As abortions triple, when will we admit that reluctant repealers were profoundly wrong?
Before the repeal of the Eighth Amendment, we were assured that all that would happen was that a similar number to the 2,879 women who travelled to England and Wales in 2018 would no longer have to do so.
Then-tánaiste
Simon Coveney
believed the argument, though he said 'removing the equal right to life of the unborn from our Constitution [was] not something I easily or immediately supported'. In an oped, he said any woman choosing
abortion
after a three-day waiting period and other safeguards 'is very likely to have travelled to the UK or accessed a pill online in the absence of such a system being available in Ireland'. He and other reluctant repealers were promised that numbers of abortions would not rise rapidly and inexorably.
The latest abortion figures show
10,852 abortions in Ireland in 2024
. There were
54,062 live births in 2024
. For every five babies born alive, one was aborted.
READ MORE
Is there no number of abortions that would be unacceptable? If one in two pregnancies was ending in abortion, would that be too many?
UK Department of Health figures show the number of women giving Irish addresses for abortions halved between 2001 and 2018, with a 5 per cent drop from 2017.
Numbers were dropping before Repeal, in other words.
Even allowing for the tiny number in 2018 of Irish-based women having abortions in the Netherlands and those using illegal abortion pills, the rise in numbers of abortions is shocking. Some 55,000 of them have taken place in Ireland since Repeal.
The reality is that restrictions on abortion reduce abortion numbers. US advocacy group Secular Pro-life has a useful summary of the evidence.
Many studies claiming restrictive abortion laws don't lower rates overlook socio-economic factors. Most countries with strict laws have low economic development, and poorer nations tend to have higher abortion rates. This important confounding factor is often ignored.
As a relatively wealthy liberal democracy that banned abortion, our abortion rates were much lower.
Abortion numbers can triple, and still Ireland refuses to acknowledge that the reluctant repealers were wrong, wrong, wrong. The Eighth was saving lives in the thousands.
We collect statistics on where abortions happen in Ireland and under what part of the legislation, and virtually nothing else. We seem to have zero interest in the reasons why women have abortions – whether it is poverty, lack of support, or housing.
Is that because we don't want to look too closely at anything that might undermine the idea that abortion is just another healthcare procedure?
At some level, people know well that abortion is unlike any healthcare procedure. English singer
Lily Allen
recently sang a flippant parody of My Way about not knowing exactly how many abortions she had. It was probably five. Many pro-choice people were shocked.
The comments on the BBC video of the podcast she hosts with Miquita Oliver, who has also had 'about five' abortions, showed the conflict people felt.
Some pro-choice people felt that by saying the only justification needed for abortion is 'I don't want a f**king baby', she had handed ammunition to the anti-abortion advocates.
[
Breda O'Brien: Ableist legislation shows lives of those with Down syndrome are less valuable
Opens in new window
]
Others disagreed, with comments such as: 'It's important to support any abortions for any reason. If you start putting restrictions on who can have them, how many they're allowed, and how they must act when they've had them ... well, you're not pro-choice.'
I am not interested in dumping on Allen or Oliver. Allen has
spoken about
losing her virginity at 12, about a 19-year-old friend of her father's who bought her drinks and 'had sex with me' when she was 14, and about living through her teens to her 30s in a haze of drugs, alcohol and mental ill-health.
(By the way, we have no idea how many women are coerced into abortion, even though domestic violence campaigners tell us it happens in Ireland, including one under 18-year-old who was locked in a room and forced to take abortion pills.)
Allen and Oliver are not alone in joking about abortion. Irish comedian
Katie Boyle
has a comedy show about her experience of having an abortion aged 34 in the US, which caused the presenters of the Morning Show on Ireland AM to laugh. Nonetheless, most people still react with shock when abortion is treated as contraception – or a joke.
It reminds me of debating in the past with people who were adamantly pro-choice,
who visibly flinched when the number of babies with Down syndrome who are aborted was mentioned
. Their humanitarian, pro-disability rights instincts conflicted with their other deeply held beliefs about the right to choose to end early human lives.
The problem is that while bans and restrictions on abortion did decrease rates, those of us who consider ourselves pro-life depended on the legal ban while underestimating how the culture was changing.
To keep abortion figures low in a well-off democracy, we needed to persuade people to build a woman-friendly society where pitting women's rights against the next generation's right to life became an unthinkable and completely outdated dilemma. The failure to do so really is no laughing matter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Donohoe delayed approving sale of State's final shares in AIB
Minister for Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe asked for a three-week postponement on the final sale of the State's stake in AIB so he could consult government about the bank's exit from 'crisis relationships'. Senior officials had sought permission to carry out a 'clean-up share disposal' on May 23rd to finally end state ownership in the bank after the financial crash. However, the Minister looked for extra time as officials said the sale would 'inevitably refocus the discussion around the topic of remuneration' and the salary cap for bankers. In a note on the submission, Mr Donohoe wrote: 'I am absolutely committed to the return of AIB to private ownership. However, I want to exit from crisis relationships with [the] bank at same time. READ MORE 'I will need to engage with government on this and will not have this complete by end of this week. Ask department to consider execution of same plan but in second half of June.' [ How AIB went from boom to bust and back again Opens in new window ] In mid-June, officials submitted a second submission on the sale saying it would 'trigger an opportunity re: salary cap.' It said the State was looking to offload nearly 44 million shares and hoped to bring in around €310 million through the sale. The submission said: 'The implication of this trade is that it will trigger an expectation to begin unwinding the crisis-era remuneration restrictions that remain in place (in particular the removal of the salary cap).' Officials wrote that AIB was one of the best performing banks in Europe and that strong momentum had continued since the last time the State sold some of its shareholding. It said the final sale would represent a 'natural point' to normalise the relationship between AIB and the State. The submission also cautioned that if pay restrictions from AIB were removed, it should also apply to PTSB . 'Absent of that happening, it would put PTSB at a severe disadvantage,' said the document. 'Such a scenario is not in taxpayers' interests.' In a note, Mr Donohoe wrote: 'I agreed to this process via phone yesterday. This is to indicate that approval was given and to conclude official documentation.' A separate presentation on the State's post-crash investment in banks said the taxpayer had invested €29.4 billion in AIB, Bank of Ireland, and PTSB. From that, around €28.7 billion had been recovered although this was over an extended period of a decade and a half. The presentation said as well as implications for the salary cap, other restrictions on how AIB operates would change. One slide said: 'These restrictions include monthly meetings with senior management, access to board papers, [and] various reporting/consent/consultation requirements. 'Since the State's exit from BOI ( Bank of Ireland ), that bank is no longer subject to these conditions. We recommend putting AIB on an equal footing with BOI in this context.' On pay caps, another slide said all restrictions were eliminated for Bank of Ireland apart from bonus payments exceeding €20,000 per year. 'While restrictions around variable pay up to €20,000 and fringe benefits were also removed for AIB and PTSB, both banks continue to abide by the total compensation cap of €500,000 per annum that is currently in place,' it said. This additional restriction relative to Bank of Ireland was 'anti-competitive and unsustainable'.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Couple fails to stop demolition of Co Meath home built in ‘wilful' breach of planning laws almost 20 years ago
A couple have lost a last ditch legal bid at preventing the demolition of their large Co Meath home built in 'wilful breach' of planning laws almost 20 years ago. There was 'no merit' to the appeals by Chris Murray and his wife Rose, Mr Justice Senan Allen said, when giving the three judge Court of Appeal 's judgment dismissing them. The appeals concerned an action that, while initiated in September 2022, was 'the latest battle' in a 20-year war about the fate of the unauthorised development at Faughan Hill, Bohermeen, Navan . It was, he believed, obvious to Meath County Council from the outset that the action and appeal were 'artifices calculated to postpone the evil day'. READ MORE After Mr Murray's 2006 application for permission to build a house on the lands was refused, the couple, 'undaunted, and in wilful breach of the planning laws', built a house anyway of about 588 sq m (6,220 sq ft), twice the size of the house for which permission was refused, the judge said. The council took proceedings in 2007 under the Planning Act and in 2017 the Supreme Court upheld High Court orders for the couple to remove any unauthorised development from their land. They were given one year to vacate the property. When that was not complied with, the council issued contempt proceedings in 2019 that settled in 2020 on terms involving the Murrays agreeing to vacate the property within two years to facilitate the council demolishing it. The council issued contempt proceedings in 2019 that settled in 2020 on terms involving the Murrays agreeing to vacate the property within two years to facilitate the council demolishing it Three days before they were to vacate, the Murrays issued a case against the council, claiming there was new evidence relating to land sterilisation agreements made by the previous owners of the land that invalidated the council's planning refusals. Last year the High Court granted a council application to strike out that case as frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of process. In the Court of Appeal judgment on Tuesday, Mr Justice Allen said the couple built a 6,220 sq ft house without planning permission, 'well knew' they would need permission 'but hoped they would get away with it'. The Murrays claimed, as a result of actions, inactions and misrepresentations by the council, they had acquired a 'pig in a poke' title to the lands, he said. While a planning condition for a nearby residence stated an agreement sterilising (preventing) the lands from any other housing or non-agricultural development should be entered into – and the council relied on that in refusing permission to the Murrays – it was accepted no sterilisation agreement was ever entered. There was 'no justification' for contending the council misrepresented the case to the court, he said. The Murrays had not appealed the original permission refusal to An Bord Pleanála or sought to judicially review it, he said. They had had 'every opportunity' to make whatever case they thought they had; the courts had considered all they had to say but the Supreme Court had, in 2017, decided the house 'had to come down'. While they argued in this appeal that adequate account was not taken of their new evidence, there was no appeal against the High Court conclusion it would not have affected the original outcome. At the heart of their opposition to the council's enforcement procedures was a grievance with the refusal of their original planning application but, as a matter of law, that grievance was 'not justiciable'. Any infirmity in the original refusal could not conceivably have provided any justification for unauthorised construction of a house, still less one twice the size, he said. It was 'perverse' that the Murrays, having 'driven a coach and four' through the planning Act, were complaining the council failed 'to strictly comply with the prescribed procedures'. A 'so-called constitutional challenge' concerning the council's use of section 160 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 in its proceedings was unrelated to the new evidence, he said. The couple's fresh permission retention applications were not relevant to whether their proceedings raised a fair issue to be tried, he held. The couple had not identified any error in the decision under appeal, the court concluded.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
The truth is out there: how many disgruntled ex-Tories can Nigel Farage's Reform UK swallow?
The latest Tory defector to Nigel Farage 's Reform UK party is a prolific author. Rupert Matthews, a Leicestershire police commissioner unveiled by Farage at a Westminster press conference on Monday, has written about 170 books. The most recent, published in November, was on his favourite subject: aliens. Matthews believes in UFOs. The defection of Matthews, a Tory activist and fringe politician of more than four decades, was an open goal for press apparatchiks working for Britain's Labour government. He specialises in books on ghosts, UFOs, the paranormal and cryptozoology, which includes studies of yetis and the Sasquatch . Downing Street's press office gleefully highlighted Farage's latest defector as a proponent of the 'fantastical and unexplained', which it suggested could include Reform's uncosted fiscal plans and lavish promises to the electorate. Labour Party HQ welcomed Matthews as the 'ghost of Tory past'. READ MORE The defector himself was characteristically unbowed by the facetious attention. At the press event alongside Farage on Monday, he promised to venture deep into the 'dark heart of wokeness' to save Britain. Fun and frivolity aside, his switch to the Tories may be more significant than it first appears. Matthews's critics have dismissed him as a crank, the sort of Tory member that David Cameron might have decried as a 'swivel-eyed loon'. But his defection also shows that the Conservative Party is losing its grip on its grassroots former stalwarts. If the local party organisations run by such leading local members fall apart, the entire Tory party could soon implode. Matthews was a councillor in the 1990s before running for the European Parliament. He narrowly missed out in several elections. He finally looked set for a Brussels seat in 2011 when another Tory MEP was set to leave and create a vacancy. There was a furore at the time, however, over an image of a golliwog on the front cover of book published by a company in which Matthews was a shareholder and director. He said he had nothing to do with the book, Britain: A Post Political Correctness Society by Bill Etheridge. Nonetheless, he was not elevated to the MEP seat. He finally made it to Brussels when another Tory stepped aside in 2017 to take up a seat in Westminster, and he served until 2019. Matthews was then elected as the police and crime commissioner for Leicestershire and Rutland in 2021. He is the first prominent Reform UK member to hold such a position. His defection this week to Farage's party dovetailed nicely with another former Tory who made the switch the same day: Vanessa Frake-Harris, a former governor of Wormwood Scrubs prison. There has been a steady stream of former Tories switching ranks to Reform in recent months, as many of them worry their old party may be in a death spiral. Earlier in the summer, former Tory chairman Jake Berry, who served in that role under Liz Truss, defected alongside former Welsh secretary David Jones: the two most senior former Tories to make the jump. More than 15 councillors, almost all of them former Tories, have also defected to Reform in Scotland. There has also been a slew of defections in Wales, where Reform could end up as the largest party after elections next May for the devolved administration in Cardiff. There has also been a steady flow of former Tory MPs who lost their seats in the bloodbath of last July who have made the switch, including former Gravesham MP Adam Holloway; former Newton Abbot MP Anne Marie Morris; and Dudley North's Marco Andrea Longhi. [ Keir Starmer promises 'no more gimmicks' as migrant-returns deal with France kicks in Opens in new window ] This stream of defections suggests there is a significant chunk of the former Tory parliamentary party who have not given up hope of re-entering parliament, but who have calculated that they have no chance for the foreseeable future while running under the Conservative banner. That augurs ill for Tory leader Kemi Badenoch as she tries to rebuild the party. The defections also present a challenge for Farage as well as an opportunity. Just how many disaffected former Tories can he accept into his ranks while claiming that Reform is the insurgent party that will clean up the Conservatives' mess? After all, his many defectors helped to create it. The real opportunity for Farage will arrive if there is ever a significant stream of defections to Reform from the Labour Party. In last July's election, Farage's party came second to many newly-elected Labour MPs in so-called Red Wall seats in the working class areas of England's midlands and north. Some of those MPs will look at the polls, where Reform is riding high, and may calculate that their only chance of avoiding being one-term parliamentarians is to make the switch to Farage's party. If that happens, then a truly historic shift could be under way.
