Former league player denied pub entry in Australia over tā moko
The former winger has a facial tā moko that includes animals symbolically significant to his ancestry, like the hawk and shark.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie sunscreen brand Ultra Violette RECALLS popular product after explosive report found it failed its SPF50+ claim
The founders of Australian sunscreen brand Ultra Violette have announced they will sensationally pull one of their products off the market, effective immediately, after it failed to meet its SPF50+ claim. The brand was thrust into the spotlight in June after CHOICE's explosive investigation revealed that the cult-favourite Lean Screen SPF50+ Mattifying Zinc Sunscreen - priced at $52 - delivered an alarmingly low SPF rating of just four. CHOICE experts said they were 'so perturbed' by the results of its extraordinary first experiment that it conducted a second test at an independent lab in Germany where the results came back with a reported SPF of 5. Ultra Violette co-founders Ava Chandler-Matthews and Bec Jefferd took matters into their own hands, commissioning further testing at multiple independent labs to investigate a concerning discrepancy in the SPF results of Lean Screen. 'As a sunscreen brand, our responsibility has always been to prioritise your safety, protection and skin health above all else,' the co-founders said on Friday. 'Before we go further, we want to make it clear that this only concerns the performance of Lean Screen. Additional testing on all Ultra Violette products has reinforced our confidence in the rest of our line. 'This week, we received results from those tests that demonstrated significant and, candidly, atypical variability. Across eight different tests, Lean Screen has now returned SPF data of 4, 10, 21, 26, 33, 60, 61, and 64. 'That wasn't good enough for us, and it isn't good enough for you. Given this pattern of inconsistency in testing, we have decided to withdraw Lean/Velvet Screen from the market, effective immediately. We are deeply sorry that one of our products has fallen short of the standards we pride ourselves on and that you have come to expect of us.' The brand confirmed any purchases of Lean Screen will be eligible for a refund and a product voucher, regardless of where it was purchased. The co-founders explained that Lean Screen was created by a third-party manufacturer, and was the only sunscreen they made for Ultra Violette. 'We will no longer be making any SKINSCREENS with that manufacturer,' they said. 'We are working with a new and wider network of testing facilities that have been BIPEA-audited and independently vetted, and we are no longer working with the original testing laboratory of Lean Screen.' The brand reassured its shoppers that every new Ultra Violette product will be SPF tested at a minimum of two different independent labs prior to launch. Australian consumer group CHOICE claimed in a bombshell report that Ultra Violette's Lean Screen SPF50+ Mattifying Zinc Skinscreen, which retails for $52, returned an SPF of just 4 during its first round of rigorous testing 'We've increased the frequency of retesting to 18 months, using off-the-shelf market samples, and will continue to take immediate action if we see any discrepancies,' they said. 'Trust is built and rebuilt over time, and we know we have work to do.' 'Thank you to those who have so generously contributed their knowledge, expertise and support throughout this process. 'And to our customers and community, thank you for your patience, care and support – we've never taken it for granted, and we will continue to earn it.'
Techday NZ
26 minutes ago
- Techday NZ
Raghav Sibal promoted to lead APAC for Manhattan Associates
Manhattan Associates has promoted Raghav Sibal to Vice President, APAC, as the company expands its leadership in response to increased demand for cloud and AI-enabled supply chain solutions in the Asia-Pacific region. The promotion follows a period of significant financial performance for Manhattan Associates, with cloud subscription revenue in Asia-Pacific growing by 49% year-on-year in 2024, and services revenue rising by 21%. The figures suggest a marked increase in demand for cloud-first technology, particularly supply chain management solutions that incorporate artificial intelligence. Raghav Sibal has been with Manhattan Associates for more than two decades, contributing operational and international expertise across both US and Australian markets. Since taking on the role of leading the Australia and New Zealand business in 2011, Sibal has overseen substantial growth in the region, building a high-performing local team and helping position the company as a trusted technology partner for retailers, distributors and logistics providers. Leadership recognition President and Chief Executive Officer at Manhattan Associates, Eric Clark, commented on the appointment and the importance of regional expertise as demand evolves. Clark said, "Over the past 14 years, Raghav has played a pivotal role in establishing Manhattan Associates' strong foundation and continued growth in Australia and New Zealand. With the APAC region undergoing rapid transformation and expansion, the time is right to elevate his role. He brings the operational expertise, customer-first mindset and regional insight needed to accelerate our vision for unified supply chain commerce across Asia-Pacific." As Vice President, APAC, Sibal's responsibilities now extend to the company's operations throughout Asia-Pacific, encompassing emerging markets such as China, Southeast Asia and India, as well as established markets in Japan, Australia and New Zealand. Regional expansion and digital transformation Sibal commented on the unique opportunities and challenges of the APAC region. He explained, "APAC is an incredibly diverse region, with each market presenting unique challenges and opportunities. As supply chains continue to evolve and digital transformation accelerates, I'm excited to work closely with our teams, partners and customers across the region to help them unlock new levels of efficiency, resilience and customer experience." The Asia-Pacific market for supply chain and commerce technology has undergone rapid change, marked by greater adoption of cloud and artificial intelligence. Manhattan Associates' continued year-on-year growth signals strong regional momentum, particularly in supporting customers responding to evolving digital and operational requirements. The company's APAC operations are tasked with servicing new and existing opportunities, including those in emerging markets such as China and India, in addition to more established locations. The broader scope of Sibal's role reflects the company's intent to align leadership with its increase in market presence and heightened customer demand for supply chain digitalisation. Since joining Manhattan Associates, Sibal has led multiple complex implementation programmes globally. His expanded regional responsibilities will continue to focus on supporting commercial partnerships, overseeing technology deployment, and helping customers adapt to swift changes within digital economies across Asia-Pacific. Manhattan Associates provides software and platform technologies for supply chain and omnichannel commerce, servicing a range of enterprises in the retail, distribution and logistics sectors. The company's stated aim is to drive both revenue growth and profitability for its customers through a combination of information integration and supply chain execution.
Sydney Morning Herald
27 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘We have become our own food scientists': Navigating a chaotic and confusing billion-dollar industry
Faced with the overwhelming task of sifting through the varying standards of halal certification in Australia, Mohammad Omran did what any self-respecting Muslim would do: start a WhatsApp group. The 1000-member-strong group called 'Halal Food Sydney' is a space where Sydney-based Muslims ask each other whether various foods or drinks are halal, the Muslim standard for consumption. 'There are thousands of consumers who want clarity on what is and isn't halal. And we can see for ourselves inconsistencies in what is certified. We see them and have our doubts. And we know it shouldn't be like this.' What is halal? Muslims have a standard they must abide by for food and drink. Everything must be halal, which generally covers ethical farming and slaughtering, as well as avoiding cross-contamination with anything that isn't halal, like pork or alcohol. The post-WWII generations of Muslim migrants established a halal certification industry, where companies (initially, small, family-run affairs in western Sydney and northern Melbourne) could check to see if a butcher or restaurant was halal, and give them the tick of approval for the fledgling Muslim community. For decades, the industry operated without a governing body, standardised guidelines or any accountability, creating a freewheeling industry plagued by allegations of mismanagement, dishonesty and corruption. Many Muslim consumers who care deeply about their faith and how it is practised no longer trust the certifying industry and its processes. 'We have become our own food scientists, food technologists, our own religious law interpreters,' Omran says about the group. 'And we've made difficult decisions, but we shouldn't have needed to do that. We should be able to rely on leaders in our community. But without transparency, without trust in the processes, what other option do we have?' And as Omran puts it, the issue is a 'fundamental' one. 'We need a place to pray without fear of harm, we need to be able to practise our religion, and we need to be able to know what is and isn't halal. Or we just go vegetarian and boycott the whole system.' What has changed? The halal certification business in Australia faces a tipping point after exploding into a billion-dollar industry. The growth was launched when major grocery chains Woolworths and Coles waded in and began offering fresh halal meat, as major butchers and suppliers seek to meet the skyrocketing demand for Australian halal meat in South-East Asia and the Middle East. These elements came together in an industry roundtable meeting held in July, where certifiers and suppliers opened conversations on regulating the domestic market, the first step in what could become a game-changing moment for the growing sector. Omran was there as a representative of 'Muslim consumers' and challenged those in attendance to meet the demands of the community, to become transparent and consistent. This push from a chaotic industry to one that is organised and self-regulated represents an evolution faced by many migrant communities and the economies they build. The pressures and focuses are different for those who came and built the industry in the suburbs of Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane: in the early days the priorities were survival, security and speed. They needed these systems up and running as soon as possible, no matter how dodgily set up. But the needs of the generation that has come after them are different, seeking instead stability and credibility. They want structures that can enable their ambitions and respect their demands, ones that require legal frameworks, connections with the rest of the economy and community support. The halal certification industry is torn between a community seeking survival and one that wants to grow and thrive. What even is halal certification? Halal certification emerged as an industry in the late '70s, as Muslim migration to Australia grew and the community sought to establish the religious infrastructure they needed. These were usually small outfits that would offer a certificate to butchers or restaurants that signified their products or services were halal. That would come with a literal certificate that could be found pinned up behind counters at these shops and restaurants, assuring Muslims they could eat there. How big is the industry today? The halal certification industry is split between two main sections: export and domestic. The export side is more organised, tightly overseen by federal bodies such as the Australian Government Authorised Halal Program. While data is scarce on the exact values of the export side of the industry, one research paper from Tridge, a global data and media company that focuses on agricultural industries, said Australia exported about $2.36 billion worth of halal meat in 2021. And that is only increasing, with data from Volza, an export-import data platform, showing a 22 per cent increase in volume between September 2023 and August 2024, most of which went to the Middle East and South-East Asia. There are 25 halal certifiers authorised by the government to certify meat for export, and they act as gatekeepers to these lucrative markets. Without certification, the meat cannot be exported to Muslim countries. But part of the success of this growing export industry is demand and reputation. Australian meat has a premium reputation across these markets, and any questions surrounding the halal certification process could jeopardise this. The domestic side is a fractured and inconsistent industry that remains unregulated. No official count exists for the number of domestic certifiers, although some industry insiders estimated there are about 30. This decentralised landscape has produced confusion among consumers, both Muslim and non-Muslim. It's not clear what is and isn't halal, by what standards, and how the industry operates. This opaqueness was exploited by racist fearmongering in the past, including via rumours halal certification funded terrorists. A 2015 Senate inquiry called the system 'lacklustre' and highlighted the risks of fraud, unclear labelling and a lack of consumer confidence. This has led to communal efforts at categorisation, such as Omran's WhatsApp group. Who does the certifying? The industry, estimated to be worth about $1.7 billion according to the Muslim World Research Centre, is marked by fierce competition. About 30 companies are vying to certify suppliers and manufacturers, ranging from large grocery chains to small goods suppliers. But the small-scale roots of the industry meant there was no regulatory body or broad guidelines adopted. It was each to their own. Each certifier was free to come up with their own process and standards. The barrier for entry was, and remains, very low, and anyone with an interest can begin a certifying business. With such an open-ended industry, tracking who does the certifying and how can be very difficult. Some major players, such as the Supreme Islamic Council of Halal Meat in Australia and Halal Certification Authority Australia, have been in the market for decades. There are also new players, such as Global Australian Halal Certification and Australian National Imams Council Halal Authority, which are attempting to elbow their way into the market. The issues While the open-ended nature of the industry and the lack of guidelines has produced some healthy competition, there is growing discomfort from within the industry at the lack of guardrails. The Arab Chamber of Commerce (AACCI) hosted the roundtable of halal certifiers and stakeholders in July, with the goal of opening a conversation on the industry's future. About a dozen industry bodies turned up, and central to the conversation was whether a minimum standard could be codified, whether that would work and how it would be policed. Mohamed Hage, the president and national chairman of AACCI, said the event was focused on making the industry 'more efficient, more transparent and more competitive'. 'Making this process more efficient is good for business and good for the economy.' Hage said it was essential the Australian certification process could be trusted by both domestic and global consumers. 'Reputation matters in this industry, and Australia exports billions of dollars' worth of halal goods. It's important our domestic process has a good reputation among global consumers to ensure we can continue to grow.' The head of a halal goods manufacturer, who asked to remain anonymous so they don't jeopardise their relationship with certifiers, told the Herald that the lack of oversight has led some certifiers to undercut each other, offer certificates without proper checks or, at worst, mislead their consumers about their own standards. 'If Muslims knew that some certifiers approve suppliers where there is cross-contamination (with pork products) or that some manufacturers are certified without proper checks, I guarantee you there would be a lot of anger,' they said. 'There is a level of trust by the community in suppliers that is not being respected,' they added. A recurring issue the manufacturer raised was the inconsistency of the standards being applied, and how that has been exploited by big suppliers or manufacturers. 'If a certifier has a more thorough, expensive process, and another has a very lax, very cheap process, why would you as a non-Muslim business make the more expensive choice? It's not about the businesses, it's about the standards of the certifiers,' they said. Where to from here? The AACCI event ended with agreement that a group of certifiers will meet in September to thrash out a potential minimum standard and how it could be implemented. It could lead to an Australian standard being developed and adopted, one that would force suppliers, manufacturers and retailers, big or small, to abide by new regulations. It would also mean the potential for undercutting or corrupt conduct is reduced, and streamline the process for new customers and businesses. It may be the biggest shake-up in the history of the industry, one that could thoroughly change the make-up of suppliers. It would potentially lead to the professionalising of this migrant-based industry, and change how the community sees halal certification. It also means exports could grow exponentially, particularly if Australia creates a world-leading standard that would only improve its already positive reputation. It would cement Australia as a permanent supplier to growing and established markets, and provide clarity for local suppliers that want in. The local Muslim community would be able to abandon their ad-hoc attempts at certification, and an industry-wide standard would be exactly the kind of measure that would alleviate the confusion that led Omran to create his WhatsApp group. But that is only if the industry bodies that have agreed to meet in September agree on a standard. The community, industry bodies and the government all have their eyes on one meeting that could reshape an industry. Over to them.
