LeBron James Reveals 'First Thing' Luka Doncic Told Him After Lakers Trade
LeBron James Reveals 'First Thing' Luka Doncic Told Him After Lakers Trade originally appeared on Athlon Sports.
We've gotten accustomed now, four months later, to the fact that the Lakers and Mavericks pulled off perhaps the most stunning trade in the history of the NBA, the deal that sent Luka Doncic to L.A. from Dallas, where he appeared to be set up to be a franchise icon for his entire career.
Advertisement
Since then, we saw the Lakers play great, falter a bit, fall in the postseason and begin looking forward to tweaking the roster around Doncic and star forward LeBron James. We also saw the Mavericks get hammered on the PR front of the Doncic trade, but recoup some of their losses by winning the NBA draft lottery and the rights to sure-fire star Cooper Flagg.
But when Doncic was first dealt, he was personally hurt to be discarded by Dallas. Fortunately, he wound up in L.A., which was important for one big reason--and not because Doncic could play with the Lakers and James, one of his basketball idols.
Los Angeles Lakers guard Luka Doncic (77) and forward LeBron James (23) during the game between the Dallas Mavericks and the Los Angeles Lakers at American Airlines Center. Mandatory Credit: Jerome Miron-Imagn Images
It was because of the beach.
Advertisement
In the new episode of the "Mind the Game" podcast, with James and former NBA star Steve Nash, Doncic made a guest appearance. James revealed the first thing that Doncic told him.
"First thing, I asked him a question, I was like, how are you adjusting?" James told Nash. "He said, 'Eh, I'm adjusting. I like the beach.' First thing he said."
Doncic, laughing, said of L.A., "First of all, this is the first city I play in that has an ocean. I really like the ocean. That was the first thing, after a couple days, that was the first thing on my mind, you know. I like it, I like it very much. The only thing is the traffic."
Indeed, before coming to the NBA, Doncic began his pro career with Real Madrid, which is smack dab in the middle of Spain, more than 220 miles from any beach. It was the same in Dallas, which is about 300 miles to the nearest beach.
Advertisement
Doncic did say that, on the floor, his adjustment to the Lakers was a, "work in progress." But he's gotten an immediate benefit from being in Los Angeles, at least.
This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 2, 2025, where it first appeared.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
30 minutes ago
- Associated Press
INVESTOR ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Investigates Claims on Behalf of Investors of Compass Diversified
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses Exceeding $100,000 In Compass To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options If you suffered losses exceeding $100,000 in Compass stock or options between May 1, 2024 and May 7, 2025 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). [You may also click here for additional information] New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 4, 2025) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Compass Diversified ('Compass' or the 'Company') (NYSE: CODI) and reminds investors of the July 8, 2025 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company. [ This image cannot be displayed. Please visit the source: ] Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) the Company's subsidiary, Lugano Holdings, Inc., maintained unrecorded financing arrangements and irregularities in its sales, cost of sales, inventory, and accounts receivable; (2) the irregularities and undisclosed details in Lugano Holdings, Inc.'s financial statements rendered the financial statements of the Company as a whole unreliable, and would require restatement; (3) the Company failed to maintain adequate internal controls related to its financial statements; and (4) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. On May 7, 2025, after the market closed, the Company disclosed that its financial statements for fiscal year 2024 should no longer be relied upon in response to an ongoing internal investigation into the Company's subsidiary, Lugano Holding, Inc. The Company revealed that the investigation 'has preliminarily identified irregularities in Lugano's non-CODI financing, accounting, and inventory practices' and that "[e]ffective May 7, 2025, Lugano's founder and CEO, Moti Ferder, resigned from all of his positions at Lugano and will not receive any severance compensation.' On this news, Compass Diversified stock price fell 8% during after-hours trading on May 7, 2025, thereby injuring investors. The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not. Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Compass' conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others. To learn more about the Compass Diversified investigation, go to or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook. Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP ( ). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner. To view the source version of this press release, please visit
New York Times
34 minutes ago
- New York Times
Does Tom Thibodeau's Knicks dismissal prove no NBA coach's job is safe?
The Bounce Newsletter | This is The Athletic's daily NBA newsletter. Sign up here to receive The Bounce directly in your inbox. On this date in 1987, Michael Cooper set a finals record with six made 3-pointers. At the time, single games averaged 2.8 made 3-pointers per game, so that's the equivalent of someone hitting roughly 58 3-pointers in a finals game in today's NBA. Feels like Steph Curry could do it. Also, nobody check that math. Will Knicks replace Tom Thibodeau with clone? Leading up to the playoffs, you'd hear a lot of rumors about the future of Tom Thibodeau with the Knicks. It often sounded like anything short of a conference finals appearance (or beyond) for Thibodeau's Knicks was going to result in him being fired. However, it also just sounded like people trying to guess whether or not James Dolan was going to be an itchy owner once again. Advertisement Well, after making the Eastern Conference finals and losing to the Pacers in six games, the Knicks actualized those rumors. They relieved Thibodeau of his duties, which is a nice way of saying they kicked his ass to the curb. After five seasons with the Knicks, Thibodeau is out and the Knicks are now looking for a new head coach. Before we get to the coaching possibilities, I'm not sure Thibodeau's firing was warranted. Above all, the organization can definitely decide there's a better voice out there. But in five seasons, Thibodeau gave the Knicks an identity, clicked with their new star player Jalen Brunson and brought them to the conference finals for the first time in 25 years. He's the fourth-winningest coach in franchise history (226). James Edwards III wrote that Thibs deserved another season and I tend to agree. He didn't seem to lose the locker room. He seemed to learn in real time during the conference finals that he needed to adapt to more depth. His coaching and minutes didn't lead to some big injury. I guess I'm failing to understand what the problem is. It feels like they're firing against the potential problem of a fallout on the sidelines, rather than something actually happening. That brings us to the top candidates, as of right now. The natural one that comes up, first and foremost, is Michael Malone. He just got fired from the Nuggets with three games left in the season. He's a New York guy, he has a championship ring and he also is repped by CAA, which fits in nicely with the assumed preferences of the Knicks over the last couple decades (give or take a couple years). Malone is a really good coach, but let's remember what got him fired in Denver. The criticism from the Nuggets front office the coach was feuding with was he didn't play enough of his bench, he played his starters a lot of minutes, and there were a lot of questions about their team defense. Thibodeau is known as a defensive-minded coach from his days as an assistant for the Celtics and as a head coach for the Bulls, but his teams really haven't defended consistently since. Malone's teams were getting pretty rough defensively, but he also had flawed rosters with questionable personnel and injuries to go with it. Advertisement Does any of this sound familiar? You'd essentially be hiring the same guy with a different voice and hairline. Maybe that works. Sometimes, a change in voice does do the trick. And Malone is a good coach. I'm just not sure he's a better coach than Thibodeau. I have no idea if Malone's 'give the ball to Nikola Jokić' offense works with the Knicks, mostly because they don't have Jokić. Other candidates could include Cleveland assistant Johnny Bryant, who is one of the top candidates for the Phoenix job. There's also Taylor Jenkins, who was just fired with nine games left in the season by the Grizzlies. Mike Brown, who was fired midseason by the Kings? All of these are good coaches or potentially good coaches. I'm just not sure they're better than Thibodeau. Regardless, the Knicks have decided to make a change. In the words of Knicks legend Charles Oakley, 'If it ain't broke, don't break it.' Finals flights had to avoid poor weather ✈️ Flight diverted. The Pacers actually had to land in Tulsa due to a tornado warning. Thankfully, everybody landed safely. 🏀 What a journey. The path of Pascal Siakam's NBA career has prepared him. It's time for another finals appearance. 🏀 Progress? It's been 12 years since Jason Collins came out as an openly gay athlete. Is it any easier? 🚫 Thank Indy. The Pacers never cared to tank. Jason Lloyd explains why the NBA should rejoice. 🎧 Tuning in. Today's 'NBA Daily' discusses why Jalen Williams is the make-or-break player in the NBA Finals. The story of the greatest players in NBA history. In 100 riveting profiles, top basketball writers justify their selections and uncover the history of the NBA in the process. The story of the greatest players in NBA history. Are the Thunder a team people don't like? I've been trying to figure something out about this Thunder team as they seem to be on the cusp of winning their first NBA championship. Do people outside of Oklahoma City hate this team? Maybe hate is too strong of a word, especially considering how loosely it's used in sports on the internet. But something I've noticed during this run by the Thunder, as they've trounced the league in front of them, is how little people outside of the Thunder fan base appear to be embracing them as a team they like and enjoy. It's confusing for a few reasons. After all, this is a … This Thunder team is deep and awesome, and yet I tend to find negativity thrown its way along this journey. I've wondered if some of this is just the bubble I'm in with friend groups and on social media. I have some friends with some basketball opinions I really respect, and so few of them have embraced enjoying this Thunder team. I've asked them what their issue is and these are some of the replies: There were more, but this seems like a good representation. The most common ones were the accusations of corniness, the foul calls and the Seattle factor. But everybody also seemed resigned to the fact that they're going to win the title, and were wondering if people will care at all, outside of OKC. It makes me wonder if 1) this is true and 2) if this is a fair question. So, I bring it to you, The Bouncers! Here is a Google Form about whether you hate the OKC Thunder. We'll share the results later this week. NBA, Stanley Cup Finals share similar vibes Over at our behemoth of a newsletter The Pulse, Chris Branch had the fun idea of having a conversation between me and Sean McIndoe about the respective championship series we're covering in our newsletters. Sean is one of the amazing scribes of Red Light, our incredible hockey newsletter. And … well … you know me from this space. Advertisement The NBA Finals and the Stanley Cup Final both feature fascinating matchups. We have a battle of some of the smallest markets in the NBA with Indianapolis (25th) and OKC (47th). In the NHL, we have a fun rematch of last year's seven-game chaotic series between the Edmonton Oilers and Florida Panthers. Branch asked us questions, and we gave answers. Branch: What's the most interesting thing to you about the other sport's title series? Sean: Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, so I think it's cool how you guys have copied the NHL's longstanding 'the best player in the final is a Canadian' gimmick. Zach: They move around on knives! How does this not freak people out?! I also find it fascinating that we haven't had a Canadian team win a Stanley Cup title in over 30 years, and a team from Florida could block the Oilers two years in a row. There is anxiety over the marketability of both series. What are you most wary about? Sean: The concern these days in the NHL isn't that smaller-market teams are having success. The problem is whether those smaller markets now have an advantage over the bigger ones, due to financial factors and player preferences, among other things. There's debate over whether this is actually a real problem at all. But as a league, and a business, you don't want the markets that are driving your revenue to feel like they're falling behind. That narrative, accurate or not, will only get stronger with another Florida win. Zach: I think I'm most wary about this being a short series. The basketball should be really good. But you can have good basketball in all of the games and end up with a sweep. Just ask last year's Pacers, who played the Celtics extremely well in the conference finals but ended up getting swept. This is a great basketball matchup, but the Thunder might make quick work of it. Concerns aside, there are superstars here aplenty. Outside of the obvious names, who's the most interesting player a general fan should know before puck drop/tipoff? Sean: Let me go off the board here with my pick: Sasha Barkov, the Panthers center who may be the best two-way player in the league. On a team full of rats (and proud of it), he just quietly goes about his business, dominating at both ends of the rink. He's kind of the Phil Hartman of the Panthers, the glue guy who makes it all work even if he isn't the one getting most of the headlines. Zach: Chet Holmgren and Pascal Siakam! Holmgren moves around like his shoulders are held up by a wire coat hanger. He can do it all on the court and is 7-foot-1. It's like watching a Tim Burton drawing audition for a new 'Space Jam' movie. And despite Siakam giving himself the horrible 'Spicy P' nickname, he's been a tremendous weapon. He's scoring within four seconds after opponent baskets and has been the Pacers' leading scorer. Advertisement In 25 or fewer words, give us one wild yet realistic prediction for your series. Sean: The Edmonton Oilers become the greatest Canadian Stanley Cup winners of the last 32 years. Zach: The Pacers will win Game 1, and Haliburton will have his teammates mock the Thunder by doing the sideline interview together. Streaming links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Thunder team I played for could have been a dynasty. This one still can
I was in Oklahoma City last month as the Thunder clinched their Western Conference semi-final against the Nuggets in Game 7, and saw first-hand the Thunder run Denver off the court. The game wasn't even close. The Thunder outplayed them on both sides of the court. Defensively, Thunder coach Mark Daigneault put the 6ft 5in Alex Caruso on in the 6ft 11in Nikola Jokić and, surprisingly, it worked. With Chet Holmgren or Isaiah Hartenstein providing help-side support, I watched a frustrated Jokić struggle to get to his spots. His usual tricks – flopping, drawing fouls – didn't work. The Thunder defense moved in perfect sync, and it completely disrupted Denver's rhythm. Advertisement It was absolutely beautiful to watch. The Thunder's Shai Gilgeous-Alexander was named league MVP shortly afterwards, beating Jokić into second, and he thoroughly deserved the award. Their superior defense was on display again in the Western Conference finals against the Minnesota Timberwolves. In the Game 5 win that sealed the Thunder's progress to the NBA finals, I watched them destroy the Timberwolves and defense was once again the key. Minnesota's Anthony Edwards described the Thunder's defense as: 'One string, 15 puppets on one string.' Related: The New York Knicks' season is over, but a divisive inquest has only just begun That's what's driven their rise all year. In a league where defense is often overlooked or criticized, the Thunder have made it their identity. And now, they're just four wins away from an NBA title. Advertisement But as I have been enjoying this current Thunder team, I can't help but think back to the Thunder team I played for in 2010. The Thunder are heavily favored to beat the Indiana Pacers in the NBA finals, which start on Thursday, and they are the youngest team to ever make the finals since … the Thunder did so with a whole different cast in 2012. But I can say with 100% confidence, that if the Thunder kept that team – with Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook, James Harden, and Serge Ibaka – they would have won multiple championships. Back in 2009-2010, when I was part of the roster, the Thunder were extremely young. Scott Brooks was the coach. It was James Harden's rookie year. I remember when I first met him, he shook my hand and said: 'Nice to meet you sir. I grew up watching you play in college with Syracuse. You was blocking everything and dunking everything' That's when I realized I was now the old man in the room. But it also hit me – Harden was in the same position I'd once been in when I joined the Washington Wizards as a rookie, meeting guys like Michael Jordan, Patrick Ewing, Charles Oakley and Christian Laettner. Advertisement Throughout that season, myself, Kevin Ollie and Nick Collison, who were some of the elder statesmen on the team, would sit and watch the younger guys, shaking our heads and saying, 'These young cats have no idea how good they are going to be'. It all started with KD. He was the youngest player to ever lead the league in scoring at the time. And his work ethic was something I had never seen before. I remember after one practice, KD was doing this drill he liked – playing one-on-one against an invisible defender. But he went at it with the intensity of someone competing in the NBA finals. Every move was as sharp and deliberate as possible. Everything was at game speed. Advertisement After practice, we all went in – showered, ate, got treatment, talked. Some of the coaches watched film with players. Then we came back out to the court, and KD was still out there, going full speed with his one-on-one moves. Dripping with sweat. He'd been at it for nearly two hours. I had never seen that kind of focus before. But when the team's star is working that hard, everyone else falls in line-and that's exactly what happened. The whole team rose to his level. Even after someone had a big game, they were back in the gym the next day, working like they'd just lost. They were running defensive slides and drills in the middle of the season, when most teams were cutting practice time. Harden fell right in line and worked hard every day. Even when he made rookie mistakes, he picked up the work ethic quickly. It was clear – if KD didn't have a problem being criticized, Harden couldn't either. I watched Harden study KD closely – how hard he worked on his shot, his offensive moves, his cuts to the basket, how he moved without the ball. Even after dropping 40 the night before, KD went right back to work. And Harden noticed. Advertisement Then there was Russell Westbrook – fearless, relentless. He trained harder than anyone and played like a Tasmanian devil, all intensity and energy. He'd pick up full court, never taking a play off. I remember Coach Brooks telling the staff, 'If we don't get this guy to slow down, he's going to wear himself out.' But he never did. He just kept going – full speed, all the time. Westbrook was being mentored by Maurice Cheeks, who really took him under his wing, guiding and encouraging him. I remember hearing them talk on the plane after games – you could feel the intensity and passion in Russ's voice. That hunger was real, and it was going to take him far. And it did. Then there was Jeff Green – one of the most underappreciated players on that Thunder team, in my opinion. He was an integral part of their success. He never complained about shots, touches, or a lack of recognition. He just showed up and did his job. Too quick for most power forwards, too strong for most small forwards, and incredibly efficient. He didn't back down from anyone. And his ability to guard positions 2 through 5 made him invaluable. Ibaka was young, athletic, and raw – but he was soaking everything in. He watched KD's work ethic, Westbrook's intensity, Green's professionalism, Harden's shooting (he even did all the shooting drills Harden did on his own time), and Thabo Sefolosha's defensive awareness. Thabo, by the way, was also a key part of that team. Advertisement Let me be clear: I'm not placing blame on the organization or any player for why this group didn't stay together and become a dynasty. But the talent was there. And they were only going to get better. This will go down as one of the biggest what-ifs in NBA history – not if they would've won a title together, but how many they could have won if they'd stayed together. This current OKC team has similar levels of talent. But this time, there's a real chance to finish what they started. And with the NBA finals starting Thursday, they have the chance to begin a championship run – one that could last for years.
