How did this shark swim a record-breaking 4,000 miles—a journey once thought impossible
The eight-foot-long female had made an epic journey of at least 4,500 miles, the longest known movement of its species and the first time a bull shark was documented swimming through two oceans. The shark traveled from the Mozambique Channel in the Indian Ocean, swam around the southern tip of Africa, and then voyaged north through the Atlantic to Nigeria, according to research published this month in Ecology.
'Wow, I was surprised,' says Hakeem. 'I didn't know they could travel that far.'
When his crew began butchering the shark to sell its meat at a local market, Hakeem found a black finger-length cylinder inside its body that read: 'Research: Reward if returned.' Curious, Hakeem emailed the address. He reached Ryan Daly, the paper's lead author and a shark ecologist at the Oceanographic Research Institute, a marine science and service facility that leads research projects in the western Indian Ocean. He implanted the acoustic transmitter in the bull shark in South Africa in 2021.
Daly was equally shocked—and very skeptical at first. 'I thought it might be a scam,' Daly admits. 'The chances of this happening are like one in a million.'
This lucky catch is providing new insights into how bull sharks move and shows how climate change may break down the environmental barriers that historically limited the migration of certain ocean animals.
Another study author and marine biologist at the Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research, Dunsin Abimbola Bolaji, confirmed Hakeem's story.
In the year after she was tagged, the female bull shark was detected 567 times along the east coasts of South Africa and Mozambique by an array of 43 different underwater receivers.
Then she disappeared on March 25, 2022 and wasn't seen again until Hakeem's crew caught the shark on July 11 last year.
As part of their shark migration research, Daly and his colleagues also tagged and tracked 102 bull, blacktip, tiger and reef sharks in southern Africa. The longest recorded migration among these sharks was 1,400 miles, just one-third the distance traveled by the female bull shark that ended up near Lagos.
Bull sharks are coastal species, not known for long-distance travel in the open ocean. They prefer shallow waters where freshwater meets the sea and need water temperature warmer than 65°F.
During her voyage north, the female bull shark had to navigate the Benguela upwelling, one of the world's largest cold-water currents that extends along the west coasts of South Africa and Namibia. This upwelling has formed a cold barrier separating Africa's bull shark populations for at least the past 55,000 years.
Scientists think this bull shark bypassed the cold water by swimming out around the upwelling, which can extend up to 90 miles offshore. It's also possible she rode pockets of warmer water around South Africa into the Atlantic Ocean during a Benguela Niño event.
This climate pattern is similar to the El Niño events that influence sea temperatures off the west coast of the Americas. Certain cold-water fish, like mackerel and sardines, have also been pushed north during Benguela Niño events.
As waters warm and upwellings shift due to climate change, Daly says the Benguela's cold water barrier may break down more often, allowing ocean animals to move to different latitudes. These Niño-related water temperature changes can change the entire species makeup of certain marine areas, impacting everything in the food web from algae to plankton to sharks.
For bull sharks, however, more movement is likely a positive sign. 'If it means more gene flow, then typically that's a good thing,' Daly points out. 'We need to adapt to survive in a changing world.'
Daly thinks that perhaps she was an immature shark who was 'just exploring'. Females don't reach sexual maturity until they are around 20 years old. Then they repeatedly return to the same estuary to reproduce. Until then, however, they may head out to 'find their groove and the pattern that works for them,' Daly says.
It's possible that this female's extraordinary journey 'might not be unusual at all', says Rachel Graham, a shark biologist who was not involved in this study and executive director of MarAlliance, a conservation nonprofit based off the west coast of Africa.
Bull sharks may have always traveled farther than scientists realized, or perhaps this female was the 'the black sheep in the family, the one who does something completely and utterly different to keep our gene pool robust,' Graham suggests.
Despite her long journey, this female won't pass on her genetics after befalling a common shark fate. Globally, sharks' numbers have been halved since 1970. Overfishing drives 90 percent of the decline in sharks—but three-quarters of the estimated 100 million sharks that are caught each year are killed accidentally.
As stocks of other fish plummet globally, more people are turning to shark meat for protein—especially in countries in sub-Saharan Africa like Nigeria where people depend on fishing for their livelihoods.
'It had a one-way ticket there because fishery pressure is so extreme,' Daly says. 'Sharks are running the gauntlet. In every country, they're facing different types of threats on top of climate change.'
Hakeem says his crew didn't hook the tagged female bull shark on purpose. She took the bait meant for more lucrative grouper and snapper.
To ensure sharks—including future record breakers—survive, Graham says that scientists need to rely more on fishers like Hakeem to track sharks and to learn whether other marine species are making transoceanic journeys.
'Small-scale fishers are our allies in science,' Graham says. 'They have PhDs of the sea.'
These sorts of novel partnerships may help scientists better understand how and where marine species are moving into new habitats.
Warming water may allow tropical species to expand their range polewards, which can relieve fishing pressure or allow them to spread to new homes. But simultaneously, climate change is also creating more intense cold events in their historic ranges, such as an extreme upwelling along the southeast coast of South Africa that killed individuals from 81 species in 2021, including sharks.
'It's kind of like this bait and switch,' Daly says. 'It gets warmer but then these intense upwelling events increase, so they might get trapped down there, at the end of their range for a tropical species and then die off.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
05-08-2025
- Yahoo
A wasting disease killed millions of sea stars. After years of searching, scientists just found a cause.
'It was like a battleground,' Drew Harvell remembers. 'It was really horrible.' She's reflecting on a time in December 2013, on the coast of Washington state, when she went out at low tide and saw hundreds of sick, dying sea stars. 'There were arms that had just fallen off the stars,' she says. 'It was really like a bomb had gone off.' The stars were suffering from something known as sea star wasting disease. It's a sickness that sounds like something out of a horror movie: Stars can develop lesions in their bodies. Eventually, their arms can detach and crawl away from them before the stars disintegrate completely. Harvell is a longtime marine ecologist whose specialty is marine diseases. And she was out for this low tide in 2013 because a massive outbreak of this seastar wasting had started spreading up and down the West Coast — from Mexico to Alaska — ultimately affecting around 20 distinct species of sea stars and wiping out entire populations in droves. In the decade since, some species have been able to bounce back, but others, like the sunflower sea star, continue to struggle. In California, for example, sunflower stars have almost completely died out. The question in 2013 was: What, exactly, was killing all these stars? While marine ecologists like Harvell could recognize the symptoms of seastar wasting, they weren't actually sure what was causing the disease. From the very beginning, though, it was something they wanted to figure out. And so, soon after the outbreak started, they collected sea stars to see if they could find a pathogen or other cause responsible for the wasting. The hunt for the culprit of this terrible, mysterious disease was on. Unfortunately, it was not straightforward. ' When this disease outbreak happened, we knew quite little about what was normal [in sea stars],' says Alyssa Gehman, who is also a marine disease ecologist. She says that when researchers are trying to do similar work to chase down a pathogen in, say, humans, they have an enormous trove of information to draw on about what bacteria and viruses are common to the human body, and what might be unusual. Not so for sea stars. ' We maybe had a little bit of information, but absolutely not enough to be able to really tease that out easily.' Also, Gehman says, there can be a lag before the disease expresses itself, so some stars have the pathogen that caused the disease, but don't present with symptoms yet, making it harder for scientists to even distinguish between sick stars and healthy ones as they run their tests. So even though a research team identified a virus that they thought might be associated with the wasting disease as early as 2014, over time, it became clear that it was most likely not the culprit, but rather just a virus present in many sea stars. 'The results were always confusing,' Harvell remembers. In the decade since the initial mass outbreak, other researchers have proposed other theories, but none have brought them to a definitive answer either. And yet, it became increasingly clear that an answer was needed, because people started to realize just how important the sunflower stars they had lost really were. ' We actually learned a lot from losing so many of these animals at once,' Gehman says. Before the outbreak, she says, they'd known that sunflower stars — giant sea stars that can be the size of dinner plates, or even bike tires — were skillful hunters and voracious eaters. They even knew that many things on the seafloor would run away from them. Gehman remembers taking a class on invertebrates back in college, where she learned that if you put even just the arm of a sunflower star in a tank with scallops, 'the tank would explode with scallops swimming everywhere trying to get away.' But all that fearsome hunting was, it seems, pretty key to ecosystem health. In many places, she says, ' after the sea sunflower stars were lost, the urchin populations exploded.' And so the die-off of the sunflower star and the explosion of urchins has been connected to the collapse of the Northern California kelp forests, a marine ecosystem that provides a home for a rich diversity of species. A cross-state, cross-organizational partnership between the Nature Conservancy and a variety of research institutions is working hard to breed sunflower seastars in captivity in the hopes that they can be reintroduced to the coast and reassume their role in their ecosystems. But as Harvell remembers, she and Gehman knew that no recovery project would be successful if they couldn't find the cause of sea star wasting disease. 'You're not gonna be able to get these stars back in nature if you don't know what's killing them,' she says. So in 2021, as part of the larger partnership, Harvell and Gehman, along with a number of their colleagues, launched into an epidemiological detective project. Their quest: to finally pin down the cause of seastar wasting disease. 'Really the work over the four years was done in the trenches by Dr. Melanie Prentice and Dr. Alyssa Gehman,' Harvell says, 'and then one of my students, Grace Crandall.' It was an emotionally difficult project because it required Gehman and her colleagues to deliberately infect many stars with the disease. 'It feels bad,' she admits, and they would be open about that in the lab, 'but we also can remember that we're doing this for the good of the whole species.' That work has paid off, though, and now, after four years of research, they've nailed their culprit in a paper out in Nature Ecology & Evolution today. What follows is a conversation with Drew Harvell, edited for clarity and length, about what she and her collaborators found, how marine ecologists do this kind of detective work, and what identifying the culprit could mean for the future health of seastars. How did you start the journey to figure out what actually had happened? Well, we chose to work with the sunflower star because we knew it was the most susceptible and therefore was going to give us the most clear-cut results. So we set up at Marrowstone Point, which was the USGS Fisheries virus lab [in Washington state], because that would give us the proper quarantine conditions and lots of running seawater. The proper quarantine conditions — what does that mean? All of the outflow water has to be cleansed of any potential virus or bacterium, and so all of the water has to be run through virus filters and also actually bleached in the end, so that we're sure that nothing could get out. We did not want to do this work at our lab, Friday Harbor Labs, or at any of the Hakai labs in Canada because we were really worried that if we were holding animals with an infectious agent in our tanks without really stringent quarantine protocols, that we could be contributing to the outbreak. So you have these sea stars. They're in this quarantined environment. What is the methodology here? What are you doing to them or with them? So the question is: Is there something in a diseased star that's making a healthy star sick? And that's like the most important thing to demonstrate right from the beginning — that it is somehow transmissible. And so Melanie and Alyssa early on showed that even water that washed over a sick star would make healthy stars sick, and if you co-house them in the same aquarium, the healthy ones would always get sick when they were anywhere near or exposed to the water from a diseased star. There's something in the water. That's right. There's something in the water. But they wanted to refine it a little bit more and know that it was something directly from the diseased star. And so they created a slurry from the tissues of the disease star and injected that into the healthy star to be able to show that there really was something infectious from the disease star that was making the healthy star sick and then die. And then you control those kinds of what we call 'challenge experiments' by inactivating in some way that slurry of infected disease stuff. And in this case, what they were able to do was to 'heat-kill' [any pathogens in this slurry] by heating it up. And so the thing that was very successful right from the beginning was that the stars that were infected with a presumptive disease got sick and died, and the controls essentially stayed healthy. You do that control to make sure that it's not like…injecting a slurry into a star is what makes them sick? That's right. And you're also having animals come in sick, right? So you want to know that they weren't just gonna get sick anyway. You want to be sure that it was what you did that actually affected their health status. So you have a slurry — like a milkshake of sea star — and you know that within it is a problematic agent of some kind. How do you figure out what is in that milkshake that is the problem? The real breakthrough came when Alyssa had the idea that maybe we should try a cleaner infection source and decided to test the coelomic fluid, which is basically the blood of the star. With a syringe, you can extract the coelomic fluid of the sick star and you can also heat-kill it, and you can do the same experiment challenging with that. And it was a really exciting moment because she and Melanie confirmed that that was a really effective way of transmitting the disease because it's cleaner. It's cleaner, like there's less stuff than in the tissue? Like blood is just like a simpler material? Right. So, that was really the beginning of being able to figure out what it was that was in the coelomic fluid that was causing the disease. So basically it's like: … So it seems like it might be ingredient B that's causing the problem here because it's consistent across all samples? Yeah, that's exactly it. And so then that was very, very incredibly exciting. Wow. There's this one bacterium — Vibrio pectenicida — that's showing up in all of the diseased material samples. Could it be that? We weren't sure. We sort of thought, after 12 years, this is gonna be something so strange! So weird! You know, something alien that we've never seen before. And so to have a Vibrio — something that we think of as a little bit more common — turn up was really surprising. Then one of our colleagues at the University of British Columbia, Amy Chan, was able to culture that particular bacterium from the disease star. And so now she had a pure culture of the presumptive killer. And then last summer, Melanie and Alyssa were able to test that again under quarantine conditions and find that it immediately killed the stars that were tested. How did you all feel? Oh, we were definitely dancing around the room. It was — just such a happy moment of fulfillment. I really do like to say that at the beginning of the task that Nature Conservancy handed us — to figure out the causative agent — we told them again and again that this is a very risky project. We can't guarantee we're going to be successful. So yeah, we were incredibly elated when we really felt confident in the answer. It was just hundreds and hundreds of hours of tests and challenge experiments that came out so beautifully. What does it mean to finally have an answer here? What are the next steps? This was the part of it that really kept me awake at night because I just felt so worried early on at the idea that we were working on a roadmap to recovery of a species without knowing what was killing it, and I just felt like we couldn't do it if we were flying blind like that. We wouldn't know what season the pathogenic agent came around. We wouldn't know what its environmental reservoirs were. We didn't know what was making stars susceptible. It was going to be really hard, and it wasn't going to feel right to just put animals out in the wild without knowing more. And so knowing that this is one of the primary causative agents — maybe the only causative agent — allows us to test for it in the water. It allows us to find out if there are some bays where this is being concentrated, to find out if there are some foods the stars are eating that are concentrating this bacterium and delivering a lethal dose to a star. Now we'll be able to answer those questions, and I think that's going to give us a really good opportunity to design better strategies for saving them. It feels like you now have a key to use to sort of unlock various pieces of this. We totally do. And it's so exciting and so gratifying because that's what we're supposed to do, right? As scientists and as disease ecologists, we're supposed to solve these mysteries. And it feels really great to have solved this one. And I don't think there's a day in the last 12 years that I haven't thought about it and been really frustrated we didn't know what it was. So it's particularly gratifying to me to have to have reached this point. Drew Harvell is the author of many popular science books about marine biology and ecology, including her latest, The Ocean's Menagerie. She also wrote a book about marine disease called Ocean Outbreak. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
04-08-2025
- Yahoo
After a decade of death, Canadian scientists say they've found the sea star killer
Scientists say they have found the cause behind the disease that turns vibrant, 24-armed sea stars into puddles of goo. Melanie Prentice, a research scientist at the Hakai Institute, is part of a team that has spent years investigating the cause of this disease. Their research was published on Monday in the journal Nature Ecology and Evolution. "The agent is a bacteria. It's called Vibrio pectinicida," Prentice told CBC News. After a decade of these creatures being pushed to the brink of extinction, experts say this is the first step in a road to recovery, not just for this species, but for a critical support in humanity's defence against climate change. Twisted arms that walk away The most affected species are sunflower sea stars, which once boasted a range along the west coast of North America, from Baja California to Alaska. Then, in 2013, a mass die-off occurred from sea star wasting disease. And it's a gruesome end. "Their arms kind of twist back on themselves, so they get kind of into puzzle pieces," said Alyssa Gehman, a marine disease ecologist who is also part of the Hakai Institute research team. They then tend to lose their arms, and then, "their arms will sort of walk away from their bodies." Soon after, Gehman says that lesions form and the sea stars dissolve and die. The paper estimates that more than 87 per cent of sunflower sea stars in northern parts of the west coast have been killed. In the southern habitat ranges, the species is considered functionally extinct. "When it first happened, it was just fields and fields of puddles of dying sea star goo," said Sara Hamilton, science co-ordinator for the Oregon Kelp Alliance. Hamilton was not involved in the research. "It was like something out of a horror movie." The hunt for the star killer Multiple theories identifying the cause either didn't pan out or were disproven. What the team did in this case was take healthy sea stars into the lab and expose them to infection. They did this over several years to try and isolate the cause. Gehman explained the process: "We take body fluid or tissue from a sick star and then we put that experimentally into other sea stars that we know are healthy." The paper's result was that 92 per cent of these exposures worked in transmitting the disease to the healthy star — killing it within 20 days. These experiments also revealed that Vibrio pectinicida was the most likely culprit. Experts are impressed with the paper's diligence and effort. "They didn't just stop when they found one level of evidence — they went and found a second level of evidence and a third level of evidence," said Hamilton, from Oregon Kelp Alliance. Amanda Bates, ocean conservation professor at the University of Victoria, also said "there's a pathway — essentially that you isolate disease agents and link them to being a cause of an outbreak — and this research team followed those processes perfectly." Hope for recovery Knowing the cause provides hope for restoration efforts, experts say. "Now we can go out and actually do tests and see the actual prevalence of this pathogen in the field," said Gehman. Furthermore, any captive breeding programs that are trying to restore sea star populations can now screen and test those populations before putting them back into a risky environment. Hamilton agrees. "That's one of the things we're most worried about with some of these recovery efforts," she said. "If we do captive breeding and outplant, we certainly don't want to introduce … a new outbreak of the disease." The lost decade Bates, who has seen this disease as far back as 2009, is cautious about the rush to recovery. "While we know disease impacts us as humans, I think we often forget that it impacts wildlife," she told CBC News. "We're a decade on since that really big mass mortality event, and we still don't have pycnopodia [sunflower sea stars] recovering in many places." Hamilton said the reintroduction of sunflower sea stars will be valuable because of what their absence has meant for ecosystems. Sea urchin populations have gone up — which also means kelp forests have been decimated. "Urchins are kind of like the goats of the ocean," she said. "They'll eat anything, they just mow things down." Restoring the sea star means kelp forests might once again thrive. This will likely mean improvements to biodiversity, food, tourism as well as serve as coastline defences against erosion and storms supercharged by climate change. "It's definitely our ally in the climate crisis," Prentice said. "I think when we're talking about sea star wasting disease, we're not just talking about the sea star species — which we love in their own right — but entire marine ecosystems that have collapsed because of this epidemic."
Yahoo
04-08-2025
- Yahoo
After a decade of death, Canadian scientists say they've found the sea star killer
Scientists say they have found the cause behind the disease that turns vibrant, 24-armed sea stars into puddles of goo. Melanie Prentice, a research scientist at the Hakai Institute, is part of a team that has spent years investigating the cause of this disease. Their research was published on Monday in the journal Nature Ecology and Evolution. "The agent is a bacteria. It's called Vibrio pectinicida," Prentice told CBC News. After a decade of these creatures being pushed to the brink of extinction, experts say this is the first step in a road to recovery, not just for this species, but for a critical support in humanity's defence against climate change. Twisted arms that walk away The most affected species are sunflower sea stars, which once boasted a range along the west coast of North America, from Baja California to Alaska. Then, in 2013, a mass die-off occurred from sea star wasting disease. And it's a gruesome end. "Their arms kind of twist back on themselves, so they get kind of into puzzle pieces," said Alyssa Gehman, a marine disease ecologist who is also part of the Hakai Institute research team. They then tend to lose their arms, and then, "their arms will sort of walk away from their bodies." Soon after, Gehman says that lesions form and the sea stars dissolve and die. The paper estimates that more than 87 per cent of sunflower sea stars in northern parts of the west coast have been killed. In the southern habitat ranges, the species is considered functionally extinct. "When it first happened, it was just fields and fields of puddles of dying sea star goo," said Sara Hamilton, science co-ordinator for the Oregon Kelp Alliance. Hamilton was not involved in the research. "It was like something out of a horror movie." The hunt for the star killer Multiple theories identifying the cause either didn't pan out or were disproven. What the team did in this case was take healthy sea stars into the lab and expose them to infection. They did this over several years to try and isolate the cause. Gehman explained the process: "We take body fluid or tissue from a sick star and then we put that experimentally into other sea stars that we know are healthy." The paper's result was that 92 per cent of these exposures worked in transmitting the disease to the healthy star — killing it within 20 days. These experiments also revealed that Vibrio pectinicida was the most likely culprit. Experts are impressed with the paper's diligence and effort. "They didn't just stop when they found one level of evidence — they went and found a second level of evidence and a third level of evidence," said Hamilton, from Oregon Kelp Alliance. Amanda Bates, ocean conservation professor at the University of Victoria, also said "there's a pathway — essentially that you isolate disease agents and link them to being a cause of an outbreak — and this research team followed those processes perfectly." Hope for recovery Knowing the cause provides hope for restoration efforts, experts say. "Now we can go out and actually do tests and see the actual prevalence of this pathogen in the field," said Gehman. Furthermore, any captive breeding programs that are trying to restore sea star populations can now screen and test those populations before putting them back into a risky environment. Hamilton agrees. "That's one of the things we're most worried about with some of these recovery efforts," she said. "If we do captive breeding and outplant, we certainly don't want to introduce … a new outbreak of the disease." The lost decade Bates, who has seen this disease as far back as 2009, is cautious about the rush to recovery. "While we know disease impacts us as humans, I think we often forget that it impacts wildlife," she told CBC News. "We're a decade on since that really big mass mortality event, and we still don't have pycnopodia [sunflower sea stars] recovering in many places." Hamilton said the reintroduction of sunflower sea stars will be valuable because of what their absence has meant for ecosystems. Sea urchin populations have gone up — which also means kelp forests have been decimated. "Urchins are kind of like the goats of the ocean," she said. "They'll eat anything, they just mow things down." Restoring the sea star means kelp forests might once again thrive. This will likely mean improvements to biodiversity, food, tourism as well as serve as coastline defences against erosion and storms supercharged by climate change. "It's definitely our ally in the climate crisis," Prentice said. "I think when we're talking about sea star wasting disease, we're not just talking about the sea star species — which we love in their own right — but entire marine ecosystems that have collapsed because of this epidemic."
