Kate Forbes responds to Keir Starmer ruling out independence vote
Starmer dismissed the idea of an independence vote if the SNP get a majority at next year's Holyrood elections when he spoke to the BBC's Good Morning Scotland programme.
He claimed there was a need for Scotland to remain part of the United Kingdom in order to remain safe as he released his defence review.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross slapped down by Holyrood Presiding Officer
Despite how John Swinney has established his strategy as building "demonstrable support" for independence through Government, Starmer said no one had raised the subject with him 'as their first priority'.
It comes after a Norstat poll suggested Scottish independence support was at 54% but would rise further to almost 60% if Farage took power at Westminster.
Deputy First Minister Forbes, who was visiting Blantyre on Tuesday as part of campaigning in the Hamilton by-election this week, was asked by The National if it was a political tactic from Starmer to suggest Swinney was not focused on independence.
She said: 'It's hardly a surprise that Keir Starmer is repeating what we've heard from Tory prime ministers for years, and the day after we saw an increase in support for independence if Nigel Farage becomes prime minister, it seems a bit rich to be telling the people of Scotland what they are saying when their greatest concern is that the change that was promised by Labour hasn't happened at all, opening the door to Nigel Farage.
'The purpose of the SNP is to deliver a better future for the people of Scotland.
'We are speaking to the people of Scotland, we are engaging directly with them, they are increasingly rejecting the empty politics of Westminster, indicating support for a different and better future.
'I think it's a lot more important John Swinney is speaking to the people of Scotland than anyone else.'
The Norstat survey also found that 63% of Scots would back independence if the other option was direct Westminster rule.
The question asked, specifically: 'If there were to be a second independence referendum tomorrow and the ONLY options on the ballot paper were full independence or the permanent closure of the Scottish Parliament at Holyrood and a return to direct Westminster rule, how do you think you would vote?'
READ MORE: SNP ministers throw out Bannockburn race track development
Labour voters during last July's General Election were quite split on the issue – narrowly backing direct rule by 51% to 49%, according to the survey.
Forbes also hit out at Farage saying he would scrap the Scottish Parliament's funding mechanism if he were Prime Minister.
Asked during a rare appearance in Scotland on Monday about whether he would get rid of the Barnett formula, which is used to fund Holyrood, Farage said the mechanism was 'out of date'.
He added: 'What I'd like to see is a Scottish Government that's able to raise a bit more of its own revenue and a Scottish economy that's actually got genuine growth and I don't believe that can happen without this sector [oil and gas] booming.'
Farage has also been accused by Swinney of "hating the very idea" of Holyrood.
Forbes said: 'The Barnett consequentials is an important route for Scotland to be able to fund public services, and anybody that suggests that they are giving back to Scotland when Scotland pays its fair share in terms of tax, where right now revenues, for example, from one of our key industries, the energy industry, oil and gas, is supporting UK public services, it illustrates the importance of a well-recognised approach to Scotland's public finances.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
26 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
DWP Winter fuel payments to return for more pensioners 2025
Chancellor Rachel Reeves told reporters that 'more people will get winter fuel payment this winter', adding that further details will be announced 'as soon as we possibly can'. She said: 'People should be in no doubt that the means test will increase and more people will get winter fuel payment this winter.' The means-testing of pensioners' winter fuel payments is an issue which has been blamed for contributing to Labour's poor performance in last month's local elections and the Runcorn and Helsby by-election. When will the details be announced? Ms Reeves said that she would set out how to pay for any increase in the threshold for the winter fuel allowance at the next budget. Asked whether she would tell the public if she planned to fund her commitments by raising taxes or cutting spending on other departments, the Chancellor said: 'As we have been clear, on winter fuel we will set out how we will fund that at the next fiscal event. 'We will set out how everything will be paid for at the budget in the autumn but it's important that everything that we do is funded, because that's how people know that we can afford it.' Will all pensioners receive winter fuel payments? (Image: House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA Wire) In short, no. Pensions minister Torsten Bell told MPs that, while more pensioners will be eligible, there is no prospect of returning to universal winter fuel payments. Speaking to the Work and Pensions Committee, Mr Bell said: 'Directly on your question of is there any prospect of a universal winter fuel payment, the answer is no, the principle I think most people, 95% of people, agree, that it's not a good idea that we have a system paying a few hundreds of pounds to millionaires, and so we're not going to be continuing with that. 'But we will be looking at making more pensioners eligible.' Very pleased to just hear the Prime Minister has just said he wants more state pensioners to get Winter Fuel Payments (WFP) and they will work out what they're doing in time for the budget. As I've said since day one, there are two main problems with the way the means testing… — Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) May 21, 2025 Mr Bell said he did not have 'lots to add' to what Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer had said recently about the allowance. He told the MPs: 'Of course the announcement, as and when it's made, will be made to the House.' Sir Keir recently signalled a partial U-turn over the Government's decision to strip winter fuel payments from millions of pensioners. The Prime Minister said 'as the economy improves', he wanted to look at widening eligibility for the payments, which are worth up to £300. The pensions minister has ruled out returning winter fuel allowance to all pensioners - our recent poll found 33% wanted to do so, but more (44%) thought they should continue to be means tested, but given to more pensioners than under current rules Results link in following… — YouGov (@YouGov) June 4, 2025 How many more pensioners will receive the winter fuel payments? Officials have been unable to say how many more pensioners would be eligible. The decision to means-test the previously universal payment was one of the first announcements by Chancellor Rachel Reeves after Labour's landslide election victory last year, and it has been widely blamed for the party's collapse in support. The Government has insisted the policy was necessary to help stabilise the public finances, allowing the improvements in the economic picture which Sir Keir said could result in the partial reversal of the measure. What were the cuts to winter fuel payments, and who currently receives them? On July 29 2024, the Government announced that from winter 2024, winter fuel payments would be dependent on receiving another means-tested benefit, as part of measures to fill a 'black hole' in the public finances. This meant the number of pensioners receiving the payment was reduced by around 10 million, from 11.4 million to 1.5 million. Pension credit is the primary benefit by which pensioners can receive the winter fuel payment. The credit tops up incomes for poorer pensioners and acts as a gateway to additional support, including the winter fuel payment. Asked what groups who are currently missing out on winter fuel payments he would like to include again, if possible, Mr Bell told the committee: 'We are committed to the principle that there should be some means-testing and that those on the highest incomes shouldn't be receiving winter fuel payments in the context of wider decisions we have to make – and fairness is an important part of that. 'You can then take from that that my priority is those who are on lower incomes but have missed out.' He told the MPs: 'I'm not getting into anything about the operation of that but just, you know, I think all of us will have heard from people on lower incomes who didn't receive winter fuel payment this year and I understand the points they've raised. And so we'd like to see wider eligibility.' Put to him that a universal winter fuel payment would be '100% guaranteed' to reach those who needed it, Mr Bell told the committee: 'You have to wait for us to set out the policy and we will engage directly with the point you are raising.' Asked what work had been done with HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) to assess the practicality of recouping payments from higher rate taxpayers, Mr Bell said: 'We're looking at all of the policy options for how this eligibility can be extended, and when I've got more to tell you about that, I absolutely will.' Recommended reading: Commenting on the hearing, Tom Selby, director of public policy at AJ Bell, said the Government 'now faces a dilemma in determining exactly who should be eligible'. He suggested that one option could be to award the payment to everyone receiving a state pension, clawing the money back from higher income households, potentially through their tax returns. Mr Selby said: 'This might look something like the process for clawing back child benefit for working households, although that has caused mass confusion among taxpayers bamboozled by the complexity of the rules.'
Glasgow Times
26 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Billy McAllister who exposed Lyons family slams police
Billy McAllister, a former SNP councillor, first raised the alarm in 2000, claiming the Lyons family had infiltrated a publicly funded community centre in Milton, Glasgow. According to the Daily Record, he alleged their control of the Chirnsyde Community Initiative, which received over £1.4 million in taxpayer funding, was a front for organised crime and laid the groundwork for a bloody feud with the rival Daniel crime clan. (Image: Newsquest) READ MORE: Property fire 'linked' to ongoing gangland feud Despite his repeated warnings, authorities failed to act until the 2006 murder of Michael Lyons, who was shot dead in a Glasgow garage by members of the Daniel gang. It was only after this killing that Glasgow City Council shut down the centre and removed the Lyons family. Speaking to the Daily Record, McAllister said: "It's shocking that two young men have lost their lives, but what is more shocking is the fact that the assignation was in a public bar where members of the public were going about their lawful business, having a good night out and their lives where put in danger. "Surely, given all the intelligence and information they (the police) have on these criminals, how was this allowed to happen? "It was wrong for the police and politicians to ignore us. "If they had done an early intervention, then maybe a lot of people might still be living. "Now, 25 years later, the feud is still ongoing and they (the police) are losing the war." READ MORE: Two Scottish men die in shooting at bar in Malaga Spain His remarks come after the Glasgow Times reported the recent murders of Ross Monaghan and Eddie Lyons Jr., both shot dead on May 11 at Monaghan's Bar in Fuengirola, Spain. The Glasgow Times reported that the gunman fled in a waiting vehicle, and Spanish police continue to investigate. Police Scotland has confirmed it is assisting Spanish authorities but has not deployed officers to Spain. Eddie Lyons Jnr and Ross Monaghan(Image: Spindrift) READ MORE: Graphic footage emerges of Ross Monaghan gangland shooting McAllister, who was elected in 2006 after campaigning to remove the Lyons gang from Chirnsyde, said the roots of the feud lie in drug trafficking and the battle for control over north Glasgow. He also claimed that both Monaghan and Lyons Jr. were members of the so-called 'Club Boys,' a group of young criminals associated with the community centre during its operation. Billy added: "The origins of the feud were all drug-related, and control of that market. "The Lyons, along with the Daniel's were determined to control the north of the city at that time. "They always hated each other, going back to when they were petty criminals. "We kept on complaining, but they just ignored it, but lo and behold, it all came out at the end." He continued: "A top policeman told me that the police and politicians had left the cancer of serious and organised crime too long without addressing the problem head-on. "That's why criminality is a growth industry, the risks are very low of getting caught. "The Lyons could have been taken out when they were petty criminals, but they have been allowed to go undetected and look where we are now." The Glasgow Times reported that Police Scotland issued a statement, reiterated that there is no current intelligence linking the Spanish shootings to ongoing gang violence in Scotland under investigation through Operation Portaledge. READ MORE: Police Scotland issue statement after fatal shooting in Spain A spokesperson said: "The investigation into the fatal shootings in Fuengirola is being carried out by Spanish police. "Police Scotland is supporting Spanish police where requested; however, at this time, we have no officers deployed within Spain. "There is currently no intelligence to suggest the deaths of these two men in Spain are linked to the recent criminal attacks in Scotland being investigated as part of Operation Portaledge. "Any misinformation or speculation linking the events in Spain is not helpful to the ongoing investigations in either country. "There is also nothing to suggest that the shooting in Fuengirola was planned from within Scotland."
Glasgow Times
26 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Polls opens in Holyrood by-election that Swinney says is ‘two-horse race'
Polling stations are now open in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse seat following a high profile campaign dominated by the rise in support for Reform. The by-election is taking place following the death of the SNP MSP Christina McKelvie, who had been receiving treatment for breast cancer. Today is polling day in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. @KatyLoudonSNP has shown she would be an outstanding MSP. This is now a two-horse race between @theSNP and Farage.#VoteSNP to stop Farage and for a better Scotland. Vote Katy Loudon. — John Swinney (@JohnSwinney) June 5, 2025 She had held the seat since 2011, winning it comfortably in the 2021 Scottish election with a majority of 4,582 over Labour. But SNP leader and Scottish First Minister John Swinney has said it is now Reform UK that is the main threat to his party there – claiming the contest is a 'two-horse race' between the two parties. Mr Swinney, who has made several campaign visits to the area, has spent much of his time attacking Mr Farage and his party. Reform has also come under attack from Labour, with a furious row prompted by an online ad which alleged Scottish leader Anas Sarwar would 'prioritise' the Pakistani community. Labour branded it 'racist', but as the war of words between the parties escalated, Mr Farage used a rare visit to Scotland earlier this week to accuse Mr Sarwar of 'sectarian politics'. It's polling day! Great opportunity to show the momentum we have, vote @CllrRossLambie and @reformparty_uk Vote Reform. Get Reform — Reform UK Scotland (@ReformUKScot) June 5, 2025 Mr Sarwar still insists his party's candidate Davy Russell can win the seat, despite him coming in for criticism over his failure to take part in a TV debate. Speaking on Wednesday, the Scottish Labour leader branded Mr Farage a 'pathetic, poisonous little man'. Hitting out at his rivals, Mr Sarwar added: 'Reform have chosen a campaign of dirt and smear, the SNP have lacked all ambition, the best they can offer is 'vote SNP to stop Farage'.' Mr Swinney was adamant that people need to vote for SNP candidate Katy Loudon if they want to 'stop Farage'. Stop SNP waste. Stop SNP incompetence. Stop SNP failures. Elect the local champion that can beat them. Vote Scottish Labour. — Anas Sarwar (@AnasSarwar) June 4, 2025 The First Minister insisted: 'People face a simple choice in this by-election. 'They can either vote for the SNP – elect an SNP MSP – or they will end up with a Reform MSP. That's the simple choice.' The election comes as polls show a surge in support for Mr Farage's party in Scotland. While Reform has not yet won an election north of the border, one poll last month suggested it could come in second to the SNP in the May 2026 Holyrood election. Polls are open in the constituency until 10pm, with the result expected to be known in the early hours of Friday.
