How Las Vegas Grand Prix's economic impact goes beyond race weekend
Yovani Barrera owns one of those stores, Bring it Back, a buy-sell-trade store for hip shoes and clothing.
'Nothing crazy like 'F1 crazy' It's more like, if it's a fight weekend or some sort of other event happening on a weekend, big concert, that kind of traffic,' Barrera said.
Applied Analysis principal Brian Gordon explained to 8 News Now how the Las Vegas Grand Prix's economic impact looks at a whole year of spending. Casinos and resorts get their chunk of change during race weekend, but everyone who gets paid for working around the track is a contributor, spending their money throughout the valley.
'They go to their doctor's office, they go to a grocery store,' Gordon said. 'All of that spending essentially ripples throughout the economy, and so it is impacting almost every corner of the market.'
For example, if a race employee spends some of their paycheck on a pair of sneakers at Bring it Back, the grand prix now has an impact on a local business. Regardless, business owners like Barrera would like to see some more support downtown.
'It would be nice, get a lot more local support. Like I said, it's all holed over there,' Barrera said.
Barrera said it's always good to have another busy weekend, but he's not sure if it's worth putting up with traffic and construction.
The Las Vegas Grand Prix did make an effort to promote small businesses, with valley restaurants providing food around the track during the 2024 race. They also made a local business directory, listing different valley-based services for F1 teams or employees.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Liam Lawson Exposes Shocking Truth Behind Red Bull F1 Demotion
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Racing Bulls Formula One driver Liam Lawson has shed light on his demotion from Red Bull after the first two races of the 2025 season, exposing how an experimental setup on his RB21 F1 car was allegedly used against him. Lawson's promotion was announced after the 2024 season, following the ousting of Sergio Perez. Red Bull finalized its decision after assessing Lawson alongside Yuki Tsunoda in the second half of last year in its junior F1 team, Racing Bulls (then VCARB). 2025 marks Lawson's first full-time season in the premier class of racing, but things took a drastic turn after Red Bull demoted him to Racing Bulls, swapping him for Yuki Tsunoda. The team took this major decision after the Grands Prix in Australia and China, where Lawson secured a DNF and P12. Red Bull's challengers have been reportedly tailored to suit Max Verstappen, and as a result, most of his teammates have often found it hard to adapt to the car. Lawson feels he wasn't given enough time to get used to the car, and highlighted that the team's preparation fell short of what a rookie driver would normally receive. Liam Lawson of New Zealand and Visa Cash App RB looks on from the grid during the F1 Grand Prix of Hungary at Hungaroring on August 3, 2025 in Budapest, Hungary. Liam Lawson of New Zealand and Visa Cash App RB looks on from the grid during the F1 Grand Prix of Hungary at Hungaroring on August 3, 2025 in Budapest, made matters worse for him were the car's reliability issues. When he agreed to try a different setup on the RB21 in China, thinking it would help him understand the car better, Red Bull used his performance in the race as the basis for his demotion. Speaking to RacingNews365, Lawson said: "If you look at how other teams have approached bringing a young driver in and you look at the test days, the time in the seat, the amount of testing that, for example, Kimi [Antonelli], has done in the past before racing this year - we didn't do any of that. "It was two weekends on two tracks I'd never raced at, one of them being a sprint weekend. They weren't smooth weekends. We had issues in Bahrain [testing] with reliability, we had issues in Melbourne with reliability." He added: "In China, we took a shot in the dark with the set-up to try and learn something. For me, I was under the understanding it was to help me develop for the future, to have an understanding of the car. "So I was happy to drive with this sort of set-up. That performance was then used to demote me from the team, basically." Red Bull has been facing problems with its car since mid-2024. In the current season, Verstappen's performance continues to suffer since the team is unable to get the car in the right working window. Tsunoda, who replaced Lawson, has also experienced a drop in performance since his promotion. While Lawson admitted that the car had issues, he wasn't happy with his own performance either, which prompted him to look back and analyze if he could have done something differently. He added: "There were a few things over that time that made it not smooth. It wasn't a clean couple of weekends. And by my own standards, they weren't good enough. I was obviously trying as hard as I could, and I was trying to get up to speed as quickly as I could. "As much as I look back now and go, 'What could I have done to do that better?', there are obviously things you look back in hindsight and go, 'I wish that I'd done this differently to try and help me'. "If I knew I was going to get two races, I would have probably done things slightly differently. But I didn't at the time. I was maybe a bit naive, but I thought I was going to get longer and have time to learn."
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Will Buxton Has a Bold Answer On Alex Palou's F1 Title Chances
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Commentator and former F1 TV host Will Buxton gave his take on IndyCar Champion Alex Palou's chances in Formula 1. Buxton is a long-time F1 paddock member who started as a reporter and eventually became a TV presenter for the sport's digital streaming platform. He featured prominently on Netflix's Drive to Survive (DTS), playing a key role in the show becoming so popular and the sport growing stateside. On DTS, he narrated the dramatic elements of the sport and gave context to specific events, helping new fans learn about the racing series. Alex Palou, driver of the #10 DHL Chip Ganassi Racing Honda, poses for a photo during the winner's photo shoot for the NTT IndyCar Series 109th Running Of The Indianapolis 500 at Indianapolis Motor Speedway... Alex Palou, driver of the #10 DHL Chip Ganassi Racing Honda, poses for a photo during the winner's photo shoot for the NTT IndyCar Series 109th Running Of The Indianapolis 500 at Indianapolis Motor Speedway on May 26, 2025 in Indianapolis, Indiana. More Photo byBefore the start of the 2025 F1 season, Buxton announced his departure from the broadcast team and revealed his new role at Fox with IndyCar. He is the lead play-by-play voice for the American racing series - this season, he has observed the greatness of the driver for Chip Ganassi Racing, Alex Palou. The Spanish sensation secured his fourth IndyCar championship, cementing his status as one of the most dominant racers in the competition's history. On Sunday, after Palou captured another title, Buxton was asked the following question on X by another user: "How does an Indy car driver compare to an F1 driver on a skill level? I suppose it's a hard question to answer but why wouldn't Palou pursue that path on his current trajectory? I'm just trying to understand if F1 is completely out of reach for him and what pushes a driver one way or the other," the person asked. As an expert in both racing series, Buxton is especially able to dissect Palou's chances in F1, and he responded with his take: "Palou is, hands down, one of the best open-wheel drivers in the world right now. Could he win in F1? Absolutely. With the right car. Would he get the right car though? Unless it's a top 4 team in F1, why walk away from making history in a championship he loves?," Buxton wrote in a post. Palou is, hands down, one of the best open wheel drivers in the world right now. Could he win in F1? Absolutely. With the right car. Would he get the right car though? Unless it's a top 4 team in F1, why walk away from making history in a championship he loves? — Will Buxton (@wbuxtonofficial) August 10, 2025 How close was Alex Palou to joining F1? Palou had signed a deal to drive with McLaren's IndyCar team, though he ended up staying with Chip Ganassi instead after winning the 2023 title. The driver claimed that McLaren promised him an F1 drive, but after the team signed Oscar Piastri, he lost confidence in landing a seat on the grid. Piastri was younger than Palou and, with Lando Norris cemented as the team's lead driver — he gave up on his F1 dream and stayed in IndyCar. Since then, he has dominated in America, though Buxton believes there is an alternative universe where Palou is fighting for a F1 title right now. "I think Palou reneged on McLaren precisely because the F1 road was closed off as soon as they signed Piastri," he wrote. "But yeah. Had Alpine been better at writing contracts, every chance Palou is leading the F1 championship and Piastri is still at Enstone." I think Palou reneged on McLaren precisely because the F1 road was closed off as soon as they signed Piastri. But yeah. Had Alpine been better at writing contracts, every chance Palou is leading the F1 championship and Piastri is still at Enstone. — Will Buxton (@wbuxtonofficial) August 10, 2025 For more F1 news, head on over to Newsweek Sports.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Steps the FIA will take to avoid a repeat of Mercedes' 2014 F1 dominance
Next year, both chassis and power unit regulations will undergo sweeping changes. Several technical directors in the F1 paddock have called it the biggest overhaul of the past 50 years. In addition to concerns from drivers about the racing in general, some fear it could pave the way for long-term dominance by a single manufacturer. Memories go back to 2014, when Mercedes' engine proved significantly superior to the rest of the field and the factory team went on to claim every world title through to 2020. Why the FIA doesn't fear a repeat of Mercedes' 2014 dominance The FIA, however, is confident that history won't repeat itself in F1's new era starting in 2026. 'I don't think that we are going to have a situation where a single manufacturer has such a huge advantage as was the case in 2014,' Nikolas Tombazis told The FIA's single-seater director believes the new engine formula is less complex, despite the substantial increase in electrical power: 'The engines are still not as simple as we would have liked. We would have liked to go further, but we had a lot of resistance against simplifying the regulations more. So there are things that we would have liked to be even simpler, but they are still simpler than the current generation of engines. They don't have the MGU-H, and there are a few things that have tighter limits, so we don't think the gaps will be as big as in 2014.' Back then, the MGU-H proved a major performance differentiator - and a very costly one. For both of those reasons it will disappear in 2026, a change that should provide newcomers with a more level playing field while also reducing development costs. How will the concessions' system work? That said, it cannot be ruled out that one manufacturer may still get out of the blocks significantly better than the rest, especially since the FIA acknowledges not all power unit manufacturers are equally transparent or willing to share data about their new engines. Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes W05, leads Nico Rosberg, Mercedes W05, Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull Racing RB10 Renault, Fernando Alonso, Ferrari F14T, Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing RB10 Renault, Kimi Raikkonen, Ferrari F14T, Nico Hulkenberg, Force India VJM07 Mercedes, and Kevin Magnussen, McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes, at the start But even if one manufacturer dominates next year, the FIA has learned from 2014. The new regulations include a safety net, allowing underperforming brands to close the gap through so-called concessions. 'We do have newcomers, and it is always a risk at the start of a new cycle that there is some divergence initially,' Tombazis said. 'Additionally, we have a cost gap for the PU manufacturers now.' It means that manufacturers who are behind cannot simply throw unlimited money at their engine projects. To still offer them possibilities to catch up, the FIA has included a new system into the 2026 regulations. 'For that reason, there is a concept called ADUO, which is an acronym for Additional Development and Upgrade Opportunities,' Tombazis explained. 'This concept has been the product of a lot of work. It was already there from day one of the regulations, but in the last few months more detail has been put into it to define exactly how that is going to operate.' This, of course, raises the key question: how does it work? 'Essentially every five, six races there will be an average performance measured for each PU manufacturer. Those who are below a certain level, and depending on how much below they are, will get that benefit accumulating over the year. That benefit would translate into three things: one is additional development money, some more dyno hours and the possibility to make a new homologation of the engine. So people who are behind will have the opportunity to speed up and catch up.' The 2026 technical regulations specify that this assessment will be made after the first five race weekends each season: 'Over the first five Competitions of each Championship Season in the 2026-2030 period, the FIA will monitor the performance of the Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) part of all the Power Units supplied by each PU Manufacturer to its customer Competitors. For each ICE supplied by the PU Manufacturers, an average power will be calculated. The methodology to calculate this power can be found in the Appendix to the Regulations. Any PU Manufacturer whose ICE power is more than 3% below that of the highest ICE power recorded amongst all the PU Manufacturers will be granted Additional Development and Upgrade Opportunities.' These extra opportunities relate to a table in Appendix 3 of the technical regulations. A special ADUO column lists which components of the ICE may still be improved if a manufacturer is granted the special status by the FIA. Several of these components are otherwise frozen for development over a specific period of time, but with ADUO status, they may still be modified to close the gap. Nikolas Tombazis, FIA Single Seater Director FIA rejects 'absolutely any suggestion' of Balance of Performance The system is designed to prevent long-term dominance, but Tombazis emphasises that it should not be seen as a Balance of Performance, as is used in series like the World Endurance Championship. 'I want to stress that I completely refute any comment about that being a Balance of Performance or anything like that, because first of all, the regulations are exactly the same for everyone. It's not like we are giving them more cubic capacity, more fuel or whatever. 'Secondly, if there was no cost cap, they would throw a lot of money at it. When Honda were behind in 2016, 2017, for a certain period they had to spend a lot more money to catch up. With a cost cap the risk is that you would never be able to do that, and that you would be behind eternally. You would just be humiliated for a whole regulation cycle, and clearly we don't want that. We don't think that would be fair, and I have to say that PU manufacturers have been extremely collaborative on this topic.' Finally, the FIA is working on a safety net for manufacturers who suffer serious reliability issues — something that cannot be ruled out at the start of a new era. 'There is an additional initiative which addresses the situation where a PU manufacturer has huge reliability issues to start with. Imagine somebody who blows up an engine each race weekend and each engine costs a lot of money. They suddenly find that they are eating their cost cap with blown engines. They have to reduce the development to stay below the cost cap, and you can imagine that would be an awful situation. 'So we've got some initiatives, which are going through the same phase of discussion now, and will hopefully be approved quite soon, whereby once you use more than a certain number of engines, you start having a certain cost cap relief. Read Also: What's got drivers so agitated about "strange" 2026 F1 cars? 'Your engines, once you exceed that number, cost very little from a cost cap point of view. Not in terms of real money, of course, they still cost the same unfortunately, but it means that we protect them from a situation where somebody is in an awful position and has no way to react under the cost cap. That would be really unfortunate.' Combined with the slightly simpler power unit formula, this approach should avoid a repeat of 2014 and has to keep the F1 field competitive - at least on the engine side. To read more articles visit our website.
