Chiz on move to dismiss VP Sara's impeach case: There's no prohibited motion
Escudero was asked if the Senate impeachment court would take up a motion to dismiss the impeachment complaint against the Vice President outright.
Senator Ronald "Bato" dela Rosa had moved in the plenary for the dismissal of the Article of Impeachment, but his motion was eventually amended that the complaint be returned to the House of Representatives pending a couple of certifications.
'Wala namang bawal na motion. 'Yan ang problema ko sa maraming nagsasabi na kung anu-ano. Asan ba 'yung rule? Asan ba 'yung provision sa Saligang Batas o sa Rules on Impeachment na bawal ang ganito o ganyang klaseng motion? Hindi mo namang pwedeng pigilan,' Escudero said in a press conference.
(There is no prohibited motion. That is my problem with people making comments. Where is the law, constitutional provision, or Rules of Impeachment that a certain motion is prohibited? You cannot stop someone from making a motion.)
'Dahil collegial body ang Senado bilang impeachment court, kapag kami nag-motion at may nag-object, ano bang gagawin? Pagbobotohan," Escudero said.
"Always by simple majority. Ang hindi lamang required ng simple majority [kasi] two-thirds ang kailangan kapag magbobotohan, iyong to, acquit or convict [an impeachable official under trial],' he added.
(The Senate is a collegial body and as an impeachment court, when a motion is put forward, what do we do? We vote on it. The only case when a simple majority is not required is on deciding whether to convict or acquit the impeachable official, which requires two-thirds.)
Escudero was referring to the Constitutional requirement that two-thirds of the members of the Senate impeachment court needed to convict the impeachable official under trial.
'It begs the question. Kung may simple majority ka to dismiss, for example, then imposible ka na maka two-thirds. It's simple math,' Escudero added.
(If you have a simple majority to dismiss, then it would be impossible for you to make two-thirds.)
Escudero said a motion to dismiss can also be put forward by the lawyers of the Vice President once the impeachment trial is convened, based on the answer ad cautelam of the Vice President seeking to dismiss the impeachment complaint for being illegal as it violates the constitutional one-year ban limiting the filing of one impeachment complaint against an impeachable official per year.
'Binring up naman na sa answer [ad cautelam] eh. So I presume her lawyers will do that,' Escudero said.
(That is what was raised by the Vice President in her answer [filed before the Senate impeachment court].)
Escudero, however, said that any motion can be made, including also a motion to convict the Vice President right away.
"Someone could also make a motion to convict her outright, and I cannot prevent that from happening. But I will not vote for that. So don't just focus on the motion to dismiss. Because a motion to convict [outright] can also be made," Escudero said. — VDV, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
28 minutes ago
- GMA Network
Win Gatchalian: Zero budget for flood control if system not fixed
Senate finance committee chairman Sherwin Gatchalian on Thursday said that no budget will be allocated for flood control projects next year if the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) will not be able to fix its system in addressing the country's perennial flooding problem. Gatchalian also shared the view that there are syndicates behind the anomalous flood control projects, emphasizing that they will just continue abusing the system if the processes are lenient. 'For 2026, hindi na kami papayag niyan… Ise-zero na lang namin 'yung budget kung hindi maaayos 'yung sistema. Dahil kung lalagyan mo ng pondo tapos ganyan pa rin, nandiyan pa rin 'yung sindikato, nandiyan pa rin 'yung contractor, parang tuloy ligaya lang 'yung mangyayari,' the senator said in a Super Radyo dzBB interview. (For 2026, we will no longer allow that... We will allocate zero budget if the system is not fixed. Because if we allocate funds and the system is still like that, the syndicates and suspicious contractors will still be there.) 'So kung hindi aayusin ng DPWH 'yan, isi-zero namin 'yung flood control projects,' he added. (If the DPWH doesn't fix that, we will give zero budget for the flood control projects.) Gatchalian further stressed that he wants the master plan for flood control projects be funded in a bid to solve the longstanding problem. Budget Secretary Amenah Pangandaman earlier said that the proposed budget for the flood control projects under 2026 National Expenditure Program stands at P274.926 billion. This amount was lower compared with the about P350-billion earmarked in the 2025 General Appropriations Act (GAA). The proposed P274.9-billion allocation for flood control projects was divided between the Department of Public Works (DPWH), which will receive the bulk of the allocation at P272.333 billion, and the Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA) with P2.593 billion. Senate President Pro Tempore Jinggoy Estrada, meanwhile, believes that 'heads must roll' amid the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee's investigation into the anomalous flood control projects. 'Basta ako, ang paniniwala ko, hindi magpo-prosper ang isang ghost project kung walang cooperation ng COA (Commission on Audit),' Estrada said. (I believe that a ghost project will not prosper without cooperation with the COA.) During the committee's initial public hearing on Tuesday, DPWH Secretary Manuel Bonoan revealed that there may be "ghost" flood control projects worth P5.9 billion that mar some areas in Bulacan. Should Bonoan resign? Amid the controversy, Gatchalian said that Bonoan should voluntarily leave his post as DPWH chief 'out of delicadeza.' 'Para makita talaga kung ano ang tunay na nangyayari sa loob at sino ang mga sangkot dito dahil nga hindi lang naman ito nangyari ngayon,' he said. (This is so we can really see what's really going on inside and identify who's involved because this didn't just happen now.) For Estrada, President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. still has the prerogative to decide on the matter. He also floated the responsibility that Bonoan might have no idea of what's really happening on the ground. 'Honestly or frankly speaking, baka hindi rin alam ni Secretary 'yan. In fairness to Secretary Bonoan, I am not defending him, in factI asked a lot of questions thrown to him yesterday, I'm not defending him, pero baka hindi lang nalalaman ni Secretary Bonoan 'yung mga nangyayari sa baba,' the Senate President Pro Tempore said. (Honestly or frankly speaking, maybe the Secretary doesn't also know what's happening on the ground. I'm not defending him, in fact I asked him a lot of questions during the hearing.) 'So, hindi naman niya mamomonitor 'yan eh. Kaya lang, ang problema niya, command responsibility. That is his responsibility as Secretary of the department,' he added. (Maybe he wasn't able to monitor the grounds. The problem is, he has a command responsibility. That is his responsibility as Secretary of the department.) Bonoan on Wednesday said he will leave the decision to the President if he needs to take a leave of absence amid the probe into the alleged corruption in flood control projects. He also said that officials of district engineering offices involved in alleged corruption in flood control projects have been removed from their positions. — RF, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
3 hours ago
- GMA Network
Imee Marcos takes drug test
Senator Imee Marcos and her staff underwent drug testing following reports of alleged marijuana use by a Senate employee inside the premises of the upper chamber. According to her office, all of Marcos' 38 staff, including her security personnel, were instructed to take a 5-panel drug test for cocaine, shabu, ecstasy, marijuana, and opium. 'Natapos na lahat ng staff ko. Inobliga ko sila at wala namang pumalag. Eh nakakahiya naman, dapat ako nauna eh kaya nga nandito na 'ko,' the senator said in a video posted on her Facebook page on Wednesday. (All of my staff have finished drug testing. I obliged them to do so and no one refused. It's a shame, I should have been the first to take it, but I'm here now.) Aside from Marcos, Senators Juan Miguel 'Migz' Zubiri and Raffy Tulfo, as well as their staff, have also undergone drug testing. Senator Loren Legarda also mandated the same for her staff in a bid to ensure a drug-free office. The test of Tulfo and his staff all yielded negative results, while the results of others have yet to be released. Senate President Pro Tempore Jinggoy Estrada, meanwhile, said that he is also willing to undergo a drug test and may ask his staff to voluntarily do the same. Some senators decided to do so after reports circulated that a Senate staff member from the office of Senator Robin Padilla allegedly smoked marijuana in the building. Actress Nadia Montenegro was named in an incident report, but she denied the allegation and eventually resigned as Padilla's political affairs officer. Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero also previously said that the Senate plans to conduct a mandatory random drug test for all officials and employees this 20th Congress. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
18 hours ago
- GMA Network
Kiko Pangilinan invites consignees of alleged smuggled crops to Senate hearing
'Under the Anti-Agriculture Economic Sabotage Law, 'pag P15 at P20 million ay dapat non-bailable economic sabotage cases. So technically, kung may basehan at nakita mismo ni [Agriculture] Secretary Kiko…nakita nilang binuksan, eh dapat sinampahan na ng kaso at arestuhin na ang mga ito,' Pangilinan said. Senator Francis 'Kiko' Pangilinan on Wednesday disclosed the names of five consignees of shipments suspected to contain smuggled agricultural products. During the hearing of the Senate committee on agriculture, food, and agrarian reform, the senator then directed the Senate committee secretary to invite the brokers and company representatives to the next hearings of the committee scheduled on August 27 and September 1. 'Under the Anti-Agriculture Economic Sabotage Law, 'pag P15 at P20 million ay dapat non-bailable economic sabotage cases. So technically, kung may basehan at nakita mismo ni [Agriculture] Secretary Kiko…nakita nilang binuksan, eh dapat sinampahan na ng kaso at arestuhin na ang mga ito,' Pangilinan said. (Under the Anti-Agriculture Economic Sabotage Law, if it's between P15 and P20 million, they are considered as non-bailable economic sabotage cases. So technically, if there is a basis and Agriculture Secretary Kiko saw that these were opened, then they should face charges and get arrested.) Undersecretary Carlos Carag then explained that the Department of Agriculture (DA) does not have law enforcement powers. 'In as much as we want to do more than our job or our responsibility, we are not even included in the law enforcement group of the council under the new law of [RA] 12022… So we are very limited, we have to coordinate all our actions with the law enforcement agencies,' he said. Carag said that the DA continues to surveil, along with the administration of the Bureau of Customs (BOC), regarding the matter. "They do have all the containers still within their jurisdiction. But it's under the BOC and the council. Walang kinalaman ang DA sa pagsunod ng kaso [the DA has no hand in the case]," the DA official added. Section 7 of Republic Act No. 12022, also known as the Anti-Agricultural Sabotage Act, states that the crime of agricultural smuggling as economic sabotage is committed when the value of each or of the combination of agricultural and fishery products smuggled by a person is at least P10 million computed using the daily price index at the time the crime was committed. Pangilinan further questioned why there are no government officials allegedly behind rice smuggling, as previously mentioned by President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. in May, who have been arrested. He raised concerns that these government officials may have already 'escaped.' 'Tatlong buwan mula noon, three months after of hunger, of rising prices, of farmers drowning in losses. and yet—nasaan ang mga opisyal na ito? Sino sila? At bakit wala pa rin nasasampahan ng kaso? O kung meron man, wala pang nakukulong? Lalo ang mga importers at smugglers. Let us stop pretending we do not know the problem,' the senator said. (Three months since then, three months of hunger, of rising prices, of farmers drowning in losses and yet—where are these officials? Who are they? And why is there still no one charged? Or if there is, why is no one jailed? Especially the importers and smugglers. Let us stop pretending we do not know the problem.) –NB, GMA Integrated News
