One of China's Few Surviving Builders Makes U-Turn on Debt Plans
The company said it should explore 'a holistic solution' to the situation, according to an exchange filing, a term that usually points to a debt restructuring.
The statement came after the developer failed to make interest payments on a $434.7 million bond within a 30-day grace period, something that would typically lead to a default.
Road King in June had proposed changing certain terms of its existing bonds in an effort to ease liquidity pressure. At the time, it said it expected to have cash available for interest payments this year, but had concerns about next year. The proposed changes failed to win sufficient approval from creditors.
Road King's about-face signals a further deepening of China's years-long property crisis, which continues to roil developers. Just this week, state-backed China South City Holdings Ltd. was ordered to liquidate by a Hong Kong court, and news came that China Evergrande Group, once the country's largest developer by sales, would have its Hong Kong stock delisted.
Road King has about $1.5 billion of offshore debt, including bank debt and bonds, the company said in the filing. Its 5.2% dollar notes due in 2029 fell 2.3 cents to 19.4 cents on Wednesday, the lowest level since April 2024, Bloomberg-compiled data show.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
5 minutes ago
- Hans India
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi to visit India on Monday
Chinese Foreign Affairs Minister Wang Yi is set to visit India on August 18 (Monday) for the 24th Round of Talks Between the Special Representatives of China and India on the Boundary Question, Beijing confirmed on Saturday. "From August 18 to 20, Member of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee, Minister of Foreign Affairs and China's Special Representative on the China-India boundary question Wang Yi will visit India and hold the 24th Round of Talks Between the Special Representatives of China and India on the Boundary Question at the invitation of the Indian side," the Chinese Ministry for Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The visit is scheduled to take place shortly before Prime Minister Narendra Modi travels to China to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit scheduled to take place at Tianjin, from August 31 to September 1. The Chinese side also welcomed PM Modi's participation in the SCO Summit. At a briefing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said, "China welcomes Prime Minister Modi to China for the SCO Tianjin Summit. We believe that with the concerted effort of all parties, the Tianjin summit will be a gathering of solidarity, friendship and fruitful results, and the SCO will enter a new stage of high-quality development featuring greater solidarity, coordination, dynamism and productiveness." According to the Chinese Foreign Ministry, leaders of over 20 countries, including all member states of the SCO and heads of 10 international organisations, will attend relevant events of the summit, which, Jiakun said, will be the "largest summit in scale since the establishment of the SCO." This will be PM Modi's first visit to China since the Galwan clash in 2020, which severely strained bilateral ties. The breakthrough in bilateral talks, first after the Galwan Valley face-off between the soldiers of the two countries at the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in June 2020, was made possible after India and China reached an agreement on patrolling along the nearly 3500-km LAC to end the four-year-long border confrontation. In July, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar visited China to attend the Meeting of the Council of the Ministers of Foreign Affairs in Tianjin. He also held discussions with his Chinese counterpart on the sidelines of the meeting. He also called on Chinese President Xi Jinping, along with his fellow SCO Foreign Ministers. Earlier in June, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh visited China to attend the SCO Defence Ministers Meeting. India had refused to endorse the joint declaration at the SCO Defence Ministers' meeting, citing the exclusion of concerns around terrorism as a key reason. India stated that it wanted concerns about terrorism reflected in the document, which was not acceptable to one particular country; therefore, the statement was not adopted. During his visit, Singh met his Chinese counterpart, Admiral Don Jun, and the two leaders had a "constructive and forward-looking exchange of views" on issues related to bilateral ties. In June, National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval also visited China to attend the 20th Meeting of the SCO Security Council Secretaries. In his intervention at the meeting, he highlighted the need to shun double standards in the fight against terrorism and take decisive actions against UN-proscribed terrorists and entities like LeT, JeM and their proxies and dismantle their terror eco-systems.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
5 minutes ago
- First Post
'Russia lost an oil client': Trump says he ‘may not have to' impose secondary tariffs on India after Putin meet
Trump on Friday said Russia has 'lost an oil client' after Washington imposed penalties on New Delhi for buying Russian crude, but hinted he may not impose similar secondary tariffs on nations continuing such purchases. US President Donald Trump speaks during a visit to the Kennedy Centre in Washington. He warned that Russia would face very severe consequences if it didn't adhere to a ceasefire after Friday's meeting. Reuters US President Donald Trump on Friday said Russia has 'lost an oil client' after Washington penalised New Delhi for buying Russian crude, but further emphasised that he may hold off on imposing similar secondary tariffs on other countries continuing such purchases of oil. 'Well, he (Russian President Vladimir Putin) lost an oil client, so to speak, which is India, which was doing about 40 per cent of the oil. China, as you know, is doing a lot… And if I did what's called a secondary sanction, or a secondary tariff, it would be very devastating from their standpoint. If I have to do it, I'll do it. Maybe I won't have to do it,' Trump told Fox News before leaving for Alaska to meet Putin. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's tariffs on India His remarks came even as New Delhi has not confirmed any halt in oil imports from Moscow, despite Washington's decision to levy a fresh 25 per cent duty, on top of an earlier 25 per cent tariff, on Indian goods from 27 August. Earlier, Trump (on August 6) escalated the pressure by doubling duties on Indian products to 50 per cent, targeting New Delhi for its continued Russian oil imports. India condemned the move as 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable,' warning it would hit exports in sectors such as textiles, leather and marine goods. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said India 'will not back down' under economic pressure. Bloomberg reported that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian crude following Trump's action, though no official confirmation has been made. Indian Oil chairman AS Sahney said on Thursday that India 'has not halted purchases from Russia' and continues to buy solely on economic grounds. India, which became Russia's largest oil buyer in 2022 after Western sanctions, faces the prospect of its crude import bill rising by USD 9 billion this year and USD 12 billion next year if it cuts off Russian supplies, according to the State Bank of India. The report suggested Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the UAE could fill the gap. Russian crude is also being offered to Indian refiners at discounted rates as EU sanctions and US threats weigh on global demand, Bloomberg cited data firm Kpler as saying.
Hindustan Times
5 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
What might Trumpian meddling mean for Intel?
WHEN LIP-BU TAN was summoned to the White House on Monday, he was ostensibly there to explain his investments in Chinese startups. After the meeting Donald Trump, who just a few days earlier had called for the boss of Intel to resign, was full of praise for his 'amazing story'. Mr Tan has kept his job. But he probably had not reckoned on gaining a co-CEO. Mr Trump is now reported to be considering an investment in the chipmaker on behalf of America's government. Intel, whose shares have jumped by 10% in response to the news of a potential bail-out, is in a funk. Demand for its old chips is waning.(REUTERS FILE) Intel, whose shares have jumped by 10% in response to the news of a potential bail-out, is in a funk. Demand for its old chips is waning. Mr Tan, who took over in March, has indicated that the company will not invest further in its advanced '14a' manufacturing process until it finds customers willing to pay it to make chips for them using the technology. Construction of its manufacturing plant in Ohio, where building began to star-spangled fanfare in 2022, has slowed to a crawl. Layoffs have been brutal. The firm has lost around half of its value since 2023 and its huge debt burden has been downgraded by rating agencies. Like his predecessor, Mr Trump thinks that Intel, America's only domestic manufacturer of advanced chips, is too important to fail. Joe Biden's administration approached the problem by showering the firm with subsidies: the company is the biggest beneficiary of the CHIPS Act. Mr Trump has vowed to cut back on such largesse. But any deal would do the opposite of untethering Intel from the state. Indeed, the president is reportedly even considering using funds from the CHIPS Act to finance an investment. That the government should meddle in business is now a matter of consensus among American politicians, though they disagree over what form this should take. Mr Trump's approach is becoming clear. He is not bureaucratic enough to be European, and he changes his mind too often to be Chinese. Instead, he behaves more like an activist investor straight off Wall Street, wringing out concessions after dressing down bosses in public. He cares a lot about share prices. Two recent investments indicate how this might work out for Intel. In June America's government took a 'golden share' in US Steel after the firm was bought by Nippon, a Japanese industrial outfit. Mr Biden had opposed the acquisition in the hope of winning union votes. He blocked the deal on spurious national-security grounds after a review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), America's inbound-investment watchdog. Mr Trump initiated another review and approved the deal. As part of a revised agreement the president gained the right to appoint a board member and a veto over lowering steel production in America. Intel, too, should expect that any deal will involve interacting directly with Mr Trump, rather than the federal bureaucracy. Control over manufacturing in Ohio may be one area of interest for the president. What Intel needs more than new board members is customers for its manufacturing, or 'foundry', arm. They have not been forthcoming, partly because Intel's chip-design business competes with would-be buyers such as AMD and Nvidia. A second transaction offers some clues as to how they might be persuaded. In July America's Defence Department invested $400m in MP Materials, a producer of rare-earth metals, and will guarantee the price it receives for its output at above-market rates. A few days later Apple, involved in its own negotiations with the president, also announced a supply agreement with MP Materials. Mr Trump may demand that chip designers such as AMD and Nvidia, which rely on his approval to sell their products in China, use Intel's manufacturing. A more radical option could see him force them to club together and purchase Intel's struggling foundry business. That's a deal any activist would be proud of pulling off.
