
Syrian government declares ‘comprehensive' ceasefire in Sweida
Armed tribes had clashed with Druze fighters on Friday, a day after the army withdrew under Israeli bombardment and diplomatic pressure.
In a statement on Saturday, the Syrian presidency warned that any breaches of the ceasefire would be a 'clear violation to sovereignty', and urged all parties to commit to the ceasefire and end hostilities in all areas immediately.
Syria's internal security forces had begun deploying in Sweida 'with the aim of protecting civilians and putting an end to the chaos', the ministry spokesperson Noureddine al-Baba said in a statement on Telegram.
A statement on Saturday by one of the three religious leaders of the Syrian Druze community, Sheikh Hikmat al-Hijri, said the ceasefire would guarantee safe exit for tribe members and the opening of humanitarian corridors for besieged civilians to leave.
Hours earlier, the US envoy announced that Israel and Syria had agreed to a ceasefire, after Israel sided with the Druze factions and joined the conflict, including by bombing a government building in Damascus.
The UN had also called for an end to the 'bloodshed' and demanded an independent investigation of the violence, which has killed at least 718 people from both sides since Sunday, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.
The SOHR reported on Friday that the humanitarian situation in Sweida had 'dramatically deteriorated' owing to an acute shortage of food and medical supplies. All hospitals were out of service because of the conflict and looting was widespread in the city.
'The situation in the hospital is disastrous. The corpses have begun to rot, there's a huge amount of bodies, among them women and children,' a surgeon at Sweida national hospital told the Guardian over the phone.
The renewed fighting raised questions about the authority of the Syrian leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa, whose interim government faces misgivings from the country's minorities after the slaughter of 1,500 mostly Alawite civilians on the Syrian coast in March.
It was Sharaa who ordered government forces to pull out of Sweida, saying that mediation by the US and others had helped to avert a 'large-scale escalation' with Israel.
A number of sources told Reuters that Sharaa had initially misread how Israel would respond to him deploying troops to the country's south earlier this week, encouraged by the US special envoy Thomas Barrack saying Syria should be centrally governed as 'one country'.
When Israel targeted Syrian troops and Damascus on Wednesday, bombarding the Syrian defence ministry's headquarters in central Damascus and striking near the presidential palace, it took the Syrian government by surprise, the sources said.
Druze people are seen as a loyal minority within Israel and often serve in its military, and an Israeli military spokesperson said the strikes were a message to Syria's president regarding the events in Sweida.
But the Syrian government mistakenly believed it had a green light from both the US and Israel to dispatch its forces south despite months of Israeli warnings not to do so, according to the Reuters sources, which included Syrian political and military officials, two diplomats and regional security sources.
The violence erupted last Sunday after the kidnapping of a Druze vegetable merchant by local Bedouin triggered tit-for-tat abductions, the SOHR said.
The government sent in the army, promising to put a halt to the fighting, but witnesses and the SOHR said the troops sided with the Bedouin and committed many abuses against Druze civilians as well as fighters. The organisation reported that 19 civilians were killed in an 'horrific massacre' when Syrian defence ministry forces and general security forces entered the town of Sahwat al-Balatah.
After the Israeli bombardment, a truce was negotiated on Wednesday, allowing Druze factions and clerics to maintain security in Sweida as government forces pulled out.
In a speech on Thursday, the Syrian president said Druze groups would be left to govern security affairs in the southern province, in what he described as a choice to avoid war.
Sharaa said: 'We sought to avoid dragging the country into a new, broader war that could derail it from its path to recovery from the devastating war … We chose the interests of Syrians over chaos and destruction.'
But clashes resumed on Thursday as Syrian state media reported that Druze groups had launched revenge attacks on Bedouin villages. Bedouin tribes had fought alongside government forces against Druze fighters earlier in the week.
On Friday, about 200 tribal fighters clashed with armed Druze men from Sweida using machine guns and shells, an Agence France-Presse correspondent said, while the SOHR reported fighting and 'shelling on neighbourhoods in Sweida city'.
Sweida has been heavily damaged in the fighting and its mainly Druze inhabitants have been deprived of water and electricity, while communication lines have been cut.
Rayan Maarouf, the editor-in-chief of the local news outlet Suwayda 24, said the humanitarian situation was 'catastrophic'. 'We cannot find milk for children,' he told AFP.
The UN high commissioner for human rights, Volker Türk, has demanded 'independent, prompt and transparent investigations into all violations' adding that 'those responsible must be held to account'.
The International Committee for the Red Cross said 'health facilities are overwhelmed, medical supplies are dwindling and power cuts are impeding the preservation of human remains in overflowing morgues'.
'The humanitarian situation in Sweida is critical. People are running out of everything,' said Stephan Sakalian, the head of ICRC's delegation in Syria.
Syria's minority groups have been given what many see as only token representation in the interim government since the former president Bashar al-Assad fled the country, according to Bassam Alahmad, the executive director of Syrians for Truth and Justice, a civil society organisation.
'It's a transitional period. We should have a dialogue, and they [the minorities] should feel that they're a real part of the state,' Alahmad said. Instead, the incursion into Sweida sent a message that the new authorities would use military force to 'control every part of Syria'.
'Bashar Assad tried this way' and failed, he added.
Government supporters, however, fear its decision to withdraw could signal to other minorities that it is acceptable to demand their own autonomous regions, which they say would fragment and weaken the country.
If Damascus ceded security control of Sweida to the Druze, 'of course everyone else is going to demand the same thing', said Abdel Hakim al-Masri, a former official in the Turkish-backed regional government in north-west Syria before Assad's fall.
'This is what we are afraid of,' he told the Associated Press.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
a minute ago
- The Independent
What happened the one and only time Zelensky and Putin met?
Ukraine's leader Volodymyr Zelensky may soon meet Russian president Vladimir Putin again, for the first time since 2019. A summit in Paris six years ago was the first and only time the two presidents ever met, flanked by French president Emmanuel Macron and Germany's then-chancellor Angela Merkel. At the time, Putin and Zelensky were looking to hash out a ceasefire deal for war in Donbas in Ukraine's east, where Russia-backed forces were fighting Ukrainian troops. The two world leaders are now potentially set for another meeting as part of US president Donald Trump's bid to end the devastating Ukraine war. However, this is far from set in stone with Putin's initial suggestion that it could take place in Moscow quickly rejected by the Ukrainian president. What happened in 2019? Ukrainian forces and Russian separatists had been embroiled in conflict in Donbas, in Ukraine's east, since 2014. Zelensky and Putin travelled to Paris in December 2019 for the Normandy Format Summit, a diplomatic forum designed by French, German, Russian and Ukrainian diplomats after the outbreak of conflict. The Ukrainian president had been elected just months earlier in spring that year - his first role in political office - beating former foreign minister Petro Poroshenko to the presidency. The summit in Paris led to progress, but was not groundbreaking. The two sides agreed to implement 'all necessary ceasefire support measures' before the end of 2019 and to release all the prisoners of war. Both sides also expressed their desire to implement the Minsk agreements signed in 2014 and 2015, the first attempt to achieve a ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia after Putin's forces rolled into and took over the Crimean peninsula. What did the leaders say about each other? The mood between the pair was chilly at first. There was no public handshake and they are said to have largely avoided eye contact during the meeting. Clean shaven and sporting a suit, 2019 Zelensky cut a strikingly different figure compared to his more familiar appearance now as a war-time leader. After the summit, Putin hailed the talks as an 'important step' towards de-escalation. He expressed what at the time appeared to be cautious hope: "All this gives us the grounds to suppose that the process is developing in the right direction.' Zelensky also hailed the meeting as a 'big step towards peace'. When he was asked by reporters who he believed had emerged victorious from the exchanges with his Russian counterpart, he said: "I don't know who (beat) who. I think it would be appropriate to be diplomatic as we've just started talking. Let's say for now it's a draw." What happened afterwards? Despite a number of prisoner exchanges, the 2019 meeting was not a catalyst for any major long-term change in Russo-Ukrainian relations - and little over two years later Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Several key sticking points remained after the 2019 negotiations. Kyiv continued to demand the withdrawal of Russian-backed troops and a complete ceasefire, with a return of border control to Ukraine. Russia insisted that before Ukraine regained control of its eastern border, local elections should be held in the occupied territories. Putin also demanded that Donbas have a special constitutional status in Ukraine, to give it a degree of autonomy. In January 2022, just weeks before the full-scale Russian invasion, the summit in Paris took place again, but was attended by officials from the same four countries, rather than their leaders. Senior diplomats met in February 2022 in an attempt to prevent a conflict. After the Russian invasion on 24 February, Zelensky said the invasion had 'ruined' the progress made by the Normandy Format.


The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump rules out sending US ground troops to Ukraine and warns Putin of ‘rough situation' if he does not move towards peace
Update: Date: 2025-08-19T16:08:13.000Z Title: Donald Trump Content: US president says it's possible Russian leader does not want to make deal Matthew Pearce (now); Jakub Krupa, Jane Clinton and Adam Fulton (earlier) Tue 19 Aug 2025 17.08 BST First published on Tue 19 Aug 2025 04.46 BST From 4.07pm BST 16:07 has ruled out the deployment of American troops in Ukraine in his first interview since yesterday's White House meeting with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders. 'You have my assurance, and I'm president,' Trump told Fox News talkshow Fox & Friends in a phone interview on Tuesday, when pressed on whether US forces could be sent to defend against another Russian incursion. The US president reiterated that Ukraine would not be admitted into Nato under his watch, but said that Kyiv would still receive security guarantees. These, he suggested, European allies would 'front load'. Trump said France, Germany and the UK were among the countries considering sending their own troops to bolster Ukraine's defences. 5.08pm BST 17:08 Volodymyr Zelenskyy has given a golf club belonging to a wounded serviceman during his visit to Washington this week, Kyiv said on Tuesday. Trump, an avid golfer who owns several courses, accepted the gift and presented Zelenskyy with symbolic keys to the White House in return, the Ukrainian leader's office said. The warm exchange marks a turnaround from February, when Zelenskyy left the White House early after a televised shouting match with Trump and US vice-president JD Vance. Since then, Zelenskyy has sought to repair ties, praising Trump's efforts to secure peace. 'The president of Ukraine presented the president of the United States with a golf club,' Zelenskyy's office said. The club belonged to Kostiantyn Kartavtsev, a soldier who 'had lost a leg in the first months of Russia's full-scale invasion while saving his brothers-in-arms', it added. Zelenskyy also showed Trump a video of Kartavtsev. Later on Tuesday, Ukrainian veteran organisation United by Golf published a video of Trump holding the club and thanking Kartavtsev. 'I just watched your swing. I know a lot about golf and your swing is great,' Trump said. 'You're an amazing person, and you just keep playing golf and doing all of the other things. Your country is a great country. We're trying to bring it back to health.' Zelenskyy also brought a letter for Melania Trump from his wife, Olena, thanking the US first lady for writing to Vladimir Putin and urging him to save children's lives. 4.47pm BST 16:47 The EU has dropped its calls for a 'ceasefire' in Ukraine and is instead demanding that Russia 'stop the killing', in a semantic shift that aims to grab the ear of US President , according to AFP. European Commission spokesperson Arianna Podestà told reporters: 'The message for us is: stop the killing. Anything that stops the killing is welcome.' Her remarks echoed EU chief Ursula von der Leyen, who stood alongside Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Brussels on Sunday. 'The effect must be stop the killing,' she said. 'That's the most important part. Whether we call it a ceasefire or a peace deal, stop the killing.' European sources said Trump now disliked the term 'ceasefire', and the intention was to avoid antagonising the US president on a matter of form as high-stakes negotiations on Ukraine and European security were under way. Yet at the White House summit on Monday, European leaders made clear their basic demands had not changed. 'I can't imagine that the next meeting would take place without a ceasefire, so let's work on that and let's try to put pressure on Russia,' said German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. French President Emmanuel Macron summed it up by saying that 'a truce, a ceasefire or at least, to stop the killings' was 'a necessity'. 4.23pm BST 16:23 Turkish foreign minister Hakan Fidan and US secretary of state Marco Rubio discussed potential steps to end the Ukraine war in a phone call on Tuesday, a Turkish foreign ministry source said. The source said the two also discussed the outcomes of talks between the U.S. and Russian presidents in Alaska and a meeting in Washington involving European leaders, Ukraine and the US, according to Reuters. Fidan and Rubio also discussed ceasefire efforts in Gaza and the latest situation in Syria, the source said, adding Fidan had called for an immediate truce in Gaza and unhindered access of humanitarian aid. 4.07pm BST 16:07 has ruled out the deployment of American troops in Ukraine in his first interview since yesterday's White House meeting with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders. 'You have my assurance, and I'm president,' Trump told Fox News talkshow Fox & Friends in a phone interview on Tuesday, when pressed on whether US forces could be sent to defend against another Russian incursion. The US president reiterated that Ukraine would not be admitted into Nato under his watch, but said that Kyiv would still receive security guarantees. These, he suggested, European allies would 'front load'. Trump said France, Germany and the UK were among the countries considering sending their own troops to bolster Ukraine's defences. 3.38pm BST 15:38 Vladimir Putin suggested holding a possible meeting with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy, aimed at ending the war in Ukraine, in Moscow, according to two sources familiar with a phone call between US president and Putin. 'Putin mentioned Moscow' during their call on Monday, one of the sources told AFP, adding that Zelensky had said 'no' in response. 3.22pm BST 15:22 Luke Harding What security guarantees might Ukraine get in return for a peace deal? As western leaders meet, four key questions remain about the steps they could take to prevent any future Russian aggression: What security guarantees might Ukraine get? How might the US contribute? What does Russia say? What does history tell us? Guardian foreign correspondent Luke Harding breaks down each one in this explainer: 3.02pm BST 15:02 Jakub Krupa I'm handing the blog over to Matthew Pearce, who will guide you through the late afternoon in Europe. 3.02pm BST 15:02 Slovak prime minister Robert Fico, who repeatedly clashed with Ukraine in the past and sought to block or delay some EU sanctions on Russia, also spoke in the last few minutes. In a three-minute video posted on his social media channels, recorded after his participation in the European Council meeting on Ukraine, he insisted that 'the first basic prerequisite for ending the conflict is the understanding that Ukraine cannot become a member state of Nato.' He noted that he expressed this view before, and faced heavy criticism. He also said: 'Equally important is the factual understanding that without a discussion about territorial changes in Ukraine, no progress can be made,' he said. He added that he was disappointed that the EU 'had to wait for to show us the path towards peace,' praising the US president's initiative as 'enormous personal success.' Fico also rejected the suggestion that EU countries could take part in buying €100bn-worth of military equipment for Ukraine, saying it sounded 'like a bad joke.' He said he could not imagine a siutation in which Slovakia spends money on US weapons to send them to Ukraine for free. Unsuprisingly, he's also 'sceptical' about the idea of further sanctions against Russia. But he said he hoped for peace 'as soon as possible' and was ready to support Ukraine's ambitions to join the European Union instead. 2.48pm BST 14:48 We are just getting a line from Reuters that a meeting between Nato military leaders on Ukraine is provisionally expected to take place tomorrow. We will bring you a confirmation once we have it. 2.31pm BST 14:31 European Council president António Costa told Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy that the EU was united in its 'unwavering support for Ukraine' when the pair spoke on the phone this afternoon. The former Portuguese prime minister added the bloc was also committed to maintaining pressure on Russia to get it to discuss and agree to ending the war in Ukraine. 'Our top priorities are to stop the killing, advance the exchange of prisoners, and secure the return of the thousands of children abducted by Russia,' he said. He added: 'We will work together with the United States on concrete and essential security guarantees. Together with President Zelenskyy and the US, we will prepare the next steps to achieve a just and lasting peace. We must continue to support the Ukrainian people and move forward with the enlargement process. Ukraine's future also lies in the prosperity and stability that EU membership can provide.' Updated at 2.33pm BST 2.06pm BST 14:06 The UK prime minister's office has just released a short statement after the meeting of the Coalition of the Willing on Ukraine, co-chaired by Starmer and French president Emmanuel Macron. It looks like the focus was on planning the next steps on security guarantees and potential sanctions to push Putin's Russia even further. The statement said the participating countries agreed on a meeting of planning teams with their US counterparts 'in the coming days to further strengthen plans to deliver robust security guarantees and prepare for the deployment of a reassurance force if the hostilities ended.' The leaders also talked about 'how further pressure – including through sanctions – could be placed on Putin until he showed he was ready to take serious action to end his illegal invasion.' The coalition gathered over 30 international leaders, No10 said.


The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
There is no ‘Trump Doctrine' in foreign policy. Just chaos
All the elaborate efforts of the European allies to prevent Donald Trump from prostrating himself before Vladimir Putin came to naught at their summit meeting in Alaska. Flattering, coddling and petting the big baby appeared to have been in vain. Before the 15 August summit, the Europeans persuaded Trump to impose new sanctions if Putin would not agree to a ceasefire, which would serve as a prerequisite for any negotiations. But Trump willfully tossed policy like a stuffed animal out of the window of 'the Beast,' the presidential car as he eagerly invited Putin to join him for a triumphant chariot ride. The Europeans scrambled once again, trying to get the addled Trump back on the page he was on before the summit. Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, sped to Washington to confer with Trump to try to pick up the pieces. At their last encounter, Trump jibed: 'You don't have any cards.' But Trump had just handed over his cards to Putin. Zelenskyy was not about to play the appeasement card. The European leaders gathered in an extraordinary posse to accompany Zelenskyy in an attempt to restore a unified western position. Unlike the last Zelenskyy meeting with Trump, he was not hectored. With the Ukrainian leader urrounded by a protective phalanx, Trump made agreeable sounding but vague gestures about a future summit with both Zelenskyy and Putin. Trump seemed favorable, if indefinite and imprecise, about western forces stationed in Ukraine to maintain its sovereignty. But the notion of a ceasefire, pressed again by the French president, Emmanuel Macron, and German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, had evaporated. While the European recovery effort took place at the White House, Russian bombs rained down. Trump dreams of receiving the Nobel peace prize. Before the summit, he called the Norwegian finance minister to lobby him. In Alaska, Trump melted again in the presence of Putin while the whole world was watching. The self-abasing embarrassment of his previous meeting in Helsinki in 2018 did not serve as a cautionary precedent. Now, he invited the sanctioned war criminal to US soil. He ordered uniformed US soldiers to roll out the red carpet, 'the beautiful red carpet' as the Russian foreign ministry called it. He applauded when Putin stood next to him. He patted Putin's hand when he clasped it with an affectionate gesture. Then the door of 'the Beast' opened for Putin. Trump's personal negotiator for the summit, Steve Witkoff, a New York real estate operator whose knowledge of Russian culture to prepare him for his delicate role may had been a bowl of borscht at the Russian Tea Room on 57th Street, was easy prey for Putin. Bild, the German newspaper, reported on 9 August that Witkoff had committed an 'explosive blunder'. According to Bild, Putin 'did not deviate from his maximum demand to completely control the five Ukrainian regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson and Crimea before the weapons remain silent … And even worse: Trump's special envoy Witkoff is said to have completely misunderstood some of the Russians' positions and misinterpreted them as an accommodation by Putin. He had misunderstood a 'peaceful withdrawal' of the Ukrainians from Kherson and Zaporizhzhia demanded by Russia as an offer of 'peaceful withdrawal' of the Russians from these regions'. 'Witkoff doesn't know what he's talking about,' a Ukrainian government official told Bild. An assessment that, according to Bild information, is also shared by German government representatives. Bild further reported: 'There was a telephone conference on Thursday evening between representatives of the US government – including the special envoy Witkoff and Foreign Minister Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance – and the European partners. As BILD learned, the American side was perceived as chaotic and ununited. This was primarily due to Witkoff, whose remarks about his conversation with Putin on Wednesday in the Kremlin were perceived as confusing. He himself seemed overwhelmed and incompetent to the Europeans when he spoke about the territorial issues in Ukraine.' The German newspaper also reported friction between Rubio and Vance, with the vice-president seeking to shut the European allies out of the process and Witkoff taking his side against the secretary of state. 'Apparently, there was also disagreement about the further course of action between Witkoff and Rubio, as the foreign minister emphasized that the Europeans should be involved in the further process, while Vance and Witkoff only wanted to inform Europe of the results of the further Trump steps.' Bild's report on Putin's position turned out to be completely accurate and its description of the Trump administration's unsettled position prophetic of the fiasco that would unfold. Little noticed in the US media accounts, Trump had presented Putin with enormous economic advantages, according to the Telegraph. He offered access to valuable Alaskan natural resources, opportunities to tap into the US portion of the Bering Strait, which would boost Russia's interests in the Arctic region. Trump promised to lift sanctions on Russia's aircraft industry, which would permit Russian airlines (and by extension the Russian air force) to return to US suppliers for parts and maintenance. Trump would give Putin approval for access to rare earth minerals in Ukrainian territories currently under Russian occupation. In Trump's new world order, Putin would be his partner, especially on the frontier of the Arctic, while Trump waged a trade war imposing harsh tariffs on every other nation. Ukraine stood as an obstacle to the gold rush. According to the Telegraph, Witkoff suggested to the Russians: 'Israel's occupation of the West Bank could be used as a model for ending the war. Russia would have military and economic control of occupied [parts of] Ukraine under its own governing body, similar to Israel's de facto rule of Palestinian territory.' Then, after Trump laid on lavish treatment for the Russian dictator at the US military base, marking his indifference to international condemnation, came the joint appearance, which exceeded the Helsinki disaster. An elated Putin and dejected Trump appeared on stage together. The announced joint press conference was a theater of the absurd. Its brevity contributed to the farce. There was no agreement, no plan for an agreement, and no press conference. Trump deferred to Putin to speak first, to set the tone and terms after which he would come on as the second banana to slip on the peel. A clearly delighted Putin reiterated his belief that Ukraine was a security threat to Russia, and that 'we need to eliminate all the primary roots, the primary causes of that conflict,' which was his language for the elimination of an independent and democratic Ukraine. He blamed Biden for the war he had launched. He affirmed Trump's presumptuous boast that there would have been no war had he been president. 'Today, when President Trump is saying that if he was the president back then, there would be no war, and I'm quite sure that it would indeed be so. I can confirm that.' A clearly glum Trump stepped to his podium. 'So there's no deal until there's a deal,' he said. He had pledged during the 2024 campaign that he could and would end the war on 'day one'. It had taken him 210 days to reach the 'No Deal'. Trump wistfully talked about doing business with Russia, his will-o'-the-wisp ambition since he attempted for decades to build a Trump Tower in Moscow even through the 2016 election. He threw Putin a bouquet. 'I've always had a fantastic relationship with President Putin, with Vladimir.' He blamed their inability to monetize their relationship to the inquiries that extensively documented Putin's covert efforts in the 2016 election to help Trump. 'We were interfered with by the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax,' Trump complained. He would not let it go, drifting incoherently into his grievances. 'He knew it was a hoax, and I knew it was a hoax, but what was done was very criminal, but it made it harder for us to deal as a country, in terms of the business, and all of the things that would like to have dealt with, but we'll have a good chance when this is over.' Then, Trump praised the Russian officials accompanying Putin. Chief among them was the foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, who had arrived wearing a sweatshirt embossed with the Cyrillic letters 'CCCP', standing for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, signaling Putin's ultimate objective to restore the empire of the Soviet Union. The message was more than nostalgia; it was a mission statement. And Trump called Putin 'the Boss', not a reference to Bruce Springsteen. 'Next time in Moscow,' said Putin. The press conference was over. There were no questions. There were no answers. Trump fled from the stage. Before the summit, Trump threatened new sanctions if Putin did not agree to a ceasefire, but now he forgot he had ever said that. He spoke loudly and carried a tiny stick. On Air Force One, on the return to Washington, he gave an exclusive interview to his lapdog, Sean Hannity of Fox News, along on the ride for this purpose. Trump reverted to his tacit support for Putin's position. He put the burden on Zelenskyy to accede to Putin's demands, which were unchanged. Then, Trump spiraled down a wormhole, obviously anxious about his growing unpopularity and the prospect of the Democrats winning the congressional midterm elections, which has prompted him to prod the Texas Republicans to gerrymander districts and California Democrats aroused to counter it in their state. 'Vladimir Putin, smart guy, said you can't have an honest election with mail-in voting,' said Trump. 'Look at California with that horrible governor they have. One of the worst governors in history. He is incompetent, he doesn't know what he is doing.' Is this a subject that Putin actually spoke about in their discussion? Has he had experience with mail-in voting or even know what it is? Was it brought up by Trump during their car ride? Or was Trump simply making it up for his gullible Fox News audience? Whatever the reality, Trump's fear about losing control of domestic politics was at the top of his mind as he flew away from his charade in Anchorage. The shambolic scene left in Alaska represented the wreckage of Trump's attempt at diplomacy. Setting the stage himself, Trump babbled, whined and weakly sided with Putin. Trump's foreign policy team was exposed as incompetent, confounded and feckless. This was no best and the brightest, no rise of the Vulcans, but the circus of the Koalemosians, after Koalemos, the Greek god of stupidity. Apologists for Trump, in advance of this exemplary event, had suggested that there was such a conceit as a Trump doctrine. A former Trump official from his first term, A Wess Mitchell, has called it 'The Return of Great Power Diplomacy' in the May/June issue of Foreign Affairs. He described 'a new kind of diplomacy' that is 'diplomacy in its classical form' and 'an instrument of strategy'. He cited an ancient Spartan king, Archidamus II, the Roman Emperor Domitian, Cardinal Richelieu, and in his mélange did not neglect to throw in Metternich and Bismarck. (Kissinger, in his grave, must be weeping over the parading of Metternich's mannequin as a forerunner of Trump. Mitchell, in any case, dismisses Kissinger as a fake realist and an 'idealist', which would have been a revelation to Kissinger.) Left out of Mitchell's pantheon of great diplomatic influences through the ages is the influencer Laura Loomer, the loony far-right troll who has an open door to Trump, feeding him lists of national security officials he must purge. In Putin's shadow, Trump was bared as having no larger or smaller concept or strategy of Great Power politics. It would be unfair to accuse Trump of having an idea beyond his self-aggrandizement. If anything, he aspires to be like Putin, whom he called a 'genius' after his invasion of Ukraine. Putin has created and controls a vast kleptocracy. In 2017, Bill Browder, an American businessperson who had invested in Russia and has been targeted for assassination by Putin for exposing his corruption, testified before the Senate judiciary committee that Putin was 'the biggest oligarch in Russia and the richest man in the world'. Nobody, however, knows Putin's true personal wealth. Trump, the Putin manqué, is trying to turn the United States into a kleptocratic system. According to the calculations of David D Kirkpatrick in the New Yorker, in just six months of his second term his alleged personal profiteering, 'would disappoint the haters who saw Trump as a Putin-level kleptocrat. Yet some three and a half billion dollars in Presidential profits – even though my accounting is necessarily approximate – is a dizzying sum.' Meanwhile, three days before the Trump-Putin summit, the Trump family crypto business, World Liberty Financial, raised $1.5bn to buy the Trump family token. The CEO of World Liberty Financial, Zach Witkoff, son of Steve Witkoff, along with Eric Trump of WLF, will join the board of the investing company. That is the Trump doctrine. Sidney Blumenthal, former senior adviser to President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, has published three books of a projected five-volume political life of Abraham Lincoln: A Self-Made Man, Wrestling With His Angel and All the Powers of Earth. He is a Guardian US columnist