logo
States are cracking down on mommy bloggers. It's about time.

States are cracking down on mommy bloggers. It's about time.

Yahoo15-04-2025

I'm not a mom, but that doesn't stop TikTok and Instagram from thinking I am, or at least assuming I'm interested in what moms are doing. I scroll past a day in the life of a wealthy stay-at-home mom in New York City shuttling kids around Manhattan or moms of multiples corralling triplets into matching outfits and then into car seats in minivans — cribs, bottles, onesies, all in threes. Parents hold newborns up to the camera; the babies are captivated by their own image in selfie mode, staring with big, glassy eyes as their moms talk to their followers.
Family and child influencers, which grew from the original online network of mommy bloggers in the 2000s, are constantly finding their way onto For You pages. The influencer economy is worth $250 billion, and parent and child influencers claim a sizable slice of that pie. Top earners like Ryan's World — the channel of a YouTuber who rose to fame at age 3 unboxing toys on camera — have raked in as much as $35 million a year. In a 2023 Morning Consult survey, 57% of Gen Z respondents said they wanted to be influencers.
The trend of kids playing influencer has gotten so unwieldy over the past two decades that lawmakers across the country are stepping in and attempting to regulate it. The trend started in 2023, and since, California, Utah, Minnesota, and Illinois have passed laws that mandate kids receive compensation in a trust if they appear in about one-third of someone's monetized content or if the poster hits a certain income threshold from their content. Some give the children the right to demand the content be deleted when they become adults. Half a dozen or so more states are drafting their own bills. It's a move that recognizes content creation as labor and not amateur home videos capturing kids being kids.
The laws are bolstered by the most heinous examples of parents abusing the children they force to perform in monetized videos. Shari Franke's recently published memoir, "The House of My Mother," is a look inside one of the most insidious cases of a parent exploiting children in a drive for online fame, one that involved abuse and the introduction of an abusive life coach into their family in Utah (her mother, Ruby Franke, is serving prison time for four counts of aggravated child abuse). Their family's story became a major driving force behind the Utah law, which is set to take effect in May. Some parents have sold photos of their children in revealing outfits to men online, running Instagram accounts for their young daughters. A new Netflix docuseries, "Bad Influence," alleges that the "momager" Tiffany Smith became verbally and physically abusive and forced preteens to work alongside her daughter for long hours to create YouTube content. (Some of the other former stars involved in the content settled a $1.85 million lawsuit with Smith last year. Smith's daughter, Piper Rockelle, has denied the claims that her mother was abusive, and Smith said the docuseries showed a "false narrative.")
For all the good intentions the laws bring, they lack teeth. There's no enforcing body, critics say: The kid-fluencers would need to first know the laws exist and then have the resources to sue for their money once they turn 18 if their parents didn't set up trusts. The laws require people to keep records of the content they created, compensation received, and what they deposited into accounts for their children. Even if there's recourse to sue your parents, it's likely to make coming home for the holidays more than awkward, and grown children of influencers may take these steps only in the most extreme circumstances. Even as the trend shows lawmakers want to do something about child influencers, they largely don't address questions about whether children can or should consent to spending hours in front of a ring light or unboxing toys.
"It's so tricky because on the one hand, these children are engaged in labor and deserve to be compensated for their labor," Sara Petersen, the author of "Momfluenced," tells me in an email. "But on the other hand, should these children be engaged in such labor?"
Petersen says the laws could normalize child labor and pave the way for children to be seen as employees of their parents, which could lead to more harm. As natural as influencing may look to the viewer, Petersen says, it's really "the performance of a self," which blurs the line between public and private aspects of life, even for adults. "I don't think children are capable of the kind of psychological compartmentalization necessary in professional influencing, nor do I think they should be asked to be," she adds.
Work is kind of everywhere and nowhere. Anybody with a device has already been experiencing that since the era of the smartphone.
Hilary C. Robinson, a professor of law and sociology at Northeastern University
Illinois was the first to pass such a law, which took effect in July, quickly followed by California. They take similar approaches: Content creators must set aside portions of earnings from content in which children appear and put it into a trust for when the kids turn 18. They're modeled largely on the Coogan Law, which mandates child actors' employers keep 15% of the kids' income in a trust their parents can't touch (some of the state laws use this 15% figure, while others require more income to be set aside). Utah passed its own law in March, which stipulates children receive pay for the time they're featured if the accounts rake in more than $150,000 in a year. Utah has been a hub for mom influencers and tradwives. Women there, many of whom are members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, show an idealistic version of home life and traditional gender norms, sometimes as a way to subtly evangelize their faith online, but also to monetize their roles as homemakers. Now the state is pivoting toward regulating how children use and are seen on the internet — both with the new kid-fluencer protections and with a new ban on smartphones and smartwatches in schools.
The biggest swing among the laws comes from Minnesota, where children under the age of 14 won't be able to "work" in content come July. The new law there defines working as appearing in more than 30% of compensated content; if parents break this rule, children are entitled to sue for all the money made from the content. Those 14 and older who make their own content get to keep all the money under the law. The feasibility of the laws will be put to test in the courts if children grow up and do bring lawsuits, but Allison Fitzpatrick, a partner at the New York law firm Davis+Gilbert who represents brands that hire influencers, says "parents better start following these laws," adding: "At some point, their child can sue them if they do not take these steps."
Influencing has ballooned in the past decade and become a way to get work outside the traditional market. Before the last century, children always worked — first in agriculture or as apprentices to family businesses, and then in factories. Then we decided as a society that they shouldn't be clocking in and out. Aside from carve-outs for child actors, some top-tier athletes, and after-school gigs, the US mostly outlawed child labor. But in recent years, there's been a rise in states attempting to roll back some child labor regulations, and child labor violations have jumped. The proliferation of family influencers created a harder industry to regulate because so much of it takes place at home, in cars, or during daily life. "You went to the factory, you went to the coal mine, and you got the kids out of there," Hilary C. Robinson, a professor of law and sociology at Northeastern University, says of past child labor crises. Now "work is kind of everywhere and nowhere," she says, adding: "Anybody with a device has already been experiencing that since the era of the smartphone."
There are shocking stories of exploitation, but most families don't have anything close to a horror story unfolding out of frame. There are kids and teens who want to express themselves online and have broken through, connecting to their peers in huge ways. There are others pushed by their parents to do so. "It is difficult for any brand, or for any agency, to really understand what goes on in the four walls of a family home," says Nick Walters, the president of SuperAwesome, a firm that represents brands and child influencers. Walters says his firm stays in close contact with families and will sever ties with those who don't put children's best interests first, perhaps by prioritizing content creation over schoolwork. He says he largely doesn't see the regulations as a hit to the influencer business: "Sensible, common-sense regulation that recognizes that young people are going to be in these spaces, and make sure they are dealt with fairly and responsibly and in a way that is in their best interest — we are a huge supporter of that."
Even as more people question whether and how children, or even themselves, should appear online, there's a massive demand for family vlogging content. People simply can't look away. "I don't see these laws stopping the momentum that has taken place in the industry with respect to child influencers," Fitzpatrick says. Some of the viewers are fans, but some are rage-watching. After several big-name influencer families moved out of California in quick succession, viral rumors circulated on social media that they were fleeing to avoid the state's new law in February. It was largely a hoax, Rolling Stone reported at the time; some influencer families had left California but did so for personal reasons. "TikTokers' outrage at parenting influencers isn't actually about protecting children or ethics in content creation, it's about pushing a moral panic for clicks and views — ironically the exact thing that they criticize influencers for," the tech journalist Taylor Lorenz wrote recently in her newsletter, User Mag.
All this regulation is focused on the concept that influencing is labor and the kids doing the work deserve a slice of the pie. There are still questions for all of us to answer about how children appear online, and what can be done to protect their privacy. In Europe, there are stronger protections, like the "right to be forgotten," that allow people to demand their images and data be removed from platforms (France passed a child influencer law in 2020, becoming a global pioneer in regulating the hours kid-fluencers worked and what happened to their compensation and enshrining a right for them to demand the deletion of videos they appear in).
For now, most Americans don't have those privacy luxuries against Big Tech. These laws are one of the first steps in recognizing that people are going to post. If they're lucky enough to strike gold, at least the kids propelling them to the top will see a cut.
Amanda Hoover is a senior correspondent at Business Insider covering the tech industry. She writes about the biggest tech companies and trends.
Read the original article on Business Insider

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Joopiter to Auction Sacai x Seventeen Limited-edition Labubu
Joopiter to Auction Sacai x Seventeen Limited-edition Labubu

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Joopiter to Auction Sacai x Seventeen Limited-edition Labubu

HAUTE LABUBU: The beyond viral plush figurine Labubu is getting an auction house treatment as a limited run of 13 green Labubu wearing custom beige Sacai looks and a secret version adorned in a distinctive color will go up for global bidding and viewing from Monday to June 18 at Pharrell Williams' auction platform Joopiter. A physical viewing of the lots to be auctioned will open to the public at Sacai Cheongdam Seoul from Tuesday. More from WWD Jaden Smith Disrupts Menswear Proportions in Louis Vuitton's Slouchy Women's Button-up Boots at Cruise 2026 Show Levi's x Sacai Reveals Spring Ad Campaign Photographed by Craig McDean EXCLUSIVE: Pharrell Williams' Joopiter Auction Platform Launches Marketplace The Labubus, an exclusive Pop Mart x How2work green edition from the Monsters series by the Hong Kong-based artist Kasing Lung, is part of Joopiter's latest project featuring an upcoming auction and limited-edition capsule collection between the Japanese fashion label Sacai and K-pop sensation Seventeen. The showcase, which coincides with the release of the group's fifth studio album 'Happy Burstday,' is aimed at celebrating Seventeen's relationship with Sacai and includes pieces worn, signed, and inspired by the group. The project is supported by Shinsegae International, Sacai's retail partner in South Korea. In addition to the custom Labubus, the auction includes a Sacai-designed jacket seen in Seventeen's 'Bad Influence' video, which was produced by Williams, and a T-shirt signed by 11 of the group's members. A line of merchandise designed by Sacai's Chitose Abe — featuring hoodies, T-shirts in two colorways and a cap, each featuring the J–17–S emblem, a new graphic that merges the logos of Joopiter, Sacai and Seventeen — will be released in tandem with the auction. Net proceeds from the sale will be donated to UNESCO, the United Nations Organization for Education, Science, and Culture. Both Seventeen and Williams serve as goodwill ambassadors for the organization. 'It was a pleasure to work with Seventeen on our new song, 'Bad Influence,' and it's exciting to bring them into the world of Joopiter, along with our brilliant friend, Chitose Abe of Sacai. This collaboration is built upon our mutual creative energy, and we can't wait for fans around the world to experience it,' said Williams, who also works as the creative director of menswear at Louis Vuitton. Abe said collaborating with Seventeen was about more than designing clothes; it was about 'creating something that could express individuality, unity and energy all at once.' 'Each member brings their own presence, and the goal was to reflect that through garments that blend contrasts, true to Sacai's philosophy,' she added. John Auerbach, chief executive officer of Joopiter, added: 'We've merged the worlds of music and fashion into a truly unique, one-of-a-kind collaboration, one that is true to Joopiter's mission of bringing the most covetable objects to the world.' Best of WWD Young Brooke Shields' Style Evolution, Archive Photos: From Runway Modeling & Red Carpets to Meeting Princess Diana The Most Memorable French Open Tennis Outfits With Serena Williams, Naomi Osaka & More [PHOTOS] Beyoncé's 'Cowboy Carter Tour' Outfits, Live Updates: Schiaparelli, Burberry, Loewe and More

Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial updates: 'Jane' testifies more about 'hotel nights'
Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial updates: 'Jane' testifies more about 'hotel nights'

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial updates: 'Jane' testifies more about 'hotel nights'

This story may contain accounts and descriptions of actual or alleged events that some readers may find disturbing. This is week five of testimony in the trial of Sean "Diddy" 9, 11:21 AM'I wanted to stop all of it': 'Jane' tells Combs she's 'tired' of 'hotel nights' in text messages By October 2023 "Jane" testified she needed a had texted her to 'call someone' for a 'hotel night,' telling her in a text, 'You're the only thing that's going to put me at peace.'"Jane" responded to the message, 'I'm not an animal. I'm not a porn star. These experiences are desensitizing sex for me.'"Jane" had seen Instagram posts of Combs with other Maurene Comey asked, 'What were you jealous of at this point in time?'"Jane" answered, 'I'm not really sure I was even jealous. I think I was really frustrated that there was more pressure on me, and more was asked of me than everyone else.'She sent a follow-up text to Combs: 'I'm not a porn star. I'm not an animal. I need a break. I don't want to do anything. I've hit a wall,' the message said. 'It's been three years of me having to f--- strangers. I'm tired.'Combs responded, 'So we're breaking up?'Comey asked, 'Had you been suggesting breaking up?'"Jane" told the court that she had not. 'I had been saying I wanted to stop all of it,' Jane testified. 'Having sex with other men.'"Jane" began to tear up and wail into the microphone as she read a subsequent text.'My spirit and my soul is tired. I need a break,' the message said. 'I can't be used like this anymore. I wanted to make you happy but it's creating a war inside me.' Jun 9, 11:14 AM'Jane' testifies she told Combs she doesn't want to be 'locked in a room to perform and fulfill your fantasies' Beginning a fifth week of testimony, Sean Combs' ex-girlfriend, appearing under the pseudonym 'Jane,' told the jury she once took a four-day trip to Miami with Combs, during which he allegedly promised to take her on a yacht following a 'hotel night.' "Jane" previously testified that "hotel night" was the phrase that she and Combs used to refer to their sexual encounters involving other Maurene Comey asked, 'Did you agree to do the hotel night?''Yes,' "Jane" testified in response, telling the court it lasted two days.'Did Sean take you on the yacht?' Comey asked.'No,' "Jane" home in Los Angeles, 'I noticed that on social media he had taken one of his girlfriends on the same yacht trip he had promised me,' "Jane" told the court that Combs told her the yacht trip with the other woman was nothing. However, "Jane" testified, a month later she saw an interview Combs gave to a podcast in which he bragged about having sex on the yacht and 'boasting they had sex for 48 hours.'The jury saw a text message she then sent to Combs: 'I don't want to be used and locked in a room to perform and fulfill your fantasies. Coming to the realization of what this is,' the message texted in response 'that was podcast talk' and then, in a subsequent message, said 'I'm tired of your false accusations.'By that point, "Jane" testified, Combs had been paying her $10,000 monthly rent for six months and she felt obligated to fulfill Combs' sexual desires."Jane" told the court that Combs then invited her to New York.'I remember he said that we would have alone time and we would do nice things in New York together,' "Jane" testified. 'We would go to dinner, go shopping and have a proper New York trip. He mentioned no hotel nights.'On the flight to New York, 'I remember on this flight that I received a message from Sean that made me a little upset,' "Jane" testified. 'I just remember just taking a deep breath and kind of feeling upset and a little disappointed, a little defeated.'The jury saw the text in question from Combs, which read: 'I have a surprise if that's ok. Just one.'"Jane" began to cry as she told the jury that she understood from the text that 'he was going to introduce me to somebody new.'On that New York trip, in September 2023, "Jane" testified that Combs infected her with the COVID-19 virus. Jun 9, 8:56 AM'Jane' to return to the witness stand as fifth week of testimony begins An ex-girlfriend of Sean Combs, testifying under the pseudonym 'Jane,' will retake the witness stand Monday as the fifth week of testimony begins in Combs' federal racketeering and sex trafficking trial."Jane" previously told the jury about a pattern of alleged drug-fueled sex encounters with male prostitutes that she testified she was afraid to discontinue once Combs started paying her rent and funding other expenses in her began paying her $10,000 monthly rent in 2023 and still pays it, "Jane" testified.'I felt that at any given opportunity Sean was just hovering the house over my head, like just really always brought it up in so many ways that he was paying for it and it just always felt like he wanted me to know that he was doing this for me all the time,' she told the testimony last week of a different witness, Bryana Bongolan, prompted the defense to seek a attorney Alexandra Shapiro argued that federal prosecutors knowingly introduced what she said was false testimony that Combs dangled Bongolan from a balcony at former girlfriend Cassie Ventura's Los Angeles apartment. Shapiro said hotel receipts show Combs was in New York at the time the alleged incident prosecutors said they planned to respond to the defense motion for a mistrial later today. Judge Arun Subramanian said he would take up the motion on Tuesday. Jun 9, 8:56 AMRead Week 4 trial testimony updates Week 4 of the Sean "Diddy" Combs trial wrapped up with testimony from "Jane," the second ex-girlfriend of Combs to testify following Cassie Ventura."Jane" is expected to return to the stand on about what happened last week during the trial. Click here to read the rest of the blog.

Say Hello to San Francisco's First Women's Sports Bar
Say Hello to San Francisco's First Women's Sports Bar

Eater

time33 minutes ago

  • Eater

Say Hello to San Francisco's First Women's Sports Bar

San Francisco's first women's sports bar opens Wednesday, June 11, on Market Street. Rikki's throws open its doors to a city ready for lots of women's basketball; the Golden State Valkyries' inaugural season is underway to huge fanfare. Co-founders Danielle Thoe and Sara Yergovich told the San Francisco Chronicle the name honors Rikki Streicher, a gay San Francisco athlete who opened two now-closed queer women's bars in San Francisco, Maud's and Amelia's. This opening makes the bar the first in the Bay Area dedicated exclusively to women's sports. Fifteen TVs stretch across the space; pop-up Rikki's parties around the city have brought in some 150 fans per event. There's a full liquor license available, and local beers, including the aptly named Local Brewing Co. on tap, with food available for hungry sports fans, as well. Rikki's is open Tuesday through Sunday from 3:30 p.m. until 10 p.m. on weekdays and until midnight on Friday and Saturday. Sacramento sells tacos to fight fascism NorCal Resist coordinated a demonstration on Sunday, June 8, in defiance of the federal government's invasion of Los Angeles's immigrant communities. To keep the momentum going, the group will work with Radio Xicanismo for a Tacos & Corridos event on Saturday, July 26, at 2 p.m. Guests will get three tacos with rice and beans for $30 at the Latino Center of Art and Culture. Tickets are on sale now. Another Divisadero Street restaurant suffers from a fire In an unlucky streak for the vibrant business corridor, Banh Mi Viet closed due to a fire. It broke out around 5:30 p.m. on Wednesday, June 4, and no one was injured. This makes another shutdown on Divisadero Street in recent years; Ethiopian restaurant Oasis Cafe and adjoining Kava Lounge have been closed since a major fire in 2022, as did Phuket on the other end of the strip. Mainstay Berkeley restaurant closes for good The team behind the beloved El Patio in Berkeley let fans know via Instagram of the restaurant's impending finale: The last day of service will be Friday, July 4. There was no reason given for the closure. More than that, the post says the catering and events arm of the business is still operational. Sign up for our newsletter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store