logo
Plan to jail water bosses who block watchdog probes moves closer to becoming law

Plan to jail water bosses who block watchdog probes moves closer to becoming law

Yahoo28-01-2025

Plans to jail water bosses who block watchdog investigations have moved a step closer to becoming law after a Commons debate.
Environment Secretary Steve Reed said on Tuesday that billpayers 'are rightly angry about the state of our waterways', as he vowed to 'clean up the mess once and for all'.
The Water (Special Measures) Bill passed its third reading on Tuesday unopposed, and has now reached the final stages of its passage through Parliament.
MPs have agreed to give regulators the power to block water executives from receiving performance-related bonus payments, if they do not meet standards related to the environment and customer service.
Company bosses will also face up to two years in prison if they obstruct investigations by regulators, including the Drinking Water Inspectorate.
Ministers saw off attempts by opposition parties to amend the Bill, including from Conservative shadow environment minister Dr Neil Hudson.
He said authorities should be able to dock water companies' ability to charge customers by the same amount as the fines they face for poor behaviour, effectively removing fines from bills.
Dr Hudson said: 'This is very important.
'A toxic cocktail of poor behaviour of water companies and rising bill prices has led to many people feeling they're getting poor value for money and not getting the quality water services they deserve.'
Conservative former minister Graham Stuart had earlier intervened in the shadow minister's speech and said it would be a 'disgrace' if fines are 'swallowed by the Treasury rather than used to improve water'.
MPs voted against the amendment 325 to 180, majority 145.
They also voted 322 to 181, majority 141, against a Conservative amendment to set up a Water Restoration Fund, which would hold fines paid by water companies and distribute money to improve habitats and the ecological status of waterways.
Proud of this brilliant team that have steered the Water (Special Measures) Bill through Parliament.
This government is cleaning up the Tory sewage crisis. pic.twitter.com/sQgcYPHPz8
— Steve Reed MP (@SteveReedMP) January 28, 2025
Shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins said: 'The public rightly wants to see the Government addressing water quality and yet, rather than use water company fines to restore water bodies, that money will now be going into the gaping hole of the Treasury's coffers, presumably to try and undo some of the damage caused by the Chancellor's disastrous growth-blocking, tax-hiking, job-cutting and investment-plummeting budget.'
Labour MP Clive Lewis backed a Liberal Democrat-led amendment to block water company shareholder bailouts by cancelling debts, if those firms fall into administration.
He accused the Government of 'inconsistency', after ministers backed public ownership for railways and renewable energy, but not water.
'Many of us on this side ran on a manifesto commitment to reduce the cost of living,' he said.
'That commitment is one which I think every Labour MP here believes in, but the cost of corruption, of extraction by private water companies, should under no circumstances – as is currently configured in this Bill – land on the heads of our constituents, should any of these companies go bust or be taken into special administration.'
The Norwich South MP later added: 'Investors, shareholders, creditors, they should be the ones that take the haircut, they should be the ones that foot the bill because of what they've done to our water. This should not be landing on our constituents' heads.'
Liberal Democrat environment spokesman Tim Farron described the proposed new law as 'OK, even good in part', but he told MPs: 'No water company chief executive is going to quake in their boots if they are not held to targets that are ambitious and enforceable with penalties, and that actually mean something.
'The water industry staff do amazing work giving us the world's cleanest drinking water, working their socks off to tackle repairs and repair leaks, to bolster the infrastructure, to oversee the operation of wastewater treatment systems and serving our communities – they are just as much victims as their fellow billpayers of the utterly failed system we are faced with.'
Mr Reed said: 'Our rivers, lakes and seas are awash with pollution, the legacy of 14 years of Conservative failure is the highest level of sewage spills on record, economic growth held back by a lack of water supplies and now painful bill rises to fix the problems they left behind.
'The British public are rightly angry about the state of our waterways. It has been left to this Government to clean up the mess once and for all.
'The water sector needs a complete reset.
'It needs reform that puts customers and the environment first, and a new partnership with the Government to invest for the future and upgrade our broken infrastructure.'
He added: '(The Bill) will introduce stricter penalties, including imprisonment where senior executives in water companies obstruct investigations by environmental regulators, and it includes provisions for automatic and severe fines for wrongdoing.
'We've also extended powers so the environmental regulators can recover costs for a wider range of future enforcement the polluter, not the public, will pay.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What it would take to convert a jet from Qatar into Air Force One to safely fly Trump
What it would take to convert a jet from Qatar into Air Force One to safely fly Trump

Washington Post

timean hour ago

  • Washington Post

What it would take to convert a jet from Qatar into Air Force One to safely fly Trump

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump really wants to fly on an upgraded Air Force One — but making that happen could depend on whether he's willing to cut corners with security. As government lawyers sort out the legal arrangement for accepting a luxury jet from the Qatari royal family, another crucial conversation is unfolding about modifying the plane so it's safe for the American president.

A Comprehensive Accounting of Trump's Culture of Corruption
A Comprehensive Accounting of Trump's Culture of Corruption

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

A Comprehensive Accounting of Trump's Culture of Corruption

At the gala dinner President Trump held last month for those who bought the most Trump cryptocurrency, the champion spender was the entrepreneur Justin Sun, who had put down more than $40 million on $Trump coins. Mr. Sun had a good reason to hope that this investment would pay off. He previously invested $75 million in a different Trump crypto venture — and shortly after the Trump administration took office in January, the Securities and Exchange Commission paused its lawsuit against him on charges of cryptocurrency fraud. The message seemed obvious enough: People who make Mr. Trump richer regularly receive favorable treatment from the government he runs. The cryptocurrency industry is perhaps the starkest example of the culture of corruption in his second term. He and his relatives directly benefit from the sale of their cryptocurrency by receiving a cut of the investment. Even if the price of the coins later falls and investors lose money, the Trumps can continue to benefit by receiving a commission on future sales. Forbes magazine estimates that he made about $1 billion in cryptocurrency in the past nine months, about one-sixth of his net worth. Only a few years ago, Mr. Trump was deeply skeptical of cryptocurrency, calling it 'potentially a disaster waiting to happen' and comparing it to the 'drug trade and other illegal activity.' Since he and his family have become major players in the market, however, his concerns have evidently disappeared. He shut down a Justice Department team that investigated illegal uses of cryptocurrency. He pardoned crypto executives who pleaded guilty to crimes, and his administration dropped federal investigations of crypto companies. He nullified an Internal Revenue Service rule that went after crypto users who didn't pay their taxes. The self-enrichment of the second Trump administration is different from old-fashioned corruption. There is no evidence that Mr. Trump has received direct bribes, nor is it clear that he has agreed to specific policy changes in exchange for cash. Nonetheless, he is presiding over a culture of corruption. He and his family have created several ways for people to enrich them — and government policy then changes in ways that benefit those who have helped the Trumps profit. Often Mr. Trump does not even try to hide the situation. As the historian Matthew Dallek recently put it, 'Trump is the most brazenly corrupt national politician in modern times, and his openness about it is sui generis.' He is proud of his avarice, wearing it as a sign of success and savvy. This culture is part of Mr. Trump's larger efforts to weaken American democracy and turn the federal government into an extension of himself. He has pushed the interests of the American people to the side, in favor of his personal interests. His actions reduce an already shaky public faith in government. By using the power of the people for personal gain, he degrades that power for any other purpose. He stains the reputation of the United States, which has long stood out as a place where confidence in the rule of law fosters confidence in the economy and financial markets. This country was not previously known as an executive kleptocracy. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Elon Musk threatens to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft after Trump feud. What does it mean for the US space industry?
Elon Musk threatens to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft after Trump feud. What does it mean for the US space industry?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk threatens to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft after Trump feud. What does it mean for the US space industry?

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. An explosive, and very public, feud between President Donald Trump and SpaceX founder Elon Musk on Thursday (June 5) has raised doubts over the future of America's space industry. The war of words could place $22 billion of SpaceX's government contracts with multiple U.S. space programs at risk, according to one estimate, although the real figure — which remains classified — could be significantly higher. Following threats from the president on his social media platform Truth Social that the U.S. could cancel the government contracts and subsidies awarded to Musk's companies, the CEO of SpaceX retorted that his space company would "begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately." Hours later, Musk responded to a follower telling him to "cool off" by saying "Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon." The disagreement began on Tuesday (June 3) when Musk criticized the administration's proposed tax and spending bill on his social media platform X. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," Musk wrote on X. Related: 'No radio astronomy from the ground would be possible anymore': Satellite mega-swarms are blinding us to the cosmos — and a critical 'inflection point' is approaching This then escalated into a full-blown social media feud on Thursday, with Musk claiming that Trump's name appears in unreleased files relating to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The White House condemned these allegations. "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted," representatives wrote on X. Trump then claimed Musk "just went CRAZY," posting: "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" SpaceX's Dragon capsule is a reusable spacecraft capable of carrying up to seven passengers and cargo to and from Earth orbit, according to SpaceX. NASA currently relies on the capsule to ferry astronauts to the International Space Station (ISS), so canceling these government contracts effectively eliminates America's ability to launch astronauts to space from American soil, Live Science's sister website, reported. NASA also heavily relies on SpaceX for other space programs, having selected the Starship Human Landing System (HLS), a lunar lander variant of the company's next-generation Starship spacecraft, to carry American astronauts to the moon for the first time in more than 50 years aboard the 2027 Artemis 3 mission. NASA is investing $4 billion into Starship's development, and canceling its contract could seriously handicap NASA and the future of U.S.-led space exploration. While other competitors exist, such as Amazon founder Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin and Boeing's Starliner spacecraft, they lag far behind SpaceX. RELATED STORIES —Facing steep funding cuts, scientists propose using black holes as particle colliders instead of building new ones on Earth —Trump's 2026 budget would slash NASA funding by 24% and its workforce by nearly one third —NASA plans to build a giant radio telescope on the 'dark side' of the moon. Here's why. The Starliner capsule is not yet certified to fly operational astronaut missions and was responsible for "stranding" two astronauts on the ISS for nine months last year. The astronauts returned to Earth on March 18 aboard a SpaceX Dragon capsule, and neither Boeing nor NASA have offered any significant updates into fixes that will make Starliner flightworthy. SpaceX's lead on its competitors is reflected in the size of its government subsidies. In April, the U.S. Space Force, the military branch of U.S. space exploration, awarded the company nearly $6 billion in launch contracts, while the United Launch Alliance received $5.4 billion and Blue Origin $2.4 billion. In response to the feud between Musk and Trump, NASA press secretary Bethany Stevens declined to comment on SpaceX, but she did tell Reuters that "we will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met." NASA's deputy administrator Lori Garver told Reuters that, as well as not being in national interests, canceling SpaceX's contacts would probably not be legal. However, she also added that "a rogue CEO threatening to decommission spacecraft, putting astronauts' lives at risk, is untenable."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store