Investigation uncovers what led to brawl at Hanford, Pasco basketball game
That's according to an investigation by the Pasco Police Department and its school resource officer obtained by the Tri-City Herald through the state Public Records Act.
Several officers interviewed more than a dozen witnesses, parents and students in the days that followed the Feb. 4 incidents.
Police also determined that a Hanford assistant coach tried to intervene between two fighting players but that allegations he choked a Pasco player were unsubstantiated.
It was a 'split-second decision' to place his arms around a swinging Pasco player and likely 'the best option to de-escalate the situation,' said police.
'There were coaches up and down the court grabbing onto players to stop their aggressive movement toward players on the opposite team,' wrote Officer Joseph Wysock, a school resource officer at Pasco High School.
'Many of the events on Feb. 4, 2025, were unlawful and were against high school sports policies from both schools,' Wysock wrote. 'The game's coaching staff and school administrators handled the situations professionally to de-escalate many problems.'
The firstfight occurred in the waning moments of the game, after a Pasco player going for a layup was pushed mid-air by a Hanford opponent. The hard foul led to a scrum between the two teams and the allegations involving Hanford's assistant coach.
But a second fight after the game involved mostly enraged fans and parents. Several people walked away with bruises and scratches, and police identified one parent who may have instigated the fight.
While Pasco police recommended third-degree assault charges for two parents and one student involved in the second incident, the city attorney chose to not file charges in the case, said Richland attorney Scott Johnson, who represents the assistant coach.
The Herald is not naming those involved or the assistant coach since no charges were filed.
The Hanford assistant coach remains on administrative leave from his part-time coaching job as the school investigation continues, but he has said he doesn't plan to return next season.
Richland said in a statement to families days after the incident that the coach's actions 'do not reflect our commitment to safety' and would not be tolerated.
Johnson argues the district should retract those statements in light of the Pasco police report.
'They made a snap judgment critical of their own coach before they knew any of the facts,' he wrote. 'The false statements the Richland School District made caused my client and his family to be subject to numerous threats, including threats of physical harm.'
The Tri-City Herald has requested additional records about the Richland School District's internal investigation.
A spokesperson for the district said it's standard practice for a staff member to be placed on leave when safety-related concerns are reported.
'This ensures a thorough, impartial review while prioritizing the safety and well-being of students and staff. The RSD's investigation into any potential violations of district policies is ongoing,' Richland public information officer BJ Sorenson told the Herald.
In the days and weeks since the fights, Pasco High School has reviewed and enhanced its safety protocols. That includes more supervision and safety staff at home athletic events.
'At the district level, we have worked closely with the Washington Interscholastic Activities Association (WIAA) to address broader concerns and reinforce clear expectations for behavior and sportsmanship,' a statement from the Pasco School District reads.
'As part of this effort, QR codes are now posted at home athletic events, providing spectators with a simple and immediate way to report concerns or inappropriate conduct during competitions,' the statement continues.
It was alleged by some witnesses that the tussles were preceded by the use of racial slurs against Pasco players on the court, specifically during a foul in the third quarter.
Wysock interviewed the game referee and two Pasco coaches. All three denied hearing anything racial, and police were unable to establish any probable cause that slurs had been used.
The referee explained in an interview with Wysock that it's WIAA protocol to pause play, speak with coaches and warn the benches if slurs or disparaging remarks are heard during play.
Police were unable to discern what was said by players during the third-quarter foul, but one juvenile witness claimed a Hanford player called someone an anti-Black epithet.
The Hanford assistant coach and a younger student were accused of calling a Pasco player 'carrot top' and 'carrot cake.'
'Pasco has a red-haired Hispanic player,' Wysock wrote. 'I interviewed him and he was unaware of these comments being made, nor did he feel that they were racial. In fact, he thought about making them a nickname for himself.'
The first fight at Pasco High School occurred with less than four seconds left on the clock of the game as the Falcons led the Bulldogs, 62-45, according to police reports.
As Hanford was running out the clock, a Pasco player stole the ball and was pushed during a layup. He landed and hit the padded wall.
'This caused the Pasco players to get upset and act with instant retaliation,' Officer Wysock wrote. Then, coaches, parents and fans from both teams came onto the court from the bleachers.
'Pasco High School administrators and coaches from both teams were clearing the court and addressing concerns as best as they could. They established command and control of the incident for the time being. Parents grew concerned over the events that just took place, such as the hard foul and the Hanford coach grabbing a Pasco player. Parents started pointing fingers as possible instigators,' he continued.
A frustrated Pasco mother was identified as a 'component of what instigated' later fights. She and her husband initially thought it was their son who had been grabbed by the coach.
After the game, as parents were waiting for their kids to come out of the locker rooms, she pointed out to the district athletic director a 20-year-old Hanford fan whom she believed was involved in the altercation, and that was 'saying racial slurs throughout the game.'
That fan reportedly got into an argument earlier that evening with a few of the Pasco fans in the locker room tunnels, and was asked to leave the tunnel.
A Pasco student there to watch the game overheard the mother's discussion with the athletic director, and he confronted the Hanford fan.
After the game, words were exchanged between the Hanford fan and Pasco student, according to the police report, and shortly after the fan was surrounded by three men.
'(The fan) crosses his arms in a manner that portrays he is not going to leave or listen to the crowd yelling and pointing for him to leave,' the report reads.
The Hanford fan's father tried to intervene and the Hanford fan gets into a wrestling match with one of the Pasco aggressors and punches began flying. Several spectators, parents and students rushed to try to break up the cluster, but others who rushed in tried joining in on the fight, the police report said.
Reports said the fan was beat by 'around 5-6 adults,' and was even knocked unconscious by an aggravated Pasco student who rushed into the scrum to land a 'haymaker' punch that also knocked down another person.
The school's vice principal, the athletic director, Hanford coaches and several 'good Samaritans' broke up the fight.
Wysock's report was based on 'hours of video footage' — both closed circuit and submissions from the public — and several written statements and interviews. It led him to the conclusion that reactions from players, fans, parents and students resulted in 'multiple people breaking the law.'
'It is not uncommon for players' emotions to be elevated during games, and retaliation for a hard foul has become common in college and professional sports,' the school resource officer wrote. 'In the events of the game between Pasco High School and Hanford High School, the actions taken by some reached the criminal level.'
In addition to the three individuals recommended on third-degree assault charges, Pasco police also listed the names of nine individuals who likely broke state law by disturbing a school activity. The misdemeanor comes with a simple penalty of up to $50.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
04-08-2025
- CBS News
Debt collection calls are skyrocketing. Here's how to handle them.
Dealing with debt can be difficult, but when debt collectors start calling, it can feel overwhelming. New data reveals debt collection calls are surging across the country and in the Delaware Valley. Monica Fisher says the calls started when she could no longer keep up with her monthly credit card payments. "They came pretty frequently," she said. "'I can pay it when I can,' that's what I would tell them and then hang up, just feeling so stressed out, so overwhelmed." The Clifton Heights, Delaware County, teacher and mom of two racked up more than $16,000 in debt on cards carrying 27% annual percentage rates. "I'm getting all the kids' things, clothes, some toys, groceries, for sure," she said. "How easy, just put it on the card." As credit card debt in the U.S. nears a record $1.2 trillion, debt collector calls have more than doubled year-over-year. According to FTC complaint data analyzed by NumberBarn, a phone number management platform, consumers reported more than 112,000 debt collection calls in the first quarter of this year. More than 7,000 of the complaints came from consumers in the tri-state area. Nearly half of reported calls were flagged as being abusive, harassing or threatening, according to the analysis. Thomas Nitzsche, with the nonprofit credit counseling agency Money Management International, says you have rights as a consumer if you start receiving calls from debt collectors. For example, you can request a collector stop calling you at work or during a time that's inconvenient. "Collectors have to operate under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, which essentially just means that you can't be called in the middle of the night, they can't just show up at your workplace or in your doorstep, they can't threaten you with jail time," he said. "They can't harass you." Violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) can result in serious penalties for the collection agency. You can report abusive, threatening, or harassing calls to the FTC at If a debt collector starts calling you, it might make sense to try to deal with it as quickly as possible, but Nitzsche says it's important not to act until you can verify the debt. A debt collector must prove that the debt is yours and that the amount is accurate. Legitimate collectors are required to provide proof in writing if you request it. Never confirm your personal information with a debt collector until you know it's legitimate. Scammers often purchase information about old debt for very cheap and try to use that to collect from consumers who don't know their rights, Nitzsche warns. Confirm the age of the debt. In each state, there is a time limit in which a debt collector can successfully sue to collect debt. It also depends on the type of debt. For most loans, the limit in Pennsylvania is four years, in New Jersey it's six years and in Delaware, it's three years. Determine your best option to pay it off. Working out a settlement to repay some of the debt might be possible. Or you can consider working with a credit counseling agency on a debt management plan. Fisher went the credit counseling route. She says Money Management International consolidated her debt and negotiated her interest rate from nearly 30% down to 10% putting her on track to pay it off within a few years. "There's steps now," she said. "I can see that amount going down, which is definitely a good feeling." The Financial Counseling Association of America, a national association representing financial counseling companies, can help you find a certified credit counselor. You can also seek help through the National Foundation for Credit Counseling, the nation's largest nonprofit financial counseling organization. Do you have a money question, a consumer issue, or a scam story you want to share? Email InYourCorner@

Miami Herald
01-08-2025
- Miami Herald
FEC Railway sues Brightline over commuter rail expansion plan
In a move that could derail plans for a long-awaited commuter train service, Florida East Coast Railway is suing Brightline for 'clandestinely' negotiating with county governments to add more trains to its rails in violation of a contract agreement between the two companies. Plans have been in the works for Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties to run a version of Tri-Rail commuter trains through South Florida's urban corridor, east of Interstate 95 along the Florida East Coast Railway tracks that Brightline uses. The private luxury train company and FECR entered into a series of agreements in 2016 and 2017 that gave Brightline exclusive rights to run passenger trains on the rail corridor — with specific limitations. In its suit, filed July 11 in Miami-Dade Circuit Court, Florida East Coast Railway notes the many accidents that have occurred on its tracks involving Brightline, saying that adding more trains to the line 'would heighten the risk of potentially severe accidents.' A recent Miami Herald/WLRN investigation found that more than 180 people have died after being hit by Brightline trains, making the higher-speed train service the deadliest major passenger railroad in the U.S. The dispute signals a breakdown in friendly relations between Florida East Coast Railway, which is more than a century old, and Brightline, which began operating its private passenger train on FECR's tracks less than a decade ago. Since that time, Brightline has struggled to turn a profit, reporting net losses over $500 million in 2024. 'The cooperation and transparency between FECR and Brightline that made Brightline's passenger service a reality has, unfortunately, long disappeared,' FECR said in its complaint. 'Desperate to salvage some of its investors' funds, Brightline has covertly engaged in a years-long campaign to stave off its own financial problems by loading FECR's tracks with more passenger trains.' Brightline denies the allegations in the complaint and argues FECR was contractually obligated to resolve the dispute in arbitration and should not have filed its lawsuit. 'Brightline does not comment on ongoing litigation but this claim is without merit and we have filed a motion to dismiss and compel arbitration,' Brightline spokesperson Ashley Blasewitz told the Miami Herald and WLRN. Representatives for FECR did not respond to requests for comment on the lawsuit. Details of the case have not previously been reported. FECR seeks a judge's action to halt any agreements or further negotiations between the counties and Brightline — potentially scuttling more than five years of work on the part of local governments, who have secured and applied for millions of dollars of grants from the federal government to improve public transit in South Florida. FECR is arguing that Brightline doesn't have the unilateral authority to negotiate for the commuter rail and that there isn't the space or infrastructure to run more passenger cars on the tracks. '[That] funding is dead in the water, as Brightline's representations are not only legally prohibited by its agreements with FECR, but also practically precluded by FECR's existing use of its tracks,' FECR wrote in its complaint. Florida East Coast Railway was founded by oil magnate Henry Flagler in 1895 and today is a subsidiary of international conglomerate Grupo México. From Miami to Cocoa, Brightline runs on tracks owned by FECR. Brightline owns the tracks from Cocoa to Orlando. While Brightline offers a luxury passenger experience, the counties plan to bring a service to the same tracks that is more similar to Tri-Rail, a lower-priced commuter train that runs west of Interstate 95. FECR alleges that Brightline violated a part of the companies' Joint Use Agreement that requires either party to present a proposal to a joint committee if they want to make major changes to the corridor, including increasing 'the capacity of the Shared Infrastructure to accommodate additional trains.' Brightline did not follow that requirement, FECR argues, when it began negotiating with the counties in 2020 to create a new rapid-transit passenger service as part of a planned 'Coastal Link' that would run from Miami-Dade to Palm Beach County. 'Brightline kept [FECR] in the dark because it knew full well that its expansion plan not only threatened to significantly disrupt FECR's freight service, but was also impossible without substantial new investment in track and facility infrastructure, which Brightline certainly could not afford,' the complaint states. FECR contends that it only found out about these talks 'by chance' and that when it approached Brightline with its concerns, Brightline accelerated its negotiations without bringing FECR to the table. In 2020, FECR wrote a letter to Miami-Dade officials, flagging concerns about the commuter rail project and saying that FECR had been 'relegated to the sidelines.' In a response to the county at the time, Brightline President Patrick Goddard said FECR's letter contained 'substantial misinformation' and mistakenly left the impression that FECR could 'veto' county commuter service. Goddard also called it 'obviously inappropriate' for FECR to involve itself in the negotiations. Florida East Coast Railway's then-president, Nathan Asplund, told county officials it wasn't FECR's goal 'to disrupt your negotiations with Brightline, nor is it to discourage commuter rail on the Line' but said the increase in rail traffic 'will require significant upgrades to the Line and potentially the installation of a 3rd [set of tracks], which may or may not be possible.' The negotiations have not been finalized. In 2023, Miami-Dade County unveiled plans for five new train stations as part of the Coastal Link project, including stops in Wynwood, Little Haiti and close to Florida International University's Biscayne Bay Campus near North Miami. According to FECR's complaint, current plans propose that Miami-Dade run 54 trains daily, seven days a week for 18 hours a day, with service every 30 minutes during weekday peak periods and every 60 minutes during off-peak periods and weekends. FECR alleges those plans were made without its approval, which is required through its agreement with Brightline, and that the plans threaten to create a logistical nightmare for South Florida. 'Instead of reducing congestion and improving transit efficiency, it will: Hinder the Counties' ability to alleviate highway traffic by diverting resources away from freight transport; disrupt critical supply chains, [and] jeopardize the efficiency of the PortMiami by forcing more freight onto trucks,' the complaint states. In October, the Biden administration pledged up to $389 million to Miami-Dade to develop transit in the county's northeast corridor as part of the Coastal Link project. The entire Miami-Dade portion of the project is estimated to cost $927 million, which the county expected to cover with a mix of state and federal grants and local dollars. The Florida Legislature removed funding for the commuter rail from this year's budget cycle, prompting worries about the project's future. Brightline has touted its imminent commuter rail agreements to investors as a sign of future growth and financial stability. In a monthly investor report from July of 2023, Brightline said it was making progress on commuter rail and expected revenues in the hundreds of millions of dollars by granting the counties access to the rail corridor. FECR argues that Brightline does not have the authority to give Miami-Dade, Broward or Palm Beach access to the tracks that FECR owns. It also claims that Brightline is at the brink of 'financial collapse' and says the 'covert' deals are an effort to stave off financial issues. Brightline has reported substantial financial losses, and its bond ratings have been downgraded multiple times this year, most recently on Wednesday. 'Today, the company teeters on the brink of insolvency and financial collapse,' the complaint states. 'But rather than gratitude for the use of the FEC Corridor, Brightline wants more — more trains and more profit.' Brightline filed a motion to dismiss FECR's lawsuit on Tuesday. In its motion, the passenger rail company calls FECR's allegations 'frivolous' and argues the proper venue to settle their dispute is not the courthouse. FECR 'chose to flout those contractual requirements and file its claims in court,' Brightline wrote.


USA Today
01-08-2025
- USA Today
Jeremy Fears Jr., Carson Cooper lead team to Moneyball Pro-Am championship
Add another trophy to the mantle for Jeremy Fears Jr. and Carson Cooper. Fears and Cooper capped off a strong showings in this year's Moneyball Pro-Am with a championship victory on Thursday evening. The two anticipated Spartans starters helped lead Tri-Star to the title over Faygo -- led by Jaxon Kohler and Divine Ugochukwu. Thursday night's semifinals and finals matchups were the last games of this year's event. This was the 20th annual Moneyball Pro-Am, which hopefully will be back again next summer as well. The Moneyball Pro-Am event is historically an opportunity for fans to get a look at the Spartans' offseason growth and itch the basketball scratch in the middle of summer. Cooper was a perfect example of watching offseason growth as he demonstrated an improved three-point shot during the event. Congratulations to Fears and Cooper on winning this year's Moneyball Pro-Am event. We will see if that strong play during the pro-am will continue onto the court this fall as Michigan State looks to defend their Big Ten title next season. Contact/Follow us @The SpartansWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Michigan State news, notes and opinion. You can also follow Robert Bondy on X @RobertBondy5.