Welfare concessions being discussed with Labour rebels, Rayner suggests
Ministers are discussing the prospect of further concessions to win over Labour MPs preparing to rebel over plans to cut disability benefits, the Deputy Prime Minister has suggested.
Angela Rayner insisted the Government was not expecting backbenchers to go against traditional party values amid a looming revolt over the welfare Bill set for a Commons vote next week.
Some 120 Labour MPs have put their names to a bid to block the legislation in its tracks, arguing that disabled people have not been properly consulted about the plans and further scrutiny is required before making any changes.
Asked what concessions could be offered to convince rebels to back the Bill, Ms Rayner said 'discussions are ongoing'.
'I'm not going to get into that on your show tonight,' she said in an interview on ITV's Peston programme.
'Those discussions are ongoing around making sure that the welfare reforms that we're bringing in support people into work who need that, and we're putting a huge amount of investment into doing that, but also protecting the most vulnerable.'
She acknowledged that 'a lot of people are very scared about these changes' but added: 'I haven't changed my Labour values and we're not expecting our benches to do anything that isn't in check with them.
'What we want to do is support people, and that is the crucial bit around these reforms of what Labour are trying to achieve, and we're discussing that with our MPs.'
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, who has already taken steps to soften the impact of the welfare Bill, has been locked in talks with backbenchers as she seeks to win over those opposed to the measures.
The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill faces its first Commons test on Tuesday.
The plans restrict eligibility for personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit, with the aim of getting more people back into work and saving up to £5 billion a year.
Existing claimants will be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, a move seen as a bid to head off opposition.
But the fact so many Labour MPs are prepared to put their names to the 'reasoned amendment' calling for a change of course shows how entrenched the opposition remains.
Earlier on Wednesday, Sir Keir Starmer defended his leadership against accusations he had misjudged the mood in his party, insisting he is 'comfortable with reading the room'.
At a press conference at the Nato summit in the Hague, he said: 'Is it tough going? Are there plenty of people and noises off? Yes, of course, there always are, there always have been, there always will be.
'But the important thing is to focus on the change that we want to bring about.'
Ms Rayner earlier told MPs in the Commons the vote will take place as planned despite the rebellion, saying: 'We will go ahead on Tuesday.'
Social security minister Sir Stephen Timms said he was 'looking forward to the debate' next week.
He told the Commons Work and Pensions Committee the changes need to be made urgently to cut the spiralling welfare bill.
Committee chairwoman Debbie Abrahams, who is one of the Labour MPs to have signed the amendment to block the legislation, asked why the provisions within the Bill had not been consulted on.
Sir Stephen said: 'Essentially because of the urgency of the changes needing to be made.'
He said the cost of Pip had gone up from £12 billion before the pandemic to £22 billion last year 'and that is not a sustainable trajectory'.
Setting out the impact of the reforms, he told the Committee 370,000 people getting Pip under the current system would not be receiving it by the end of the decade.
Other senior Labour figures outside Parliament, including Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham and London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, have also publicly expressed their opposition to the plans.
Meanwhile, the Tories seem unlikely to lend the Government their support, with leader Kemi Badenoch setting out conditions for doing so including a commitment to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget and further cut the benefits bill.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Criticizes Fed Chair Jerome Powell at NATO Summit
President Trump lashed out at Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, whose term runs for another 11 months, during a press conference at the NATO summit. Sign in to access your portfolio
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Port Moody councillor pens letter to ministry of municipal affairs calling for end to local oversight of conduct codes
A Port Moody councillor is urging the provincial government to eliminate local council oversight of codes of conduct, warning that the current self-regulation model enables bullying, retaliation, and political weaponization – particularly against councillors in the minority. In a June 18 letter to Housing and Municipal Affairs Minister Ravi Kahlon, Coun. Haven Lurbiecki called for sweeping reform to how conduct concerns are addressed in B.C. municipal governments. She argued that locally adopted and enforced codes allow those in power to target dissenters, silence critics, and foster a toxic workplace culture without meaningful checks. 'Much more often than public feuds, local elected representatives, especially those in the minority, can face issues such as bullying, intimidation, or retaliation, alone and without adequate support,' Lurbiecki wrote. 'These issues rarely make headlines, yet their impact can be just as severe.' The letter comes after Minister Kahlon publicly committed to bringing forward new legislation to improve local government oversight, though no draft has been released. Lurbiecki said she hopes her letter will help shape that work. Lurbiecki has made these arguments before , frequently pushing for a larger provincial role overseeing municipal conduct. She is often a minority vote on council, particularly around development issues. While councils can hire external investigators or seek legal advice in response to conduct complaints, those decisions typically rest with a majority vote of council. That creates an inherent conflict of interest when a complaint is made by – or against –members of that same majority, Lurbiecki stated in the letter. 'There is currently little or no protection or support for local elected representatives in minority situations who may be facing bullying, retaliation or weaponization of a code of conduct,' she wrote. 'The mere threat of an investigation is enough to have a significant negative emotional and psychological impact.' Lurbiecki said the confidentiality often surrounding code of conduct investigations means that even when councillors are cleared of wrongdoing, they may be unable to speak publicly about their experience or the process, which itself can be isolating and traumatic. She described the model as fundamentally flawed, especially in cases where access to legal support depends on the approval of council – a potential obstacle if the councillor under scrutiny is not part of the majority. 'Minister, I respectfully ask: in the legislature can you imagine if a simple majority vote could take these types of actions against individual MLAs?' Lurbiecki wrote. Lurbiecki called on the province to scrap locally adopted codes of conduct entirely and establish a provincial or regional Municipal Government Ethics Commissioner. Such an office, she contended, could offer impartial and consistent oversight and reduce the risk of politically motivated abuse. She also pointed to Alberta's recent decision to eliminate local government codes of conduct as a potential model, suggesting B.C. should consider doing the same. As an interim step, Lurbiecki said the province should standardize conduct codes across all B.C. municipalities and create an independent body to oversee their application. 'I am not surprised so many in local government, often women, leave local politics disillusioned,' she wrote. 'Without institutional support, we risk losing more, and others may never run for office at all.' Code of conduct issues have often been raised during the council's current term. Following allegations of an illegal meeting between a majority of council and a developer, Lurbiecki introduced a motion calling for a municipal ethics commissioner. While a majority of council disputed that anything improper took place, the motion found unanimous support, with several councillors citing historical precedent. Lurbiecki also raised the issue following an somewhat murky altercation at a 2023 convention between Mayor Meghan Lahti and former Port Moody council candidate David Stuart, which resulted in the latter filing a formal complaint. One Port Moody councillor, Coun. Kyla Knowles, was subject to three code of conduct complaints in her first year in office, though no disciplinary action was taken. The city did not release any information about the complaints. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ministers in talks over welfare concessions as Labour rebellion grows
Ministers are discussing the prospect of further concessions to win over a growing list of Labour MPs poised to rebel against planned cuts to disability benefits. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said talks between backbenchers and Government were 'ongoing' on Thursday night as Downing Street seeks to head off what would be Sir Keir Starmer's first Commons defeat on Tuesday. It came as six more Labour MPs added their names to an amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks, arguing disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. The new signatories include North Ayrshire and Arran MP Irene Campbell and Colchester MP Pam Cox, both of whom won their seats in the party's 2024 landslide general election victory, taking the Labour total to 126. Stroke-on-Trent Central MP Gareth Snell, Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend MP Mary Glindon, Tamworth MP Sarah Edwards and Chesterfield MP Toby Perkins also added their names. The Prime Minister has insisted the reforms are set for a vote on Tuesday despite the looming revolt, but ministers are locked in talks with backbenchers about the possibility of making changes to soften the impact of the Bill. Asked what concessions could be offered to convince rebels to back the Government, Ms Rayner sought to reassure backbenchers that they would not be expected to betray the party's traditional values. 'I'm not going to get into that on your show tonight,' she said in an interview on ITV's Peston programme. 'Those discussions are ongoing around making sure that the welfare reforms that we're bringing in support people into work who need that, and we're putting a huge amount of investment into doing that, but also protecting the most vulnerable.' She acknowledged that 'a lot of people are very scared about these changes' but added: 'I haven't changed my Labour values and we're not expecting our benches to do anything that isn't in check with them. 'What we want to do is support people, and that is the crucial bit around these reforms of what Labour are trying to achieve, and we're discussing that with our MPs.' The plans restrict eligibility for personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit. The Government hopes the changes will get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year. Existing claimants will be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, a move seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. But the fact so many Labour MPs are prepared to put their names to the 'reasoned amendment' calling for a change of course shows how entrenched the opposition remains. One backbencher preparing to vote against the Bill told the PA news agency: 'A lot of people have been saying they're upset about this for months. To leave it until a few days before the vote, it's not a very good way of running the country. 'It's not very grown up.' They said that minor concessions would not be enough, warning: 'I don't think you can tinker with this. They need to go back to the drawing board.' According to the Government's impact assessment, the welfare reforms as a whole could push an extra 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, into relative poverty. Asked whether she thought there were hundreds of thousands of people claiming disability benefits who were not disabled, Ms Rayner said: 'No, what we're saying though is that the welfare system has to be able to have longevity.' Earlier on Wednesday, Sir Keir Starmer defended his leadership against accusations he had misjudged the mood in his party, insisting he is 'comfortable with reading the room'. At a press conference at the Nato summit in The Hague, the Prime Minister said: 'Is it tough going? Are there plenty of people and noises off? Yes, of course, there always are, there always have been, there always will be. 'But the important thing is to focus on the change that we want to bring about.' Later on Wednesday, armed forces minister Luke Pollard echoed the Deputy Prime Minister, telling Sky News's Politics Hub show that 'of course' the Government was in talks about possibly making changes. 'Of course we are, and I think there's a concern that's very valid and real for lots of my colleagues. They're not doing this to cause trouble or be argumentative,' he said. 'They're doing it because they have a genuine, heartfelt concern about some of the impacts. ' He said some of the reforms would be supported across the party but 'where there is concerns… those discussions will continue until the vote and beyond.' Other senior Labour figures outside Parliament, including Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham and London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, have publicly expressed their opposition to the plans. Meanwhile, the Tories seem unlikely to lend the Government their support, with leader Kemi Badenoch setting out conditions for doing so including a commitment to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget and further cut the benefits bill.
