‘Nepra is delaying MLR on cold storage tariff decision'
ISLAMABAD: The National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) is reportedly sitting on a Motion for Leave for Review (MLR) on its decision regarding tariff for Cold Storages filed by a citizen of Karachi as the decision of Nepra Appellate Tribunal has also put the Regulator in a difficult position in which the latter has been directed to rehear the case.
Arif Bilwani had filed his MLR on December 30, 2024 under Rule 3(2) of the Nepra (Review Procedure) Regulations, 2009 against the decision in the matter of application of tariff category for Cold Storages.
In a recent letter to Registrar Nepra, Bilwani referred to the issue wherein the Authority accepted his MLR after a lapse of eight weeks through a letter of February 13, 2025. However, since then, there has been no update or progress communicated by the Authority.
Classification of cold storage facilities: Nepra faces legal challenges following decision of appellate forum
'It is difficult to comprehend the continued delay in scheduling the hearing, despite more than four months having passed since the acceptance of the MLR. Subsequent to the said decision of the Authority, the Ministry of Industries & Production, the Federal Cabinet, and the ECC have all formally recognised Cold Storages as an industrial activity. The relevant approvals, meeting minutes, and official clarifications were duly submitted to Nepra on March 05, 2025,' said Bilwani in his letter.
He requested the Authority to conduct the hearing on the MLR without any further delay as Cold Storages are incurring significant financial losses due to the imposition of an incorrect Commercial Tariff—stemming from the flawed decision currently under review.
In MLR of December 30, 2024, he referred to the Authority's decision which was made through a casting vote by the Chair, despite dissenting notes from two learned members, including the Member Legal. He added that this approach raises significant concerns about the fairness and rationale of the decision.
In objections to the decision he referred to Section 5(3) of the Nepra's Act regarding compliance with Section 5(3) of the Act which states: 'The member shall have reasonable notice of the time and place of the meeting and the matters on which a decision by the Authority shall be taken in such meeting.'
Arif Bilwani argued that it is unclear whether reasonable notice was served to the Member Tariff, whose input was critical given the nature of this issue. The Member Tariff actively participated in all prior deliberations on this matter over the last two years. His absence from the final meeting raises questions about procedural compliance and the validity of the decision-making process.
He further stated that he had regularly attended Nepra's public hearings, including those held in 2023 for various Discos (PESCO, TESCO, GEPCO, and MEPCO). During these hearings, he had presented detailed arguments distinguishing modern cold storage facilities from traditional ones.
Bilwani argued that modern cold storages, which use controlled temperature and humidity systems, provide critical value-added services to industrial and commercial sectors. These services play a pivotal role in food security, health security, and export facilitation. His recorded views on this subject are available with the Authority in audio/video format.
Bilwani further maintained that the dissenting opinions of the Member Legal and Member Technical align with his arguments. These members articulated well-founded positions based on technical, legal, and global practices. Overruling such expert insights in favour of concerns about circular debt or subsidy implications undermines the integrity of the decision-making process.
He also challenged the understanding of the Authority about the modern Cold Storage industry and its operations, saying that the Authority's reasoning in paragraphs 10–12 of its decision reflects a narrow understanding of value addition. Categorising modern cold storages as merely providing a 'service to grocery chains, food distributors, restaurants, and other retail businesses' disregards their complex and highly technical operations, he said.
Modern cold storage facilities involve significant investments and employ advanced electromechanical processes to: (i) preserve the physical, chemical, and nutritional properties of products; (ii) extend the shelf life of perishable goods through precise temperature and humidity controls; and (iii) support critical industries like pharmaceuticals, where the controlled storage of active ingredients is essential for life-saving drug production.
He said that such facilities are distinctly industrial in nature and contribute significantly to the economy.
According to Bilwani, categorising modern cold storages as commercial consumers will increase electricity costs, disproportionately affecting industries relying on these services. Exporters, in particular, will face higher costs, reducing their competitiveness in both local and international markets. Another major sector which avails this facility is the Pharma sector which manufactures hordes of Pharma products including many life saving and other critical medicines whose active ingredients need specialized storage facilities which the controlled temperature Cold Storage facility provides. As the Pharma sector cannot take risk of any hurdle, shortage or scarcity of these critical active ingredients they always keep them readily available in bulk by availing the aforesaid facility.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
12 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Fixing budget to unleash growth
Every year, Pakistan's federal budget arrives with familiar choreography: a frantic scramble for revenue, a ritualistic promise of belt-tightening, a prayer for donor approval—and, inevitably, a deepening economic funk. The budget, instead of being a strategic tool to unleash growth and build reserves, has become a reactive exercise designed to appease creditors and perpetuate the status quo. This is not just a budgeting problem—it is a full-blown political economy failure. To break this cycle, we must fundamentally reimagine the budget—not as a ledger-balancing ritual, but as the central engine of economic revival through a sustained growth acceleration. Bloated government Pakistan's budget has historically expanded alongside a steady growth in government spending—starting with the welfare and development spree of the Bhutto years. Since then, successive governments have continued to bloat expenditures, expand political patronage networks, and indulge in borrowed vanity projects. Unsurprisingly, the lion's share of the budget is now devoured by a bloated and inefficient government machinery—ministries, SOEs, elite subsidies, and ever-growing civilian and military pensions. Development spending (PSDP) does not fare much better. It is either slashed mid-year or burned on politically motivated brick-and-mortar projects that neither raise productivity nor enhance exports. Numerous studies show that public investment in Pakistan is failing to crowd in private capital, generate jobs, or enhance competitiveness. No surprise, then, that economic growth has been on a steady downward slope this century. Don't tax the economy to death Maintaining the donor mantra that the 'tax-to-GDP ratio is low,' the IMF responds to our fiscal deficits by prescribing more and more taxes. When unrealistic revenue targets fall short, they roll out the usual remedy: 'further taxes,' 'additional taxes,' 'super taxes'—all piled on top of already over-taxed sectors in the infamous minibudget blitzes. The result? A regressive, volatile, and thoroughly anti-growth tax regime. Pakistan's real problem is not just low revenue—it is the structure of revenue—complicated, intrusive, and volatile. The consequence is a skewed, unjust, and investment-suppressing system. As deficits ballooned alongside unchecked political largesse, public debt skyrocketed past the 60 percent of GDP ceiling set by the 2003 Fiscal Responsibility Act—an IMF-sponsored law. Today, over 50 percent of the federal budget is consumed by interest payments. Yet both federal and provincial governments continue spending with abandon. Just in FY2025, they added over 60 new government agencies. Apparently, austerity is for textbooks — not our political class. A good budget To shift the budget toward growth, we must reframe our fiscal strategy around three core objectives: investment facilitation, economic restructuring, and foreign exchange generation. Our fiscal culture is rooted in control. Every economic activity is smothered in paperwork, redundant approvals, and bureaucratic misalignment. The budget must empower cities, universities, and private innovators—not just federal ministries. Local governments have been 'in the pipeline' for decades. While this issue lies beyond the immediate scope of the budget, it is crucial that administrative decentralization and institutional autonomy be pursued with proper performance checks and accountability frameworks. Perhaps the most urgent—and overdue—reform is the restructuring of the Planning Commission and the PSDP. The Haq/HAG model of brick-and-mortar development must evolve into a productivity-enhancing strategy. Let us transform the PSDP into a competitive grants framework—empowering cities and knowledge institutions to innovate, tied to clear outcomes in research, urban regeneration, and enterprise development. Likewise, the Planning Commission should be converted into a genuine reform engine—steering away from bloated plans and abstract visions that no one reads, let alone implements. And yes, this also means an end to discretionary funds and politically captive schemes. Enough random taxation The obsession with squeezing more out of the same tax base is strangling the economy. We need to broaden the base by simplifying, lowering, and stabilizing the tax structure—rather than repeatedly taxing the same goods and sectors into oblivion. As we outlined in the Haque Tax Commission Report of 2024: a) Simplify the tax code and reduce compliance burdens b) Replace withholding and turnover taxes with a value-added tax (VAT) system, with automatic and credible refunds c) Streamline documentation requirements for entering the tax system d) Broaden the base through digitization and administrative ease e) Most importantly, stop the frantic revenue drives that inject volatility, erode confidence, and drive away both domestic and foreign investment A good time to open the economy The relentless thirst for revenue has turned tariffs into a catch-all crutch—even exports now suffer because import duties are raising the cost of globally integrated inputs. Worse still, policy remains trapped in an outdated import-substitution mindset that rewards rent-seeking rather than export excellence. It is time for a bold pivot: abandon import substitution and stop using tariffs as a revenue crutch. Elementary economics teaches that tariffs are used to prevent a needed exchange rate adjustment. Tariffs can never be a competitive strategy. If we are serious about export-led growth—not just sloganeering—we must let the rupee find its true value, open the economy, and dismantle protectionist walls. Make the budget a living, transparent document For two decades, we have had a grand-sounding World Bank project—PIFRA ('Project to Improve Financial Reporting and Auditing')—with nothing to show. We still lack basic budget transparency. Follow the rest of the world and now adopt accrual-based budgeting across Pakistan. Here is a modest proposal for the finance minister: Make PIFRA live for public access this year. Put real-time dashboards online so citizens can trace every rupee spent. Growth is the only way out Our fiscal burden continues to grow as economic growth slows. The only way to break free from perpetual debt, IMF bailouts, and creeping default is through a sustained acceleration of private sector-led growth. This must be the cornerstone of budget policy: raise private investment from today's pitiful 8–9 percent of GDP to over 20 percent in five years. Deregulate. Open up. Simplify taxes and documentation. Build a performance-oriented public sector that enables growth—not one that chases after taxes with a club and spends the money on useless projects, bloated government, and patronage. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
12 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Punjab power relief funded by profits of two power companies
LAHORE: After the reduction in electricity tariffs of two power companies - Quaid-e-Azam Thermal Power Private Limited and the Punjab Thermal Power Private Limited - there will be cut in power tariff for the consumers but its impact would not be too significant, it has been learnt. 'There will be definitely reduction in power tariff of electricity consumers in Punjab and the relief will be financed with profits earned by said two government-owned power companies,' sources in the energy department said, adding: 'In light of the Punjab cabinet decision, the provincial government would approach Nepra for a reduction in power tariffs for these two plants so that these price reductions get permanence and are reflected in the new tariff.' It may be noted that the Punjab government had established a special purpose vehicle company by the name of Quaid-e-Azam Thermal Power (Pvt) Limited (QATPL) in March 2015 under section 32 of the Companies Ordinance 1984 in Independent Power Producer (IPP) mode with the mandate to build, own and operate a 1180 MW RLNG based power plant at Bhikki, Shiekhupura on fast track. Punjab CM announces up to 40pc relief in power tariffs The Punjab Thermal Power (Private) Limited (PTPL) is a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2017. It is wholly owned by the government of Punjab through the energy department. The main objective of the company is to establish and operate a 1263 MW thermal power plant based on RLNG at Haveli Bahadur Shah near Trimmu Barrage, District Jhang in Punjab. It may be recalled that the provincial cabinet in its meeting had given nod to cut the power tariffs of these two plants by 30-40 per cent to reduce electricity bills. This move is similar to the federal government's which recently renegotiated contracts with independent power plants (IPPs) to reduce tariffs, the sources added. 'Both the companies had curtailed its profits as well as reduced non-developmental expenditures to materialize this move.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Nepra allows relief for Karachi, raises tariff for the rest
The National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) on Thursday issued two separate notifications, reducing the power tariff by Rs2.99 per unit for the consumers in Karachi, while increasing the rate by Rs0.93 per unit for the rest of the country. The changes in the tariff had been done on account of fuel adjustment for the month of March in case of Karachi and for the month of April for other parts of the country. In any case, the new changes would be reflected in the current month's electricity bills. According to one notification pertaining to the tariff of the K-Electric, the authority "decided to allow a negative FCA of Rs2.9898/kWh (negative Rs4.045 billion) for March 2025, to be passed on to the consumers in the billing month of June 2025". Nepra said the negative FCA would apply to "all the consumer categories except lifeline consumers, domestic protected consumers, Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (EVCS) and prepaid electricity consumers of all categories who opted for pre-paid tariff". It said that the KE would reflect the fuel charges adjustment in respect of March in the billing month of June. "The adjustment would be shown separately in the consumers' bills on the basis of units billed to the consumers in the respective month to which the adjustment pertains," it added. According to a separate notification, the authority "has reviewed and assessed a National Average Uniform increase of Rs0.9306/kWh in the applicable tariff for Discos [Distribution Companies] on account of variations in the fuel charges for April". The notification added that the FCA should apply to all the consumer categories except lifeline consumers, protected consumers, EVCS and pre-paid electricity consumers of all categories who opted for prepaid tariffs. (WITH INPUT FROM NEWS DESK)
