‘Making it harder': Energy providers accused of deceptive practice
Australian consumers are getting ripped off $171 a year on their power bills due to remarkably simple trick by the electricity providers.
According to research by Choice, Australians are getting ripped off by their power company due to deliberately confusing names.
Choice alleges electricity providers are using the same name on two different energy plans, meaning unexpected Aussies are paying more for their power than they need to.
Choice chief executive Ashley de Silva said it shouldn't be this hard to know if you're being ripped off on your energy bill.
'The potential impact of this practice is significant,' says De Silva.
'Choice estimates that reusing identical names for plans with differing prices could, in aggregate, be costing consumers approximately $65 million in savings.'
In a lodgement to the ACCC the consumer group claims electricity providers deliberately make it harder for Australians to switch plans.
The Australian Energy Regulator added a requirement in September 2023, forcing the energy retailers to make it easier for consumers to understand.
As part of these changes power companies have to tell customers on their bills if they have a cheaper plan available and how much they could save by switching.
The guideline requires a compulsory 'better offer' statement on the first page of the bill, under the heading 'Could you save money on another plan?'
Choice claims to have collected almost 400 energy bills from January to March 2025, finding 64 energy plans have identical names.
As such, Choice alleges Australians believe they are on the cheapest plan possible and are paying more than they should for electricity.
'Across these 64 examples, people could have saved an average of $171 annually had they switched to the cheaper plan, even though it had the same name.
'The highest potential savings amongst these examples was $588 per year.'
Ms De Silva said the energy market is already difficult for Aussie households to navigate without the need for misleading practices such as using the same name on plans.
'At a time when we're all looking for ways to save, energy companies are making it harder and harder to know what you're paying and why,' De Silva said.
'This practice is extremely confusing, and potentially misleading or deceptive.
'Supporters who shared their bills with CHOICE often thought that the offer to save money by switching to a plan with an identical name was a mistake, and likely missed out on significant savings.'
The submission to the ACCC comes on the eve of millions of Australians paying more for their power.
Australian Energy Regulator (AER) has released its latest default market offer (DMO) draft determination in April which is the maximum households living in NSW, South Australia and South East Queensland will be paying.
Under the draft, households' power bills could rise between 2.5 and 8.9 per cent depending on where a person lives.
Small business customers could see rises between 4.2 and 8.2 per cent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
41 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
Rio Tinto's $20b Pilbara investment wave is just getting started
There was a strong sense of yesterday's heroes when departing Rio Tinto chief executive Jakob Stausholm hosted a range of foreign and domestic dignitaries in the Pilbara iron ore district on Friday. The official opening of the $2.4 billion Western Range mine could easily be Stausholm's last visit to the Pilbara as chief executive, and his successor will be greeted with a public narrative that Australian iron ore is in decline, requiring Rio to pivot towards a new hero such as copper or lithium.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
‘Security anxiety': Nuclear warning on China
China's rapidly growing nuclear arsenal is driving 'security anxiety' in Australia, Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles says. As of mid-2024, China's operational nuclear warheads exceeded 600, according to the US Department of Defence. That was nearly triple what the country was estimated to have in 2020. Speaking to reporters in the Indonesian capital Jakarta, Mr Marles said on Thursday evening (local time) Beijing's nuclear activity 'does shape how we think about the strategic landscape that we face'. 'I mean, we've made no secret of the fact that we have a security anxiety in relation to China that's principally driven by the very significant conventional military build-up that China is engaging in, and, for that matter, a nuclear build-up that China is engaging in,' said Mr Marles, who also holds the defence portfolio. 'We've made that clear to China itself.' He refused to say whether Australia would lift its defence budget in line with Washington's demand to hike military spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Mr Marles said Australia would 'determine its own defence spending based on our own national interest' and 'America understands that'. 'In fact, we've increased our defence spending considerably already,' Mr Marles said. 'We have, over the last couple of years, engaged in the biggest increase in peacetime spending for defence in our history, and that has significantly begun the process of enhancing the capability of the Australian Defence Force.' He added that spending on 'procurement in the financial year 23-24 it was the largest amount that defence has ever spent, and we will spend more again in this financial year, 24-25'. 'So that spending is happening across the board. We will continue to look at the resources that we need, the capabilities that we need, and we will resource that appropriately, which is what I've said, and what the Prime Minister has also said, and we will do that in a manner which meets the strategic moment,' Mr Marles said. Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles says China's rapidly growing nuclear arsenal is driving 'security anxiety' in Australia. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia ADF chief David Johnston warned on Wednesday that Australia must consider launching combat operations from its own territory, saying Canberra needed to rethink the national preparedness. 'Perhaps finally we are having to reconsider Australia as a homeland from which we will conduct combat operations,' he told a major defence conference. 'That is a very different way, almost since the Second World War, of how we think of national resilience and preparedness.' Admiral Johnston said Australia 'might need to operate and conduct operations from this country'. Asked on Thursday if Australians were 'fully aware' of the risks facing their country, Mr Marles said there was 'at the academic level, a lot of discussion'. 'But I would also say that at the level of main street, when you're talking to people across Australia … there is a broad sense that we live in a much more complex world,' he said. 'That world is uncertain, and that we need a government which is focused on national security.'
West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
China's nuclear build-up driving ‘security anxiety', Richard Marles says
China's rapidly growing nuclear arsenal is driving 'security anxiety' in Australia, Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles says. As of mid-2024, China's operational nuclear warheads exceeded 600, according to the US Department of Defence. That was nearly triple what the country was estimated to have in 2020. Speaking to reporters in the Indonesian capital Jakarta, Mr Marles said on Thursday evening (local time) Beijing's nuclear activity 'does shape how we think about the strategic landscape that we face'. 'I mean, we've made no secret of the fact that we have a security anxiety in relation to China that's principally driven by the very significant conventional military build-up that China is engaging in, and, for that matter, a nuclear build-up that China is engaging in,' said Mr Marles, who also holds the defence portfolio. 'We've made that clear to China itself.' He refused to say whether Australia would lift its defence budget in line with Washington's demand to hike military spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Mr Marles said Australia would 'determine its own defence spending based on our own national interest' and 'America understands that'. 'In fact, we've increased our defence spending considerably already,' Mr Marles said. 'We have, over the last couple of years, engaged in the biggest increase in peacetime spending for defence in our history, and that has significantly begun the process of enhancing the capability of the Australian Defence Force.' He added that spending on 'procurement in the financial year 23-24 it was the largest amount that defence has ever spent, and we will spend more again in this financial year, 24-25'. 'So that spending is happening across the board. We will continue to look at the resources that we need, the capabilities that we need, and we will resource that appropriately, which is what I've said, and what the Prime Minister has also said, and we will do that in a manner which meets the strategic moment,' Mr Marles said. ADF chief David Johnston warned on Wednesday that Australia must consider launching combat operations from its own territory, saying Canberra needed to rethink the national preparedness. 'Perhaps finally we are having to reconsider Australia as a homeland from which we will conduct combat operations,' he told a major defence conference. 'That is a very different way, almost since the Second World War, of how we think of national resilience and preparedness.' Admiral Johnston said Australia 'might need to operate and conduct operations from this country'. Asked on Thursday if Australians were 'fully aware' of the risks facing their country, Mr Marles said there was 'at the academic level, a lot of discussion'. 'But I would also say that at the level of main street, when you're talking to people across Australia … there is a broad sense that we live in a much more complex world,' he said. 'That world is uncertain, and that we need a government which is focused on national security.'
