logo
Indonesian minister vows transparent probe into death of army recruit allegedly abused by seniors

Indonesian minister vows transparent probe into death of army recruit allegedly abused by seniors

CNA2 days ago
EAST NUSA TENGGARA: An Indonesian minister has vowed that the military will conduct a transparent probe into the death of a newly-enlisted army recruit based in East Nusa Tenggara province who was allegedly abused by his seniors in a case that has rocked the country and its armed forces.
'The government is committed to ensure such incidents do not happen again through legal enforcement and reforms in the internal supervision system within military units,' Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal and Security Affairs Budi Gunawan said in a written statement on Tuesday (Aug 12), as quoted by local news outlet Tempo.
Prada Lucky Chepril Saputra Namo, 23, died on Aug 6 after four days in intensive care at Aeramo Regional Hospital in East Nusa Tenggara, following alleged abuse by his seniors from the army.
As of Monday, 20 soldiers - including senior officers - have been detained as part of an ongoing investigation by the Indonesian army which Budi said his ministry will monitor closely, Jakarta Globe reported.
Lucky's death is a serious concern for the government as it involves safety, discipline and honour of military personnel, said Budi on Tuesday.
Piek Budyakto, Commander of the Regional Military Command IX/Udayana - which oversees the provinces of Bali, West Nusa Tenggara and East Nusa Tenggara - told reporters on Monday that those detained have been brought to Kupang for further legal proceedings.
Kupang is the capital of East Nusa Tenggara province.
According to the army's public relations chief Wahyu Yudhayana, the alleged abuse took place during soldier training activities which are now subjected to investigations.
Wahyu said on Tuesday that one of the officers allegedly involved in Lucky's death is a platoon commander in the Territorial Battalion unit where Lucky was stationed in the remote Nagekeo regency in East Nusa Tenggara.
'He's a platoon commander and second lieutenant,' Wahyu told Kompas on Tuesday, without revealing the officer's name.
Previously, Wahyu had said that the officer had allegedly allowed his subordinates to commit acts of violence and may be charged under Article 132 of the military code.
'Article 132 refers to soldiers who deliberately allow subordinates or other soldiers to commit acts of violence and it carries criminal penalties,' Wahyu was quoted as saying by Kompas.
He added that the number of suspects in the case is relatively high because the acts of violence took place over a period of time, involving multiple personnel, including the victim.
'Therefore, the investigation must be thoroughly conducted so that appropriate actions can be taken against the right individuals, ensuring accountability and allowing for proper evaluation and improvements,' he said.
Wahyu also requested time from the public and media to complete the investigation so that each suspect's role in the alleged abuse could be accurately identified.
'The Indonesian army does not tolerate any form of training that deviates from principles meant to benefit the soldiers, especially if it results in death of personnel,' he stressed.
According to Kompas, once the probe is completed, investigators will hold a case review before submitting the files for trial in a military court.
Lucky had joined the Indonesian Army in May 2025, just mere months before his death. Investigations found that there were multiple cuts and bruises on his body, with cigarette burn marks found on his back.
'I would have accepted if my son died in a battle, but this happened because of irresponsible individuals,' Lucky's mother Sepriana Paulina Mirpey was heard saying at his funeral on Saturday, as quoted by Tempo.
Paulina told reporters that her son had previously told her that he was beaten and whipped by several soldiers in the military barracks.
According to Paulina, her son had been critically ill at the hospital since Aug 2.
In a video that has since gone viral on social media, Lucky's father Christian Namo - who himself is an active duty soldier - demanded justice for his son's death.
'Only two punishments are fitting: Death penalty and dishonourable discharge,' he was quoted as saying by Tempo.
Investigations into Lucky's death are still ongoing and involve the Military Police Detachment unit and the Udayana regional military command.
In 2021, army sergeant Sertu Marctyan Bayu Pratama was found dead due to alleged abuse by his seniors in Papua province. Investigations into his death was then reopened by then-Commander of the Indonesian National Armed Forces Andika Perkasa the following year.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Drug trafficker on Singapore death row granted clemency
Drug trafficker on Singapore death row granted clemency

CNA

timean hour ago

  • CNA

Drug trafficker on Singapore death row granted clemency

SINGAPORE: A convicted drug trafficker was spared the death penalty and given life imprisonment on Thursday (Aug 14) after he was granted a pardon by President Tharman Shanmugaratnam. Tristan Tan Yi Rui was sentenced to death in 2023 after he was found guilty of possessing and trafficking 337.6g of methamphetamine. His conviction and capital sentence were upheld by the Court of Appeal. The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said on Friday that President Tharman had granted the pardon on the advice of the Cabinet. "Cabinet was advised that the sentence imposed on Tan was legally sound. Nevertheless, a recommendation was made to grant clemency to him because of the specific facts and circumstances of the case," MHA said in response to CNA's queries. Tan was nabbed as part of an operation by the Central Narcotics Bureau in which several other people were arrested. "One of the other subjects arrested in the operation, who was tried separately for a capital charge, eventually received a non-capital sentence," MHA said. "The Cabinet decided to advise the grant of clemency to Tan to reduce the disparity in their respective outcomes." Clemency is an "exceptional power" that is exercised as "an act of executive grace", said MHA. The president may, on the advice of the Cabinet, grant a pardon, reprieve or respite of the execution of a sentence. He or she may also remit the whole or any part of the sentence, penalty or forfeiture imposed by law. In cases involving prisoners awaiting capital punishment, a sentence of death may be commuted to a sentence of imprisonment or fine or both. Clemency has been sought for previous death sentences, but it is rarely given. In 1998, the late President Ong Teng Cheong commuted the death sentence of convicted murderer Mathavakannan Kalimuthu to life imprisonment. He was eventually released in 2012 after spending about 16 years in prison. In 2018, in a case of clemency not involving a death row inmate, then President Halimah Yacob granted clemency to a man who was a teenager when he murdered the wife of Anthony Ler, who had himself plotted the crime. Ler was sentenced to death. His accomplice was spared the gallows because of his age and was eventually released after being detained under what is known as the President's pleasure for 17 years. THE CASE According to court documents, Tan - the drug trafficker granted clemency - was arrested on Sep 27, 2018, by a team of Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) officers during an operation involving another man, known as Hakam, who was suspected of being involved in drug activities. At 6.15pm, Tan drove to 3 Fourth Lok Yang Road, with another man named Hanis in his front passenger seat. Around 7.40pm, Hakam was observed arriving in another car. Both Hakam and Hanis exited their vehicles and met each other, before boarding Tan's car together. Tan then drove to a coffee shop at 21 Kian Teck Road, where Hanis entered briefly they returned Fourth Lok Yang Road. At about 8.20pm, two unknown riders on motorcycles bearing Malaysian licence plates arrived at Fourth Lok Yang Road. One of the riders met Hakam behind Tan's car before both motorcycles left. Shortly after, Tan drove from Fourth Lok Yang Road to an HDB block in Tampines, with Hanis still in the front passenger seat. A team of CNB officers then moved in to arrest Tan and Hanis. A plastic bag containing at least 499g of a crystalline substance was found in the car. The substance was later revealed to contain not less than 337.6g of methamphetamine. Prosecutors argued that Tan knew he possessed methamphetamine and intended to traffic it, pointing to evidence on two mobile phones, 'TT-HP1' and 'TT-HP2', which allegedly belonged to Tan. Messages on the two phones showed negotiations between a user and a man known as Hari, who had previously supplied Tan with small amounts of methamphetamine for his own consumption. The messages, prosecutors argued, also showed that a person named 'Travis' - who Tan said had passed him TT-HP1 on the day of the arrest - was not a real person and was instead an alias used by Tan for the purpose of drug transactions. This was evidenced by messages on TT-HP2, which Tan testified was his personal mobile phone, telling his friends to contact TT-HP1 for the purpose of drug transactions, and to address him as 'Travis' when doing so. The prosecution also relied on the testimony of Hanis, who testified that he was only there to facilitate, on behalf of Hari, Tan's collection of the drugs on the evening they were arrested. The defence argued that Tan was merely acting as a driver and had no knowledge of the nature of the drugs or intent to traffic. Tan testified that he was a regular drug user and Hari was his supplier. Hari would sometimes give him drugs for free, in exchange for doing him favours. These favours usually involved ferrying Hari's friends around in his car or helping them withdraw money. Thus, the defence argued, Tan was merely a driver for Hanis, who had been tasked to collect the drugs for the group. The defence also contended that "Travis' was real person, not an alias. THE CONVICTION AND SENTENCE High Court Judge Aedit Abdullah found that there was a 'clear conclusion' that Tan's negotiations with Hari on TT-HP1 had been for the sale and handover of the drugs on Sep 27, 2018. 'The accused's actions on the day of arrest - following Hari's instructions to various locations and waiting for long periods of time at these locations - were only plausible if he had been planning to take possession of the drugs that day,' Justice Abdullah said. Messages on Hanis' mobile phone, as well as his own testimony, also indicated that Tan had taken possession of the drugs from Hakam at the Lok Yang area. Justice Abdullah added that he could not accept that the messages on TT-HP1 had been sent by Travis rather than the accused, as the evidence showed that the accused had been the sole user of TT-HP1, and Travis appeared to have been an alias for conducting drug transactions. Under Singapore law, anyone proven to have more than 25g of methamphetamine is presumed to possess it for trafficking unless proven otherwise. Justice Abdullah noted that while the prosecution did not show that Tan intended to traffic the drugs, the defence also failed to rebut the presumption of possession for the purpose of trafficking. 'The defence essentially relied on the argument that the accused had not intended to possess the drugs in the first place and had not known that the bundle contained methamphetamine, even if Hakam had indeed passed the bundle to him,' he said. But as evidence showed that Tan had negotiated for the purchase of the drugs from Hari and had intended to and had in fact taken possession of the drugs at the Lok Yang area, it meant that defence's argument could not stand. 'The result was that the presumption applied, and thus the element of possession for the purpose of trafficking was made out,' Justice Abdullah said. He found Tan's role went beyond that of a courier, noting he had negotiated the purchase and handover of the drugs. As Tan was not eligible for the alternative sentencing regime, which allows certain death-eligible drug offenders to be sentenced to life imprisonment and caning instead of the mandatory death penalty, and the amount of methamphetamine exceeded 250g, Justice Abdullah sentenced Tan to death.

Man argues with ATM user for taking too long, Singaporeans side with him
Man argues with ATM user for taking too long, Singaporeans side with him

Independent Singapore

time4 hours ago

  • Independent Singapore

Man argues with ATM user for taking too long, Singaporeans side with him

FB screengrab/ Singapore Incidents Singapore News In the Hood SINGAPORE: After a man got upset with another man who was using an ATM for what appears to be an unusually long amount of time, an argument ensued between them. When the irate man said he would call the police, the man using the ATM dared him to go ahead and do so. The exchange was caught on camera and was shown on the Singapore Incidents Facebook page on Sunday (Aug 13). It was captioned, 'This kind of ATM user should be banned for life.' At the beginning of the clip, a man in a red shirt and dark pants can be seen in front of an ATM with a sheaf of envelopes on the machine, which made it look like he was doing multiple transactions, perhaps for several people. Off camera, a voice can be heard saying, 'Hello? Boss? You are one person, other people are waiting there. How long can you use the ATM?' Perhaps seeing that he was being filmed, the man in the red shirt began to raise his voice, asking why he couldn't use the ATM. The first man then asks how many cards he was using, which the man in red did not exactly answer. He then said he would call the police. Continuing to use the ATM, the man in red told him to go ahead and call. The man who was off-cam then asked why he was using other people's cards in succession, but the man in red again seemed to merely push him away. The first man then explained that each person should only use the ATM for one card, and seemed to suggest they should line up again for another transaction. However, the man in red ignored him. 'How many cards are you using? 10 cards, 20 cards?' he asked, raising his voice. The man simply waved him away again, telling him he could call the police. They hurled vulgarities at each other, and by the end of the video, the man in red was undeterred, taking out another card to make another transaction. Commenters on the Singapore Incidents post took the side of the man who was off-camera. 'He should apply for an ATM machine, in his house,' wrote one. Many netizens called him out for being so inconsiderate, with one saying that if he had so many transactions to accomplish, he should use an ATM in the middle of the night. 'If I were there, I would go to the back to unplug the electricity,' wrote another. 'He might be transferring money to his workers or colleagues… as we can see that there's a passport with an ATM card from each envelope. He should go over to his bank branch, and the staff will service the transfer for him and not use an ATM.' /TISG Read also: 'My brother treats our parents like an ATM' — Singaporean worries as parents lose their retirement funds () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store