Exclusive: Don Jr. and Eric Trump's Middle East jaunt cost US taxpayers over $40,000 in hotel rooms and rental cars
Federal procurement data reviewed by The Independent shows more than $40,000 in disbursements by the Secret Service, whose agents accompanied Don Jr. and Eric Trump to Qatar and Saudi Arabia this spring, underwritten by the American public.
One transaction, a $13,984 payment arranged by the U.S. Embassy in Riyadh and funded by the State Department's Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, describes the outlay as: 'ERIC TRUMP Protective USSS Visit – 4 rental vehicles.'
It was prepared on April 20, and approved on May 13, 2025, the same day President Trump arrived in the kingdom. However, Eric, 41, was not part of the official delegation, according to reports.
A second transaction, for $26,813.24, was arranged by the State Department and funded by the U.S. Embassy in Doha, covered a room for Donald Trump Jr., 47, at The Ned, a 5-star hotel and members-only club located in a building formerly occupied by the Qatari Interior Ministry.
'Trump Jr Visit – May 25 – Team X,' reads the expenditure, which was prepared on May 11 and approved on May 18, 2025, nearly a week after the president was in town.
'Expect tactile furnishings, classical details, and all the essentials for a comfortable home away from home,' the property's website tells prospective travelers. 'Guests enjoy access to Ned's Club Spa and Gym throughout their stay. Airport transfers in our BMW 7 Series can be arranged upon request.'
Together, lodging and local transportation for Trump's two adult sons cost taxpayers at least $40,797.24, a figure that does not include air travel, agents' salaries, meals, and other significant outlays.
A Secret Service spokesman on Monday told The Independent, 'We support any of our protectees, that go anywhere in the world, including foreign trips. For these foreign trips, we have personnel on the ground before a protectee gets there, so we may be on the ground several days in advance, working with the local government and local authorities.'
The contracts themselves, such as the hotel rooms and rental cars required for Don Jr. and Eric, are executed on behalf of the Secret Service by U.S. embassies in the destination countries, according to the agency spokesman.
He said the members of the Trump family 'are our protectees, we protect them, regardless of where they go. When you're a protectee, you have round-the-clock protection anywhere in the world. It doesn't matter what type of trip it is, they're getting protection.'
The Trump Organization, which is being nominally run by Don Jr. and Eric while their father serves a second term in the White House, recently partnered with a Qatari real estate firm – backed by the country's sovereign wealth fund – to build a Trump-branded luxury golf resort in the emirate.
The deal was announced two weeks before Trump made the jaunt to Qatar, which subsequently 'gifted' the president a $400 million Boeing 747 for his own use.
The Trump family is also developing two new real estate projects in the Saudi Arabian capital of Riyadh, as well as a Trump Tower to be erected in Jeddah.
'Combining coastal elegance with urban sophistication, Trump Tower Jeddah delivers an unmatched lifestyle,' read an April 30 press release issued by the Trump Organization. 'From refined residences to world-class amenities and personalized service, every detail reflects the signature Trump standard of excellence.'
Two weeks later, the White House formally announced that Saudi Arabia had committed to buying at least $100 billion worth of military equipment from the U.S., and said Qatar had agreed to purchase $200 billion worth of U.S.-built jets from Boeing, as well as some $3 billion in American-made drones from General Atomics and Raytheon.
The trips by Don Jr. and Eric raised numerous questions about the Trump family's aggressive monetization of the presidency, which administration officials attempted to minimize as a non-issue. During the president's first term, the Trump Organization vowed not to pursue any foreign deals while the company's namesake was in office – a promise promptly broken, according to an investigation by anti-corruption watchdog Global Witness.
When Trump returned to the White House in January 2021, he released an ethics agreement that said the Trump Organization would not directly strike any deals with foreign governments. However, it included no prohibition on doing business with private companies abroad, and the president's family business is now involved in no fewer than 21 Trump-branded projects throughout the world, according to CItizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
Still, prior to Trump's Middle East sojourn, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt insisted that the notion Trump would personally benefit from his family's private business pursuits was, in a word, 'ridiculous.'
'The president is abiding by all conflict of interest laws,' Leavitt said. 'The president is a successful businessman, and I think, frankly, that it's one of the many reasons that people reelected him back to this office.'
In October 2018, U.S. taxpayers were hit with a $90,000-plus hotel bill for First Lady Melania Trump and her Secret Service detail, who were in Cairo for six hours but did not spend the night.
A vacation to Berlin the previous year by Tiffany Trump, the president's youngest daughter, cost taxpayers at least $22,000 in hotel stays for the Secret Service agents accompanying her and her boyfriend.
But when the Secret Service traveled with members of the Trump family to Trump-owned hotels, the agency was reportedly charged 'exorbitant' markups far above the usual room rate, contradicting Eric Trump's previous claim that agents were provided lodging 'at cost.'
At the same time, a vindictive Trump has sought revenge on officials he believes wronged him during his first term by revoking Secret Service details assigned to protect President Joe Biden's adult children, along with those looking after former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, former National Security Adviser John Bolton, and a host of others.
During Barack Obama's time in office, before Trump's foray into national politics, he raged on Twitter about the cost of providing security for the president and his family, taking aim at supposed 'taxpayer funded vacations' costing the American people 'millions of dollars.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
What's holding up a ceasefire in Gaza?
'There needs to be an end. There must be an end.' For Ameer living in a tent in Khan Younis, Gaza, a ceasefire can't come soon enough. 'I've seen how people change, because their instinct for survival is growing stronger.' Emma Graham-Harrison, the Guardian's chief Middle East correspondent, explains to Nosheen Iqbal that a long-awaited deal between Israel and Hamas will probably centre on a 60-day ceasefire, the release of Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners, the entry of aid into Gaza, and the withdrawal of Israeli forces. The extent of that Israeli withdrawal is, however, a major sticking point and the pair discuss how plans for a 'humanitarian city' in southern Gaza, controlled by the Israelis and populated by the Palestinians, are a major obstacle to the negotiations. Graham-Harrison also outlines the desperate conditions being faced by people in Gaza, but suggests that with the Israeli courts and Knesset about to break for summer a ceasefire deal may be imminent. Support the Guardian today:
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Trump rages as Jewish judge rips administration apart for stripping 'antisemitic' Harvard of its funding in blistering courtroom showdown
Donald Trump has fired off a furious missive at a Jewish judge who holds power in his war with Harvard. Judge Allison Burroughs is presiding over the tense lawsuit to determine whether the Trump administration can legally defund Harvard for not taking a strong enough stance against antisemitism on campus. While she did not issue a ruling in Monday's hearing, her barrage of questions toward the administration's lawyer and her status as an Obama-era appointee was enough for Trump to find fault with her handling of the case. 'The Harvard case was just tried in Massachusetts before an Obama appointed Judge. She is a TOTAL DISASTER, which I say even before hearing her ruling,' he wrote in a Truth Social post. 'She has systematically taken over the various Harvard cases, and is an automatic 'loss' for the people of our country! 'How did this Trump-hating Judge get these cases? When she rules against us, we will IMMEDIATELY appeal, and WIN.' Trump argued Harvard 'has $52 billion dollars sitting in the bank, and yet they are anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, and anti-America.' 'Much of this money comes from the USA, all to the detriment of other schools, colleges, and institutions,' he wrote, adding, 'we are not going to allow this unfair situation to happen any longer.' Trump vowed to 'not stop until there is victory', promising to cut funding to Harvard no matter how much effort it took. But if Judge Burroughs rules in Harvard's favour, it could make Trump's promise hard to deliver on. Steven Lehotsky, representing Harvard, said at Monday's hearing the case is about the government trying to control the 'inner workings' of the institution. At Monday's hearing, Harvard asked to reverse funding freezes in an effort to revive Harvard's sprawling scientific and medical research operation and hundreds of projects that lost federal money. A lawyer for the government, Michael Velchik, said the Trump administration has authority to cancel the grants after determining the funding did not align with its priorities, namely Trump's executive order combating antisemitism. He argued Harvard allowed antisemitism to flourish at the university following the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attacks on Israel. He said protesters had camped out on campus chanting antisemitic slogans and cited attacks on Jewish students. 'Harvard claims the government is anti-Harvard. I reject that,' Velchik, a Harvard alumnus, said. 'The government is pro-Jewish students at Harvard. The government is pro-Jewish faculty at Harvard.' Judge Burroughs pushed back, at one point describing the government's assertions as 'mind-boggling.' 'What I'm wrestling with is this idea that the executive branch can decide what is discriminatory or racist,' she said. 'You're saying you can terminate a contract for any and all reasons, even if the reason you're giving is a violation of the Constitution? I don't think you can justify a contract action based on impermissible suppression of speech.' Velchik said the case comes down to the government's choosing how best to spend billions of dollars in research funding. Judge Burroughs said: 'Let's assume for the sake of argument that Harvard has not covered itself in glory on the topic of antisemitism.' Noting her own Jewish faith, the judge asked what the relationship was between antisemitism and cutting funding to cancer research. 'You're not taking away grants from labs that have been antisemitic,' she noted. Despite her strongly worded rebuke, Judge Burroughs did not deliver a verdict at the bench, and is instead expected to issue a written decision at a later date. Harvard's lawsuit accused the Trump administration of waging a retaliation campaign against the university after it rejected a series of demands from a federal antisemitism task force in April. The task force's demands included sweeping changes related to campus protests, academics and admissions. Harvard was told to audit the viewpoints of students and faculty and admit more students or hire new professors if the campus was found to lack diverse points of view. Harvard President Alan Garber says the university has made changes to combat antisemitism but said no government 'should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.'
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Oil edges lower as trade war concerns increase worries about fuel demand
July 22 (Reuters) - Oil prices edged down on Tuesday as concerns the brewing trade war between major crude consumers the U.S. and the European Union will curb fuel demand growth by lowering economic activity weighed on investor sentiment. Brent crude futures fell 24 cents, or 0.35%, to $68.97 a barrel by 0055 GMT after settling 0.1% lower on Monday. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $66.99 a barrel, down 21 cents, or 0.31%, following a 0.2% loss in the previous session. The August WTI contract expires on Tuesday and the more active September contract was down 23 cents, or 0.35%, to $65.72 a barrel. Still, the oil market has struggled to find any direction since the ceasefire on June 24 ending the conflict between Israel and Iran removed concerns about major supply disruptions in the key Middle East producing region. Since then, Brent has traded in a range of $5.19 and WTI in a range of $5.65 as supply concerns have been alleviated by major producers raising output and investors are increasingly worried about the global economy amid U.S. trade policy changes. However, a weaker U.S. dollar has provided some backing for crude as buyers using other currencies are paying relatively less. Prices have slipped "as trade war concerns offset the support by a softer (U.S. dollar)," IG market analyst Tony Sycamore wrote in a note. Sycamore also pointed to the possibility of an escalation in the trade dispute between the U.S. and the EU over tariffs. The EU is exploring a broader set of possible counter-measures against the United States as prospects for an acceptable trade agreement with Washington fade, according to EU diplomats. The U.S. has threatened to impose a 30% tariff on EU imports on August 1 if a deal is not reached. There are also signs rising supply has entered the market as the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies unwind output cuts. Saudi Arabia's crude oil exports in May rose to their highest in three months, data from the Joint Organizations Data Initiative (JODI) showed on Monday.
