logo
When Raoul Moat shot my twin in face he blew family apart – but cops could have stopped tragedy after chilling warning

When Raoul Moat shot my twin in face he blew family apart – but cops could have stopped tragedy after chilling warning

The Sun4 hours ago
WHEN former prisoner Raoul Moat shot PC David Rathband in the face, he not only blinded the traffic cop but also blew apart his family life – and effectively triggered his death.
It is 15 years since the crazed gunman went on a shooting spree, wounding his ex, murdering her new partner and sparking a week-long manhunt across the north of England.
8
8
8
After issuing a threat to the police that he would kill an officer, Moat crept up on PC Rathband's parked patrol car on the outskirts of Newcastle and blasted him at close range.
From that moment, traumatised David's life fell apart, and just 20 months later — after his wife Kath walked out on their 20-year marriage — he took his own life.
In the aftermath of his death in 2012 at the age of only 44, his family were barely speaking to each other.
But on the 15th anniversary of the shootings, PC Rathband's twin brother Darren exclusively revealed to The Sun how he is now in contact with David's 26-year-old daughter Mia.
He said: 'Every day without David is a s**t day, so an anniversary isn't something to celebrate.
'But thankfully I've just started talking to Mia again.
'It's beautiful — she's had a little boy, Ronnie, who looks the spit of my brother, and when I spoke to her she said, 'Come here, somebody's on the phone'.
'He came on and looked at me and went, 'Oh Grandad!'.
'I started crying and Mia started crying.
'Three weeks later, she rang me again and said, 'Just hold on a minute, somebody wants to meet you'.
'Mia turned the camera away to her lap and there was a little baby, a week old.
Chilling warning
'I hate getting really emotional — I'm a typical bloke.
'You just put it to the back of your mind and try to get on with it.
'It's been 15 years and it's still raw.
'But I knew Mia would always reach out.
'She told me, 'You're the closest thing I've got of my father — I need to ask you some questions'.
'She said, 'I'm really struggling to remember things about my dad because I was 13 at the time'.
'I said, 'Ring me and you can ask me anything — any questions.
'I'll tell you the truth, I'm really grateful that we are in touch again'.'
To Darren, David will always be his big brother, although they were born just two minutes apart.
They were inseparable while growing up in Staffordshire, where they both later joined the police.
David moved to Northumberland, while Darren emigrated to South ­Australia, where he served with the force in Adelaide.
It was the release of Moat from Durham Prison on July 1, 2010, after he had served an 18-week sentence for assault, that led to the terrible chain of consequences for David.
Two days after he got out, Moat shot and wounded his former girlfriend ­ Samantha Stobbart, then killed her new partner Chris Brown, who Moat wrongly believed was a policeman.
Moat then sent a chilling warning to the Northumbria force that he was 'hunting down police'.
The force did not issue a warning to its officers, and PC Rathband, who should not have been on duty that night, was blasted with a sawn-off shotgun by Moat, who had crept up to his car parked in the ­ Newcastle suburb of Denton Burn.
Nearly a week later, the net was closing on Moat following an occasionally bizarre search that involved TV survival expert Ray Mears and former footballer Paul 'Gazza' Gascoigne, who claimed he knew Moat and offered to take him 'chicken and lager' in an attempt to convince him to surrender.
After a six-hour stand-off with police, Moat shot himself dead near the market town of Rothbury.
8
8
8
Darren, 56, said: 'Honestly, if they set what happened to music it would be the Keystone Cops.
'They didn't put out a warning to officers there was a man out to kill police.
'Chief Constable Sue Sim held a public meeting in Rothbury with the door wide open while a madman with a gun was on the loose.
'And they walked Ray Mears in, dressed in a ­sergeant's uniform.
'Then the fiasco with Gazza turning up with a fishing rod and cans of beer, wanting to talk to Moat.'
Darren believes not enough was done for David in the aftermath of the shooting.
He said: 'David got shot square in the face.
'He was seen as a hero, he had survived with a bit of pride.
'But Northumbria Police breached their own human resources welfare policy because they were supposed to give him counselling.
'They were ­supposed to get him to return to work, but they never did any of it.'
After David had travelled to ­Australia to visit Darren, he returned home in February 2012 and hanged himself at his home in Blyth.
Darren said: 'I was surprised he lived as long as he did.
'I knew eventually he would take his own life.
'I'm proud of him because he made the decision, not Raoul Moat.
'He decided he'd had enough.
'He couldn't deal with being blind and he had the strength of character, because it [suicide] is hard.'
Poignantly, Darren also spoke about having his own suicidal thoughts.
He said: 'I've thought about it every day since he died and I haven't done it, because I can't do it.'
Wrong place at wrong time
And Darren believes that if David had received proper aftercare, he would still be here to enjoy life with his grandchildren.
He said: 'David should have had counselling from the time it happened.
'Anyone injured in the line of duty should be sent to a medical ­professional without delay to assess if they have PTSD.
'Police officers never ask for help because, if they do, they're made to feel like a leper.
'If they made it ­mandatory, then that stigma about mental health gets taken away because everybody has to go.'
When David was in Australia, he told his brother that all he wanted was to be able to 'book off' the shift — the customary end to an officer's work period — which he had never ­completed because of Moat.
So after his death, Darren planned to book David off shift at Newcastle's Etal Lane police station as his coffin was being carried to a memorial ­service at the city's cathedral.
But Darren says he was told he could not go inside the station, so instead he officially booked Tango Charlie 190 — PC Rathband — off shift in the car park.
He said: 'I also asked the Chief Constable in one of our meetings, 'Can you posthumously make him Sergeant, because he'd qualified for the promotion?'. That never happened.'
During our 90-minute conversation, I accidentally called Darren by his late brother's name.
But when I apologised profusely, he said: 'You aren't the first and hopefully you won't be the last.
'People calling me David is a tonic, it's just like he's still here.
'I don't want people to forget him.'
Now Darren is backing a drive, the 999 Injured And Forgotten campaign, to create a medal for the thousands of other emergency service personnel who have been discharged from service due to injury in the line of duty.
He said: 'David survived being shot in the face and if he had decided to live and left the force because of his injuries, he would not have got a medal to show he'd served.
'There are more than 16,000 other police officers who, when they have had to leave through injury, don't even get a ­certificate.
'The only way you get a medal is if you die in the line of duty and you receive the new Elizabeth Emblem.
Every day without David is a s**t day, so an anniversary isn't something to celebrate. But thankfully I've just started talking to Mia again. It's beautiful
Darren Rathband
'Or if you display bravery, you will get a medal for gallantry, like the George Cross.
'But if you are injured on duty and you don't complete enough years for a long-service medal, you don't get any recognition.
'Nobody would ever know that you've ever done any service.
'There's nothing for officers like David, who were just in the wrong place at the wrong time.'
He added: 'My dream is to get a medal for David and give it to Mia's children.'
8
8
MORE than 240 MPs have backed the 999 Injured And Forgotten campaign to award a medal to former police officers and other emergency services staff badly injured while on duty.
Tomorrow, nearly 30 wounded police officers will attend a rally outside Parliament calling for a Commons debate on the issue.
Former Sussex detective Tom Curry, 75, is leading the campaign.
He says: 'In 2017, PC Kris Aves was mown down on Westminster Bridge along with 49 other people by the terrorist who went on to kill PC Keith Palmer.
'PC Palmer was rightly honoured with the George Medal for bravery.
'Had PC Aves died, he would have got the Elizabeth Emblem, but because he survived, even though he is paralysed, he gets nothing.
'Billy Burns is a brave officer who tackled a bank robber who was carrying a high-calibre weapon.
'PC Burns was shot in the mouth, but he hasn't got anything to show that he was ever a copper.
'In 1983, an IRA bomb planted outside Harrods killed three police officers and injured 14.
'The three who were killed get the Elizabeth Emblem, but Pam White was one of those who survived.
'At the age of 24, she suffered life-changing injuries and had to leave the force. She has nothing to show she was a copper.
'More than 40 years later, she sees three officers get a posthumous award and it adds insult to injury. How do you think she feels now? She feels worthless.
'This is an injustice that needs to be put right.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I was reporting in London on the day of the 7/7 bombings - here's what happened
I was reporting in London on the day of the 7/7 bombings - here's what happened

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

I was reporting in London on the day of the 7/7 bombings - here's what happened

I heard about the 7/7 bombings from the guard on my train into London. Well, sort of. We had ground to a halt sometime after 9am just outside Croydon when he ambled through our carriage to warn us there was trouble ahead - a power surge had knocked out the whole of the London Underground network. That was all he could tell us, so I had to work out the rest for myself from ringing the people who might really know what was going on. At that stage, officially, the emergency services were dealing with a fire at Aldgate Tube station. A senior press officer at Scotland Yard, the Metropolitan Police headquarters, told me rather more than he would normally have done: it was serious, several incidents, some casualties. "Anyone dead?" I asked. "Yes, but please don't report that yet," he said. "Maybe." 3:10 I was told there were explosions at five Tube stations and anti-terror branch officers were on their way. At around 9.40am, via my mobile phone from the train carriage, I repeated all that live on Sky News. While I was on air a colleague, producer Bob Mills, phoned in with an extraordinary account of him seeing a blast rip apart a red double-decker bus near Euston. When I finally put down the phone my fellow passengers were understandably alarmed. So was I. And not for the first time, I was in the wrong place as a major crime story was breaking, and if I was worried, it was more that my rivals would be getting ahead of me on the details. Sky News was already showing helicopter footage of dazed and bloodied passengers emerging from Aldgate Tube station. The more seriously injured were being stretchered away. All Underground and bus services were suspended, and with no taxi in sight and through the drizzle, I walked the two and a half miles from Cannon Street station to Scotland Yard in Westminster. I was headed against a tide of bewildered people through damp streets that echoed with the wail and screech of emergency vehicle sirens. At precisely 11.10am my phone died as the whole mobile system crashed under the weight of calls. I was told later that Scotland Yard had considered shutting the network for fear the bombs - like those that killed 193 train commuters in Madrid a year earlier - had been triggered by mobile phones used as timers. I got to Scotland Yard around 11.30am, joined a posse of reporters and our own live camera crew on the pavement outside, plugged in my earpiece and was there, day and night, for three weeks. Read more: 7/7 - the bravery of victims and responders 20 years on How Prevent is tackling extremism 20 years on Why is the govt's anti-terrorism programme controversial? Before midday, Met Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair went on TV, saying that the capital had been hit by "probably a major terrorist attack". He repeated, mistakenly, what I had reported, that there had been five Underground explosions. In fact there were only three, at Aldgate, Edgware Road and Russell Square stations. Get Sky News on WhatsApp Follow our channel and never miss an update Tap here to follow The confusion arose because some survivors had escaped by walking through tunnels and emerging above ground further away at King's Cross and Liverpool Street. The bombs were a huge shock, but not unexpected. My mind went back four years to the al Qaeda 9/11 attacks in the United States. Days after 9/11, at a meeting of the Metropolitan Police Authority, I had listened to the then-commissioner Sir John Stevens tell the committee: "Make no mistake, we're next." By 1pm police sources suggested at least 40 people had died with hundreds injured, many seriously. In an evening report I raised the spectre of suicide bombers. If confirmed they would be the first in the UK. I was told by someone who had been to the site of the bus blast that a body recovered there had injuries consistent with those found on suicide bombers in Israel and Iraq. 1:22 At 6.13pm police announced that at least 37 were dead. It went up to 38 that night when a critically injured victim died in hospital. The eventual death toll was 52. It had been an extraordinary day, but there was much more drama to come over the next three weeks, with the discovery of the bomb factory in Leeds, unexploded devices, the identities of the terrorists, an attempted copycat attack and the shooting by police of Brazilian electrician Jean Charles de Menezes, 27, mistaken for a would-be bomber. Britain's terror threat had changed forever. Who were the victims of the 7/7 bombings The 52 victims of the London terror attack on 7 July 2005 are remembered with a memorial in Hyde Park. Here are the names of the victims and where they were killed. Russell Square James Adams, 32 Sam Badham, 35 Philip Beer, 22 Anna Brandt, 41 Ciaran Cassidy, 22 Rachelle Chung For Yeun, 27 Liz Daplyn, 26 Arthur Frederick, 60 Karolina Gluck, 29 Gamze Gunoral, 24 Lee Christopher Harris, 30 Ojara Ikeagwu, 56 Emily Jenkins, 24 Helen Jones, 28 Susan Levy, 53 Shelley Mather, 26 Michael Matsushita, 37 James Mayes, 28 Behnaz Mozakka, 47 Mihaela Otto, 46 Atique Sharifi, 24 Ihab Slimane, 24 Christian Small, 28 Monika Suchocka, 23 Mala Trivedi, 51 Adrian Johnson, 37 Tavistock Square Anthony Fatayi-Williams, 26 Jamie Gordon, 30 Giles Hart, 55 Marie Hartley, 34 Miriam Hyman, 31 Shahara Islam, 20 Neetu Jain, 37 Sam Ly, 28 Shyanuja Parathasangary, 30 Anat Rosenberg, 39 Philip Russell, 28 William Wise, 54 Gladys Wundowa, 50 Aldgate Lee Baisden, 34 Benedetta Ciaccia, 30 Richard Ellery, 21 Richard Gray, 41 Anne Moffat, 48 Carrie Taylor, 24 Fiona Stevenson, 29 Edgware Road Michael Stanley Brewster, 52 Jonathan Downey, 34 David Graham Foulkes, 22 Colin William Morley, 52 Jennifer Vanda Nicholson, 24 Laura Webb, 29

Don't assume that junking juries will speed up justice
Don't assume that junking juries will speed up justice

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Don't assume that junking juries will speed up justice

Proposals will be unveiled this week that could mean crimes now decided by juries are heard instead by a judge with two magistrates in a radical change to a centuries-old cornerstone of our justice system. No one would deny the present crisis in criminal justice. Delays are at record levels: nearly 80,000 cases are waiting to be heard and, without reform, the backlog is predicted to reach 100,000 by 2029. In December, Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, appointed Sir Brian Leveson, a highly experienced former Court of Appeal judge, to propose measures for reform. He was specifically tasked with exploring the idea of a new intermediate court between magistrates and the Crown Court, consisting of a district judge sitting with two magistrates. • Priest, 83, is arrested in Palestine Action protest in London This new court could lead to jury trial being scrapped for thousands of middle-ranking offences. At present defendants are allowed the choice of being tried by a judge and jury or by magistrates for such crimes as theft, common assault with a racial or religious aggravation, dangerous driving, some offences of criminal damage and drug possession. Defendants in fraud cases could also lose the right to jury trial. With certain offences, Leveson is expected to give defendants the right to ask for a judge-only trial. And if there is strong public disapproval of a crime, some may do just that. But many would surely prefer to wait and chance their arm with a jury and the higher prospect of acquittal. Meanwhile, lower-level offenders, whose crimes carry perhaps up to two years in jail, would lose the choice of jury trial altogether. • The judge who sentences criminals with a synthetic voice Is the state of the system now so dire that eroding the right to trial by one's peers is justified? Many believe it is when weighed against the injustice of serious crimes going unpunished through lengthy delay. But judges are already privately voicing concerns. A new court will cost money and training and need more district judges, magistrates and criminal lawyers who are prepared to do this doubtless lesser-remunerated work. Juries give no reasons for their verdicts; jury room deliberations are sacrosanct. Non-jury courts, however, will have to do so. There may be endless appeals, fresh delays and costs, defeating the whole object. Instead of jettisoning centuries-old rights, the existing system could be better funded to provide more judge-time and sittings. After all, the chronic lack of this, exacerbated by Covid, is what has led to the present crisis. Either way, more funding will be needed. But if the sacred cow of jury trial is to be sacrificed to expediency, the cull must be worth it. Frances Gibb is a former Times legal editor and host of The Lord Chancellors: Where Politics meets Justice podcast

Post Office scandal victim: 'I need someone to be punished'
Post Office scandal victim: 'I need someone to be punished'

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Post Office scandal victim: 'I need someone to be punished'

Former sub-postmaster Harjinder Butoy spent more time in prison than any other victim of the Post Office Horizon IT 18 months in jail, it then took another 15 years to clear his name. He is one of dozens of sub-postmasters who gave evidence to the official inquiry into what inquiry chair, Sir Wyn Williams, will deliver the first part of his final report on Tuesday, which will focus on the human impact of the scandal and will also look at Mr Butoy is not sure he will be able to watch. "It's going to bring back too many bad memories for me," he told the BBC, adding he needs "someone to be punished". The Post Office scandal is believed to be one of the biggest miscarriages of justices in UK of victims were wrongly blamed for financial losses from the faulty Horizon computer system which was rolled out across the Post Office branch network from than 900 people were prosecuted and 236 were sent to Butoy was one of them, convicted of stealing more than £200,000 from his branch in Nottinghamshire in 2007. "We lost everything from the day I got sentenced. We lost our business. I had to declare bankruptcy. My wife and three kids had to move back in with my parents, " he he was released from prison his conviction meant he struggled to find work and his health also suffered."I just want everyone to know the impact, what's happened to us all. But I also need someone to be punished and let them go to prison and feel like what we've been through," he conviction was overturned in 2021. Parliament later passed a law exonerating all those who had been convicted. 'Huge day' The inquiry heard from 189 people who gave evidence on how the scandal had turned their lives upside lost their businesses, some lost their homes, and most lost their reputations and financial second part of the inquiry's report – on how the scandal happened and why – may not be published until 2026. Although Harjinder Butoy may not be watching, Wendy Buffrey and Nichola Arch will be among dozens of victims and their families travelling to hear Sir Wyn speak as he presents Volume 1 of his report. Many more will be watching the proceedings livestreamed over the Buffrey, who had a Post Office in Cheltenham, was suspended after an audit in December 2008 and prosecuted. She had to sell her house and business to pay off the alleged shortfall in her accounts, and has suffered with her mental says the publication of the report is going to be "a huge day"."To actually have the establishment recognise what they've put us through is huge," she said. "The apologies we've had from the Post Office have been so mealy-mouthed, not thought through, and really not sincere."Mrs Arch, who managed the Chalford Hill branch near Stroud, says: "You would hope the government would acknowledge every detail of that report."She was accused of stealing from pensioners, shunned by her local community, and spat on outside a local two years she was found not guilty, "but the damage had been done by then".The impact on her family was "like a tsunami", she says. "It's like a cobweb. It just affects every single friend, family, child, you know, connected to you." 'Painful' compensation issue For many victims of the scandal, the most pressing issue is financial the main reason why Sir Wyn has split his report into two, to publish his findings on the progress of compensation as soon as has taken a keen interest on how redress is being delivered, holding several hearings on the issue and delivering an interim report in 2023 where he likened the various schemes to a "patchwork quilt with some holes in it"."Compensation has been a painful issue," says solicitor David Enright, from Howe & Co, which represents hundreds of wronged sub-postmasters."However, we are also hoping [the report] will remind people of what the real harm has been, and that is the shattering of families across the country. "According to the latest figures from the government, more than £1bn has been paid out in compensation to over 7,300 hundreds are still waiting for their final payments and many are locked in disputes over the amount they have been Butoy has only just submitted his claim for compensation. It has taken three years to gather all the necessary reports and paperwork. "Clearing our name was so good. But compensation is very hard. It's like they don't believe us, don't trust us."His solicitor, Neil Hudgell, whose firm also represents hundreds of other former sub-postmasters, told the BBC that if the situation doesn't improve, full and fair redress for all victims could take another two to three Solicitors says it has helped more than 300 people agree damages totalling more than £170m. However, Mr Hudgell says his firm still has more than 700 cases waiting to be resolved through the various compensation the police officer leading the investigation into the scandal has admitted criminal trials may not start until Mr Butoy, and others who want to see those responsible held to account, the wait continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store