QIP fundraising hits 5-year high, SBI's Rs 20,000 crore issue receives 4 times bids
QIPs are a way for listed companies to raise capital without having to submit legal paperwork to market regulators.
Ten issuances have offered over Rs 30,470 crore so far this month. It is the biggest monthly performance of QIPs since September 2020, when companies had collectively raised over Rs 39,000 crore.
Driving this surge was the State Bank of India's (SBI) historic QIP on July 17, which mobilised over Rs 20,000 crore. The offering drew robust investor interest, with demand reportedly outstripping supply by nearly four times.
According to multiple reports, the SBI QIP has received significant interest from global and domestic investors worth around Rs 1 lakh crore.
July also saw a flurry of other notable QIP deals. CG Power raised over Rs 3,000 crore, while Marathon Nextgen and Navin Fluorine collected Rs 900 crore and Rs 750 crore, respectively.
Several other mid- and small-cap firms also tapped into institutional funding during the month.
The fundraising momentum in 2025 has remained strong beyond July.
In the year so far, Biocon raised Rs 4,500 crore through a QIP, followed by Hitachi Energy (Rs 2,500 crore), IREDA (Rs 2,000 crore), UCO Bank (Rs 2,000 crore), and Capri Global Capital (Rs 2,000 crore).
In June alone, seven companies together raised over Rs 14,000 crore.
Altogether, 30 companies have raised close to Rs 60,000 crore via QIPs so far in 2025. This shows the robust activity seen in 2024, when 95 firms mopped up more than Rs 1.37 lakh crore.
The SBI fixed the floor price at Rs 811.05 per equity share for its Rs 20,000 crore bonds after the board of directors approved the proposal to raise the amount through issuing bonds to domestic investors.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
24 minutes ago
- Hans India
Industries Minister visits Kovur sugar factory
Nellore: Industries and Commerce Minister T G Bharath along with Kovur MLA Vemireddy Prasanthi Reddy visited the Kovur Co-operative Sugar Factory Limited (KCSFL) located at Pothireddy Palem village in Kovur mandal on Tuesday. On this occasion, the Minister sought to know the reasons related to closure of KCSFL and why the Sugarcane Farmers Associations (SFA) was not handed over land to the Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (APIIC). Mentioning the circumstances that led to the closure of KCFCL, Kovur MLA Vemireddy Prasanthi Reddy said that Chief Minister Nara Chandrababu Naidu agreed to pay the Rs 28 crore arrears to the workers in order to facilitate reopening of KCSFL. The MLA appealed to the Minister to initiate steps to see that the APIIC gets the possession of 124 acres of land related to KCSFL, so that more industrial units could be set up. It may be recalled that the KCSFL was established under Nellore Co-operative Sector (NCS) at Pothireddypalem village of Kovur mandal in 1979. It functioned well for three decades providing direct and indirect employment to around 10,000 people. It has also contributed to the economic growth of sugarcane farmers belonging to 15 mandals of Kovur, Kavali and Nellore Rural constituencies. The factory has remained closed for past 13 years due to severe financial crisis. After the coalition government came to power last year, MLA Vemireddy Prasanthi Reddy raised the issue on the floor of the Assembly several times. Following her plea, Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu at a recent meeting assured to pay Rs 28 crore to the workers.
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Short recoveries, lost revenue cost Indian Railways Rs 543 crore: CAG
From non-recovery of Rs 148.61 crore in land licence fee from five government-aided schools by Northern Railway to nine zonal railways collectively failing to recover Rs 55.51 crore in District Mineral Foundation (DMF), the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India has flagged financial irregularities and inefficiencies totalling Rs 543.17 crore by various zones and field units of the Indian Railways. In its compliance audit report on Railways for the year ending March 2023, which was tabled in Lok Sabha on Monday, the CAG found a consistent pattern of short recoveries, avoidable expenditures, mismanagement and loss of potential revenue in a total of 25 cases, which happened due to the violation of rules, regulations or directives by specific entities of railways. Among the most significant findings is Northern Railway's failure in recovering Rs 148.61 crore in land licence fee from five government-aided schools, despite clear directives to charge 6% of market value of the land. This was the largest single non-recovery cited in the report. The CAG has also found that a total of nine zonal railways — South Eastern, South Western, North Central, East Coast, Eastern, North Western, South East Central, West Central and Central Railway — collectively failed to recover Rs 55.51 crore in District Mineral Foundation (DMF) contributions from contractors from January 2015 to March 2024. The amount is DMF is used in the interest and benefit of persons and areas affected by mining-related operations. Another key finding in the CAG report is East Central Railway losing Rs 50.77 crore due to non-realisation of shunting charges at Bina siding (BCSK), for unbilled shunting activities using railway engines. The audit was conducted for a period from April 2020 to March 2023. The national auditor also said that the Southern Railway and Integral Coach Factory (ICF) manufactured a total of 28 Nilgiri Mountain Railway (NMR) meter gauge coaches for Rs 27.91 crore without adequate technical assessment or consultation with the Research, Design and Standards Organisation (RDSO). 'ICF did not comply with the instructions of MoR (Ministry of Railways) in developing a prototype coach in consultation with RDSO, which led to creation of ineffective and deficient assets at a cost of Rs 27.91 crore as NMR coaches were not put to effective use even after three years of manufacturing,' said the auditor. Similarly, some other findings are that South Central Railway incurred an 'avoidable financial liability' of Rs 23.16 crore in late fees due to delayed renewal of licences for Very High Frequency (VHF) sets. Central Railway faced extra expenditure of Rs 15.62 crore on Road Under Bridges (RUBs) in Diva-Panvel-Jasai-JNPT section on Western Dedicated Freight Corridor (WDFC) due to non-adherence to cost apportionment instructions, with the state government not contributing its share. South Central Railway irregularly reimbursed Rs 15.51 crore in seigniorage charges to contractors, by amending contract provisions without the Ministry's approval, the report said. Western Railway suffered a revenue loss of Rs 12.62 crore from June 2021 to September 2023 due to non/delayed upgrade of routes to higher axle-load capacity, restricting freight loading, it said. Similarly, Northeast Frontier and South Central Railways did not realise Rs 12.76 crore in maintenance and inspection charges from Container Corporation of India due to the non-execution of formal agreements. South Western Railways construction of a road over bridge without ensuring approach road work by the state government resulted in Rs 11.81 crore in blocked capital for more than five years (2018 to 2023) and non-elimination of level crossing. Dheeraj Mishra is a Principal correspondent with The Indian Express, Business Bureau. He covers India's two key ministries- Ministry of Railways and Ministry of Road Transport & Highways. He frequently uses the Right to Information (RTI) Act for his stories, which have resulted in many impactful reports. ... Read More
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
More domestic capital flowing into start-up ecosystem compared to Covid period: STPI DG Arvind Kumar
The Software Technology Parks of India (STPI), an autonomous society under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), Government of India, was formed in 1991 with the aim to promote the IT/ITeS industry, foster innovation, support research and development (R&D), and encourage start-ups across the country. STPI has been actively working on strengthening India's start-up ecosystem by providing support and resources through its Next Generation Incubation Scheme (NGIS) and domain-specific Centres of Entrepreneurship (CoE). Arvind Kumar , Director General of STPI, talks to ET Digital about the organisation's initiatives that are shaping the future of India's technology and start-up ecosystem. Edited excerpts: Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Data Analytics Operations Management Design Thinking Leadership CXO healthcare Management MCA Project Management Finance Technology Product Management Artificial Intelligence Degree Data Science MBA PGDM Digital Marketing Data Science Cybersecurity Healthcare Others Public Policy others Skills you'll gain: Data Analysis & Visualization Predictive Analytics & Machine Learning Business Intelligence & Data-Driven Decision Making Analytics Strategy & Implementation Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Applied Business Analytics Starts on Jun 13, 2024 Get Details Economic Times (ET): Tell us about STPI's initiatives in the tier II and III cities. Arvind Kumar (AK) : We have 67 STPI centres in India, with 59 located in tier II and III cities. We also have 24 CoEs (Centres of Entrepreneurship) across the country. Most of these are in tier III cities. So, these 24 centres of entrepreneurship are domain specific. These are different from other incubators because other incubators are generally for all kinds of start-ups. But we have domain-specific or technology-specific centres. For example, we have CoE in Bengaluru for artificial intelligence (AI), medtech in Lucknow, and blockchain in Gurugram. We have created 8 COEs in the Northeast, including Kohima, Shillong, Itanagar, Agartala, Gangtok, and Guwahati. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Our scheme NGIS (Next Generation Incubation Scheme) is particularly for tier II and tier III cities. Under this scheme, we are supporting around 700 start-ups. Here, we provide Rs 25 lakh and incubation space at 12 locations to those who are selected. Along with this, we also provide mentorship and global connections to them. In the past three years, we have taken 25 to 30 start-ups to Silicon Valley along with this TiE Silicon Valley program. Live Events ET: What are some of the key challenges these entrepreneurs typically face? AK: When I meet investors and other stakeholders in the industry, they say that even though the start-up has a very good solution, they don't know how to pitch. This realisation came to us three years back and since then, we have been working with these start-ups, teaching them how to pitch right. We first did 90 days of intensive mentorship with them, where they got to understand how to talk to investors as well as those outside the country. An important factor here is also to be ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance)-compliant. So, in this mentorship programme, we have a number of mentors who are experts in climate change or in ESG, and they guide them on how to go and how to show your pitch to outside investors, assuring them that you are indeed ESG compliant. ET: Recently in an event, you mentioned that STPI was unable to meet its start-up target. What have you been able to analyse here? AK: So, we have the NGIS scheme, which was for three years. We need to fund around 200 start-ups in these three years. That was our target, but we were able to fund only 135 start-ups. Then we analysed the problem. This fund needs to be dispersed through the fund manager, and sometimes these start-ups are not even an official company yet; they don't have chartered accountants. It takes time. Sometimes they don't know what the shareholders agreement (SHA) is, so we have to make the SHA for them. And even then, they are sometimes not aware of the implications of some small conditions of SHA. When we select to disperse the Rs 25 lakh fund, we have to sign this agreement. Then sometimes they get this advice from somewhere that this will be bad for them, and they should remove themselves from the SHA. While we had selected more than 300 start-ups, we were able to onboard only 135 due to lack of awareness and compliance issues. Because it takes a lot of time. ET: The MeitY Secretary S. Krishnan had also recently said that a lot of innovations coming from start-ups are adopted by big tech companies and taken forward. And sometimes they are not able to find new start-ups to populate incubation centres. So, what has been your experience? AK: Not lack of ideas, but lack of awareness, like I said. So, they have ideas, but they don't know which incubator they should have. Sometimes one start-up may get incubated at 10 places. They may also get funded from 10 places. Sometimes, they are unable to present their ideas to any incubator or any fund investor. The problem is they aren't able to pitch the ideas before the right incubator based on what exactly they are looking at. Every incubator is offering something different. Every fund investor is offering something different. Some could be incubation equity and some could be investment equity. As a start-up, you are busier in building technical things but may not be able to identify incubators. ET: What kind of start-up sentiment are you seeing today, in terms of funding, ideas, and products, compared to a few years back when there was a funding winter? AK: The best of the time was actually the Covid-19 period, about four years back. So, 2021 was the best period when a start-up was getting a lot of funding. Once this period was over, there was a funding winter. Back then, most of the fund investors were from outside. India's capital was not moving towards the start-up ecosystem. Indian investors were looking at the stock market, real estate, and gold as investment options. While the Indian innovators were creating start-ups, HNIs (high net-worth individuals) in their fifties with a lot of money did not have start-ups in their investment portfolio. So, the big change that I can see today is now domestic capital is moving towards the start-up ecosystem. Now, domestic people who have money want to invest. Now they have a lot of awareness about start-ups. They are looking for a good start-up to invest in. So that is why today funding is not a major issue. Funding is coming from all corners. So, there is positive sentiment towards funding as of now.
