure for decarbonisation means the O&G industry faces a future that is as challenging as ever. How effectively will this signed declaration translate into tangible definers of progress, or will it need to be revisited and reviewed from time to time? These are pertinent questions that challenge us to look beyond today. Only time will tell, but one thing is certain – the next chapter is unwritten, and the stakes may be high. The Prime Minister and Premier of Sarawak with federal and state leaders posing for a photo-call after the historic signing of the joint declaration. — Photo courtesy of the Office of Premier of Sarawak Other considerations There may be other considerations that need to be addressed to allow the agreement to be transacted effectively, and to create a conducive environment for future cooperation to be promoted. Such considerations may involve making joint investments to facilitate technology transfer in the local O&G sector and build local capacity, establishing robust and transparent mechanisms for dispute resolution, to putting in place rigorous environmental protection policies throughout the O&G value chain. Additionally, maintaining social peace and sustainable development will require ensuring that local communities affected by O&G operations are included in the long-term agenda, and that they are to receive equitable benefits. Effective management of these social challenges requires a genuine 'give and take' approach in the allocation of resources and opportunities. Navigating this requires open channels, continuous dialogue from all of us – among the federal government, Sarawak state government, Petronas, Petros, and the local communities. For Sarawak, invalidating the Petroleum Development Act (PDA) 1974 is a complicated legal and political issue. The Sarawak state administration sees it as a possible, but drastic, measure to reclaim more authority over its O&G resources. The contention is based on the belief that the PDA is intruding into Sarawak's constitutional rights and thus, watering down the state's rightful portion of revenue and ownership of its natural resources within its territory. But such a move would spark an extended legal contest with the federal government and would have devastating impacts on the national O&G industry. As such, before taking this path, Sarawak must explore and have access. The Sarawak administration sees invalidating the PDA 1974 as a possible, but drastic, measure to reclaim more authority over its O&G resources. — Bernama photo Crucial shift point Some critics view the joint agreement as a shift point, which sets the groundwork for a more just and sustainable partnership. Notwithstanding, it remains to be said that the O&G agreement still requires good faith and continued vigilance to ensure its long-term success and mutual advantage. Ultimately, the success of the signed declaration will be gauged by its ability to improve the life of the people of Sarawak, as well as to contribute to the progress and prosperity of the country. The joint declaration on O&G represents a move towards greater cooperation and a more equitable distribution of wealth and opportunities. It does show that the federal government is willing to discuss and give Sarawak more power over its resources and independence. This negotiated arrangement to address Sarawak's concerns about its O&G rights is significant within the broader context of devolution under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 63), and it should not be viewed in isolation of other socio-political dynamics. Beyond the historic joint agreement, it is hoped that the Kuala Lumpur-Kuching cooperation will serve as the basis for future agreements and legal discourse that, rather than being adversarial, uphold the spirit and letter of MA63. However, the true impact of the joint declaration will depend on its implementation and how the modifications to Sarawak's revenue-sharing, regulatory authority, and operational domain are defined. Sarawak in advantageous position A closer examination reveals that Sarawak may have secured a more advantageous position, although both sides are likely touting the agreement as a win-win. Interestingly, a shift in the power dynamic is apparent with Sarawak's increased control over its O&G resources, which may be achieved through greater revenue-sharing, decision-making power in exploration and production, and participation in the value chain. As Sarawakians, we would like to view it as a decisive victory for our state, and we recognise that its long-term economic effects and the details of its implementation must follow suit. Equally gratifying to us is that initial indications suggest the joint agreement is a significant step towards greater autonomy and resource control for Sarawak. Sarawak's greater control over its hydrocarbon resources is the primary factor contributing to its advantage. Sarawak can avoid depending on federal funding by actively participating in the lucrative O&G industry and producing a sizeable amount of revenue for the state through Petros. This increase could improve the standard of living of Sarawakians by funding the development of infrastructure, healthcare, education, and other important areas. Sarawak can avoid depending on federal funding by actively participating in the lucrative O&G industry and producing a sizeable amount of revenue for the state through Petros. Sustainable, equitable collaboration Discerning critics will concur with me that further discussion is necessary in several crucial areas to reinforce the Kuala Lumpur-Sarawak joint declaration on O&G in Sarawak. Clarifying the definition of 'net revenue' and putting in place transparent, mutually agreed-upon accounting practices are crucial to avoid disputes regarding revenue sharing. Sarawak's role in overseeing O&G operations, including enforcing environmental rules, must be strengthened to ensure that resources are used responsibly. Investing in Sarawakian talent development in the O&G sector through focused education and training programmes would give power to the local communities and make the industry more sustainable. Lastly, to avoid problems and keep the collaboration strong and productive, there should be a clear way to resolve disputes that includes specific steps and deadlines. Although we commend Kuala Lumpur and Sarawak for their willingness to collaborate and pool resources, there may still be 'gaps' due to the intricacies of revenue-sharing, operational control, and future exploration rights. Neither side should lose sight of this. Given this, the joint declaration should be regarded as a transitional stage that aims to establish the framework for a more sustainable and equitable collaboration. Amidst the signed declaration, Petronas appears to be devoted to striking a balance between national duty and profitability. — AFP photo Secure Petros' position However, to guarantee its long-term success and mutual gain, both parties must maintain their vigilance and act in good faith. The declaration's actual effectiveness will ultimately be determined by how it affects Sarawakians' quality of and the country's general prosperity. Petros has secured a favourable bargain. This stems from several considerations. First, the power balance shifted from one heavily federally dominated to one of state dominance as a result of the mutual understanding, which gives Sarawak increased authority over the extraction, development, and production of O&G resources inside its borders. This includes greater control over operational choices, profit-sharing, and direct access to its natural resources. Additionally, the deal enables Sarawak to develop its O&G industry knowledge and capabilities, generating jobs and promoting technological development in the state. Sarawak can strengthen its position and ensure future prosperity by ensuring that future development is in line with its nuanced needs and priorities rather than being limited by federal interests. This can be achieved by having a defining say in resource management decisions. * Toman Mamora is 'Tokoh Media Sarawak 2022', recipient of Shell Journalism Gold Award (1996) and AZAM Best Writer Gold Award (1998). He remains true to his decades-long passion for critical writing as he seeks to gain insight into some untold stories of societal value. MA63 oil and gas PDA Petronas Petros sarawak