Taunton, Easton elections officials: There are no 'missing' mail-in ballots for state rep
According to official election results, Democrat Lisa Field has beaten Republican Larry Quintal for the race for state representative in Taunton and Easton by 17 votes.
Quintal has indicated he will be seeking a recount. Field declared victory on election night, Tuesday, June 10.
In a June 12 Facebook post, Quintal wrote, "I question many things" about the election. He wrote that he is concerned that there were "mail in ballots that were stamped June 10th by the USPS but were delivered on June 11th" and that "they don't want" those ballots "counted."
But both the Easton town clerk and the Taunton elections director disputed the idea that mail in ballots that were delivered after 8 p.m. on election day are legally eligible to be counted.
The state representative race between Quintal and Field was a special election to fill a vacancy created by the death of incumbent Carol Doherty in February — and under Massachusetts state law, mail-in ballots delivered after the close of the in-person voting cannot be counted as valid ballots in a special election.
Here's what we know.
According to the Massachusetts secretary of state's website, with the exception of the regular biannual November state election, mail-in ballots must 'reach your local election office or drop box by close of polls on Election Day in order to be counted." (In the biannual November statewide elections, mail in ballots can be received up to three days after election day, according to the secretary of state's website.)
This means that mail-in ballots that arrived after 8 p.m. on Tuesday could not be counted in the election results.
The Gazette sent questions about mail-in ballots to the city of Taunton and town of Easton. Taunton's elections department issued a written statement about the election results on Thursday, June 12 2025.
The written statement cited a Massachusetts law that says that mail in ballots "shall be received by the city or town clerk before the hour fixed for closing the polls." (That law says that the exception to this is biannual November state elections, during which ballots that arrive up to three days after the close of the election day polls can still be counted.)
Provisional ballots and overseas ballots could have been counted in the special election between Field and Quintal, according to the written statement. However, in Taunton, "our office does not have any provisional or overseas ballots to be counted," the Taunton elections department said.
According to the written statement, 409 mail-in ballots were requested by Taunton voters for the special election, and 327 of those were returned before 8 p.m. on election day, the deadline by which they needed to be delivered in order to be counted.
"This leaves 82 ballots that were mailed to voters, but not received by the Elections Department by the close of polls," the written statement said. "It is not unusual to have less than a 100% return rate of Vote by Mail Ballots, in any election. They are not missing, they simply were not received by the Elections Department by the appropriate time to be cast and counted."
"Since the close of polls on June 10th at 8 p.m. our office has received 15 late ballots," the press release said. "Per the law, it is too late to count these Vote by Mail Ballots after the close of polls on Election Day.
Easton Town Clerk Danielle Sicard told the Gazette in a Thursday, June 12, email that "mail in ballots must be received by 8PM on Election Day to be counted."
Sicard said that Easton had two overseas ballots, one confidential ballot, and one ballot that was placed in the "hand count compartment" by the voter and that those four ballots were not counted in the unofficial results but were counted in the official results. (The Easton unofficial results and Easton official results differed by four votes).
According to the official results from Easton, Field won Easton with 1,033 votes to Quintal's 961 votes.
According to the official results from Taunton, Quintal won Taunton with 1,597 votes to Field's 1,542 votes.
In total, Field won the election by 17 votes, garnering 2,575 votes to Quintal's 2,558, according to the official election votes from both municipalities.
The 3rd Bristol District consists of parts of Taunton and parts of Easton:
Easton: Precincts 4A, 5, and 6
Taunton: Ward 1 Precincts A, B, Ward 2, Ward 5, Ward 7 and Ward 8
Lisa Field, a Taunton Democrat, comes from a family of union activists and workers, she told the Gazette.
She works as associate director for the Massachusetts Nurses Association (MNA). Her role involves advocating for legislation for the MNA on beacon hill. Her position as a lobbyist, she said, gives her insight into how the State House works.
Field told the Gazette she had been encouraged by her friend, Carol Doherty, to enter state politics, and, upon Doherty's death, wanted to "continue her legacy."
"I know what families in Taunton and Easton are going through because I've lived it: family and friends struggling with substance use, and the crushing weight of rising costs of living — even losing my home," Field told the Gazette.
Her campaign priorities included increasing government transparency, reviewing state education funding, examining the Department of Public Health's enforcement powers, and addressing potential impacts of federal cuts on veterans services.
Quintal, a Republican, is a Taunton city councilor and co-owner/funeral director at Silva Funeral Home on Broadway in Taunton.
Quintal won his first term on City Council in November 2021 and his second term in November 2023. He told the Gazette during his state rep campaign he believes his profession prepared him for politics.
'Caring for and putting people first,' and 'listening to people' come naturally to him, he said.
With reporting by Daniel Schemer.
This article originally appeared on The Taunton Daily Gazette: Taunton, Easton election officials: No 'missing' mail-in ballots
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump tax law could trigger about $500B in Medicare cuts over decade without fix: CBO
Recent analysis from the Congressional Budget Office estimated that Medicare spending would see steep cuts over roughly the next decade absent congressional action, following passage of President Trump's major tax law last month. The nonpartisan budget scorekeeper crunched the numbers of potential across-the-board cuts that federal programs could see under the Statutory Pay‑As‑You‑Go Act of 2010 as a result of the enactment of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' — which it estimates could cost trillions of dollars over the next 10 years. The 2010 law, enacted under the Obama administration, seeks to require Congress to ensure new legislation is budget-neutral and can be enforced with the threat of automatic cuts, also known as 'sequestration,' to counter excess costs. But Congress has often enacted legislation over the years to avoid those cuts under both Republican and Democratic administrations. CBO noted in a June letter that sequestration has never been triggered under the law since its enactment in 2010. However, in its analysis, conducted at the request of Democrats, CBO estimated the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) would be required to issue a 'sequestration order not more than 14 days after the end of the current session of Congress' to cut fiscal 2026 spending by $415 billion, if Congress does not act. The office estimated that reductions in Medicare spending would be limited to about $45 billion for fiscal year 2026 under the 2010 law, leaving '$370 billion to be sequestered from the federal budget's remaining direct spending accounts in that year.' CBO also noted that the law exempts large accounts that fund programs like Social Security, while further estimating that the OMB would 'have roughly $120 billion in budgetary resources available for cancellation in 2026 — less than the remaining amount that would be required to be sequestered.' CBO's analysis included a closer breakdown of how Medicare spending would fare under such circumstances. 'The 4 percent maximum reduction in Medicare spending would continue to apply to sequestration orders for years after 2026,' it said. 'If OMB ordered a sequestration of $415 billion for each year through 2029 and $339 billion each year from 2030 through 2034, the ordered reductions in Medicare spending would increase to $76 billion in 2034 and would total $491 billion over the 2027–2034 period.' When factoring in fiscal 2026, the estimated spending reductions in store for Medicare would total more than $500 billion. 'After accounting for the reduction in Medicare spending, the required reduction in spending for other programs would exceed the estimated amount of resources available to those programs in each year over the 2027–2034 period,' CBO said. It added that, if the OMB 'sequestered all of the funding for those programs, the total amounts would be less than the reductions required by' the 2010 law. The Hill has reached out to OMB for comment. The CBO has estimated Trump's major tax package will add nearly $3.4 trillion to the nation's deficits over roughly the next decade, not factoring in macroeconomic and debt-service effects. However, Republicans have largely downplayed the cost of the tax cuts and argue the overall plan will help boost the economy.
USA Today
42 minutes ago
- USA Today
Liberty University faces second lawsuit accusing it of mishandling sexual assault cases
A former Liberty University employee says she was terminated in part for cooperating with a federal investigation of the school's handling of sexual assault, according to recently filed court documents. In her suit against the private Christian university, Erika Woolfolk stated she was paid less, required to work more, and the subject of a hostile work environment while employed in the university's office of Equity and Compliance and Title IX. Woolfolk's work involved investigating cases of sexual violence on campus, of which she alleged her bosses would improperly predetermine their outcomes, according to her lawsuit. She claimed in the filing that she shared that information and more about the university's 'systemic violations of federal law' with the U.S. Department of Education. She also claims she was fired for it. She is now the second former Liberty University employee who has alleged in lawsuits that they reported the university's improper and unethical investigations into sexual assault and were later terminated. Most recently, Peter Brake sued the university along similar grounds and his firing was cited in Woolfolk's filing. Both suits also name as a defendant Ashley Reich, a former top administrator at the university who oversaw the Title IX office. In a statement to USA TODAY, Liberty University declined to respond to all the allegations but disagreed with Woolfolk's claims. It stated that her termination did not have to do with her race or her interactions with the federal government. Instead, her firing was tied to "legitimate business reasons" related to Title IX investigations. USA TODAY reached out to Reich for comment but received no response prior to publication. The Biden-era Education Department in 2024 found that the university had created a culture where students and others were afraid to report sexual violence. The university was penalized $16 million as a result. It also remains on federal monitoring through April 2026. Liberty has previously said it believed it was treated unfairly by the Biden administration, while agreeing 'there were numerous deficiencies that existed in the past' with its compliance with the Clery Act. That regulation includes requirements for how universities respond to and report sexual assault and other crimes on their campuses. More: Liberty to pay Jerry Falwell Jr. $15 million settlement after high-profile sex scandal The government's final report found that college administrators overlooked and failed to track repeat cases of sexual violence on campus, and that it failed to warn students of potential danger. It laid out how university officials tried to cover their tracks by seeking technology staff to delete hard drives. Liberty, based in Lynchburg, Virginia, is among the nation's largest and most prominent Christian universities. The school is also hugely popular among Republican politicians. Jerry Falwell, a televangelist and conservative figure, started the school in 1971. The university has grown thanks to online students – about 124,000 combined in the 2023-24 academic year, according to the school – and it took nearly $880 million in federal financial aid for its students in the 2022-2023 academic year, according to the Department of Education. What did Woolfolk allege? In her lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. District Court in the Western District of Virginia, Woolfolk stated she earned undergraduate and master's degrees at the school and had been working there since 2014. She initially produced content for the Liberty Flames Sports Network, before transferring to the Office of Equity and Compliance/Title IX in 2018. In that office, she was the only Black employee and faced a hostile work environment, the suit states. She alleged she was paid less than her more inexperienced peers and was asked to work longer hours on more arduous tasks. She said she was denied promotions and accommodations, like remote work, while Reich routinely stayed home, according to the lawsuit. She also described facing racial comments from her colleagues, like one who stereotyped 'Blacks as either 'black-black' or 'white-black'' with more positive connotations for the latter, according to the lawsuit. The suit also included screenshots from Microsoft Teams chats where her peers joked about naming a coworker's new dog after Confederate generals. Woolfolk's suit also states that Reich regularly influenced the findings of Title IX cases, either directly or through another employee. In another instance, Woolfolk learned details of a confidential case were improperly shared throughout the office, which 'posed significant risks of prejudice to complainants and respondents.' That was because members of her team would sometimes have to serve as neutral deciders in cases other than their own. In 2022, Woolfolk spoke to Education Department investigators. Her suit states she told them about numerous violations of Title IX, which included 'systematic efforts to minimize and downplay sexual assault reports; and predetermined case outcomes before investigations were completed.' She also alleged that Reich was aware of her actions. By June 2024, Woolfolk said she had filed an internal complaint against Reich related to workplace discrimination and retaliation for cooperating with the federal government. She was assigned to work virtually, but was fired days later. The suit stated that the university fired her for unspecified compliance issues. She was terminated on the same day as two other investigators, including Peter Brake, who had also raised complaints about Reich. Reich now works at the Education Department where she'll be recused from matters involving the school. In a statement to USA TODAY, a department official praised her nearly two decades of working in higher education, policy development and government affairs, and said that she'll help advance President Donald Trump's agenda but didn't offer more details about her is seeking legal fees and an unspecified amount of Quintana is an investigative reporter at USA TODAY. He can be reached at cquintana@ or via Signal at 202-308-9021. He is on X at @CQuintanaDC
Axios
42 minutes ago
- Axios
Private nuke waste storage in NM seen as "impossible" in near term
A company seeking to open a temporary storage site for commercial nuclear waste acknowledged that New Mexico's political opposition has at least temporarily clouded its prospects. Why it matters: Holtec International said a Supreme Court ruling in June over waste storage reaffirmed the company's license from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to pursue the site in southeastern New Mexico. Driving the news: Holtec, however, said in a July 28 letter to the project's local supporters that opposition from the New Mexico Legislature and Democratic Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham was a hindrance. "Unfortunately, the passage of state legislation that effectively prohibits the construction of the [site], combined with the continued public opposition expressed by New Mexico's current administration, has made further advancement of the project impossible in the near future," William F. Gill, Holtec's vice president and senior counsel, said in the letter. Lujan Grisham's predecessor, Republican Susana Martinez, backed the project. But state lawmakers passed a law in 2023 seeking to block it. Gill said the company would seek to terminate a revenue-sharing agreement with the Eddy-Lea Energy Alliance, the local group backing the project. The agreement would give the alliance a share of the project's revenue once the facility was operational in exchange for land. Zoom in: Holtec spokesman Patrick O'Brien said in a statement that the project isn't doomed and "remains a viable part of the solution" to spent fuel accumulating at nuclear reactor sites. "The two parties, with a nearly decade-long relationship, have discussed options available moving forward on both the revenue sharing and land purchase aspects under the current agreement, and will continue to do so," he said. Lujan Grisham — who has expressed repeated fears that a temporary site could become permanent — is term-limited and leaves office in January 2027. Catch up fast: The Supreme Court ruled in June that Texas and oil interests can't challenge the NRC's permit for a separate privately owned temporary nuclear waste storage site not far from Holtec's.
