Labour-run councils consider legal challenges to close asylum hotels
Wirral and Tamworth councils said they are exploring high court injunctions to remove claimants after the Conservative-run authority in Epping Forest won a temporary high court injunction to remove people from the Bell Hotel.
The developments come after the Home Office minister Dan Jarvis said the government is looking at alternative options if there is a flurry of successful challenges from councils.
Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, is determinedto stick to her plan after the Epping ruling and its consequences, a source said.
'We have a plan and we're sticking to it to close asylum hotels by the end of the parliament. This is one narrow court judgment that happened yesterday. We're not being knocked off course, this is our manifesto commitment,' the source said.
Ministers are reluctant to disclose the details about alternatives to asylum hotels because of concerns that it could be used as a recruitment tool for the far right, a government source said.
Cllr Paula Basnett, the leader of Wirral council whose boundaries include the Wallasey constituency of the immigration minister Angela Eagle, said the council is actively considering 'all options' to close a local hotel.
She added: 'Like many other local authorities, we have concerns about the Home Office's practice of placing asylum seekers in hotels without consultation or regard to local planning requirements.
'We are actively considering all options available to us to ensure that any use of hotels or other premises in Wirral is lawful and does not ride roughshod over planning regulations or the wishes of our communities.
'Wirral has always been proud of its record in supporting families and those fleeing conflict, but it is unacceptable for the government to impose unsuitable, short-term arrangements that disrupt communities and bypass local decision-making.
'If necessary, we will not hesitate to challenge such decisions in order to protect both residents and those seeking refuge.'
Labour councillor Carol Dean, leader of Tamworth borough council, said they had explored similar legal avenues in 2022 when the Home Office first started using a local hotel, but did not end up pursuing them.
'The situation at Epping Forest represents a potentially important legal precedent, and we are carefully assessing what this might mean for our circumstances here in Tamworth.
'We fully recognise the UK government has a statutory duty to accommodate people seeking asylum. However, we have consistently maintained that the prolonged use of hotel accommodation may not represent the best approach,' she added.
Conservative-run Broxbourne Council in Hertfordshire has said it was taking legal advice 'as a matter of urgency', while Tory-run East Lindsey district council in Lincolnshire said officers are investigating and 'will take appropriate action'.
Reform UK-led councils, West Northamptonshire council and Staffordshire county council, also said the authorities would look at the options available after the high court ruling.
On Tuesday, Reform UK leaders Nigel Farage and Richard Tice indicated that councils run by the party will consider their own legal challenges.
However, a number of these do not have responsibility for planning permission, which may limit their ability to launch legal bids.
Other authorities have ruled out legal action, with the leader of Labour-run Newcastle city council saying she was 'confident' the council could end the use of hotels without going to court.
Karen Kilgour said: 'We recognise that people seeking asylum include families, women, and children, many of whom have faced unimaginable trauma.
'Newcastle has a proud history of offering sanctuary, and we stand ready to play our part – but it must be done in a way that works for our city and supports the dignity and wellbeing of those who come here.'
Mr Justice Eyre granted the Epping injunction after hearing the local council's complaints that planning law had been breached in changing the site's use.
Epping district council also cited disruption caused by the protests and concerns for the safety of the asylum seekers themselves.
The hotel has been at the centre of violent far-right protests since an asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu has denied charges against him and is due to stand trial later this month.
Since 2020, there has been greater reliance on hotels to house asylum seekers, with 32,345 being housed temporarily in England and Wales at the end of March this year. Labour has promised to end the use of hotels to house asylum seekers by 2029 by cutting small boat crossings and building new accommodation.
Asked on Times Radio about possible housing options for anyone removed from hotels, Jarvis said on Wednesday that the government is 'looking at a range of different contingency options'.
These are understood to include placing people removed from hotels in Wethersfield Air Base in Essex and Napier Barracks in Kent.
Figures from the end of March show that almost a third of asylum seekers that receive government support were housed in 'contingency accommodation' which is flats and houses.
The statistics, from the National Audit Office (NAO) and other official sources, says this amounts to about 32, 300 people, a reduction of 42% compared with its 2023 peak.
But the current government and its predecessors have also been forced to use disused military bases to house refugees, with the two most high-profile being Wethersfield Air Base in Essex and Napier Barracks in Kent.
Despite ministers coming under heavy criticism for the conditions refugees have been forced to endure, this Labour government is set to expand the use of both bases.
It comes after the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, pledged to stop using taxpayer-funded hotels by 2029 in her Spending Review, in a drive to save £1bn. The Home Office aims to achieve this by moving refugees into cheaper sites.
In April of last year, Cooper said Wethersfield is neither 'a sustainable solution' nor provides 'value for money for the taxpayer'. But an internal Home Office memo dated 24 July, seen by the Guardian, shows there are plans to put people in Wethersfield despite it being at maximum capacity.
It states: 'While the site's regular cap is 800 an additional 445 bed spaces may be used temporarily during peak demand. There are no plans to exceed 1,245.'
In March, the high court found the previous government's use of Wethersfield to be unlawful after three men likened their conditions to a prison.
Napier Barracks, which was due to be handed back to the Ministry of Defence in September, will instead continue to house migrants into 2026.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
As Epping case could bring migrant hotel use to an end – where else can asylum seekers go?
A High Court Judge ruled that asylum seekers can no longer be housed at a hotel in Epping that has been the site of multiple protests in recent weeks. Epping Forest District Council won an interim injunction to stop asylum seekers being hosted at The Bell Hotel, saying it had become a 'feeding ground for unrest.' The judgement requires all migrants currently housed in the hotel – around 140 men as of last month – to leave by 4pm on 12 September. The Home Office is responsible for asylum and protection in the UK, and must now find somewhere else for these people to go. Reacting to the ruling, it warned it would 'substantially impact' its ability to house asylum seekers across the UK. Home secretary Yvette Cooper had unsuccessfully attempted to have the council's case dismissed shortly before the ruling. Other councils have also shown an interest in following suit in the wake of the ruling. However, none have initiated legal proceedings similar to Epping. Most experts agree that housing asylum seekers in hotels is not appropriate for a number of reasons. Cost, overcrowding and community tensions are amongst of the most commonly cited reasons. Border security minister Angela Eagle said the government will 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns', adding: 'Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament.' The case raises the question of where the asylum seekers currently in the Bell Hotel will need to go come September and, should the widespread use of migrant hotels come to an end, where all people currently housed in them can be placed instead. Hotels The latest Home Office figures show that there were 32,059 asylum seekers in UK hotels at the end of June, up eight per cent on the same point 12 months ago. This is down slightly on the previous quarter, however, and far lower than the peak of 56,000 in September 2023. There are also now fewer than 210 hotels in use, down from 400 in summer 2023. These hotels only make up around 35 per cent of all people in asylum accommodation, according to a report from the National Audit Office (NAO) in May. But their cost is disproportionately expensive, making up 76 per cent of total government spending on asylum accommodation. And, as has been seen in recent months, they are also a hot-bed for protests which have oftentimes turned violent. Imran Hussain, director of external affairs at Refugee Council said: 'Asylum hotels have become a flashpoint for tension in communities, cost billions to the taxpayer, and leave people trapped in limbo. Ending their use is in everyone's interest, but the Government's current plan to phase them out by 2029 is far too slow. We need to reform the accommodation system so that councils can house people in the community.' Housing Moving more asylum seekers into houses or flats is one possible alternative to the use of hotels. These could be provided by private landlords or social housing groups. Around 66,000 migrants were housed in these kind of properties by the end of December 2024, compared to 38,000 in hotels at the same time. The main criticism of this approach is that it will add more demand onto the UK's already stretched housing industry. In the private sector, rising rents are making living costs unaffordable for many households. Moving more asylum seekers into these properties – funded by the government – may push up rental prices further and create less availability for UK residents. However, housing more asylum seekers in social housing would possibly create issues for residents who are struggling most in that local authority. The waiting list for council housing reached over 300,000 in 2024 – if more migrants are moved into social housing, the already-long wait times may increase further. Mr Hussain said: 'Housing people in communities is cheaper and more effective than hotels or military sites. Local authorities already manage housing for other groups and know their local areas best, so they're well placed to provide accommodation.' 'Ultimately, the only way to end hotel use for good is to resolve asylum applications quickly and accurately so people can either rebuild their lives here or return home with dignity. This will cut costs and allow refugees to integrate into their new communities, contribute, and play their part in Britain.' Military bases and boats Military bases have been used to accommodate asylum seekers in the past, but their use attracted widespread criticism. In 2022, the Conservative government said it would use 'large sites' like ex-military facilities, as well as barges and ferries to reduce demand on asylum hotels. The only two sites still in use are Wethersfield Airfield in Essex and Napier Barracks in Kent. As of December 2024, there were only 735 migrants living between them. The government said in March that Napier Barracks would be closing after multiple allegations of poor conditions and criticism from MPs. It was also found that former home secretary Suella Braverman acted unlawfully in accommodating three asylum seekers at Wethersfield who argued they were living in 'prison-like' conditions. However, despite pledging to close Wethersfield in opposition, Labour is set to continue and even expand its use, increasing its capacity from 800 to 1,225 in July. Most agree that the use of boats is not a tenable or humane solution. The last people left the Dorset-moored Bibby Stockholm in November after fierce criticism against the 'migrant barge'. Student accommodation The government purchased former student accommodation in Huddersfield in 2023 with the purpose of housing asylum seekers. As of February 2025, the property was under development, according to the NAO. The 405-bed block of flats will hold a maximum of 670 people, the Home Office has said. There were reports that 168 students had planned to live in the building and were told they had to make alternative arrangements, although the government denied this. Using this kind of accommodation – already built for temporary use – may be a strong option to replace the use of hotels in the coming years. However, Kirklees Council said in March that there were issues it would like to see addressed before the plans go ahead. Council leader Cathy Scott said: "The Home Office needs to commit to engaging properly with the Huddersfield community on its plans as well as addressing the many important issues the council and its partners have put forward before the site becomes operational. She added: "In Kirklees, we have a strong record of supporting people who are fleeing persecution. But the system relies on trust and confidence. We do not believe the Home Office has done enough to build trust over the past six months. That's why we will continue to raise our concerns on behalf of local residents and communities."
The Guardian
15 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Bolsonaro given 48 hours to explain alleged plans to flee to Argentina
A supreme court judge has given Brazil's ex-president, Jair Bolsonaro, 48 hours to explain police claims he was planning to flee to Argentina to avoid punishment for allegedly masterminding a failed coup after losing the 2022 election. Bolsonaro's trial for the alleged attempt to seize power is scheduled to conclude early next month, with the far-right populist facing more than four decades in prison if found guilty. Court documents made public on Wednesday night showed federal police investigators had found a draft asylum request on the ex-president's mobile phone addressed to Argentina's rightwing president, Javier Milei. In the undated and unsigned document, Bolsonaro claimed he was 'facing imminent arrest' for political motives and needed 'urgent' sanctuary overseas. An Argentinian government source told the Reuters news agency that Milei's office had not received a letter. But Brazilian police claimed the document indicated Bolsonaro had 'planned to flee the country, in order to prevent the law being enforced'. After the document was released as part of a 170-page police report, supreme court justice Alexandre de Moraes demanded answers from Bolsonaro's lawyers. 'The evidence gathered by the federal police indicate that Jair Messias Bolsonaro was in possession of a document designed to enable him to escape national territory,' Moraes wrote in his dispatch. Bolsonaro, who was president from 2019 until the end of 2022, was placed under house arrest in early August after the supreme court decided he had violated a court order banning him from using social media. But Moraes's 48-hour ultimatum reportedly fuelled fears among Bolsonaro supporters that their 70-year-old leader could be now taken into custody to stop him absconding before his final judgment, which is due to start on 2 September and conclude on 12 September. Bolsonaro stands accused of plotting to overturn the result of the 2022 election, which he lost to his leftwing opponent Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. He denies those charges, but political and legal experts – and many of Bolsonaro's allies – are convinced he will be convicted. The accusation that Bolsonaro had planned to flee Brazil for Argentina came as federal police formally accused the ex-president and his congressman son, Eduardo Bolsonaro, of trying to interfere in Bolsonaro's judgment by encouraging US officials to put pressure on the supreme court. If found guilty of that offence they could receive a sentence of up to 12 years. Eduardo Bolsonaro moved to the US in February and has spent recent months lobbying Donald Trump's administration – with some success – to pile pressure on Brazil's supreme court justices and Lula's government over his father's trial. In July Trump slapped 50% tariffs on Brazilian imports in retaliation for what he called a 'witch-hunt' against Bolsonaro and announced the imposition of sanctions on Moraes, who is presiding over Bolsonaro's trial. Eight of Brazil's 11 supreme court judges, including Moraes, have been stripped of their US visas, as have the wife and 10-year-old daughter of one of Lula's closest allies, the health minister, Alexandre Padilha. 'It's really a political execution that they're trying to do with Bolsonaro. I think that's terrible,' Trump told reporters last week. In other developments during a dramatic 24 hours for Brazilian politics, Silas Malafaia, a powerful and wealthy evangelical pastor who is one of Bolsonaro's most vocal cheerleaders, was questioned by police after flying back from Portugal to Rio. Malafaia, who is also being investigated by federal police over suspicions he too tried to influence the outcome of Bolsonaro's trial, has now been banned from leaving the country and communicating with Bolsonaro and his son and has been ordered to surrender his passports. 'You'll have to arrest me to silence me,' Malafaia shouted at reporters after being released. The federal police report also exposed the foul-mouthed infighting that appears to be playing out between members of the Bolsonaro clan and key supporters in the lead-up to the ex-president's judgment. In one WhatsApp exchange found on Jair Bolsonaro's phone, which was seized as part of police investigations, Eduardo Bolsonaro reacts to an interview in which his father criticised him, writing in all capitals: 'Go and fuck yourself you fucking ingrate!' In another message, from Malafaia to Jair Bolsonaro, the firebrand church leader attacks Eduardo Bolsonaro for publicly celebrating Trump's tariffs on Brazilian imports. 'I'm sorry, president. This son of yours Eduardo is an inexperienced prick who is handing the nationalist discourse to Lula and the left … a complete idiot. I'm fuming!' In a statement, Eduardo Bolsonaro criticised the police for 'leaking private, absolutely normal conversations'. He called the move 'shameful' and politically motivated and denied trying to interfere in his father's trial. Polls suggest Lula has received a boost after Trump's attempts to pressure Brazil's institutions, with more than 70% of Brazilians opposed to the US president's actions and only 21% supporting them. A poll released on Thursday showed Lula beating all of his potential rightwing rivals in next year's election, including Bolsonaro's wife, Michelle Bolsonaro, Eduardo Bolsonaro, and a handful of conservative state governors battling to inherit leadership of Bolsonaro's political movement.
The Guardian
15 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Teenager who planned mosque attack in Scotland detained for 10 years
A teenager who listed Hitler, Mussolini and the Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik as his inspirations and who planned a terrorist attack on a mosque has been sentenced to 10 years in custody. The 17-year-old, who cannot be named because of his age, had intended to set fire to an Islamic centre in Greenock, Inverclyde, after befriending the imam and mapping out the building's interior on his phone. The teenager was arrested at the door of the centre in January this year. He was carrying a military-style rucksack that contained a German-manufactured Glock-type air pistol, ammunition, ball bearings, gas cartridges and aerosol cans, according to prosecutors. He was sentenced at the high court in Glasgow on Thursday after pleading guilty to two terrorism charges, with a further eight years of supervision on licence upon release. In his sentencing statement, Lord Arthurson said: 'What you had in mind was what can properly be characterised as a quite diabolical atrocity involving extreme violence and multiple deaths. You even requested that your attack be livestreamed. Your conduct was only stopped by your arrest, when you were quite literally at the very door of the centre.' Prosecutors said the teenager, who became radicalised online, began plotting the attack in December 2024 and joined the mosque's WhatsApp group saying he was 'looking for guidance', later winning the trust of the imam during several visits. Meanwhile he was boasting of his plans to set the centre on fire on the social media platform Telegram and later filmed himself wandering the corridors, including footage showing him superimposing a hand carrying a semi-automatic pistol. Sineidin Corrins, deputy procurator fiscal for specialist casework at the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, said: 'This heinous plan to attack those within his own local community was prepared and driven by racial and religiously motivated hatred, and showed that he not only held neo-Nazi beliefs but was about to act on them to cause pain and suffering'.
