logo
Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood, Qatar In Coordinated Campaign Against Egyptian Regime: Helping Gaza Is Jihad And A Religious Duty; The 'Blood-Spilling Al-Sisi Regime' Must Fall

Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood, Qatar In Coordinated Campaign Against Egyptian Regime: Helping Gaza Is Jihad And A Religious Duty; The 'Blood-Spilling Al-Sisi Regime' Must Fall

Memri6 days ago
Amid the stalemate in the ceasefire talks with Israel, Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) movement, along with their patron Qatar, have been waging an orchestrated campaign against the Egyptian regime, which is threatening its stability. This axis is using the narrative of "the systematic starving of the Gazans" – another campaign it is promoting – to place direct blame on Egypt and its president, Abd Al-Fattah Al-Sisi, for the crisis in Gaza. It thereby presents Egypt, which mediates between Israel and Hamas and which refuses to fully open its side of the Rafah border crossing, as directly complicit in harming the Palestinians.
As part of this effort Khalil Al-Hayya, a member of Hamas's political bureau in Gaza and the head of its team for the indirect negotiations with Israel, called on the people of Jordan and Egypt, in a speech that was aired in full on Al-Jazeera, 'to break the siege on Gaza' and to storm the border with Palestine.[1] Directly addressing the Egyptian people, leaders, armed forces and tribes, he added: '[Can it be that] your brothers in Gaza are dying of hunger [right] on your border, close to you?!… The great Egypt must speak out boldly [and say]: 'Gaza will not starve. [Egypt] will not let the [Israeli] enemy leave the crossing closed while the people of Gaza are in need…'[2]
A major partner in this intimidation campaign against the Egyptian regime is the International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS), sponsored and funded by Qatar and Turkey,[3] which are also the patrons of the MB, Hamas's parent organization. The leaders of the IUMS have long been inciting against Egypt. As part of their present campaign against it, they have issued statements and religious rulings stipulating that aiding Gaza is a religious duty and part of jihad, and that any leader withholding aid from Gaza will be held accountable by Allah. President Al-Sisi was even described as 'an enemy of Allah' whose regime must be overthrown. Moreover, the heads of the IUMS pressed the Sheikh of Al-Azhar – the leading religious institution in the Sunni Muslim world, which is based in Cairo – to call for the opening of the Rafah crossing in contravention of the Egyptian regime's position. Shortly afterward Al-Azhar indeed issued a statement that implicitly blamed the Arab world, and possibly also the Egyptian regime, for the situation in Gaza, but soon removed it, presumably under pressure from the regime.
The Egyptian regime itself rejected the pressure from Hamas and its allies, accusing them of 'spreading lies.' However, it allowed the Egyptian media to serve as a platform for a harsh attacks against them.
It should be noted that this campaign is similar in its methods to previous incitement campaigns waged by Hamas and its allies against Arab regimes that have normalized relations with Israel. These campaigns included attempts to destabilize these regimes by encouraging protests against them and by directly calling on their citizens to wage jihad against Israel from their own countries.[4]
It should also be mentioned that the relations between Egypt and Qatar have known considerable tension, and were even severed for several years, mainly due to Qatar's support of the MB, which is designated as a terror organization in Egypt.[5] The tension between the two countries flared up recently following reports in Israel that Qatar had allegedly paid close advisors of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to spread negative messaging about Egypt in the media.[6]
This report reviews the campaign waged by Hamas, the IUMS, Qatar and elements identified with the MB against the Egyptian regime, as well as responses in Egypt to this campaign.
Cartoon in Qatari daily: The Gazan child "goes to sleep hungry because the Arab armies are slumbering" (Al-Quds Al-Arabi, London, July 31, 2025)
IUMS, Supported And Funded By Qatar And Turkey: It's Time For Jihad And Self-Sacrifice; Egypt Must Open The Rafah Crossing
Following Hamas's July 19, 2025 call for worldwide protests against what it terms the systematic starving of the Gazans,[7] Hamas, the MB, and the IUMS launched a campaign urging Muslims to wage jihad on Gaza's behalf and proclaiming it a religious duty to open the Rafah crossing between Egypt and Gaza. For example, on July 20, IUMS chairman Ali Al-Qaradaghi called on the Islamic governments and on all Muslims who can do so to wage 'comprehensive jihad, with their possessions, lives, words and stances,' in order to save the people of Gaza.[8] In a July 28 post on his X account he reiterated the call for 'comprehensive jihad' and added, 'The time has come.'[9]
Al-Qaradaghi's X post calling for 'comprehensive jihad'
On July 22 the IUMS's Fatwa Committee issued a religious ruling stating that 'countries and leaders who neglect [helping Gaza] will be accountable to Allah' and that 'this shari'a obligation… is part of jihad.' A separate clause in the ruling focused on Egypt, calling on it to 'open the crossings' and describing this as a religious duty.[10] Another IUMS member, Shu'aib Al-Hussein Al-Nadawi, likewise called on religious clerics around the world to pressure the Egyptian government to allow the delivery of aid through the Rafah crossing.[11]
A statement issued by the London branch of the MB stressed that 'the duty of jihad is incumbent not only on the people of Gaza but on all their close neighbors.' Criticizing Egypt, it added that the 'Zionist expansion would not have been possible were it not for the shameful impotence and the closing of the crossings.'[12]
IUMS Incites Head Of Al-Azhar Against Al-Sisi Regime
IUMS officials – including the union's secretary-general Ali Al-Salabi and deputy chairman Ahmad Al-Khalili, who also serves as the Mufti of Oman – as well as the IUMS Fatwa Committee, urged Ahmad Al-Tayeb, the Sheikh of the Cairo-based Al-Azhar – the leading religious institution in the Sunni Muslim world that provides religious backing to the Al-Sisi regime – to issue a religious ruling obligating Egypt to open the Rafah crossing and break the siege on Gaza, in contravention of the regime's policy.[13] On July 22 Al-Tayeb indeed responded to this call. He issued a harsh statement against Israel and all its supporters, and implicitly criticized the Arab states and possibly also the Egyptian regime by quoting an Arab proverb against turning one's back on one's allies.[14] The statement was removed from Al-Azhar's social media accounts shortly after its publication, presumably under pressure from the regime – which is concerned for its role as a mediator in the current negotiations for a ceasefire in Gaza – and also in response to fury over the statement's implicit criticism of the Arab world. Responding to the removal of the statement, the IUMS published an open letter to Al-Azhar Sheikh Ahmad Al-Tayeb, signed by its chairman Al-Qaradaghi and secretary-general Al-Salabi, urging Al-Tayeb once more to issue a religious ruling advising the Egyptian regime to support and aid its 'neighbor that is under attack,' i.e., the Gaza Strip. Addressing Al-Tayeb and the Egyptians, the letter asked: 'What will Allah say about your failure and the failure of the Egyptian people to come to the aid of the weak?'[15]
Elements Identified With MB And Qatar Call For Overthrow Of Al-Sisi Regime
Alongside the statements obligating Egypt to wage jihad, the IUMS also launched a direct campaign against President Al-Sisi himself. IUMS member Wasfi Ashour Abu Zeid, who resides in Turkey, wrote on X that 'closing the crossings to Gaza is a crime and constitutes direct complicity in the murder of innocents,' and blamed 'the blood-spiller Al-Sisi.'[16] Moreover, social media users circulated remarks by IUMS member Al-Sadiq Al-Gharyani, who is affiliated with the MB and serves as Mufti of western Libya, in which he called Al-Sisi "an enemy of Allah" and his regime 'a Zionist product' and exhorted Muslims to 'overthrow the usurper and his tyrannical regime.'[17]
With the encouragement of MB-affiliated elements, protests were held in front of Egypt's representations across the world.[18] Some of these protests included harsh calls against the Egyptian president, such as 'There is no god but Allah and Al-Sisi is Allah's enemy,'[19] and "Al-Sisi is a traitor."[20]
Protest in front of the Egyptian ambassador's residence in London condemns the closing of the Rafah crossing (Image: Facebook.com/AbdullahELshrif, July 27, 2025)
The Qatari media, and especially Al-Jazeera, also joined the campaign against the Egyptian regime. Conspicuous in his pointed criticism of this regime was prominent Al-Jazeera presenter Jamal Rayyan, who wrote on X: 'Dozens of Gazans are dying of starvation every day. Do the Egyptians and their president not fear the punishment of Allah?' He added: 'History will record that the people of Gaza were collapsing from hunger in the streets while Egypt's President Al-Sisi prevented food from reaching them.' Rayyan also shared footage of former Egyptian president Muhammad Morsi, of the MB, pledging he would never abandon Gaza, and commented: 'Why were [the reins of government] handed to the one who abandoned Gaza?', hinting at Al-Sisi.[21] The Qatari government daily Al-Sharq published an article titled 'If Cairo Acts, Gaza Will Be Able to Breathe,' which called on Egypt to open the Rafah crossing and claimed that 'Egypt's centrality in the nation's consciousness' was being put to the test.[22] The London-based Qatari daily Al-Arabi Al-Jadid published an article titled 'Rage, Egypt!', by Palestinian journalist Ziad Barakat, a former Al-Jazeera employee, who wrote: 'We are entitled to expect Cairo to rage, to open the crossing, and to force Israel to lift the siege on Gaza and face a torrent of angry Egyptians streaming across the border.'[23] Another London-based Qatari daily, Al-Quds Al-Arabi, published an article by an Egyptian journalist stating that 'the hunger in Gaza threatens Al-Sisi's throne,' and holding Egypt responsible for the situation there.[24]
Egyptian Establishment Rejects The Criticism: Egypt Is Committed To The Palestinian Cause; The Accusations Should Be Directed At Israel
For many days, official Egypt refrained from responding to the campaign against it. The first official who eventually referred to it was Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty, who implicitly accused the MB of spreading lies and stressed that Israel is responsible for the situation in Gaza. He said: 'There are five crossings into Gaza. Why doesn't anyone speak about opening the Israeli crossings? Why do they focus on the Egyptian side? This is a transparent and deliberate attempt to harm Egypt, but Egypt's hands are clean when it comes to its Palestinian brothers…"[25]
Two days later, President Al-Sisi also rebuffed the criticism against Egypt. He said that 'it's important that people be familiar with [Egypt's] positive positions,' and added: 'On our side [of the border] there is a large amount of aid ready to enter the Strip… But sending it in requires coordination with the other side [i.e., Israel]… Our role is honorable, loyal and honest, and it will not change.' He urged the world and especially U.S. President Donald Trump to 'invest every effort in ending the war and bringing aid' into Gaza.[26]
Alongside these declarations, the Egyptian media launched a wide-ranging counterattack, which was directed mainly at the Hamas leadership, due to Hamas official Al-Hayya's inciting calls on the Egyptian people, army and tribes to break the siege on Gaza and storm the border with it. Senior journalist Dandrawy Al-Hawary addressed Hamas leaders "who live lives of luxury abroad and have obtained various citizenships for themselves and their children," and asked them, "What have you done for your people in Gaza other than chatter on social media, move between hotels in different capital cities, and then attack Egypt and accuse it of not assisting [Gaza]?" He added: "Why don't you return to your homeland, fight there and get a bitter taste of the hunger and the thirst you caused with your ill-considered and reckless October 7 [operation] against the Israelis, which you call the Al-Aqsa Flood[?]"[27] In a similar vein, journalist Hamdy Rizk, the former editor of the daily Al-Masri Al-Yawm, published a scathing article against Hamas official Khalil Al-Hayya, while playing on his name, which means 'snake' in Arabic. He wrote: "When a snake is satiated it sleeps, but Khalil Al-Hayya woke up satiated, yawned, and [then] demanded, from his warm bed in voluntary exile, that [people] advance on the [Rafah] crossing. Al-Hayya and his ilk in the 'hotel resistance' do not represent the resistance on the ground… or the people in Gaza…"[28]
"No limit to the destruction" – cartoon on X account of Palestinian journalist Majdy Abd Al-Wahab, who wrote: "After destroying Gaza, Al-Hayya wants to destroy Egypt" (X.com/majdywahab, July 28, 2025)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lebanese Writer: Syria's President Al-Sharaa Must Protect The Minorities – Not Blame Israel For The Sectarian Violence In The Country
Lebanese Writer: Syria's President Al-Sharaa Must Protect The Minorities – Not Blame Israel For The Sectarian Violence In The Country

Memri

time3 hours ago

  • Memri

Lebanese Writer: Syria's President Al-Sharaa Must Protect The Minorities – Not Blame Israel For The Sectarian Violence In The Country

Under the shadow of the bloody events in the Druze stronghold of southern Syria, that began July 13, 2025 and involved Druze factions and Bedouin tribes backed by Syria's Al-Sharaa regime, and in which over 1,000 Druze were massacred, Lebanese columnist Khairallah Khairallah called in his July 21, 2025 column in the London-based UAE daily Al-Arab for Syrian President Ahmed Al-Sharaa to prove that he is the president of all Syrians "in deeds and not words." Stressing that the broad international and regional legitimacy enjoyed by his administration does not exempt him from reconciliation with all Syrians, including the Druze, he added that it also does not mean that he need not learn lessons from the harm that has been done to Syria's minorities since he took power. In his column, Khairallah rejected the Syrian regime's depiction of Israel as responsible for the sectarian tensions in the country. He wrote that Israel's support for the Druze in Syria is more than natural, given that they are part of the Israeli social fabric and serve in the Israeli military, and that Israel has not intervened in other cases of harm to Syrian minorities such as the Alawites or the Christians. The Syrian people under a cloud of violence (Source: Al-Arab, London, July 17, 2025) The following is the translation of Khairallah's column: "...The events in the Syrian province of Al-Suwayda, which has experienced and continues to experience crimes and atrocities against the Druze community, are an opportunity for the new Syrian regime, led by Ahmed Al-Sharaa, to reinvent itself – instead of settling for accusing Israel [of fanning the violence] or turning a blind eye to the attack on the Druze, committed by so-called Bedouin tribes, [if we believe the regime's] claims, which are unsubstantiated, to say the least! "This is an opportunity for Al-Shara to prove, in deeds and not words, that he is the president of all of Syria and of all the Syrians – and not the leader of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham [HTS] and its supporters. He can do so by proving that the [new] Syrian state, which has been in existence for just seven months, can be different from the Alawite regime that had existed from 1966... "There is no way out of the profound crisis in which Syria finds itself unless this young regime takes charge of protecting the Druze, who are first and foremost Syrian citizens. In this realm, Ahmed Al-Sharaa and his aides can learn from recent past experience, and avoid what happened to the Alawites and Christians. "Last March [2025], the Alawites were slaughtered in the Syrian coastal region, after armed militias suppressed a move they had made to bring up what could be called 'the Alawite issue,' based on the assumption that the world takes an interest in their fate. But it turned out that the Alawites were the world's least concern, and that no one, including Israel, was willing to embrace the cause of a minority that had ruled Syria with an iron fist and with fire for some six decades. The Alawites are now paying the price for the crimes of Hafez and Bashar Al-Assad and other members of their family, who considered Syria nothing more than the ruling family's [private] ranch. "Israel did not interfere in events in Syria, particularly when they concerned the Alawites and then the Christians. It was clear that the Christians in Syria were the least concern of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government, even though they were massacred by an ISIS fighter inside a church in one of the Damascus neighborhoods.[1] The Syrian officials treated the Christians somewhat contemptuously, considering that they were a minority that played an important role in shaping Syria's history... "The Christians were the victims of the Egypt-Syria union [i.e., the United Arab Republic, a union of Egypt and Syria that existed in 1958-1961], and later they were the victims of the Ba'ath Party because of its dearth of political thought and its wickedness. [They were also] one of the victims of the Alawite regime, which handed the Golan over to Israel in June 1967 in order to ensure Hafez Al-Assad a monopoly on power after [the 1967 War] and also to ensure that Syria would be inherited by his son Bashar in 2000. "Ahmed Al-Sharaa received strong American and Western support, for example, meeting with President Donald Trump in Riyadh and visiting Paris. He played the card of the relations with Israel wisely, and at all times hinted at a return to the 1974 [Israeli-Syrian] separation of forces agreement. [2] He disregarded all Israeli attacks aimed at specific Syrian military sites. Moreover, he has established close ties with influential Arab countries, led by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. He maintained the special relationship with Turkey and did not for one moment take lightly the issue of the Iranian presence in Syria. He took care to emphasize that this presence had ended permanently and that Syria would never again serve as a bridge between the Islamic Republic and its proxy Hizbullah in Lebanon. This great achievement, historic in nature, cannot be spent on marginal battles in which the Druze are required to be the victims. "Everything that Ahmed Al-Sharaa has done is good. But this does not mean that there is no need for reconciliation with the Syrians – all Syrians, including the Druze, who throughout the state's modern history have played an important and central role on the national level, starting with their rejection of the idea that Syria would include several states, including a Druze state. The Druze had a role in strengthening the Syrian national unity that Hafez Al-Assad, and later his son, tore to shreds, by gambling on an alliance of minorities led by the Alawites in order to confront the Sunni [majority]. The most dangerous thing that the elder and younger Assads did was to use the Islamic Republic of Iran to create a new demographic reality in Syria, and to change the political balance [of power] in Lebanon. "Yes, Ahmed Al-Sharaa has a chance to prove that he is the president of all of Syria and of all Syrians, without discrimination or distinction. It is easy to blame Israel [for the sectarian violence in the country], but it is difficult to block its interference in Syria's domestic affairs in a sensitive region like Al-Suwayda province. Israel's support for the Druze of Al-Suwayda is more than natural, given that Israeli Druze serve in the Israeli military and given the Druze community's historical role in the Israeli sphere. "To put it more clearly, Ahmed Al-Sharaa has no choice but to play the role of the historic head of state who leads the people and is not led by them. More important than anything else is the new Syrian president's duty to prove that he is Ahmed Al-Sharaa and not Abu Muhammad Al-Joulani [the name by which he was once known].[3] This requires both great courage and political maturity. Additionally, there is a need to play the role of the national leader who reconciles first with the Sunni moderates, and [then] also with the Druze, Christians, Alawites, and Kurds, of course."[4]

Hezbollah: Lebanese government arms plan serves Israel
Hezbollah: Lebanese government arms plan serves Israel

Shafaq News

time5 hours ago

  • Shafaq News

Hezbollah: Lebanese government arms plan serves Israel

Shafaq News – Beirut On Wednesday, Hezbollah rejected a Lebanese government plan to centralize all arms under state authority, describing the move as a 'grave mistake' that strips the country of its right to resist Israeli aggression and violates national commitments. In a statement, the Shiite group emphasized that the plan contradicts the government's own ministerial declaration, claiming it was influenced by 'dictates from US Envoy Tom Barrack.' Hezbollah also warned that the draft serves Israeli interests, leaving Lebanon exposed to attacks without an effective deterrent. 'We will treat this decision as if it does not exist,' the statement added. The Lebanese party reaffirmed its willingness to engage in dialogue on a national defense strategy, but stressed that such discussions cannot proceed amid ongoing Israeli attacks. The group also called for a broader approach that includes ending Israeli operations, reclaiming occupied Lebanese land, releasing detainees, rebuilding damaged areas, and safeguarding national sovereignty. Meanwhile, Amal Movement, a Shiite party allied with Hezbollah, accused the government of offering 'gratuitous concessions to Israel,'' arguing that the cabinet's stance goes against the President's oath and its ministerial declaration. The rejection followed a prolonged cabinet session. While Prime Minister Nawaf Salam delayed a final decision on the weapons issue until Thursday, he instructed the Lebanese Army to develop a plan detailing how arms would be placed under state control. The draft is expected to be submitted to the cabinet by the end of August. Violations of the US-brokered ceasefire, which took effect on November 27, 2024, have continued. Lebanese media reported on Wednesday that an 11-year-old boy died and his father sustained serious injuries after an Israeli drone strike hit their home's garage in the southern town of Touline. An Israeli drone has also dropped a stun grenade on the nearby town of Yaroun. Since the ceasefire began, Lebanese authorities have recorded over 4,200 Israeli violations, resulting in at least 230 deaths and more than 450 injuries. Although the ceasefire requires a full Israeli withdrawal, five Israeli military outposts remain in southern Lebanon.

British Islamic Scholar Asrar Rashid: The Final Caliphate Will Emerge from Jerusalem; Palestinian Uprisings Are Harbingers – The NATO-Backed, Nike-Wearing, McDonald's-Eating Jihad of ISIS Is Meant to
British Islamic Scholar Asrar Rashid: The Final Caliphate Will Emerge from Jerusalem; Palestinian Uprisings Are Harbingers – The NATO-Backed, Nike-Wearing, McDonald's-Eating Jihad of ISIS Is Meant to

Memri

time8 hours ago

  • Memri

British Islamic Scholar Asrar Rashid: The Final Caliphate Will Emerge from Jerusalem; Palestinian Uprisings Are Harbingers – The NATO-Backed, Nike-Wearing, McDonald's-Eating Jihad of ISIS Is Meant to

British Islamic scholar Asrar Rashid said in an interview with journalist Dilly Hussein that final Caliphate will be established out of Jerusalem, and that past and current Palestinian 'uprisings' are harbingers of this. He said democracy does not work for Muslims, calling it a 'tyranny,' and cited examples such as the West orchestrating a coup against Hamas in the Palestinian Authority and the ouster of Muslim Brotherhood President Mohamed Morsi in Egypt. Rashid claimed that the 'Nike-wearing,' 'McDonald's-eating,' Mossad-backed 'so-called' Jihad of ISIS is intended to distort the concept of Jihad and invalidate the 'real Jihad' of the Palestinians. He added that Jews would be safe and welcome in the Caliphate, provided they pay the jizya poll tax. The interview was conducted at Lozells Central Mosque in Birmingham as part of the launch of Rashid's book Intellectual Intifada: Blueprint for Restoring the Caliphate.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store