Israel carries out new attacks on Iranian military sites
Published June 23rd, 2025 - 06:34 GMT
ALBAWABA - The Israeli army announced it was striking military sites in western Iran's Kermanshah on Monday morning.
The Israeli air force "is currently striking military infrastructure sites in Kermanshah in Iran", a military statement read. "Approx. 20 IAF fighter jets conducted intelligence-based strikes using over 30 munitions on sites across Kermanshah, Hamedan and Tehran," the army added.
The conflict between Iran and Israel has marked its 11th day after the Israeli army launched the first attacks on Iran's nuclear sites and targeted major commanders in the Iranian army on June 13. On June 21, the US Air Forces carried out attacks on three Iranian nuclear sites, US President Donald Trump posted via Truth Social.
🔴 Approx. 20 IAF fighter jets conducted intelligence-based strikes using over 30 munitions on sites across Kermanshah, Hamedan and Tehran.Targets included:⭕️ Missile storage & launch infrastructure⭕️ Radar and satellite systems used for aerial intel
⭕️ A surface-to-air… pic.twitter.com/uAJFhVwm4w — Israel Defense Forces (@IDF) June 22, 2025
On the other hand, Iran on Monday warned the US of severe repercussions following the attacks on nuclear facilities.
"This hostile act... will widen the scope of legitimate targets of the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran and pave the way for the extension of war in the region," AFP cited armed forces spokesman Ebrahim Zolfaghari.
Moreover, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi will be holding "important" talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday, 48 hours after the US attack on nuclear facilities.
© 2000 - 2025 Al Bawaba (www.albawaba.com)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ammon
an hour ago
- Ammon
The 'Washington Effect' could decide the AI race
Ammon News - BALTIMORE – Five months into his second presidency, Donald Trump is already ushering in a new era of imperial technological governance in which both domestic and foreign regulatory authorities are subordinated to a US administration increasingly dominated by Big Tech. Silicon Valley has cultivated its political influence through aggressive lobbying and strategic presidential appointments. Now, despite the tech industry's distaste for Trump's tariffs and policy priorities, its efforts are paying off, as Republican leaders work to stymie tech regulation not just in Congress – where legislative progress was always unlikely – but also at the state level and around the world. As part of Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget bill, lawmakers are considering a decade-long ban that would block US states from regulating AI. The proposed ban would severely undermine efforts to mandate transparency in AI systems, protect consumers from algorithmic price fixing, and curb worker surveillance. Although it's unlikely to survive the Senate's procedural rules, Republican Senator Ted Cruz has pledged to pursue a similar prohibition in future legislation. For the tech industry, federal preemption has long been a reliable strategy for avoiding troublesome state laws. It also dovetails with Republican efforts to centralize AI regulatory authority within the White House. This may explain why the debate over the proposed ban has largely focused not on states' rights, but on geopolitical anxieties. For example, at a congressional hearing on the proposal, lawmakers and expert witnesses turned what should have been a conversation about the role of statehouses in Sacramento and Denver into sprawling diatribes against overregulation in Brussels and authoritarianism in Beijing. If the United States ends up with a patchwork of state AI laws, the argument goes, American companies will struggle to innovate and compete with China. Throughout that hearing, industry speakers repeatedly cited flagship European Union regulations like the GDPR and AI Act, arguing that regulatory overreach has hindered Europe's ability to produce world-class tech companies. The message was clear: to defeat China, the US must not become another Brussels. But is Brussels still Brussels? Well before any discussion of AI preemption, the Trump administration had begun pressuring the EU into watering down tech laws like the Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act. In February, speaking before a room of EU and world leaders at an AI summit in Paris, Vice President J.D. Vance decried the 'onerous international rules' that apply to US businesses. At the same summit, French President Macron signaled his desire for the EU's tech laws to 'simplify' and 'resynchronize with the rest of the world.' There are signs this strategy is working. The EU's recent AI Continent Action Planreflects a softer approach to regulation, and enforcers are scaling back fines on US tech firms. Meanwhile, those same US companies are keeping up the pressure, lobbying the European Commission to keep AI rules 'as simple as possible.' Tech regulation also remains a point of contention in Trump's trade policy. In May, Trump threatened to impose 50% tariffs on EU imports as negotiations over digital taxes and tech regulation remained deadlocked. US politicians often portray the 'Brussels Effect' as a cautionary tale, based on the largely discredited notion that the EU, obsessed with setting de facto global standards, overplayed its hand and ultimately sabotaged its own tech sector. But now we are witnessing the emergence of a 'Washington Effect': a contraction of tech governance at all levels – local, state, and multinational – aimed at shoring up the supremacy of US firms, with regulatory power increasingly concentrated in the federal government's executive branch. In pursuit of global tech dominance, former President Joe Biden – a staunch advocate of the US-led liberal world order – worked with allies to coordinate 'AI safety networks' and reconfigure key lines of tech hardware production. By contrast, as historian Jake Werner observed, Trump 'conceptualizes the economy as a market where those with bargaining power squeeze profit out of those who lack it, rather than as a supply chain in which power accumulates at strategic nodes associated with scarce goods or technologies.' With its decision to abandon Biden's semiconductor export restrictions, the Trump administration has shown that it sees no need to weaponize access to high-end graphics processing units (GPUs) to bring other countries to the table; nor does it show much interest in multilateral coordination. Speaking about the recent EU tariff announcement, Trump was characteristically blunt: 'I'm not looking for a deal. We've set the deal.' That same logic is playing out in US domestic politics. Gone are Biden's 'legislative convenings' that brought together state lawmakers to address nationally significant issues. Instead, Republicans want to turn the White House into the central clearinghouse for all AI policy, even if that means banning state officials from introducing protections against abusive practices. These measures complement each other: while administration officials pressure foreign governments to ease up on US firms, Congress moves to block state-level oversight altogether. Washington, in short, is being positioned as the only place where decisions can be made. The irony is this: even in an age of regulatory retreat, federal authority will shape the future trajectory of US tech. 'Winning the AI race,' a vague and largely undefinable goal, will depend as much on US state power and political coercion as on private investment. However slim the prospects for multilateral collaboration may be, the Washington Effect is rapidly diminishing them. Much will depend on how China responds. Still, with the exception of those who stand to profit directly from the tech arms race, the outlook is bleak: as nationalist rhetoric intensifies, the interests of dominant tech firms increasingly outweigh the vision of an innovation system that serves the public good. The US likes to cast itself as the world's foremost champion of democracy and innovation. But its strategy for achieving AI primacy depends on imperial overreach and the unchecked expansion of executive power. The Trump administration isn't favoring red states over blue, or cooperating with European allies to beat China. Instead, it is seeking to strip power from state authorities and foreign partners alike, prioritizing predation over effective governance.
Al Bawaba
5 hours ago
- Al Bawaba
Missile hits Ashkelon as Iran launches new attack on Israel
Published June 23rd, 2025 - 07:52 GMT ALBAWABA - The Iranian military announced on Monday that it had launched missiles and dozens of drones equipped with anti-fortification warheads toward Israel, media reported on Monday. Israel said that between 10 and 15 missiles were fired. An Israeli military spokesperson said the army detected missile launches from Iran towards Israel, confirming that defense systems are working to intercept them. Local Israeli media said that sirens sounded first in northern Israel, including the Galilee area, followed by sirens in central and southern Israel. Furthermore, AFP said that loud blasts were heard in Jerusalem as well. Magen David Adom (MDA) further mentioned that teams are heading to crash sites, adding that one was reported in an open area in the Lachish area. © 2000 - 2025 Al Bawaba (
Al Bawaba
6 hours ago
- Al Bawaba
JD Vance calls previous presidents 'dumb' except Trump
Published June 23rd, 2025 - 06:19 GMT ALBAWABA - In a recent interview with NBC News, US Vice President JD Vance sparked controversy on social media after stating that the previous presidents who have taken office over the past 25 years were "dumb," with the exception of Donald Trump. The US VP touched on subjects including Americans' concerns over going to war with Iran due to the country's ongoing tensions with Israel. The US recently bombed three Iranian nuclear sites to prevent Iran's advancement of nuclear weapons manufacturing and possession. Vance said, "I empathize with Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of wars in the Middle East. I understand the concern. But the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents, but now we have a president who knows how to actually accomplish America's national security objectives." JD Vance calls previous presidents 'dumb' except Trump 'I empathize with Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of wars in the Middle East. I understand the concern. But the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents.' - JD VanceLol good luck selling that. — Spencer Hakimian (@SpencerHakimian) June 22, 2025 He added, "So this is not going to be a long, drawn-out thing... We've got in, we've done the job of setting their [Iran] nuclear program back, and now we're going to work on permanently dismantling that nuclear program over the coming years." The statement reportedly took a jab at several US presidents who held office over the past 25 years, including Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden. 25 years of war in the Middle East US soldiers gather at the scene an attack on a military vechile in the al-Mustansiriya neighborhood of Baghdad 01 July 2003. (Photo by AHMAD AL-RUBAYE / AFP) In the interview, JD Vance brought up the US's involvement in the Middle East over the past 25 years, so here's a brief regarding his comment, excluding the country's recent attack on Iran. The US was involved in several conflicts in the Middle East, including the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Afghanistan war (sharing a border with the Middle East), tensions with Syria and Yemen, and its financial support of the ongoing Israeli aggression on Gaza since Oct. 7, 2023. © 2000 - 2025 Al Bawaba (
