Monopoly Reinvents Its Board Game Without Paper Money
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links."
Earlier this week, Hasbro announced its newest version of the classic board game Monopoly but with a big change—the role of the banker is gone. In its place is Monopoly App Banking, a concept designed to speed up play and make the game more enjoyable. When it lands in stores this August for $25, smartphones will serve as the bankers, and each player will manage their money using the accompanying free mobile app. (Players must each have their own phone.)
With the new version, you start by downloading the Mobile Banking App, which handles all the transactions with money and properties for you. Just select a token and a matching bank card and scan it to the mobile app. With purchases and rent now automated, it may be an effort to appeal to younger players who might also find the updated board more relatable. Also gone are the two most expensive properties—Boardwalk and Park Place. In their place are Rocket Launch Pad and Moon.$19.99 at amazon.com
Not to date myself, but this isn't the game that I grew up playing for hours with friends and family. Yes, marathon Monopoly sessions could drag on for days where we would have to leave the board and come back to it. But who didn't love the colorful cash—pink $5 bills and blue $50s? Of course, the goldenrod yellow $500s were special. You only got two of those, and it was always a tough decision to break one to purchase a property or, worse yet, pay rent to someone else. What about that huge pot of money in the center that was constantly accumulating, and that you could scoop up if you were lucky enough to land on the Free Parking spot? Remember feeling flush every time you passed Go and collected your $200? How can an app replace that, I wonder.
If you're not a numbers person, I guess it's a win. You can focus on your entrepreneurial skills without fumbling around to make change when you have a big picture concept for a block of properties. Transactions are easier, no one gets stuck in the thankless role of the banker, and cheaters will be out of luck. At its core, Monopoly remains a game of economic lessons, real estate gambles, and chance that teaches negotiation, interpersonal skills, and business judgement regardless of physical money or not.
And this is not the first reinvention of the game. Other digital versions exist including Monopoly Go, a single-player mobile board game, and The Monopoly Super Electronic Banking board game with an all-in-one electronic banking unit. Each player gets a bank card instead of paper money.
On the other end of the spectrum, Monopoly Deal, has no electronics. It's a card game perfect for family game nights that is also suitable for younger kids—ages 8 and up—and offers fast play for up to five players.
Yeah, but traditional Monopoly had an educational benefit for kids and families. It was an opportunity to add, subtract, and weigh consequences of a purchase or a debt. With a digital banker, there's no creative math or slipping some emergency cash under the board for when you land on an expensive property like Park Place with a hotel. Somehow the paper money adds a reality check. And what about the value of this being a screen-free family board game? There are so few of those today.
'I understand that the market is changing and that this is Hasbro's response to the way kids play, but I will admit I'm disappointed that kids who play this version of the game are going to be missing out on the tangible learning that the paper money system provided,' says Cat Bowen, our Senior Editor who reviews (among other products) parenting gear and gadgets. 'The old school Monopoly could be played anywhere and anytime, but this new version requires a smartphone and internet connection, which means either the kids need a phone, or they need to use their parent's phone. In a time when parents are increasingly concerned about their kids' screen time, this feels like a push towards more of that, not less.'
Sure, we'll likely try out the new Monopoly. Younger kids won't know any better since many have smartphones now and may not use much cash since seemingly everyone has Zelle, Venmo, and Apple Pay.
Still, having a thick stack of hundreds in your hand is a feeling that will be hard to replace with the digital banker in this new version of Monopoly. But thankfully, the traditional one is still available if you want to count your cash and hold onto your properties, like I do.
Shop Now
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Stockton Rush Was Dedicated to Ocean Exploration. His Cofounder Still Is Despite the Deadly Risks
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: In June 2023, the OceanGate Expeditions submersible Titan imploded while descending to the wreckage of the Titanic. All five passengers died. Company cofounder Guillermo Söhnlein has publicly defended his late business partner, OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush, and ocean exploration more broadly. A year after the disaster, Söhnlein announced plans for his current company to explore Dean's Blue Hole in The Bahamas. On June 16, 2023, OceanGate Expeditions CEO Stockton Rush and four other passengers left the coast of Newfoundland, Canada, for the thrill of a lifetime—a submersible dive to the sunken Titanic. Tragically, none of them returned to shore. 'They knew what they were getting into,' OceanGate cofounder Guillermo Söhnlein said. 'And yeah, and it's just, it's a sad thing that they died doing something that they were passionate about.' Streaming June 11, the Netflix documentary Titan: The OceanGate Disaster takes a closer look at the titular craft's deadly underwater implosion and the events preceding it. It also examines the business practices of Rush and whether they ultimately played a role in the accident. While Rush's company has drawn intense scrutiny, Söhnlein has rendered a different image of his former business partner—insisting his commitment to exploration is worth continuing. Rush and Söhnlein cofounded OceanGate in 2009 in Seattle. Similar to space tourism brands such as Blue Origin and Virgin Galactic—created by Jeff Bezos and Richard Branson, respectively—the company's mission was to make undersea exploration more accessible. According to Söhnlein, he and Rush planned to purchase a 'fleet' of submersibles capable of diving at least 4,000 meters. The craft could be used for a variety of purposes, including tourism, military operations, and scientific research. 'The whole intent was to create these work subs and, in that way, as our tagline was in the early days: Open the oceans for all of humanity,' Söhnlein told Sky News in 2023. The company's first five-person submersible, Antipodes, followed this model and was used primarily by researchers and what Söhnlein called 'citizen scientists'—or regular people fully trained as crew members for their respective excursions. In June 2011, Antipodes successfully explored the wreckage of the S.S. Governor off the coast of Washington. But by 2013, Rush determined OceanGate needed to build its own craft to explore greater depths as originally intended. That same year, Rush became CEO when Söhnlein left the company, though he maintained a minority stake. He testified that as of September 2024, he had approximately 500,000 common shares but 'basically resigned myself to the fact that I'm probably never going to see anything out of that equity stake.' That's because of what would happen a decade later in the North Atlantic Ocean. In July 2021, OceanGate made its first successful dive to the wreck site of the Titanic, the massive ocean liner that sank on April 14, 1912, and resulted in more than 1,500 deaths. Rush and his team used the company's Titan submersible, which had a unique carbon fiber hull to make it lighter and less expensive to build. But during the expedition in June 2023, team members lost contact with the Titan. After a frantic days-long search for the craft, investigators recovered debris on June 22 and determined the submersible suffered a catastrophic implosion. All five passengers—including Rush, 61, and Titanic expert Paul-Henri Nargeolet, 77—died. The U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) later determined that layers of the Titan's carbon fiber hull had begun to delaminate, or break apart, a year prior—ultimately compromising the craft's integrity. This, along with testimony from a former employee saying an accident was 'inevitable,' led to scrutiny of Rush's business and safety practices as company CEO. The Netflix documentary promises to look at 'technical challenges, moral dilemmas, and shockingly poor decisions' that led to the implosion. However, Söhnlein, who has never been on a Titanic dive, has publicly defended Rush. He denied leaving OceanGate over safety concerns and told CTV News that OceanGate 'operated as safely as possible and we had a very safety-conscious culture' prior to his 2013 departure. Then in September 2024, Söhnlein testified to a USCG panel that Rush performed the first manned test dive of Titan on his own and recalled their conversation beforehand. 'He goes, 'I don't want anyone else in the sub. If anything happens, I want it to only impact me. It's my design, I believe in it, I trust it, but I don't want to risk anyone else,'' Söhnlein said. Söhnlein will offer his full thoughts about the Titan tragedy with the November 2025 release of his book, Titan Unfinished: An Untold Story of Exploration, Innovation, and the OceanGate Tragedy. In the wake of the accident, OceanGate suspended 'all exploration and commercial operations.' But Söhnlein, undeterred by his friend's death, has continued to advocate for underwater exploration. In June 2024, he announced plans for his own company, Blue Marble Exploration, to launch a craft to Dean's Blue Hole, an underwater sinkhole located in The Bahamas. Scientists have measured its depth at 663 feet, but no humans have ever reached the bottom. However, Blue Marble Exploration's website currently doesn't include any information about the company or planned excursions to the blue hole or elsewhere. Although it's unclear what the future holds for his company, Söhnlein has expressed hope that the Titan implosion won't deter other explorers and said future missions would be a way to honor the five victims. 'Those of us who work in the deep-ocean community know that there are risks. We know that working down there is difficult,' Söhnlein told the Seattle Times in 2023. 'And yet we all believe in what we're doing. We believe that what we're doing is greater than us.' Titan: The OceanGate Disaster begins streaming Wednesday, June 11, on Netflix. Tudum has confirmed the project includes new testimony about OceanGate and 'footage from the company's early days.' You Might Also Like Nicole Richie's Surprising Adoption Story The Story of Gypsy Rose Blanchard and Her Mother Queen Camilla's Life in Photos
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jobs report lift, Tesla stock rebounds, Lululemon sinks
Yahoo Finance host Madison Mills tracks today's top moving stocks and biggest market stories in this Market Minute, including Tesla's (TSLA) rebound this morning after erasing $153 billion in market value due to CEO Elon Musk's feud with President Trump and Lululemon Athletica (LULU) cutting its full-year forecast over tariff pressures. Stay up to date on the latest market action, minute-by-minute, with Yahoo Finance's Market Minute. Time for Yahoo! Finance's market minute. Stocks are jumping, the S&P 500 breaking above the 6,000 level for the first time since February on the back of that stronger than expected May jobs report. President Trump taking a Truth Social to celebrate the data and call for the Fed to cut rates saying, quote, "Go for a full point." Plus, Tesla is rebounding from Thursday's slump as investors hope for a cooldown in the feud between Trump and CEO Elon Musk. The the online dust-up initially leading to a more than $150 billion wipeout of Tesla's value. And Lululemon shares sinking after the retailer cut its full year profit guidance citing higher tariff-related costs as well as increased markdowns. Number of analysts slashing their price targets on the stock while maintaining their ratings including BMO Capital, Needham and TD Cowen. That's your Yahoo! Finance market minute. For more on what's trending on Yahoo! Finance, you can scan the QR code below to track the best and worst performing stocks of this session. Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille


Gizmodo
4 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Trump Pulled His NASA Pick, But Jared Isaacman Would've Rebuilt the Moon Program
Shortly after Donald Trump withdrew his nomination for Jared Isaacman to lead NASA, the billionaire private astronaut revealed what he would have changed at the agency had he been given the role of administrator. The most notable change would have been to NASA's Artemis program, which is struggling with cost overruns and a super expensive, disposable rocket. During an interview with the All-in Podcast on Wednesday, Isaacman spoke about his nomination for the role of NASA administrator and where his priorities would have lied at the agency. 'Let's complete our lunar obligations, because that's a whole other story with China,' Isaacman said. 'At the same time, in parallel, develop the capabilities to get to Mars.' If Isaacman had taken the helm at NASA, however, he would've focused on reusable hardware to reach the Moon. NASA's Artemis program has come under heavy criticism for its use of the agency's Space Launch System (SLS), an expendable super-heavy-lift rocket designed to launch the Orion capsule towards the Moon. The 5.75-million-pound rocket was built using components from NASA's Space Shuttle program, which ran from 1981 to 2011. 'It's a giant disposable rocket program that repurposes shuttle hardware,' Isaacman said during the interview. 'It's expensive, it's disposable. It is not the way to do affordable, repeatable, efficient exploration, whether it's to [the] Moon, Mars, or anywhere else.' So far, NASA has poured billions into SLS before admitting that it's ultimately unaffordable. SLS has already gone $6 billion over budget, with the projected cost of each SLS rocket being $144 million more than anticipated. That would increase the overall cost of a single Artemis launch to at least $4.2 billion, according to a report released in May by the office of NASA's inspector general. Instead of relying on SLS, Isaacman suggests focusing on reusable launch vehicles for Artemis 3 onwards. 'There's enough hardware now to fly a couple of missions and make sure you beat China back to the Moon,' Isaacman said. 'But you can't be stuck on this forever. This is literally the equivalency, by the way, of taking P-51 Mustangs [a fighter aircraft] from World War II and using them in Desert Storm, because we got to keep the plants open. And that obviously makes no logical sense whatsoever.' He went on to criticize other aspects of NASA's Artemis program. 'We signed up a lot of international partners to support it because we like collecting flags, and it doesn't necessarily always mean that what they're contributing to is in the best interests of the program,' Isaacman said. 'This is going down a rabbit hole of a lot of things because of the shortcomings of the vehicle.' This week, President Trump withdrew his nomination of Isaacman to lead NASA. The move was disappointing for the space community, which largely viewed Isaacman's prospective role as a welcomed change for the agency as it struggles with budgetary constraints and bureaucratic red tape. Trump's decision coincided with SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk's supposed departure from the government, which Isaacman suggests was the reason behind the president's sudden change of heart. 'I'm not going to play dumb on this – I don't think timing was much of a coincidence,' Isaacman said. 'Obviously, there was more than one departure that was covered on that day. There were some people who had some axes to grind, and I was a good, visible target.' With Isaacman gone, NASA's future is filled with uncertainty, particularly in relation to its Artemis program. The administration's proposed budget for NASA suggests phasing out its SLS rocket and the Orion capsule, and replacing them with commercial alternatives. There is a lot of emphasis on returning astronauts to the Moon, but no clear way on how to do it.