Doug Ford walks back pledge to issue work permits to asylum seekers
Ford and the rest of the country's premiers said at their gathering last week they wanted more control over immigration, usually a purview of the federal government.
The Ontario premier vowed to issue work permits to asylum seekers after he and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith believed they found a workaround in the Constitution.
He says the federal government is taking too long to issue the permits, but Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada says work permits are usually issued within 45 days.
Ford now says he does not want to take over work done by the federal government, but did not explain why he changed his mind.
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada says it is working with the provinces and territories to plan out immigration levels from 2026 to 2028.
—With files from Sarah Ritchie in Ottawa
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 28, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
11 minutes ago
- CBC
From Texas to South Sudan: ICE's deportation pipeline
The U.S. federal immigration law enforcement agency — ICE — is offshoring migrants incarcerated in the U.S. to detention camps in Africa. In at least one of these cases, migrants were told they would be transported to a domestic detention facility and instead were taken to a prison located nearly 10,000 KM away from the U.S. This decision to deport groups of people in American prisons, against their will, to detention camps in nations they have never visited marks a radical and unprecedented shift in American policy. Legal experts say it might well be unconstitutional. Hamed Aleaziz is an immigration reporter with The New York Times and joins us for a conversation about the offshoring of immigration detention, the future of the migration crisis, and the two facilities at the centre of Trump's immigration detention plan: 'American Siberia,' and 'Alligator Alcatraz.' Subscribe to Front Burner on your favourite podcast app. Listen on Apple Podcasts Listen on Spotify Listen on YouTube
Globe and Mail
28 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Public Safety Minister helped in Sri Lankan man's immigration case even though wife was not a constituent
Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree's statement that he was helping a constituent when he intervened in her husband's bid to come to Canada from Sri Lanka has been contradicted by the woman's lawyer. Lorne Waldman, whose law firm represents the wife of a Sri Lankan whom federal officials had barred from entering Canada over previous claims of links to a banned terrorist group, says she does not live in the Toronto-area riding of Mr. Anandasangaree as previously claimed. Before he became a minister, Mr. Anandasangaree wrote to the Canada Border Services Agency supporting an application to overturn a decision not to let Senthuran Selvakumaran into the country. Carney backs Public Safety Minister over letters supporting Sri Lankan's immigration case Canadian immigration officials had denied Mr. Selvakumaran entry after determining that he may have been affiliated with the militant Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, also known as the Tamil Tigers. He had previously told British immigration authorities he had links with the Tamil Tigers, and they denied his asylum claim. But he later told Canadian authorities, after seeking to come to this country, that he had lied to the British authorities about those ties on the advice of a British lawyer. Mr. Anandasangaree, who was born in Sri Lanka and is a Tamil Canadian, asked the CBSA if it would review its decision to advise the former public safety minister not to grant Mr. Selvakumaran permanent residence in Canada so he could join his wife. The Liberal MP wrote two letters in support of his case in 2016, as well as in 2023, when he was a parliamentary secretary. In his 2023 letter, he said he had 'met and counselled the applicant's wife and sponsor, Nilushie, many times over the course of the seven years as a Member of Parliament.' He told The Globe and Mail earlier this month that he was trying to help her as a constituent, as he had done with many other immigration cases in his riding. 'That a constituent, a Canadian citizen, with a Canadian child, would want to reunite her family in Canada is not unusual,' the minister said in the statement earlier this month. 'MPs from all parties provide letters of support for constituents as a routine matter, including in Ministerial Review cases.' Mr. Waldman, a member of Nilushie's legal team, said on Tuesday that she did not live in Mr. Anandasangaree's riding, but rather in Markham, Ont. Nilushie's surname is not given in the court documents. Mr. Waldman had previously believed she was his constituent, but recently checked after being contacted by Global News on the matter, and found she lived in a different riding. He said she had been referred to Mr. Anandasangaree by a distant relative who lived in his riding. Earlier this month, Prime Minister Mark Carney gave his backing to Mr. Anandasangaree, saying he 'is being transparent about the details of that situation, and he has my confidence.' On Tuesday, the Prime Minister's Office said it had nothing to add to this statement. Mr. Anandasangaree's spokesman, Simon Lafortune, said in a statement Tuesday that 'providing guidance, advocacy, and letters in support of Canadians is a standard responsibility of Members of Parliament across all parties. It is part of an MP's duty to assist, in accordance with federal rules, Canadian citizens seeking to reunite with their families.' 'It is also not uncommon for MPs to assist Canadian citizens that are out of their riding, especially if the local MP is unable to assist due to their role in Cabinet, as was the case in this situation. It is also important to note that this particular applicant's family was introduced by a known constituent of Scarborough-Rouge Park.' Mr. Lafortune added that Mr. Anandasangaree is 'proud of his Tamil heritage and denounces terrorism in all its forms.' He said that 'out of an abundance of caution,' Mr. Anandasangaree has voluntarily chosen 'to recuse himself from any matter related to the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) or the World Tamil Movement (WTM).' A member of Mr. Anandasangaree's staff had been mistaken about Nilushie being a constituent at the time the minister's statement to The Globe was issued, his office said. In his letters, Mr. Anandasangaree does not refer to Nilushie as his constituent. In the July, 2023, letter he said she had married Mr. Selvakumaran in 2005 but they had spent 'most of their nearly 18 years of marriage separated from each other, relentlessly striving to be reunited.' 'Senthuran's claims of affiliation to the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) was erroneously made when he sought asylum in the United Kingdom in 1998 to escape the growing conflicts in Sri Lanka. He was wrongfully counselled by his legal representative to lie,' Mr. Anandasangaree's letter said. 'However, his claims were found lacking credibility, and the U.K. Refugee Tribunal had established that Senthuran did not have any affiliations to the LTTE. This is consistent with Senthuran's position all along.' Court documents relating to a judicial review decision about his case earlier this month noted inconsistencies in Mr. Selvakumaran's accounts about whether he had links to the Tamil Tigers. The court documents said he had 'provided U.K. immigration authorities with inconsistent explanations for his involvement with the LTTE.' 'At various times, he claimed that he joined the organization because: i) he wanted to help; ii) because he was paid for the work; iii) in response to a friend's request, and; iv) under compulsion from the LTTE.' A Canadian visa officer had asked him about his inconsistent narratives, and he gave differing explanations, the court document said. The document said that in subsequent permanent-residence applications, he had said 'the narrative about his involvement with the LTTE was fabricated based on advice he received from a solicitor in the UK.'
Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
Ford government agrees to fee canceling $100M deal with Elon Musk's Starlink
The Ford government has negotiated a break fee to cancel its $100 million contract for Starlink internet, Global News has learned, officially ending its deal with Elon Musk-owned SpaceX. The now-defunct agreement between Ontario and SpaceX was first signed in November to provide satellite internet to roughly 15,000 homes in the north of the province. A spokesperson for the Ministry of Energy and Mines confirmed to Global News the deal had ended. 'Our government has cancelled the Starlink contract,' they wrote in an email. 'We are seeking an alternate solution as we continue our efforts to secure long term, stable high-speed internet access across the province.' Ending the deal meant the province had to pay a fee, although it is unclear how much that was. A senior government source, speaking on background, told Global News negotiations with SpaceX to settle on the fee had gone well, but still left Ontario on the hook. Story continues below advertisement They said the cost of the cancellation was 'not zero,' stressing it was substantially less than the $100 million valuation of the original deal. SpaceX did not respond to a request for comment in time for publication. A deal that hinged on Donald Trump Ontario's $100-million agreement with SpaceX was announced just days after Donald Trump won the U.S. presidential race, with the help of the world's richest man, Elon Musk. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy On Nov. 14, when the Ford government unveiled its agreement with SpaceX, Musk had been a major figure in Trump's campaign and was preparing to take on an even bigger role in his new administration. The agreement was announced at the same time Ontario was mounting a 'charm offensive' directed at Trump, hoping to convince him to work with the province and not to slap massive tariffs on Canadian goods. Story continues below advertisement It didn't work, however, and months later, tariffs were levied on some Canadian products. When tariffs were unveiled, Ontario Premier Doug Ford announced retaliation, including the fact that he would 'be ripping up' the $100 million agreement with Musk. 'It's done,' Ford said in March. 'We're not going back there, it's done.' At the time, Musk responded on social media with two words: 'Oh well.' The Cancelling Starlink Act Working out how to end the lucrative agreement with Musk's company proved more complicated than simply declaring the plan at a news conference. According to sources and documents, the government toyed with the idea of introducing legislation to end the agreement. Story continues below advertisement A law was considered under a working title, the Starlink Cancellation Act, to end the contract. A senior government source said it would have had the advantage of allowing Ontario to indemnify itself if SpaceX tried to sue it for backing out of the deal. It could also have provoked the U.S. company to refuse to work with the province in the future, or even cancel other contracts it has in Ontario. Some northern health care facilities, for example, use satellite internet to deliver services. By negotiating a deal with Starlink, instead of unilaterally cancelling it, the province is able to ensure other agreements aren't touched, and the two parties could work together in the future, sources indicated. What next for the north? Cancelling the deal does leave 15,000 homes in northern Ontario which had been promised high-speed internet without it. Story continues below advertisement The government has not said which companies it is considering to pick up the hole left by the end of the Starlink agreement or when it plans to sign a new deal. Ontario NDP Leader Marit Stiles said the situation meant Ontario residents are without internet service, and Musk is making money off a deal he didn't even have to fulfil. 'This should have been done a long time ago and the premier should have secured a proper deal for those in Northern and rural communities who still don't have the reliable internet that they were promised by this government,' she said in a statement. 'Handing over hard-earned tax dollars to Elon Musk's company was never the right approach. Months have passed and we still don't have a plan or even a process that's calling for home-grown solutions.'
