Syria blames US-backed Kurds for instability after failed meeting
The mostly Kurdish, secular militia, called the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), has emerged as the most powerful rival to Hayat Tahrir Al Sham (HTS), a splinter group from Al Qaeda led by Mr Al Shara. HTS has taken central power since the ouster of former president Bashar Al Assad in December.
The accusation came after a failed meeting on Wednesday between the two sides during a visit to Damascus by Thomas Barrack, the American envoy to Syria. Mr Barrack is a key figure in the normalisation that started in May between Washington and the post-Assad order in Syria.
An official in the SDF said that while Mr Abdi left Damascus on Wednesday without meeting Mr Al Shara, he did meet Mr Barrack together with senior Syrian officials, including Interior Minister Anas Al Khattab, one of Mr Al Shara's closest subordinates. That meeting "was tense and did not go well", the official said, without elaborating.
Asked about the Syrian government reaction, the official said that Damascus, egged on by Turkey, "is escalating and trying to show the Kurds as the problematic partner".
An official Syrian statement thanked Washington for its efforts to implement the March 10 agreement. It recognised that although SDF faces "challenges", delaying the deal "will complicate the scene, and hinder the efforts to bring back security and stability."
The SDF has warded off encroachment by HTS and its militia allies, who are backed by Turkey, on its strongholds in eastern Syria, and repeatedly demanded federalism to solve the country's fragmentation.
The central authorities "insist on one army, one government" and refuse any form of federalism, because it "contrasts with Syrian sovereignty and territorial unity," the statement said.
For reasons that still remain unclear, a meeting failed to take place as scheduled on Wednesday between Mr Al Shara and SDF chief Mazloum Abdi, to solve differences that has prevented implementing the March 10 deal.
The US-and Turkish-brokered agreement stipulated in general terms bringing the SDF military and administrative units into the new Syrian state, without setting a timetable.
Syrian media reported that a Turkish security delegation had arrived in Damascus on the same day Mr Al Shara was due to meet Abdi.
Security threat
Turkey regards the SDF as a national security threat, partly because it has links to the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), a group that has been waging a decades-long insurgency against the Turkish state, and received support from the former regime in Syria during the time of its inception.
The SDF also collaborated with the Syrian regime on several occasions during the 13-year civil war.
The SDF, unlike the PKK, which in recent months has taken steps to disband, refuses to dissolve itself. It has agreed to join the new Syrian army as long as it retains its Kurdish commanders, Kurdish sources said.
However, Mr Barrak appeared to blame the SDF for a lack of progress on solving the Kurdish issue in Syria, saying that the new Damascus authorities have 'done a great job' by giving the SDF an option that the group should "quickly" consider.
Mr Barrack was also quoted by local Syrian media as saying that federalism is not a viable solution in Syria, and that the SDF has been a "slow" party in the negotiations.
The United States set up the SDF in 2015 as the main ground component in the American-led war on ISIS in Syria. Last month, the Pentagon allocated $130 million for the anti-ISIS militias in Syria, mainly the SDF. The forces have played a pivotal role in the fight against ISIS in the country and are currently in charge of overseeing the camps and prisons hosting remnant fighters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Lebanon's cabinet fails to vote on disarming Hezbollah in stormy meeting
Lebanon 's government failed to vote on a motion to disarm Hezbollah during a heated cabinet session on Tuesday, but announced a timeframe for doing so. After hours of tense debate marked by raised voices and deep divisions, the cabinet decided to reconvene on Thursday to continue discussions. 'The Cabinet has decided to continue discussions on the American proposal in a government session on August 7, and to task the army with drafting a plan to [limit] weapons by the end of this year, to be presented to the Cabinet before the 31st of this month,' Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said after the session. The high-stakes meetings are part of a US-backed push for Lebanon to commit to a timeline for disarming Hezbollah. But they coincided with a forceful speech by the group's leader Naim Qassem, rejecting any disarmament, in one of the most defiant public stances in recent months. Lebanon now finds itself in a precarious position, squeezed between US pressure and continuing Israeli air strikes and assassinations. The talks were convened by President Joseph Aoun and began at 3pm local time at the presidential palace in Baabda. They lasted nearly six hours. While the meeting was taking place, Mr Qassem was speaking to mark the death of an Iranian general killed during the Israel-Iran conflict in June. A political source briefed on the meeting said that "voices were raised" among the ministers during the discussions, adding that Thursday's session could be attended by the Army commander given the key role it is expected to play. "The session saw firm insistence from Hezbollah allies on the stance announced by Naim Qassem, whose speech coincided with the cabinet meeting. In it, he made clear remarks rejecting the surrender of weapons or the setting of any timelines, arguing that doing so would serve Israel, and stressing that this is a Lebanese issue to be discussed internally," the source said. "The President entered the meeting with a spirit of seeking a consensus formula that wouldn't provoke tensions in the country, aiming to ease pressure and encourage a more measured approach. It was in this context that the call for postponement was made." Mr Qassem warned that missiles would fall on Israel if it decided to launch a wider war on Lebanon again, insisting that Hezbollah and the Lebanese Army would defend the country. Mr Qassem said the problem was not Hezbollah's weapons, but the attacks on Lebanon. "We cannot accept Lebanon committing to gradually giving up its strength while all the strength cards remain in the hands of the Israeli enemy," Mr Qassem said Hezbollah had expected a discussion about national defence that had moved to one about disarming. He reiterated Hezbollah's stance that Israeli troops should withdraw, end their bombings and release prisoners before there is any talk of disarmament. Minutes after he spoke, dozens of men on motorcycles carrying Hezbollah's yellow flags emerged from its strongholds in Beirut's southern suburbs for the second day running. While none of the cabinet ministers are members of a political party, some were nominated by and affiliated with Hezbollah and its allies. Health Minister Rakan Nasreddine, nominated by Hezbollah, and Environment Minister Tamara El Zein, nominated by its ally the Amal Movement, left the cabinet meeting for unclear reasons. "Some ministers adopted an escalatory tone during the session, warning that if no timetable is agreed upon for the issue of weapons, they will withdraw from the government," said a political source briefed on the meeting "Hezbollah allies outlined the group's red lines, namely not relinquishing sovereignty and major national causes." A source close to the four ministers nominated by the anti-Hezbollah Lebanese Forces refused to say what they would do if the ministers did not set out a clear timeline for disarmament, but added: 'Our four ministers along with our allies will fight forcefully for a clear text with a clear timeframe." The US and Lebanese politicians opposed to Hezbollah have demanded that the Cabinet formally announce its desire to disarm the group and a give a clear timeline for the surrender of weapons. Nonetheless, a source said: "There is no doubt that Lebanon is in a dire situation." "The Cabinet found itself embarrassed over the issue of regulating weapons and making a decisive decision, namely, setting a timeframe as outlined in the US proposal, specifically what was demanded by the US envoy. In other words, Washington will accept nothing less than a clear timeframe. "However, what took place in the Cabinet was difficult and complicated due to intense pressure, talk of protests, Hezbollah supporters potentially taking to the streets, as well as threats and provocations. All of this surrounded the Cabinet's discussions with considerable obstacles regarding this item, leading to a decision to postpone the matter until Thursday's upcoming session." The source described Mr Qassem's speech as "his most escalatory in a long time" and a message that "Hezbollah will not hand over its weapons". Last week, Mr Aoun said the country's leaders must 'seize the historic opportunity' to ensure all weapons are taken under state control. The talks about Hezbollah's weapons is highly contentious and a once unthinkable topic up for discussion under rising US pressure. Mr Salam called for the Cabinet session to conclude discussions over 'the extension of state sovereignty over all its territories' and weapons exclusivity − which means disarming Hezbollah and other non-state groups. The US proposals would mean Israel, at least in theory, ending its bombings, but included a condition that Lebanon's government pass a cabinet decision clearly pledging to disarm Hezbollah. While Hezbollah was weakened by its war with Israel last year, it was not destroyed and retains some military power. It also commands strong backing from some in Lebanon, but particularly within its core Shiite support base. There are fears that sectarian strife could be significantly stoked if the weapons argument is not dealt with in the right way. In June, US envoy Thomas Barrack proposed a road map to Lebanese officials to fully disarm Hezbollah, in exchange for Israel halting its attacks on Lebanon and withdrawing its troops from five points they occupy in southern Lebanon.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Lebanon charges army with plan to give state sole access to weapons
Lebanon's cabinet holds a session to discuss the issue of disarming Hezbollah, which the US has demanded
The National
7 hours ago
- The National
Ali Larijani appointed secretary of Iran's top security body
Iran has appointed Ali Larijani, a top adviser to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, as secretary of its Supreme National Security Council. The appointment by Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian was reported by the semi-official Tasnim news agency on Tuesday. Ali Akbar Ahmadian previously held the position. The son of a prominent cleric, Mr Larijani has held several influential positions in government. He served as speaker of parliament from 2008 to 2020. He was also a national security adviser and before that the head of Iran's state broadcaster. He and his four brothers are part of a powerful conservative family with ties to other prominent members of the political class. Mr Larijani's father-in-law was the late Morteza Motahhari, a well-known cleric and a central figure in the 1979 revolution. Last month, Mr Larijani made a surprise visit to Moscow, where he met the Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss Tehran's nuclear programme. Mr Larijani "conveyed assessments of the escalating situation in the Middle East and around the Iranian nuclear programme", the Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said of the meeting at the time. Mr Putin had expressed Russia's "well-known positions on how to stabilise the situation in the region and on the political settlement of the Iranian nuclear programme", he added. Moscow has a cordial relationship with Iran's leadership and provides crucial backing for Tehran but did not swing forcefully behind its partner even after the US joined Israel's massive bombing campaign against Iran in June. Iran has consistently denied seeking a nuclear weapon, while defending its "legitimate rights" to the peaceful use of atomic energy. Mr Larijani also visited China as the sitting speaker in 2019, in the company of Mohammad Javad Zarif, who at that time was the country's foreign minister. Even after leaving office, he continued to help steer Tehran's relations with Beijing.
