
5 Universities Get $90 Million Gift For Science Research Amid Federal Cuts
In a time of uncertainty for federal science funding, the Leinweber Foundation has announced a landmark investment in theoretical physics. The Michigan-based foundation is endowing five leading institutions — MIT, UC Berkeley, the University of Chicago, the Institute for Advanced Study and the University of Michigan — with a total of $90 million to support curiosity-driven research and early-career scientists. The gift aims to strengthen American leadership in basic science through a coordinated network of research centers.
Larry Leinweber, who grew up in rural northern Michigan and made his career in software, has had a lifelong interest in science. He wistfully recalled how deeply he felt the death of Albert Einstein during his adolescence, a moment that crystallized his fascination with physics.
His foundation first supported theoretical physics at the University of Michigan in 2017. The new initiative expands that investment to the national scale, creating a unified network of leading institutions committed to advancing theoretical physics through collaboration and sustained investment. 'We wanted to have at least five research centers, including University of Michigan, to launch a broader effort,' said Leinweber, who hinted at his interest in expanding even further.
Theoretical physics has long held a special place in the scientific imagination — not just for its foundational questions, but for its strangeness. It grapples with particles that tunnel through barriers, forces that bend space and constants that define the fate of the universe. It's the realm where Einstein reimagined time, Schrödinger proposed a cat both dead and alive, and today's physicists speculate about multiverses, quantum foam and dark matter. Even when its discoveries resist application, the field stirs both public fascination and scientific wonder. Its applications are typically decades away. But, from semiconductors to global positioning systems, history teaches us that today's basic discoveries become tomorrow's technological revolutions.
The endowments will support early-career scientists, particularly postdoctoral fellows and graduate students, along with visiting scholars, conferences and collaborative meetings. Each center will have flexible funds to recruit talent, host events and pursue long-term theoretical work. Every two years, the centers will convene to discuss major challenges in the field — a modern echo of the early 20th-century Solvay Conferences that helped shape modern physics.
Why prioritize early-career scientists? "Postdocs are the secret sauce of research," Leinweber said. "They run with ideas... they're young, energetic... they can explore... and interact with different faculty.' He emphasized the value of flexibility and independence.
The model he supports enables these scholars to operate with unusual freedom, not only within their host institution but across the network. He calls the postdocs supported by his gifts "free-range chickens" who are not tied to any one faculty member, grant or deliverable. This kind of autonomy is rare in contemporary science, where early-career scientists are often structurally disincentivized from taking risks. Empirical studies indicate that flexible, long-term funding models — those that tolerate early failures and reward long-term success — can foster more innovative and impactful research, particularly when offered to scientists in the formative stages of their careers.
Behind the scenes, the Science Philanthropy Alliance played a key role in shaping the initiative. Founded in response to a decade of stagnant federal budgets for science, the Alliance works with partners like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative to identify research areas and institutions where their resources can have the greatest strategic impact. It advised the Leinweber Foundation throughout its multiyear planning process and helped organize campus visits that ultimately shaped the multi-institutional design.
"Our mission is to advance science through visionary philanthropy," said France Córdova, the Alliance's president and former director of the National Science Foundation. 'We accompany philanthropists on that journey.'
Córdova noted that theoretical physics is particularly underfunded in the current climate. 'We used to say that all of science is underfunded, and now we really mean it. Things are not going in a good direction,' she said, referencing proposed cuts to federal research agencies in the 2026 budget.
In a period when public support for discovery is strained, the gift signals a long-view commitment to advancing fundamental understanding. 'We've come so far," Córdova said, again referencing the federal decline in science funding, "and then having science emerging on that path towards greatness… losing that and not being the world leader in any kind of science... it's a frightening prospect."
This initiative offers a countercurrent: a bet on the future, powered by curiosity, collaboration and the enduring value of basic research. Philanthropy alone cannot fill the gap left by public retrenchment. But when done thoughtfully — grounded in long-term vision — it can provide the patient capital that fundamental research needs to pursue the kind of work that doesn't fit neatly into five-year plans. In an era of mounting pressure to produce short-term results, the new Leinweber endowments affirm the belief that the most consequential scientific advances begin with questions — not deliverables.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gizmodo
29 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
The Long-Awaited ‘Mass Effect' Show Has a Showrunner Now
Prime Video's upcoming Mass Effect show is progressing slowly, but surely. On Friday, Deadline revealed the live-action series gained Doug Jung as its showrunner. Jung, who most may remember as the co-writer for 2016's Star Trek Beyond, recently ended a showrunner/executive producer stint for Apple TV+'s Chief of War. He'll be working alongside writer Dan Casey, and both will EP for the series alongside franchise producer Mike Gamble. As Deadline notes, this is a 'major step forward' in the show's development, which was first teased all the way back in 2021, then had its existence reaffirmed back in 2024. To date, Prime Video's kept mum on what exactly Casey's pitch was for the Mass Effect show. Among fans, the general thinking is that it'll just adapt the initial trilogy of Commander Shepard gathering allies to fight the Reapers. (This also seemed to be the plan when a movie seemed likely back in 2007 after the first game came out.) But shows like Castlevania and Prime Video's own Fallout have taken a different approach that tells an original story inside the worlds of those series. (Fallout in particular carries itself like a Fallout 5 we're getting to watch but not play.) Others, like Tomb Raider and Dragon Age, continued (or hoped to) the stories of the games they're based on. There's certainly different routes for the Mass Effect series to take, and we'll be interested to learn Jung and Casey's approach in due time.


CNN
32 minutes ago
- CNN
Federal judge approves $2.8B settlement, paving way for US colleges to pay athletes millions
Source: AP A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports Friday, clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century. Nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences to lift restrictions on revenue sharing, U.S. Judge Claudia Wilken approved the final proposal that had been hung up on roster limits, just one of many changes ahead amid concerns that thousands of walk-on athletes will lose their chance to play college sports. The sweeping terms of the so-called House settlement include approval for each school to share up to $20.5 million with athletes over the next year and $2.7 billion that will be paid over the next decade to thousands of former players who were barred from that revenue for years. The agreement brings a seismic shift to hundreds of schools that were forced to reckon with the reality that their players are the ones producing the billions in TV and other revenue, mostly through football and basketball, that keep this machine humming. The scope of the changes — some have already begun — is difficult to overstate. The professionalization of college athletics will be seen in the high-stakes and expensive recruitment of stars on their way to the NFL and NBA, and they will be felt by athletes whose schools have decided to pare their programs. The agreement will resonate in nearly every one of the NCAA's 1,100 member schools boasting nearly 500,000 athletes. 'Approving the agreement reached by the NCAA, the defendant conferences and student-athletes in the settlement opens a pathway to begin stabilizing college sports,' NCAA President Charlie Baker said. Wilken's ruling comes 11 years after she dealt the first significant blow to the NCAA ideal of amateurism when she ruled in favor of former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon and others who were seeking a way to earn money from the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL) — a term that is now as common in college sports as 'March Madness' or 'Roll Tide.' It was just four years ago that the NCAA cleared the way for NIL money to start flowing, but the changes coming are even bigger. Wilken granted preliminary approval to the settlement last October. That sent colleges scurrying to determine not only how they were going to afford the payments, but how to regulate an industry that also allows players to cut deals with third parties so long as they are deemed compliant by a newly formed enforcement group that will be run by auditors at Deloitte. The agreement takes a big chunk of oversight away from the NCAA and puts it in the hands of the four biggest conferences. The ACC, Big Ten, Big 12 and SEC hold most of the power and decision-making heft, especially when it comes to the College Football Playoff, which is the most significant financial driver in the industry and is not under the NCAA umbrella like the March Madness tournaments are. The deal looked ready to go since last fall, but Wilken put a halt to it after listening to a number of players who had lost their spots because of newly imposed roster limits being placed on teams. The limits were part of a trade-off that allowed the schools to offer scholarships to everyone on the roster, instead of only a fraction, as has been the case for decades. Schools started cutting walk-ons in anticipation of the deal being approved. Wilken asked for a solution and, after weeks, the parties decided to let anyone cut from a roster — now termed a 'Designated Student-Athlete' — return to their old school or play for a new one without counting against the new limit. Wilken ultimately agreed, going point-by-point through the objectors' arguments to explain why they didn't hold up. 'The modifications provide Designated Student-Athletes with what they had prior to the roster limits provisions being implemented, which was the opportunity to be on a roster at the discretion of a Division I school,' Wilken wrote. Her decision, however, took nearly a month to write, leaving the schools and conferences in limbo — unsure if the plans they'd been making for months, really years, would go into play. 'It remains to be seen how this will impact the future of inter-collegiate athletics — but as we continue to evolve, Carolina remains committed to providing outstanding experiences and broad-based programming to student-athletes,' North Carolina athletic director Bubba Cunningham said. The list of winners and losers is long and, in some cases, hard to tease out. A rough guide of winners would include football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, which will devote much of their bankroll to signing and retaining them. For instance, Michigan quarterback Bryce Underwood's NIL deal is reportedly worth between $10.5 million and $12 million. Losers will be the walk-ons and partial scholarship athletes whose spots are gone. One of the adjustments made at Wilken's behest was to give those athletes a chance to return to the schools that cut them in anticipation of the deal going through. Also in limbo are Olympic sports many of those athletes play and that serve as the main pipeline for a U.S. team that has won the most medals at every Olympics since the downfall of the Soviet Union. All this is a price worth paying, according to the attorneys who crafted the settlement and argue they delivered exactly what they were asked for: an attempt to put more money in the pockets of the players whose sweat and toil keep people watching from the start of football season through March Madness and the College World Series in June. What the settlement does not solve is the threat of further litigation. Though this deal brings some uniformity to the rules, states still have separate laws regarding how NIL can be doled out, which could lead to legal challenges. NCAA President Charlie Baker has been consistent in pushing for federal legislation that would put college sports under one rulebook and, if he has his way, provide some form of antitrust protection to prevent the new model from being disrupted again. See Full Web Article
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What we know so far: Trump and Musk's spectacular public blowup rocks Washington
President Trump's signature 'Big Beautiful Bill' has precipitated an epic fallout between the US president and one of his closest allies, billionaire Elon Musk. The blowup played out publicly on social media, with both men using their respective platforms, X and Truth Social, to exchange criticisms. Related: Eyes on Senate Republicans as Trump and Musk feud over tax and spend bill Here is a summary of how the rift unfolded, and what we know so far: Donald Trump kicked off the fight during an Oval Office meeting with German chancellor Friedrich Merz. Asked about Elon Musk's criticism of his 'Big, Beautiful Bill', the US president told reporters: 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more.' Trump told reporters he was 'very disappointed in Elon', telling them: 'He knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left. … He said the most beautiful things about me, and he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next, but I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Soon after Musk posted on X denying Trump's statement, beginning a flurry of posts that stepped up his feud with the president. Musk wrote: 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' He went on to claim that without him Trump would have 'lost the election' before bemoaning what he called 'such ingratitude'. The president followed up by , prompting a return threat from the SpaceX boss to decommission the Dragon spacecraft (which brought home astronauts stuck on the ISS for months), potentially throwing US space programmes into turmoil. Hours later Musk rescinded the threat. Musk also suggested Trump should be impeached and that JD Vance should replace Trump, warning that Trump's global tariffs would 'cause a recession in the second half of this year'. Musk went on to say on X the reason the had not released the files into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was because they implicated the president. The White House called the assertions an 'unfortunate episode'. Meanwhile, Steve Bannon, a longtime ally and Elon Musk critic, suggested there were grounds to deport the tech billionaire, who has US citizenship. Bannon told the New York Times: 'They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately.' The spectacular blowout between Trump and Musk sent Tesla shares into free fall. They The decline in Tesla's share price on Thursday knocked about $8.73bn off Musk's total net worth, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. The reported $152bn drop also decreased the value of the company to roughly $900bn.