Uber's UK Robotaxi Fleet is Ready, But Regulations Hold Keys
Uber U.K.'s self-driving fleet pushed back a year as lawmakers work on regulatory frameworks
Uber's CEO has boldly declared that the company is ready to launch its U.K. self-driving fleet, but regulatory hurdles have caused the rideshare service to pump its brakes for now. In 2024, the U.K.'s Department of Transport said that the Automated Vehicles Act would allow autonomous cars to be on roads by 2026. However, current regulations require self-driving vehicles to have a human behind the wheel, and the deadline for details on how autonomous fleets can deploy has been pushed to 2027, Newsweek reports.
0:06
/
0:09
Walmart is selling a 'heavy duty' $89 step ladder for $48, and shoppers say it's 'sturdy and secure'
Walmart is selling a 'heavy duty' $89 step ladder for $48, and shoppers say it's 'sturdy and secure'
Watch More
Last June's general election in the U.K. led to a new government reviewing legislative frameworks on self-driving cars, influencing the change in launch timing. Andrew Macdonald, senior vice president of mobility at Uber, told the BBC: 'We're ready to launch robotaxis in the UK as soon as the regulatory environment is ready for us.'
Uber currently offers autonomous rideshare services with companies like Waymo in the U.S. —
Source: Getty
Macdonald added that Uber is working with 18 automated vehicle tech companies, including Wayve, which is helping launch Nissan's next-generation ProPILOT driver-assist system. In the U.S., Uber runs a self-driving fleet with Waymo, generally considered the world's leading autonomous rideshare service, with plans to deploy thousands of electric ID. Buzz self-driving vans starting next year in Los Angeles. The U.K.'s Department of Transportation is working to release autonomous vehicle legislation in the second half of 2027 while exploring short-term trials and pilot programs for the tech, according to the BBC. While Macdonald noted that Uber is ready to launch its robotaxis in the U.K., he emphasized the brand's commitment to safety by saying, 'One accident is too many.' Waymo reported in late April that its autonomous fleet was involved in 81% fewer injury-causing crashes compared to a human benchmark over tens of millions of miles.
Autonomy expert highlights the hurdles governments and companies like Uber face with self-driving tech
Dr. Saber Fallah, a professor of safe artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomy at the University of Surrey, told Newsweek that the U.K.'s decision to delay regulatory frameworks for self-driving vehicles will help the public get on board with the tech that many still view as risky.
'While the maturity of certain technologies, such as those proposed by Uber, is advancing rapidly, readiness must be judged not just on how well the technology performs in ideal conditions, but also on how consistently and reliably it makes decisions in complex real-world environments. The fundamental challenge lies in bridging the gap between statistical learning and human-level reasoning. Current autonomous vehicle systems often lack the capacity to explain their decisions, adapt meaningfully to unique scenarios, or respond with the nuanced judgment that human drivers routinely demonstrate. True readiness requires systems that offer traceable reasoning, safety assurance, and hybrid validation under diverse conditions. Legally and ethically, certifying decision-making processes that remain unclear to regulators poses significant risks,' Fallah explained.
Fallah also cited infrastructure gaps, primarily in digital connectivity and scenario testing, as hindering the progress of autonomous cars. In other words, self-driving vehicles can still experience difficulty communicating with each other and the road infrastructure, and there are limited ways to test all the real-world scenarios the tech might face.
Uber headquarters, California —
Source: Getty
Final thoughts
While Fallah raises several valid points on the challenges of commercializing autonomous fleets, he also offers insight into how tech companies and government regulators can overcome these obstacles. Fallah views the key ingredients to self-driving cars' success as emphasizing public assurance, regulation, AI transparency, and human oversight. This industry expert described the U.S. and China as placing less emphasis on assurance and regulation, but China has demonstrated a recent commitment to tighter regulations with actions like banning words like 'smart' and 'autonomous' from vehicle ads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
8 hours ago
- The Independent
Will Gemini Trains leave the station any time soon?
Q Do you think the new Gemini services from London to Paris will actually happen? Rebecca H A Gemini Trains is one of several contenders aiming to compete with Eurostar, the incumbent operator from London St Pancras International to Paris, Brussels and the Netherlands. Eurostar has had the lucrative cross-Channel passenger train market to itself since the Channel Tunnel opened in 1994. The start-up plans to purchase 10 new trains for the service and promises 'competitive fares on comfortable, high-quality and frequent train services between the UK and continental Europe'. If it is permitted to launch trains through the Channel Tunnel, services will not start from the terminal at St Pancras – but six miles down the track at Stratford International. Stratford is served by the Elizabeth Line from central London, Heathrow airport and Reading. Two Underground lines – the Central and Jubilee – provide other connections, as does the London Overground, Greater Anglia and the Docklands Light Railway. Regrettably, it is a 10-minute walk from Stratford's main station to the International station, but perhaps some kind of shuttle will be provided. Gemini Trains will also call at Ebbsfleet, the north Kent station mothballed by Eurostar since Covid and Brexit. Gemini's chances of success improved sharply when the transport tech giant Uber said it would go into partnership. Services from Stratford to Paris Nord and Brussels Midi could begin by 2030 – which might look an age away, but in international rail terms is relatively swift. One big concern is stabling for the trains; Temple Mills depot is close to full just with Eurostar trains. As well as Gemini Trains, Sir Richard Branson's Virgin Group and Italy's state railway operator FS Italiane Group are hoping to start services from London to Paris. I expect at least one of them to launch – hopefully, all three will do so. The High Speed 1 line and the Channel Tunnel are both running at about half their capacity, and the traveller deserves better. Q You have been writing about fare dodging and the complexity of rail fares. Perhaps a small number of exceptionally quiet off-peak services could be free? That would allow legitimate travel for those who can't afford to travel at convenient times. Peter C A Your idea is well worth an airing. Fresh thinking about public transport is much needed. As a frequent rail passenger across the UK, I always feel despondent when boarding (for example) an early afternoon midweek train and find I am virtually the only passenger in a carriage built for 70 or 80: what a waste of safe, swift capacity. Could it not be used to transport people who are currently not paying? This would provide much-needed mobility, and possibly tempt motorists to switch to the train. Well, I have modelled what might happen if, for example, the 1.18pm Greater Anglia service on a Wednesday from London Liverpool Street to Clacton in Essex was declared free. This is one of many such trains that are almost certain to be lightly loaded. It stops nine times along the way to the resort at the end of the line, including Chelmsford and Colchester. I predict that most passengers who would normally travel around lunchtime on trains to those cities would switch to the free option. In addition, people whose final destination is Ipswich or Norwich would take the opportunity to cut the cost of their journey. They would avail of the free train and pay only for the segment onwards from Colchester. They would change trains and wait for the next express to Suffolk and Norfolk, which would become extremely crowded with people who had the same plan. Moving motorists to trains is a noble ambition, but I must point out that Luxembourg introduced nationwide free travel five years ago, and traffic congestion is still terrible. Perhaps, though, I can finesse your concept by recommending a heavily discounted fare – perhaps £5 compared with a typical price of £20. That is pitched temptingly low for people who currently travel ticketless to conclude fare dodging is not worth the risk – but not quite so cheap that mayhem breaks out on Greater Anglia as existing passengers converge on a bargain train. The train operator will soon come under UK government control – a good moment to test the concept. Q I read your article about easyJet passengers spending 23 hours travelling from Palma to Liverpool. Two things intrigued me: is it normal for a person whose condition causes a diversion to be allowed back on the flight? And will the passengers be due any compensation? Jenny R A An easyJet plane from Mallorca to Merseyside was at 38,000 feet over southwest France shortly after midnight on Wednesday when crew were alerted to a male passenger experiencing a health issue. The pilots decided to divert, turned around and landed half an hour later at Bordeaux airport. Paramedics attended the aircraft. The passenger, who was able to walk off the aircraft, was taken to a local hospital for a check-up. While that was happening, the normal procedure would be for the plane to refuel and continue its journey. But no fuel was available due to the late hour, and the flight could not continue. As a result, everyone was offloaded. Passengers had to spend almost all of the next day in Bordeaux as a new crew was found for the flight. Happily, the gentleman who was unwell on the original flight was also on board after undergoing checks and being passed as fit to fly. So there was no reason for him not to fly home with everyone else (including the original crew, who travelled back as passengers). This is far from normal. In almost all other cases, one or both of the following happens: the medical condition is serious enough to warrant extended medical treatment, or the flight is able to continue once the passenger (and their baggage) have left the aircraft. It is clear that easyJet was dealt a difficult hand, with almost all hotels in the area full. Some passengers had to spend the night – and much of the following day – at the airport. Under air passengers' rights rules, no one is entitled to any cash compensation. Unlike 'delay repay' on the railways, the deciding factor for a payout is whether the airline was at fault. When the pilots divert due to concern for a passenger's health, that is classed as an 'exceptional circumstance' and easyJet is excused from paying compensation. Q We will be visiting our daughter in Australia this November and will spend some time in Adelaide en route. We would also like to visit Kangaroo Island. Is this doable on a day trip or would you recommend a stay on the island? Chris B A Kangaroo Island lies west of Cape Jervis in South Australia, which itself is about 100km (62 miles) southwest of the state capital, Adelaide. It is Australia's third-largest island, after Tasmania and Melville Islands in the Northern Territory – and bigger than some sizeable English counties, such as Kent and Cornwall. Yet if you want simply to see some highlights, there are plenty of tours that will take you there for the day. They mostly involve the ferry from Cape Jervis – a 45-minute voyage to Penneshaw on Kangaroo Island. Three main island attractions are on the western half of the south coast: sea lions frolicking at Seal Bay Conservation Park; the weirdly sculpted Remarkable Rocks on the edge of the Southern Ocean; and the boardwalk descent towards another natural feature, Admirals Arch, at Kangaroo Island's version of Land's End. The other essential: Kangaroo Island Wildlife Park, plumb in the middle of the island, where you can see the island's distinctive kangaroos – shorter, stockier and darker than the mainland marsupials. If time and money are not on your side, go for the Sealink one-day trip from Adelaide, costing $227 (£109). While it is a long day – 16 hours – you will get a sense of the island. Ideally, though, make it a longer adventure: three days with a rental car from Adelaide. This will allow you to pause and enjoy the scenery of the Fleurieu Peninsula along the way rather than racing through to Cape Jervis. More importantly, it will give you time to appreciate the island in more depth. In particular, you should sample at least a few hours of the Kangaroo Island Wilderness Trail. The stretch of this trans-island path running east from the Southern Ocean Lodge is particularly rewarding for both coastal views and inland nature. If you plan to splash out at any time during your Australian trip, and have an industrial-strength credit card, consider staying there for two nights (the minimum stay) – for around £3,500.
Evening Standard
8 hours ago
- Evening Standard
When can we expect to see driverless taxis in London?
Despite the roadworks, a destination does appear to be pre-programmed: self-driving vehicles are coming to UK roads— and were meant to be arriving as early as next year, following the May 2024 passing of the Automated Vehicles Act. That timeline has now slipped to 2027, the Department of Transport recently confirmed, although it says it's 'working quickly' to implement legislation.
Reuters
a day ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Robotaxis go from hype to maybe, possibly, profit
HONG KONG, June 4 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Self-driving cars have seemed the ultimate unfulfilled promise. Everyone from Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab boss Elon Musk to ousted Nissan (7201.T), opens new tab Chair Carlos Ghosn has hailed, opens new tab the impending mass arrival of vehicles that can dispense with human drivers, only for much-hyped timelines to pass by. Recently, though, the tone has shifted. Costs are falling; adoption in early markets is rising; artificial intelligence heralds new capabilities. Challenges still loom, but robotic taxis are looking more inevitable. Musk perhaps best embodies the sense of missed expectations. Over the past decade, he has promised that truly autonomous vehicles were coming first in 2018, then 2019, and so on, to the point that he dubbed himself the 'boy who cried' full-self driving. Even when limited tests were delivering rides with no people behind the steering wheel, incidents like General Motors-owned (GM.N), opens new tab Cruise's tragic pedestrian collision in 2023 seemed critical setbacks. Now, though, things are moving faster. Tesla is internally committed to launching a robotaxi service later this month in Austin, Texas, Bloomberg reported. But they're already playing catch-up. Alphabet-controlled (GOOGL.O), opens new tab Waymo operates commercial services in multiple cities; in San Francisco, its market share has exceeded traditional ride-hailing app Lyft (LYFT.O), opens new tab, according to analysts at venture capital firm Bond, opens new tab. The technology is moving out of early hotspots in the U.S. and China, too: this year, WeRide (WRD.O), opens new tab started to serve passengers in Abu Dhabi. Waymo is conducting tests in Japan. Behind the optimism is one major factor: cost. First, take the cars themselves. Morgan Stanley analysts, totting up the wealth of sensors they sport to map the world and computing grunt to traverse it, estimated in October that Waymo's current-generation vehicles cost over $120,000. Its upcoming car, by their reckoning, could fall to $85,000. By July, Goldman Sachs estimated that specialized vehicles could ring in at $50,000 by 2030. In the interim, though, Baidu ( opens new tab CEO Robin Li told analysts that the company could bring costs to under $30,000. Elon Musk has suggested that Tesla could do that too. Higher production volume is key. For Tesla, so too is eschewing expensive sensors like lidar. Those still hewing to the gizmos may get a boost, too: Chinese manufacturer Hesai Technology says its latest lidar is half the price of the previous generation. Actually delivering on these boasts is another matter. Getting any of the way there, though, would be hugely significant, since depreciation accounts for the majority of per-ride costs, according to TD Cowen. Yet operating expenses must come in line, too. Initial stabs at self-driving were a tangle of neural networks and hard-coded rules, requiring vast quantities of real-world data to finesse. Key to the process was not just using regular maps, but minutely surveying areas of operation, which requires constant updates. The appeal of Tesla's approach is that it avoids this step, using camera feedback to make on-the-fly decisions. The likes of UK-based Wayve and China's Pony AI (PONY.O), opens new tab, meanwhile, are using generative AI to create virtual training scenarios to prepare their models for the statistically unlikely but potentially ride-ending 'corner cases' that human drivers can readily handle. This could make expansion less laborious: Wayve, for instance, claims that its software was able, opens new tab to navigate unfamiliar U.S. and German roads with only a few weeks of additional training. Of course, technology sometimes fails, and a human must be on hand to observe and potentially take over. Today, robotaxi operator Pony AI lets one person monitor as many as a dozen cars, a person familiar with the matter told Breakingviews. What may limit that ratio in the end is public debates over safety. Analysts' and industry insiders' estimates for how many supervisors will be required range anywhere from one for every five vehicles to one for every fifty. Ultimately, though, this is squeezing a small part of total expenses. Morgan Stanley pegs mobile operators at under 5% of Waymo's vehicle-level per-mile costs. Given the momentum, profitability seems plausible. Analysts at Huatai foresee Guangzhou-headquartered Pony AI's vehicles costing 200,000 yuan, around $28,000, by 2028. If that happens, vehicle depreciation, remote monitoring, maintenance and other expenses like insurance could be roughly 100,000 yuan annually, all-in. Charging as little as 3 yuan per kilometer, if it can cover some 300 kilometers for 340 days per year – in the ballpark of what a human taxi driver manages, opens new tab in super-dense cities – would yield double that in revenue, even accounting for the fact some of those miles will be without passengers. There remain corporate expenses like research, financing, and more. Still, analysts polled by LSEG see everything coming into balance, forecasting a net profit for Pony AI by 2029. Compatriot WeRide, which also operates other, simpler kinds of autonomous services like street-sweeping, may get there by 2027, per the estimates. Caveats apply. A working robotaxi is one thing; finding customers is another. Operators like Waymo and WeRide have thus far tended towards partnering with ride-hailing apps like Uber (UBER.N), opens new tab. These dominant platforms will take their cut, possibly as much as 30% of gross bookings, analysts at TD Cowen reckon. Political tensions may stymie international expansion. The U.S. has effectively banned Chinese connected car technology within its borders. The constant threat of stricter controls on chips and chip-making gear from Uncle Sam could be a hurdle for manufacturers in the People's Republic. There are other wildcards, too. Local regulators' decisions on things like the required number of monitors, or where fleets can operate, are just the beginning, nudging the scales of cost and revenue. A single tragic accident – like the fatal crash that sunk Cruise – could trigger tighter controls and spook customers. Powerful lobbies could keep robotaxis out of certain markets entirely. It's therefore easy to understand why some CEOs are wary. Yu Kai, boss of Volkswagen partner Horizon Robotics, told Breakingviews that the current generation of autonomous cars are akin to a horse – 'smart enough' to get from A to B most of the time, yet not so smart that riders can simply take a nap. Musk himself once preached that getting to 90% of miles driven autonomously is the easy part, with the final 10% being a much tougher challenge. Robotaxis are now all about profitably claiming those final miles. Follow Katrina Hamlin on Bluesky, opens new tab and Linkedin, opens new tab.
