
Can a French citizen's petition reverse the reintroduction of a banned pesticide?
But some farmers, environmentalists and medical experts have criticised many of the law's proposals – particularly one provision that proposes to reintroduce the insecticide acetamiprid, a chemical known to be toxic to pollinators such as bees and to ecosystems – which was banned in France in 2018.
The contentious provisions spurred 23-year-old masters student Eleonore Pattery to launch a petition against the law on July 10, which brought the bill to the public's attention. The petition's author, who describes herself as "a future environmental health professional", called the new law a "scientific, ethical, environmental and public health aberration".
"It represents a frontal attack on public health, biodiversity, the coherence of climate policies, food security, and common sense," she said.
At the time of writing, the petition had collected more than 1.5 million signatures – higher than any other petition published on France's official National Assembly site so far.
The reintroduction of acetamiprid – an insecticide that belongs to a class of synthetic chemicals similar to nicotine called neonicotinoids, often shortened to "neonics" – is the most divisive provision of the law.
Neonics were developed in the 1980s to target the central nervous system of insects and disrupt nerve function. These insecticides are extremely effective against a wide range of pests like aphids and grubs, and have been used globally since the 1990s. In France, they are widely used by beetroot and hazelnut growers.
However, they come with a list of caveats that harm biodiversity and human health, according to experts.
Unlike contact pesticides that coat the surface of a plant, neonics are absorbed by the plant and distributed through its leaves, flowers, pollen, and nectar.
While this makes them very effective against pests, they also cause impaired navigation, reduced learning, weakened colony health and death among bees. Various beekeeping organisations have urged citizens to fight against the law for this very reason and have branded the chemical "a bee killer".
Scientists also say that neonicotinoids tend to remain inside the soil and hurt non-target species i.e., insects and animals that don't hurt crop yield but play an essential role in maintaining ecological balance.
However, the invertebrates aren't the only ones at risk. A growing body of research shows that neonicotinoids impact human nervous systems too. Hundreds of doctors and researchers have signed an open letter published by French healthcare organisation Médecins du Monde that says the law fails to address the collapse of biodiversity and the impact on farmers' health. The letter specifically mentions three chemicals: acetamiprid, flupyradifurone and sulfoxaflor.
'The primary consequence of these dysfunctions is an increased risk for farmers of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), myeloma, prostate cancer, Parkinson's disease, and neurodevelopmental disorders, to take just a few examples, while the precautionary principle (and the European regulation) requires that no marketing authorisation be issued in the event of a risk to human health or biodiversity,' it says. The letter has been backed by The French League Against Cancer and the European Federation of Neurological Associations.
01:34
Environmentalists are also concerned by some of the other provisions of the law.
The law claims it will promote the expansion of industrial agriculture by easing permits for large livestock facilities and water reservoirs. Critics say this move will harm smaller family-run operations and is likely to increase greenhouse gas emissions and environmental degradation.
The Duplomb law will also implement several long-standing demands from France's largest farm union FNSEA, which has historically supported pesticide use.
"We need to maintain our means of production, and I believe there's a lot of exaggeration in the comments being made," the head of FNSEA, Arnaud Rousseau, told franceinfo radio.
Growers also argue that acetamiprid, allowed in other EU countries, is vital to fight yellows disease, which cut yields by 30% in 2020 and slashed sugar output.
Can a citizen's petition change the law?
The number of signatures on Pattery's petition continue to climb, and increasing pressure on the government to revisit the law.
The French government has defended the bill, but has been obliged to acknowledge the outcry, amid the rapidly rising number of signatures.
In France, petitions with over half a million signatures can prompt a parliamentary debate, but do not require a new vote.
National Assembly chairwoman Yael Braun Privet said the government "had to listen to the people. We will hold a debate but this debate will not – it cannot – change the text that was just voted." Former Prime Minister Gabriel Attal has also said he would back a debate.
Benjamin Morel, a constitutional expert and lecturer at the University of Paris-Panthéon-Assas agrees, saying that while the petition might lead to a debate, it will not ultimately lead to any change in the text of the law itself: "For the Duplomb law not to be enforced, a new bill would have to be introduced, or the president of the Republic would have to get involved."
" Emmanuel Macron could request a new deliberation by Parliament, in accordance with Article 10 of the Constitution," Morel adds. But he believes that the result of the vote would be identical.
For now, France's left – the four parties formerly allied under the banner of the New Popular Front – have promised to continue to battle to repeal the Duplomb law. "The fight has only just begun," warned Green Party MP Sandrine Rousseau on franceinfo radio on Monday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Paris to host talks on integrating Kurdish administration into Syrian state
Syria, France and the United States said they agreed Friday to convene "as soon as possible" talks in Paris to integrate the autonomous Kurdish administration into the Syrian state. The Kurds, who control large swathes of northeast Syria, are negotiating with the central government in Damascus on the integration of their civil and military institutions into the state. Those include the US-backed, Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). The three countries "agreed on the need... to host as soon as possible the next round of consultations in Paris between the Syrian government and the Syrian Democratic Forces regarding the full implementation of the March 10 agreement", according to a joint statement. The statement was issued after a Friday meeting in Paris between French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot, US Special Envoy for Syria Tom Barrack and Damascus's top diplomat Asaad al-Shaibani. In March, SDF chief Mazloum Abdi and Syria's interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa signed an agreement aimed at incorporating Kurdish institutions into the Syrian state. Several rounds of talks have been held but the process has stalled, with Kurdish officials criticising a constitutional declaration announced by the new authorities, saying it failed to reflect Syria's diversity. The Islamist authorities in Damascus, who took power after ousting longtime ruler Bashar al-Assad in December, have repeatedly rejected calls for a "decentralised" government that would let the Kurds and other groups maintain some level of autonomy. A meeting was set to take place in Paris on Thursday between Kurdish representatives and a Syrian government delegation, but it was postponed. Barrot held a phone call on Friday with the SDF's Abdi, Paris said, to "confirm the upcoming negotiations session". Damascus insists on reunifying the country at any cost and demands that the Kurds hand over their weapons. 05:10 But on Wednesday SDF spokesperson Farhad Shami told Al-Yaum TV that disarmament is a "red line". "No one is surrendering in Syria. Those betting on our capitulation will lose – the tragic events have made that clear," he added, referring to recent sectarian violence in the southern Druze heartland of Sweida which left nearly 1,400 dead according to a monitor. A Syrian government source told state broadcaster Al-Ikhbariya that "talking about refusing to hand over weapons or maintaining an autonomous military force is completely unacceptable". Friday's joint statement stressed the need to "ensure the success of Syria's transition" and the importance of "efforts aimed at national reconciliation and cohesion, especially in northeastern Syria and Sweida".


France 24
6 hours ago
- France 24
Why has France decided to recognise Palestinian statehood?
International envoys are set to discuss a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict early next week in New York, before a further summit co-hosted by France ahead of the UN General Assembly in September. Why now? Macron's announcement on Thursday came as international alarm grew about the plight of the more than two million Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, where Israel's war against the Hamas militant group has triggered a dire humanitarian crisis and warnings of mass starvation. "The sense of urgency may have driven the president to move forward alone," France's former ambassador to Israel Gerard Araud told the France Inter broadcaster. Besides the humanitarian crisis and "the shocking declarations of certain Israeli ministers" on the fate they wish for all Gazans, Macron may also have been influenced by the political climate in France, said David Khalfa of the Jean Jaures Foundation. The war has triggered tensions in France, which is home to the largest Muslim community in the European Union, as well as the biggest Jewish population outside Israel and the United States. What's the plan? France has long advocated for the so-called "two-state solution" for a Palestinian state to live in peace side-by-side with an Israeli one. Macron's original idea was for France and other countries to recognise a Palestinian state at the same time as other nations -- including Gulf heavyweight Saudi Arabia -- normalised ties with Israel. As that proposal did not appear to gain traction, Macron made his announcement in the hope of spurring others to do likewise in the run-up to September's UN General Assembly, said analyst Amelie Ferey. "The idea is to have a little over a month to potentially rally other countries to make a larger announcement in New York," said Ferey, an analyst at the French Institute of International Relations. "The United Kingdom and Canada could perhaps follow suit," she added. Will it work? Canada, France and Britain were among 25 countries on Monday to say the Gaza war "must end now", arguing that the suffering of civilians had "reached new depths". Mujtaba Rahman, the Europe director of political risk consultancy Eurasia Group, said British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was under pressure from his Labour party to act. "He wants to move in concert with other countries and use recognition as a card in negotiations on a ceasefire in Gaza," he said. "But the timing is awkward" as US President Donald Trump arrives in Scotland on Friday evening, he added. "Starmer will be reluctant to upset him when there's still things to be done on the UK-US trade deal." Why team up with Riyadh? As France has no leverage to end the current Gaza war, "the idea in Paris is to let the United States impose a ceasefire, and for Paris to then be an important actor afterwards, along with the Saudis," said Ferey. Camille Lons, an expert from the European Council on Foreign Relations, said France and Saudi Arabia were working on a post-ceasefire roadmap. This would include proposals for "the isolation and disarmament of Hamas, Palestinian elections in 2026, a new legal framework for political parties" and "the prospect of having a technocratic government", she said. Other options on the table could include a UN peacekeeping mission, including personnel from neighbouring Egypt, she said. "The goal is to garner support from countries in the region for the sidelining of Hamas, including Qatar," an ally of the Palestinian Islamist group, she added. Is it realistic? But "this is all quite detached from reality", warned Lons. For Ferey, "the Israeli government's goal is for there to be no Palestinian state." After almost 22 months of war in Gaza, sparked by an unprecedented attack against Israel on October 7, 2023, the blockaded Palestinian territory has been largely ravaged by bombardment. And Israel's far-right government is pushing for the expansion of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. Many Israelis now live in what would become a Palestinian state. Excluding Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem and its 200,000 Jewish residents, the occupied West Bank is home to around 500,000 Israelis in settlements considered illegal under international law. Three million Palestinians also live in the West Bank. Khalfa added that Saudi Arabia had no intention to normalise its ties with Israel for as long as Prime Minister Netanyahu -- who critics accuse of prolonging the Gaza war to stay in office -- remains in power.


France 24
6 hours ago
- France 24
Gaza on the brink of mass starvation
03:28 25/07/2025 US quits Gaza ceasefire talks, accuses Hamas of lacking 'good faith' Middle East 25/07/2025 Macron defies Israeli and US opposition to French plan to recognize Palestine at the United Nations France 25/07/2025 US 'strongly rejects' French plan to recognise Palestine, Saudis hail 'historic decision' France 25/07/2025 French President Macron says France will recognize Palestine as a state France 24/07/2025 Gaza: 'War is far-ranging and it needs to stop for those in Gaza, the West Bank, and Israel as well' Middle East 24/07/2025 Protests against the Gaza war in Tel-Aviv outside US embassy Middle East 24/07/2025 Gaza war: As world leaders seek 'durable' solution, '100 Palestinians each day find theirs in death' Middle East 24/07/2025 Hunger crisis deepens in Gaza : More starvation deaths reported Middle East 20/07/2025 Ceasefire calms Syria's Sweida after sectarian clashes kill 1,000, displace 128,000 Middle East