
EU ministers name Russians they want banned from bloc
The ban was proposed in a joint statement by the interior ministers of Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Norway, Poland, Sweden, and Finland after a meeting in Tallinn on Thursday. All of the represented countries, except Sweden, have already effectively shut down their borders to Russian citizens.
In their statement, which was shared by the Estonian Interior Ministry, the officials claimed that 'even after the end of the military operation against Ukraine, threats emanating from Russia to the internal security of the European Union will remain.'
They claimed that hundreds of thousands of Russian nationals who have taken part in military operations against Ukraine now have combat experience and could supposedly join organized crime groups in Europe.
The statement urges EU member states to take all necessary steps to prevent individuals with military backgrounds from Russia from moving freely within the Schengen area and undermining the bloc's security. It calls for a complete ban on residence permits and visas for these individuals.
The officials also highlighted the need for drone detection and disruption capabilities along the eastern borders to counter threats from organized crime networks and hostile states.
Last month, Latvian Foreign Minister Baiba Braze urged all EU member states to stop issuing Schengen visas to Russian citizens, citing risks to the bloc's internal security. Latvian Interior Minister Rihards Kozlovskis also insisted the EU must acknowledge it is 'in a hybrid war' with Russia and claimed that Russian tourists are a danger to the bloc.
In recent months, a number of Eastern European governments have argued that Russia could pose a military threat to the EU even after the Ukraine conflict concludes and have enacted draconian policies specifically targeting Russian nationals and Russian speakers.
Moscow has vehemently accused Western officials, particularly those in the Baltics, of fearmongering to justify a military buildup and 'blatant discrimination against Russians.'
The country's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova previously also stated that the EU's Russophobia has turned out to be an 'expensive obsession' for the bloc, noting that it has dealt a significant blow to its economy and citizens.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Kiev fears repetition of Oval Office ‘disaster'
The upcoming meeting between Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky and US President Donald Trump could replicate the 'disastrous' Oval Office confrontation earlier this year, the Washington Post reported on Sunday. The Ukrainian leader, joined by senior EU officials, is set to meet Trump on Monday for what was widely reported as a discussion on a potential peace February visit to Washington ended in a PR debacle. His talks with Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance collapsed into a confrontation, with Trump accusing him of disrespect and 'gambling with World War III.' A joint press conference was scrapped, Zelensky was ushered out, and the US briefly froze military aid. US media, including the Washington Post, called the session 'disastrous' and a major diplomatic setback for Kiev.'Foremost in Ukrainians' minds is avoiding a repetition of a contentious meeting in the Oval Office,' the newspaper wrote.'Unfortunately, there is such risk indeed' of a repeat, Nikolay Beleskov, a research fellow at the Ukrainian National Institute for Strategic Studies, told the Washington Post. Beleskov added that Zelensky must tread carefully during the Washington visit, stressing that the Ukrainian leader needs to 'strike a balance between being non-provocative' and pushing his concern comes just days after Trump held his first face-to-face meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022. The summit in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday was described by Trump as 'warm' and by Putin as 'frank' and 'substantive.'After the Alaska talks, Trump said Washington and Moscow were 'pretty close to the end' of the conflict. He is reportedly drafting a plan requiring Kiev to cede parts of Donbass still under its control, in exchange for a Kremlin halt to hostilities elsewhere. Zelensky has repeatedly rejected any territorial has insisted that any settlement must include Ukrainian neutrality, demilitarization, and denazification, along with recognition of the new territorial reality covering Crimea, Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporozhye, all of which voted to become parts of Russia. Putin expressed cautious optimism after the summit, saying the talks had brought Russia and the US 'closer' to ending hostilities.


Russia Today
9 hours ago
- Russia Today
Silence or secrecy? What Putin and Trump didn't say in Alaska
Although the conversation was cordial, no deal was sealed. That was the essence of the Alaska summit between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. The meeting on Friday appeared warm and friendly, at least judging by the footage. Yet instead of agreements came a perfunctory press conference, a cancelled lunch, and little clarity about what was actually achieved. Neither participants nor 'insiders' have disclosed specifics. What is known is that Putin and Trump agreed on most parameters of a peace deal – with a few unnamed sticking points. A preliminary truce may have been discussed. Territorial exchanges were not. The Americans still hope to pull Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky into the process with a trilateral summit. But no dates have been set. Nor was a follow-up meeting between Putin and Trump confirmed. By asking 'next time in Moscow?' Putin drew a smile, but Trump dodged, noting only that he would face heavy criticism if he went. The near total absence of detail can be read two ways. Perhaps nothing was really agreed. The agenda, slimmed down from the start, might suggest that. Or, just as plausibly, the Kremlin and White House have reached an understanding but are keeping it tightly under wraps to prevent third parties from sabotaging the process. Either way, the outcome satisfied both leaders. Trump can now indefinitely postpone a disastrous trade war with India and China, which secondary sanctions on Russia would have triggered. Putin, meanwhile, drove home the point that a temporary ceasefire is insufficient – that the time has come to talk about a full peace treaty. Trump's comments after the summit suggest Washington has quietly accepted this Russian framing. This marks a departure from the Ukrainian-Western European line of 'first truce, then peace.' His 'difficult' conversations with European leaders, following his 'good' talk with Putin, show clearly who lost this round: Kiev and Brussels. The next move lies with Zelensky. If, in Anchorage, Putin and Trump agreed on the core terms of a deal, then the unresolved points are those that Kiev and the Western Europeans resist most fiercely – above all, territorial issues. Trump's task now is to bring them into line. On Monday, Zelensky travels to Washington to meet Trump. From there, two paths are possible. First, Zelensky could dig in. Without Western European backing he might panic, refuse the terms, and repeat his February 28 clash with Trump. That would sharply sour US-Ukrainian relations and could even lead Washington to abandon the conflict entirely. The second, more likely scenario is delay. Zelensky will float an 'alternative plan,' most likely insisting on a three-way summit with Trump and Putin, claiming that only heads of state can make such decisions. His calculation is simple: Moscow refuses to speak directly to Kiev until there is already a US-Russian framework. How Trump reacts will determine the pace. He has leverage over both Kiev and Brussels. If he wants to end the war swiftly, he must use it. If not, the talks will stall yet again, with only a catastrophic battlefield collapse by Ukraine forcing change. If a trilateral meeting ever does occur, Minsk would be the logical venue. Alexander Lukashenko has already extended an invitation to Trump. Both Putin and Zelensky could reach the Belarusian capital easily. For the Kremlin, such a summit would serve one purpose: to corner Zelensky collectively and force him to accept what has already been decided. But for now, this remains speculation. So the Alaska summit ended without a treaty, without even a date for another meeting. But it also ended without acrimony, without confrontation, and with both leaders claiming satisfaction. That alone marks it as significant. For Trump, it meant relief from an impending trade war and a step toward reshaping Washington's approach to Russia. For Putin, it signaled that the US president is willing to bypass Western Europe and move directly to the question of peace. As ever, the decisive variable is Zelensky. Trump has placed the future of negotiations in his hands. But Zelensky, boxed in by Western European partners and by his own political survival, may prefer to stall. If he resists, US-Ukrainian ties will suffer. If he hesitates, Washington may move on without him. Either way, the Alaska summit was not an end, but a beginning – the first act in what promises to be a long and unpredictable diplomatic article was first published by the online newspaper and was translated and edited by the RT team


Russia Today
12 hours ago
- Russia Today
Woman killed in Ukrainian drone raid – Kursk governor (VIDEO)
A Ukrainian drone attack on Russia's Kursk has killed a 45-year-old woman and left 12 people injured, acting governor Aleksandr Khinshtein has said. In a statement on Friday, Khinshtein said the overnight attack – which he described as 'an inhuman crime by Ukrainian Nazis' – hit an apartment block, which sustained 'serious damage.' He added that a fire had broken out on the four upper floors, which has since been extinguished, and that the blast wave had shattered windows in nearby buildings and a school. According to Khinshtein, the casualties included a 15-year-old. Nine people were hospitalized and three are receiving outpatient treatment, he added. The building's residents have been temporarily relocated to a nearby school, Khinshtein said, noting that authorities will provide them with sleeping accommodation, essential supplies, and food. Experts will assess the extent of damage to the building and whether it can be repaired, he said. Footage circulating on social media showed a large blaze in the yard near the building, with several cars on fire. A fire was also visible on the upper floors of the structure. Later videos from the scene depicted balconies and exterior walls badly damaged, and nearby streets littered with debris from the blast. Officials in the southern city of Rostov-on-Don also reported a Ukrainian drone strikes on apartment buildings, which injured at least 15 people, including two children. Ukraine routinely launches drone attacks deep into Russia, which often target residential buildings and civilian infrastructure. Border areas, including Kursk Region, have been particularly heavily impacted by drone raids and artillery shelling.