
Inside most secret radioactive site in US said to be 'Chernobyl in making'
The Hanford Site in Washington saw more than 400 billion gallons of contaminated liquid dumped into its ground during its use - and now it could be developed as an AI development hub
A huge radioactive site which is planted on almost 600 acres of desert land has been compared to an "underground Chernobyl" with warnings that it is a disaster waiting to happen.
The Hanford Site in Washington, US, was constructed during World War II and is known as one of the country's most radioactive chemical contamination sites. The area was built as part of the Manhattan Project, where workers made plutonium to put together an explosive which was eventually set off in Nagasaki, Japan, on August 9, 1945. According to experts, the site's most hazardous waste is hidden in the tanks and unlined trenches. Washington's Department of Ecology has warned that there are 177 leaky storage tanks buried on the property, holding 56 million gallons of radioactive waste.
Now, the site has been proposed as a potential location for AI development by the Department of Energy. Richland has been included on the list as it is home to the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, which could result in a partnership with developers on advanced hardware for next-generation data centres and power systems needed to run them.
The 295 acres in Richland, however, is former Hanford nuclear site land, which was transferred to the Department via the Tri-City Development Council to the city of Richland in 2015 to be developed as part of a new Advanced Clean Energy Park. But the land has a long, deadly, history.
The toxic facility was so dangerous that it was nicknamed "death mile" in 1985 after local farmers were being diagnosed with cancers. The string of incidents was linked back to the residents breathing in the chemical, Iodine 131. Iodine 131 is used in medicine to treat thyroid cancer and hyperthyroidism.
Government officials gave locals a mere 30 days to leave the area, with residents being paid for their land. However, indigenous tribes weren't given any compensation.
The War Powers Act which was put in place prior to its 1973 resolution allowed the government to use land for military purposes. Under the act, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt acquired over 600 square miles of land.
The shock request saw up to 55,000 men and women taken to the area to start work on the undercover development. A lot of them knew very little about what they were working on, with most being unaware it was for the war. It was reported that only 5 per cent actually knew why they were hired.
The secret workers were given access to almost ten dining halls, a hospital, a post office, barbershops and a cinema. The Department of Ecology revealed that they were also given entry into dance halls and bowling alleys to keep them entertained outside of working hours.
It was reported that its first full-scale plutonium production reactor was finalised within 13 months. The operation was launched in 1944. Physicist Leona Libby, 23, and her team created the first nuclear chain reaction which later helped create the bomb.
Once the explosive was released, the workers were given further insight into the circumstances behind the project. After WWII had finished, the production site continued its operation during the Cold War. In 1963, the last reactor was constructed.
When the site was in use, more than 400 billion gallons of contaminated liquids were dumped into the ground. According to the Department of Ecology, that dumped material then came into contact with groundwater and even reached parts of the Columbia River. The Department of Ecology was launched in 1970 and assessed any concerns surrounding the site. By 1989, it was forced to close its doors due to a potential red flag which was highlighted in 1987. Despite, discussions about clean-up efforts taking place, the Hanford Site is still viewed as an environmental concern.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Coin Geek
2 hours ago
- Coin Geek
Ethiopia pushes for domestic AI; S. Africa clears path for Starlink
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed has called on African nations to develop homegrown artificial intelligence (AI) to propel the region's development. In his keynote address at the Ethiopian Technology Expo, Ahmed stated that Africa must shape its own technological destiny with AI after decades of adhering to Western standards. 'Africa must not be a passive recipient of AI tools developed elsewhere. We must become innovators and owners of our future, ensuring that no one is left behind in this transformation,' he stated. Ahmed is the latest to call for local AI solutions in Africa, a region whose needs are rarely addressed by Western technology. AI could exacerbate the divide even further; a United Nations report last month revealed that over 120 countries, mostly in the global south, have been left out of the global AI development, which could widen economic inequalities. 'With a clear strategic vision and bold investment, Africa can guide the development of AI on its own terms—anchored in ethical frameworks, inclusion, and sustainability,' Ahmed stated. He added that AI could usher in a new era 'that holds the promise of inclusive prosperity for our continent, driven by homegrown innovations in AI.' Africans must not rely on foreign solutions, which rarely account for the region's nuanced challenges and its diversity. Africa's AI development has been limited by poor infrastructure. A separate UN report revealed that only 5% of the region's AI developers have access to the computing power they would require to build AI applications. Starlink setting foot in South Africa Elsewhere, South Africa is set to amend a law that requires telecom firms to be at least 30% black-owned to enable Elon Musk's Starlink to operate in the country. The decision, announced on Tuesday, comes at a time when tensions between Africa's most industrialized nation and the United States are at a boiling point. U.S. President Donald Trump and Musk have accused the South African government of orchestrating a genocide against white residents, a claim that the African nation has refuted, and which one court has dismissed as 'clearly imagined and not real.' Still, Trump has persisted, and last week, the U.S. welcomed the first batch of South Africans as refugees. Trump and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa are set to have a meeting this week in Washington, and the decision to amend the black ownership law is seen as an effort to smooth things over before the crucial meeting. 'We're not doing it for Musk' The law being amended—known as the Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) law—was introduced in the '90s as South Africa abandoned apartheid, which had significantly disadvantaged the black majority. It requires companies in some industries, such as IT, telecoms, and automotive, to be at least 30% owned by black entrepreneurs. Starlink, where Musk has 79% control, was to set up operations in South Africa last year after successful debuts in 20 other African nations. However, it didn't meet the BEE threshold, and since then, Musk has ramped up criticism against the Ramaphosa government. The X and Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) CEO was born in Pretoria, the South African capital, but relocated to Canada at 17. 'I am in a situation where I was born in South Africa, but cannot get a license to operate Starlink because I am not Black,' he told Bloomberg this week. The South African government has finally bowed to the pressure and will amend the BEE law, allowing Starlink to set up in the country, home to 61 million people. Experts say the timing of the move suggests that Ramaphosa is using it to appease Trump ahead of their meeting. However, the South African government has denied the allegations, claiming it's 'part of a broader strategy to create an enabling environment for international investment and expand digital connectivity across South Africa.' The move is part of the government's medium-term plans, the Department of Communications and Digital Technologies told media outlets. However, some in the country's political landscape remain opposed to Starlink's entry. Economic Freedom Fighters, the top opposition party, says the move is unconstitutional and 'exposes Ramaphosa as willing to compromise on our sovereignty to massage the inflated ego of Elon Musk and Donald Trump,' the party's spokesperson, Sinawo Thambo stated. 'These powers are governed by national legislation and independent regulators, not the whims of one man desperate for foreign approval,' he added. The party has vowed to fight against the move 'in the courts, and on the streets.' In order for artificial intelligence (AI) to work right within the law and thrive in the face of growing challenges, it needs to integrate an enterprise blockchain system that ensures data input quality and ownership—allowing it to keep data safe while also guaranteeing the immutability of data. Check out CoinGeek's coverage on this emerging tech to learn more why Enterprise blockchain will be the backbone of AI . Watch: Bitcoin Retrospective and a Focus on the Future of the Internet with Mike Hearn title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">


Geeky Gadgets
4 hours ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Obsidian & Cursor AI Knowledge and Workflow Management System
What if you could merge the art of knowledge management with the precision of AI-driven coding? Imagine a workspace where your ideas, notes, and projects seamlessly connect, while intelligent algorithms anticipate your next move. Bold claim? Perhaps. But with the combined power of Obsidian and Cursor, this vision becomes a reality. Obsidian, with its unparalleled flexibility, transforms chaotic information into structured clarity, while Cursor's AI capabilities elevate coding and content creation to new heights. Together, they offer a glimpse into a future where productivity isn't just streamlined—it's redefined. In this exploration, Stable Discussion uncover how these two tools complement each other to create a dynamic system for knowledge and workflow management. From organizing sprawling data to generating fresh insights, the synergy between Obsidian and Cursor unlocks possibilities for developers, researchers, and creators alike. Whether you're curious about AI-assisted brainstorming, advanced document retrieval, or simplifying complex coding tasks, this partnership offers something fantastic. As we delve deeper, consider how these tools might reshape not just how you work, but how you think. Obsidian and Cursor Integration Obsidian: Your Hub for Knowledge Management Obsidian serves as a centralized platform for organizing and managing diverse types of information. Whether you're handling notes, bookmarks, engineering logs, or code snippets, Obsidian consolidates these elements into a single, easily accessible space. Its ability to replace multiple apps with one streamlined solution makes it an invaluable tool for both individuals and teams. What makes Obsidian stand out is its flexibility and adaptability. With a wide range of plugins and customizable workflows, you can tailor the platform to meet your specific needs. Whether you're building a personal knowledge base or collaborating on a team project, Obsidian ensures your information is well-structured and easy to retrieve. Additionally, its compatibility with markdown files simplifies content creation, editing, and sharing, making it a practical choice for both technical and non-technical users. Obsidian also supports graph visualization, allowing you to map relationships between notes and ideas. This feature is particularly useful for researchers, writers, and developers who need to see the connections between different pieces of information. By offering a clear and intuitive interface, Obsidian enables users to focus on their work without being bogged down by disorganized data. Cursor: AI-Powered Coding and Insight Generation Cursor is more than a standard code editor; it's a tool designed to enhance coding and knowledge workflows through the power of artificial intelligence. Equipped with features like code autocompletion, AI-powered search, and content generation, Cursor is a valuable asset for developers, researchers, and knowledge workers. One of Cursor's most notable capabilities is its ability to analyze raw files, including markdown files from Obsidian. This feature allows users to extract insights, locate specific documents, and even brainstorm new ideas. By automating repetitive tasks and providing intelligent suggestions, Cursor enables you to focus on high-value activities such as coding, data analysis, or refining documentation. Cursor also excels in error detection and debugging, offering real-time feedback to improve code quality. Its AI-driven search functionality allows you to quickly locate specific code snippets or documents, saving time and reducing frustration. For professionals working with large datasets or complex projects, Cursor's ability to streamline workflows is a significant advantage. Obsidian Cursor Magical AI Knowledge Management Watch this video on YouTube. Take a look at other insightful guides from our broad collection that might capture your interest in Obsidian. How Obsidian and Cursor Work Together The integration of Obsidian and Cursor creates a cohesive workflow that bridges knowledge management with AI-powered tools. Cursor can directly import markdown files from Obsidian, allowing you to apply its AI capabilities to your existing knowledge base. This integration is particularly beneficial for tasks such as: Efficient document retrieval : Quickly locate specific files or information stored in Obsidian. : Quickly locate specific files or information stored in Obsidian. Content generation : Use Cursor's AI to create new ideas or refine existing materials. : Use Cursor's AI to create new ideas or refine existing materials. Knowledge enhancement: Extract insights and identify patterns within your stored data. File syncing between the two platforms ensures that your data remains up-to-date and accessible. You can configure syncing settings to prioritize essential files, reducing clutter and improving overall performance. This level of control makes the integration ideal for users who value efficiency and organization. For example, a developer might use Obsidian to organize project documentation and brainstorming notes, while relying on Cursor to write, debug, and optimize code. This division of labor allows you to use the strengths of each tool, creating a workflow that is both efficient and effective. Practical Use Cases and Benefits The combined use of Obsidian and Cursor offers numerous practical applications and benefits, including: AI-assisted brainstorming : Generate innovative ideas or solutions based on your existing knowledge base. : Generate innovative ideas or solutions based on your existing knowledge base. Enhanced search capabilities : Locate and retrieve information with precision and speed. : Locate and retrieve information with precision and speed. Document refinement : Improve the clarity, structure, and readability of your materials using AI-driven suggestions. : Improve the clarity, structure, and readability of your materials using AI-driven suggestions. Task-specific flexibility: Use each tool for its unique strengths, making sure a seamless and efficient workflow. For instance, researchers can use Obsidian to organize their literature reviews, hypotheses, and experimental data, while using Cursor to analyze datasets or draft research papers. Similarly, content creators might use Obsidian to store ideas and references, relying on Cursor to refine drafts and generate polished content. This synergy allows users to maximize productivity while maintaining a high standard of quality. Complementary Roles: A Balanced Partnership While Obsidian and Cursor serve distinct purposes, their roles are highly complementary. Obsidian excels in organizing and structuring information, offering an intuitive interface and a vast plugin ecosystem. Cursor, on the other hand, brings advanced AI capabilities to the table, making it a powerful tool for coding, analysis, and content generation. Together, they form a comprehensive solution for managing information and enhancing productivity. This partnership is particularly appealing for users who value data privacy and control. Unlike proprietary systems, Obsidian and Cursor allow you to manage your files locally, making sure greater security and flexibility. This is especially important for professionals handling sensitive information or those who require tailored workflows to meet specific needs. By combining the strengths of these two platforms, you can create a workflow that is not only efficient but also adaptable to a wide range of tasks and industries. Whether you're a developer, researcher, or knowledge worker, the integration of Obsidian and Cursor offers a powerful toolkit for achieving your goals. Media Credit: Stable Discussion Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.


Reuters
16 hours ago
- Reuters
Artificial Intelligence is now an A+ law student, study finds
June 5 (Reuters) - The latest generation of generative artificial intelligence can ace most law school final exams, a new study has found. OpenAI's newest model, called o3, earned grades ranging from A+ to B on eight spring finals given by faculty at the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, researchers found in a new paper published on SSRN, opens new tab. Those high grades represent a significant improvement from previous studies done on earlier versions of ChatGPT, also from OpenAI, which scored B's, C's, and even one D's when researchers had them take law school finals in 2022 and 2023, according to the paper. Studies conducted earlier by other researchers had also found that ChatGPT earned 'mediocre' grades on law school finals and that although it improved the speed of legal writing, it did not improve the quality. Researchers also have found that AI can pass the bar exam. However, generative AI looks to be catching up to actual high-performing law students, based on the latest study. Unlike ChatGPT, which immediately generates text in response to a user's query, o3 is what is known as a reasoning model. This means that it generates tentative answers and multiple approaches to questions after internally evaluating and revising those responses, after which it produces the final text for the user. The study's authors — seven law professors from University of Maryland — graded the final answers from o3 on the same curve they use for their students. The program's answers earned an A+ in Constitutional Law, Professional Responsibility, and Property. Its answers got an A in Income Taxation, and an A- in Criminal Procedure. It scored a B+ in Secured Transactions and Torts, and a B in Administrative Law. The's answers program did well on both multiple choice questions and essays, the study found. However, there were some limitations on o3's answers. The program's relatively low grade in administrative law was attributable to the fact that o3 did not know about the 2024 U.S. Supreme Court opinion in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which overturned the Chevron doctrine, which was central to administrative law. That ruling had come shortly after the o3's knowledge cutoff date. The o3 program performed worse on one final when given access to the professor's notes — an unanticipated outcome the researchers attributed to the program being 'distracted' by too much text. OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday about the study's findings. The study's authors wrote that they are already contemplating an updated experiment to determine how much of a cheating threat AI poses by instructing the program to make occasional spelling and grammar mistakes, so that those exams will be difficult to distinguish from those completed by real students. Read more: ChatGPT passes law school exams despite 'mediocre' performance AI improves legal writing speed, not quality - study