Should police dogs get a government pension?
The Thin Blue Paw Foundation charity said it has provided grants up to £380,000 to owners, since it started in August 2020, to cover the vet bills of the animals with health issues after the hard physical work they undertook throughout their careers.
There is around 1,700 police dogs in the UK, according to the charity, with around 100 retiring each year.
Charity chairman Kieran Stanbridge said the government "shouldn't turn their backs" on these animals who have given "the best years of their lives to the job."
He said police dogs "throw themselves into dangerous situations without a second thought, they show unwavering loyalty to their handler and their job, and they give so much to help fight crime and keep the public safe.
"During their careers they receive the very best care and support from the force they serve with but, as soon as they hang up their harness, they're on their own, and the responsibility for their often-expensive care falls to their ex-handler or new owner.
"We believe that the Home Office, who allocate funding to police forces nationally, have an ethical and moral obligation to these dogs and shouldn't turn their backs on them when it's time to pay them back for everything they've done."
The charity has set up a petition to push ministers to ring-fence a budget to provide financial support for the owners.
Mr Stanbridge added: "Police dogs lead physically demanding lives and, when they retire – whether due to injury or age, they often have health problems as a result of their career, which can require expensive medication, therapy and management throughout their retirement.
"Taking on any dog is a responsibility, but taking on an older retired police dog with health problems is a huge commitment, particularly during the current cost of living crisis.
"We need to ensure that there is support in place for these heroic police dogs so that people aren't put off the idea of re-homing them when they retire and so that owners are never faced with the heartbreaking decision of having them put to sleep because they can't afford their treatment."
Dog handler Claire Bird, form West Sussex, adopted Belgian Malinois Fiji, who worked for Surrey Police.
She has required two operations, one for an infection of the uterus and another for a gastric procedure. She also needs regular medication for allergies. So far the foundation has paid £10,000 for her care.
Ms Bird said: "I've kept all of my working dogs when they retire and, as any dog owner knows, taking care of them is expensive.
"But I couldn't turn my back on them after everything they've given.
"I believe that there should be more support in place for these incredible heroes when they retire.
"They do so much for us while they're serving and yet when they retire, the Government and the police turn their backs on them."
Health conditions such as arthritis can lead to bills of up to £2,400 per year for pain medication with pre-existing medical conditions not covered by pet insurance, the charity said
Police Scotland dog handler Julie Roy was faced with large vet bills caring for retired German shepherd Keach, who worked for West Midlands Police before moving north of the border.
Keach has arthritis in her spin and knee, and the Thin Blue Paw Foundation pays for her pain medication.
Ms Roy said: "Vet bills are expensive and our dogs have worked hard in their working life, putting extra strain on the joints and the body.
"These dogs deserve to have ongoing support when they retire, so they can access the medication and treatment they need having served their communities for so long."
The Home Office has been approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
3 days ago
- Spectator
Revealed: Mental health claims see Foreign Office absences soar
Back to the UK's bloated civil service. As if the government didn't have enough on its plate trying to slash Whitehall red tape, the number of sick days taken by civil servants won't help Sir Keir Starmer's army pick up the pace on progress. Civil servant absences are on track to reach a record high – and the Foreign Office is no exception to the trend. Mr S can reveal the number of sick days taken by David Lammy's mandarins shot up by more than 50 per cent in the financial year ending March 2024 compared to the previous year – while the number of days lost to mental health issues soared by more than three-quarters. A Freedom of Information response has shown that in the period from April 2023-March 2024, almost 30,000 days were lost to sick leave within the Foreign Office department, a rise of 51.4 per cent on the previous year. 8,400 days were lost to mental health issues within the department – a surge of 77.3 per cent on the year before – while those civil servants requiring sickness leave on mental health grounds rose to 254 in 2023-24, a 65 per cent increase on the previous financial year. These rather staggering absence rises are despite the total number of Foreign Office staff increasing between the years by just 500 people. Good heavens… Remarking on the revelation, the TaxPayers' Alliance's investigations manager Joanna Marchong noted: While families up and down the country are working hard and paying their bills, civil servants are increasingly absence for any reason in the book. Ministers must get a grip and ensure that the Foreign Office is run with the same discipline expected in private sector workplaces. It's unacceptable that civil servants don't show up. The findings come after central department data published earlier this month found that mandarin absences in 2025 could work out at more than eight days a year per employee. Last year, the average number of days off per worker was 4.4 – but this year, departmental reports are suggesting that the number of average days lost per worker could soar past the all-time high of 8.3 days per person, reached in the post-pandemic period of 2023. Staff sickness rates increased by 11.8 per cent in the year to March 2025 at the Home Office, while the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government saw absences shoot up by 12 per cent. Perhaps Starmer had a point when he insisted 'too many people in Whitehall are comfortable in the tepid bath of managed decline', eh?
Daily Mail
09-08-2025
- Daily Mail
Moment small boat arrives at Gravelines beach to pick up migrants to take them illegally across to the UK - as the French do NOTHING
This is the moment a small boat arrived at Gravelines beach to pick up migrants to take them illegally across to the UK. The rubber vessel was pictured off the French coast, just east of Calais, this morning, before heading off into the English Channel. Passengers, which included men, women and children, loaded on to the boat, reaching out hands to help each other aboard. Some threw peace signs at the camera - while a handful of French police officers stood on the beach, watching on. It comes after the first small boat migrants were detained in Dover on Thursday for removal to France under the Government's new 'one in, one out' scheme. The Home Office confirmed the Channel arrivals were held after they were brought into Dover but did not disclose how many there were. Migrants selected for removal under the new Labour plan will be held in Home Office detention facilities rather than living in taxpayer-funded asylum hotels. But there has been widespread criticism of the scheme - from concerns human rights challenges and other legal action could delay migrants' removal for months, to scepticism over the plan's narrow scope. The images from today show the passengers gathering on the sand as they wait to be loaded on to a boat at sunrise. They soon wade into the water at around knee depth as they wait for boats to arrive. Many are carrying children, some of whom look no older than toddlers, with most of them wearing lifejackets ahead of the passage. The majority of people have no possessions with them, apart from one small bag in some cases. One pair is seen clasping hands, while another hugs tightly. They soon variously swim and wade out to the boat, with some climbing onboard before helping to lift others on to the craft. A boat is soon densely packed with passengers, with a row of young men seen sitting astride the edge of the vessel. After the first boat is loaded up, remaining passengers watch on as it embarks on its journey into the Channel. Most of the children wear lifejackets ahead of the passage (pictured) It appears to pass very close to another vessel, before receding into the distance. Two French gendarmerie vehicles can be seen on the sand, with a small group of officers standing stationery as the events unfold. One policeman appears to be looking at his phone. Today's small boat passage comes after Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp blasted Labour's 'one in, one out' scheme as a 'gimmick that just won't work'. He said: 'As far as we can see, removals under this scheme will only amount to six per cent of arrivals, meaning 94 per cent will stay. 'It will have no deterrent effect whatsoever. 'We also know that the agreement with France means any migrants claiming to be under 18, or who make a modern slavery or human rights claim, will not get removed. 'So this plan will get bogged down in an endless legal quagmire. Today's small boat passage (pictured) comes after Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp blasted Labour's 'one in, one out' scheme as a 'gimmick that just won't work' 'Just like Sir Keir Starmer's claim to "smash the gangs", this is another gimmick that just won't work.' Former Tory Cabinet minister Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg said the Anglo-French deal - announced by Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron on July 10 and since approved by the European Commission - was a 'complete waste of time'. 'It's a fake. It's a phony, it's a cheat on the British people,' he said on GB News. 'It's a bogus deal, it's a complete waste of time. 'There's an extraordinary loophole that means almost no one can be deported.' Despite the narrow scope of the scheme and the fact it is likely to expire in less than 11 months, the PM has insisted on social media: 'If you break the law to enter this country, you will face being sent back.' He added: 'No gimmicks, just results.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has previously said: 'Yesterday, under the terms of this groundbreaking new treaty, the first group of people to cross the Channel were detained after their arrival at Western Jet Foil [at Dover port] and will now be held in detention until they can be returned to France. 'That sends a message to every migrant currently thinking of paying organised crime gangs to go to the UK that they will be risking their lives and throwing away their money if they get into a small boat. 'No-one should be making this illegal and dangerous journey that undermines our border security and lines the pockets of the criminal gangs.' She added: 'Criminal gangs have spent seven years embedding themselves along our border and it will take time to unravel them, but these detentions are an important step towards undermining their business model and unravelling the false promises they make. 'These are the early days for this pilot scheme, and it will develop over time. 'But we are on track to do what no other government has done since this crisis first started - sending small boat arrivals back to France and strengthening our borders through the Plan for Change.' As part of the treaty, Britain will accept migrants from France in exchange for small boat arrivals. That element of the scheme also began on Thursday, allowing migrants to lodge 'expressions of interest' on a specially-created Home Office website. It comes after a Cabinet minister appeared to contradict the terms of the new treaty with France earlier this week. Despite the narrow scope of the scheme and the fact it is likely to expire in less than 11 months, the PM has insisted on social media (pictured): 'If you break the law to enter this country, you will face being sent back' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper (pictured) has previously said: 'Yesterday, under the terms of this groundbreaking new treaty, the first group of people to cross the Channel were detained after their arrival at Western Jet Foil [at Dover port]' Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said small boat migrants sent back under the deal would see their human rights claims heard after being sent back to France. But it later emerged some types of human rights cases would, in fact, block the Home Office from being able to remove migrants in the first place. The treaty clearly sets out small boat migrants cannot be sent back to France if they have 'an outstanding human rights claim'. The Home Office confirmed some human rights claims will block migrants' removal until they have been concluded in full. It will include cases which cannot be formally 'certified' by officials as 'clearly unfounded'. The Mail has learned pro-migrant groups have begun informal discussions about launching a joint legal action against Labour's plan – just as they did against the Tories' Rwanda asylum scheme. Sources said there had already been 'a certain amount of co-ordination' between charities and other groups, with details of the treaty still being analysed. Meanwhile, the Free Movement website, which offers advice to immigration lawyers, published an analysis of the new measures earlier this week. The treaty clearly sets out small boat migrants cannot be sent back to France if they have 'an outstanding human rights claim'. Pictured: Passengers waiting for a boat at Gravelines beach today It said: 'Legal challenges will be more difficult than for Rwanda, however there are still likely to be grounds on which some people can resist removal to France. 'For example, if the inadmissibility decision was wrong, if people have family in the UK, or had experiences in France which make it inappropriate to send them back.' It means the Home Secretary is likely to face a huge legal battle to get the first migrants removed from Britain. Last month, the PM pledged migrants would be 'detained and returned to France in short order' under the agreement. But on Wednesday – the first day it was in force – Shadow Home Secretary Mr Philp posted videos from the Channel as he watched migrant boats bound for the UK coast, escorted by a French vessel.
Daily Mirror
09-08-2025
- Daily Mirror
Starving Palestinian students 'left to die in Gaza warzone' as UK sets impossible test
Soha Abu Eid, a 31-year-old determined to study a nursing PHD in the UK in honour of her friend and colleague Fatima, has been blocked from taking up her place by UK Home Office requirements A starving midwife living in a refugee camp is one of dozens of hopeful Palestinian students blocked from UK universities by government bureaucracy. At least 70 people living in Gaza have overcome enormous odds to earn places and scholarship offers from UK universities off the back of applications written in the famine-stricken warzone. Many wrote essays from tents in refugee camps, using 2G phone internet to download forms while the war raged around them. Glimmers of hope in the form of acceptance letters have been cruelly extinguished by the Home Office, which insists they must submit biometric information to travel - despite the only authorised-biometric centre in Gaza closing in 2023. Salvation has turned to yet more despair for the students, as the UK Government refuses to waive the impossible, Kafkaesque requirement in favour of online visas, as countries including Ireland and Italy have. Among them is Soha Abu Eid, a 31-year-old determined to study a nursing PHD in the UK in honour of her friend and colleague Fatima. As military aircraft flew overhead, UNRWA worker Soha told the Mirror her fears that she wouldn't make it to next summer, having lost 20kg since October 7 and many loved ones to a war that has claimed 60,000 Palestinian lives. 'My main goal right now is to survive. I lost my friend, Fatima, who was killed back in November 2023. She was doing a midwife PHD. I thought, 'I need to complete her dream. I need to do this to honour her'. Both of us had a real connection to women. The end goal is rebuilding the health care system,' Soha explained from the Nuseirat refugee camp in the centre of the Gaza Strip. That dream looked much closer to Soha when she received a scholarship offer from Ulster University, in June 2024. 'It was the second day of Eid. 12pm Gaza time. I was stuck to my phone refreshing my email, leaning out of my grandma's window for signal. I didn't even finish the email. I started to scream and jump. It was a huge moment for me. My cousins and sisters were next to me. Even my mum started crying.' As much as these scenes echo those that will take place in schools across the UK on A Level results day on August 14, Soha's joy was shortlived. Nora Parr, a researcher with the University of Birmingham, explains that from there the process for Gazan students reaches an unpassable, inexplicable dead-end. 'Once you have your unconditional offer and have submitted English language assessments, then you apply for your visa. This is a convoluted process; the first thing it asks you to do is to go to a biometric centre, which is now closed," Nora said. 'They have had extraordinary difficultly applying for biometric differment. It has all been dead ends, the students have found no way to get round it. The UK says they have created a route, but they have not. No one has been able to access it. Not a single student.' Right now there are more than 70 Gazan students accepted to UK universities, 48 with full scholarships. As it stands, none will start studying in the UK come September. For Soha, that means her offer of a place and scholarship will expire, along with her dream of spending three years in the UK to perfect her profession before returning to rebuild Gaza. 'I deserve to be there. I deserve to take up my place. But I can't defer again. I don't think I'll be alive next year.' This week more than 70 MPs have signed a letter asking the government to delay biometric checks for the students from Gaza so they can study in Britain. A government spokesperson said: "We are aware of these students and are considering how we can best support. Of course, the situation on the ground in Gaza makes this extremely challenging but we are doing everything we can to find a solution."
