
Middle Managers Vulnerable as 120 Companies Announce Layoffs
Companies across a broad array of industries and business sectors are announcing layoffs in May, according to WARNtracker.net, a national website where companies are required to report such moves. From retail to banking, food service to technology, over 120 companies are letting workers go by the dozens - or by the hundreds - according to reports published in Newsweek. Against this backdrop, organizations and employees are questioning the role of middle managers, moving towards self-directed work teams, and taking steps to cut into the middle. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg led the charge months ago, saying that 'managers managing managers' is a symbol of inefficiency, not support. Companies like Citi followed, reducing its 13 levels of management to eight. According to a survey from Korn Ferry, 44% of companies have cut back at the manager level. And that trend is expected to continue: Gartner predicts that 20% of organizations will use AI to flatten their organizations, eliminating more than half of current middle management in 2026.
Perhaps it's time to explore what leaders are really thinking in the age of AI. Planning, organizing and allocating resources are key parts of the manager's job description. Setting goals, or OKRs (Objectives and Key Results), is the first step in tracking performance and accountability from teams. Couldn't AI be used to allocate resources, identify and communicate goals, and provide follow-ups to ensure performance? Could agentic AI create work schedules, and provide follow-up reminders to direct performance, guide learning and increase personal development? For anyone who's used DuoLingo, the answer is, 'Yes.' Welcome to your performance review, conducted by ChatGPT.
Perhaps the above analysis misses a key component of what managers really do: they coach and encourage their employees on an interpersonal (human) level. What happens when that connection is lost? Losing managers can leave employees feeling 'directionless', according to Korn Ferry - where 40% of recent survey respondents identify this kind of uncertainty when managers are let go. Notice that sentiment and shareholder value are two different things. The fact is, AI is inevitable. That's why it's vital that employees (especially executives and managers) get clear on what's ahead.
When companies provide guidance and training on self-directed work teams (emphasizing the importance of self-leadership) they provide a new framework for decision making and performance. The key metric here, for business leaders, isn't a layoff statistic. It's a measurement of engagement.
Gallup reports that engagement has dropped another 2%, costing the world economy an estimated $438 billion in lost productivity. Instead of lamenting the current shifts around middle management, organizations need to take steps to drive employee engagement - a suffering metric that is directly tied to profitability, growth and customer expansion. At the heart of engagement is a two-part communication issue, for leaders and executives: (1) Can you walk the talk? and (2) What, exactly, is the talk?
A Harvard Business Review post on the 'Middle Manager of the Future' features this ambitious subheading: 'Skilled middle managers foster collaboration, inspire employees and link important functions at companies.' Middle managers aren't an endangered species, according to the article. They are evolving. But towards what exactly? For forward-thinking leaders, the manager evolution points towards more self-directed work teams.
Preparing for the future, for individual contributors and job seekers, means understanding how to be 'manager-proof'. Do you embrace self-directed work teams - not from a classroom standpoint, but from a practical one? Are you able to take ownership of tasks and responsibilities, identifying what needs to be done, with clarity? Inside the self-directed work team, are you able to be persuasive, clear and compelling as you share your ideas?
In the age of AI, survival of the fittest means taking greater ownership in your role - and your career. Being able to identify what needs to be done, and the resources needed to do it, is everybody's job right now. Middle management is shrinking - but self-leadership has never been more important.
Sophisticated leaders know that driving engagement begins with clear communication around a company's purpose. For employees, that same kind of clarity of purpose is required. The past has passed; the future of work is changing right now. How is your purpose aligned (aka 'engaged') in the world of AI?
Gallup says that 'if the world's workplace was [sic] fully engaged, $9.6 trillion in productivity could be added to the global economy.' Making employees manager-proof is the first step, on a human level, for improving engagement in age of AI. Training and coaching is key to understanding the new paradigm.
For leaders, concentrate on what your organization needs, right now: greater engagement. If you are going to move forward in you career, at any level, focus on self-leadership. And if you are struggling with where you are, and where your career or company is headed: coaching can help. You want to have every possible resource enrolled in your success. For high-growth executives, coaching the organization around greater ownership, human insight, and collaboration (with or without managers) is crucial to your purpose. And your company's profits. In a world where layoffs continue, self-leadership is the key to the future of work.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Meta in talks to hire former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman to join AI efforts, The Information reports
(Reuters) -Meta Platforms is in talks to hire former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman to join the Facebook parent's AI efforts, The Information reported on Wednesday, citing a person familiar with the matter. The social media giant is also in discussion with Daniel Gross, Friedman's partner in the investment fund NFDG, about joining the company to work on AI, the report added. Meta did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. The company is also in talks to partially buy out NFDG, the report said. Big tech companies are doubling down on AI partnerships and investment to stay ahead in the race for dominance. Meta announced a $14.8 billion investment in Scale AI last week, its second-largest investment to date. The company hired Scale AI CEO, Alexandr Wang, to work with Meta and lead its new superintelligence unit. Friedman is part of Meta's Advisory Group, an external advisory council established by the company to provide guidance on technology and product development. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Desperate Zuckerberg Apparently Offering OpenAI Staffers $100 Million Bonuses to Come Save His Failing AI Efforts
Certain sought-after AI engineers might want to jot this down: Mark Zuckerberg is apparently offering sign-on bonuses as high as $100 million — yes, a full tenth of a billion dollars — to join Meta's new "superintelligence" AI lab. There's only one caveat to snagging this life-altering offer: you need to work at OpenAI to get the invite. According to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Zuckerberg has been trying to poach his employees by offering nine-figure welcome bonuses, on top of annual salaries ranging anywhere from seven to nine figures. Altman, sometimes said to be Zuckerberg's chief co-competitor in the mythic "AI race," complained that Meta has attempted to hire "a lot of people" from his company. "So far, none of our best people have decided to take them up on that," he said on his brother Jack Altman's "Uncapped" podcast. Poaching is a common — though sometimes legally dubious — tactic in the highfalutin business world, and usually happens when a firm looks to scoop up a rival's high-profile executives, and sometimes the executive's underlings. In the US tech space, poaching usually looks like "big tech" firms nabbing promising young staffers from up-and-coming startups, fueling widespread allegations that the American tech industry runs on monopoly power rather than innovation. For Meta, poaching is both a familiar move, and likely a necessary one, if the company hopes to eke out the monopoly on consumer large language models (LLMs.) The company recently acquired the sketchy startup Scale AI, and is working to integrate its employees into Zuckerberg's superintelligence AI unit. That recently formed team is widely understood as Meta's last-ditch attempt to pull out all the stops in the face of mounting LLM failures. "I've heard that Meta thinks of us as their biggest competitor," Sam Altman quipped. "Their current AI efforts have not worked as well as they have hoped and I respect being aggressive and continuing to try new things." In all, Meta's seeking to fill 50 seats, with Zuckerberg reported to be personally involved in recruitment. His company has successfully poached researchers from Google's AI research group DeepMind, including Jack Rae, the team's principal scientist. But whether Zuckerberg's deep pockets will turn the tide on Meta's lagging LLM development remains to be seen. Altman, of course, has his doubts that you can buy an innovative team outright. "I think that there's a lot of people, and Meta will be a new one, that are saying 'we're just going to try to copy OpenAI,'" he said. "That basically never works. You're always going to where your competitor was, and you don't build up a culture of learning what it's like to innovate." OpenAI, meanwhile, recently acquired the expertise of former Apple bigwig Jony Ive in a $6.4 billion acquisition in May — making big spending seem more like the rule, rather than the exception. More on Meta: People Don't Realize Meta's AI App Is Publicly Blasting Their Humiliating Secrets to the World Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Oracle's Larry Ellison just rocked the billionaires club—a $40 billion gain has made him the second-richest man, ahead of Bezos and Zuckerberg
Oracle cofounder Larry Ellison is now the second-richest person in the world, after his cloud-computing business's stocks soared last week. The chairman's net worth surged by more than $40 billion, outpacing the wealth of Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg and reaching a high of $250.9 billion. But he'll have a hard time topping the riches of his close friend Elon Musk, who sits on a cool $405.8 billion fortune. No one was in a better mood last week than Larry Ellison—the Oracle cofounder shot up Forbes' billionaire rankings list, reaching the number two spot, right below his close friend Elon Musk. Ellison's net worth now stands tall at $250.9 billion after Oracle's recent earnings report triggered its shares to skyrocket. With approximately 41% of Oracle's shares in his name, the cloud-computing mogul saw his net worth climb by over $40 billion in a matter of days. On Thursday last week, his fortune grew by $25 billion, and increased by another $16 billion on Friday: easily two of the largest daily swells in billionaire net worth that week, according to Forbes. Now Ellison has overtaken Amazon's founder, Jeff Bezos, who is currently worth $229 billion, and Mark Zuckerberg, who has a $240 billion net worth, in the billionaires club. The one person he hasn't topped yet is Elon Musk—Ellison's close friend, who is still the world's wealthiest man with $405 billion in riches. There's nearly a $155 billion difference between their respective net worths, so Ellison has his work cut out for him if he ever hopes to reach number one. Last Wednesday, the afternoon earnings report was dubbed a 'watershed' moment for the cloud-computing company. It was also a big moment for Ellison's wallet. The report shows Oracle's total revenue for the 2025 fiscal year rose by 8%, reaching a whopping $57.4 billion. The $1.70 adjusted earnings per share outperformed Wall Street's expectations, alongside its unprecedented $15.9 billion in sales. One day after these figures were released, Oracle's stock soared by 13%—and by midafternoon Friday, it rose another 7% to a record of $215 per share. Ellison, the chairman and CTO of Oracle, subsequently enjoyed an 11-figure surge in net worth. Last Tuesday afternoon, the day before the cloud-computing titan released its earnings report, Ellison's net worth stood at $213 billion. While the 80-year-old entrepreneur may feel on top of the world right now, there's no telling where he'll be in 2026. Billionaires' wealth fluctuates all the time—Bernard Arnault, founder and CEO of luxury fashion house LVMH, was the world's richest person at the start of 2024 with $231 billion. Today, he's in seventh place with a net worth of $142 billion, thanks to tumbling stocks. However, TD Cowen analyst Derrick Wood said Oracle's 2026 fiscal year, starting this month, will be a 'major inflection point' for the business' cloud infrastructure services, propelled by 'massive demand for AI training workloads.' And Ellison himself sees the promise of what lies ahead. 'Oracle's future is bright in this new era of cloud computing. Oracle will be the number one cloud database company,' Ellison said in the business' earnings call last Friday. 'Oracle is already prospering in this new era of cloud computing and AI, and it's just the beginning.' Ellison sees the next year as a new frontier for Oracle, which could mean another big payout for the executive. But even if he takes the number one spot for the world's richest person, Musk probably won't have hard feelings—after all, they're good friends. 'I am not sure how many people know, but I'm very close friends with Elon Musk, and I'm a big investor in Tesla,' Ellison said during a 2018 conference call with analysts. Ellison and Musk are two peas in a pod—both are wildly successful tech entrepreneurs with big personalities. The Oracle cofounder has repeatedly defended Musk, arguing against public backlash that he 'doesn't know what he's doing,' saying he 'loved' articles about the Tesla founder 'smoking dope.' In 2018, Musk even appointed Ellison to his Tesla board, drawing scrutiny from critics who argued it's harder to maintain objectivity with friends on corporate boards. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data