Union accuses council of ‘abhorrent' practices and calls for leader to quit
Onay Kasab visited a picket line in the Tyseley area of the city on Thursday to speak to dozens of the hundreds of workers who went on all-out strike four months ago over fears some could face pay cuts of up to £8,000.
Birmingham City Council leader John Cotton said in a statement issued on Wednesday that the council had 'sought to be reasonable and flexible, but we have reached the absolute limit of what we can offer'.
Mr Cotton added that the authority had 'now run out of time' after negotiating in good faith 'but unfortunately Unite has rejected all offers so we must now press ahead to both address our equal pay risk and make much needed improvements to the waste service'.
The Labour-run council would communicate with staff and trade unions as to its next steps, with voluntary redundancy remaining on the table alongside opportunities for training and redeployment, Mr Cotton said.
Speaking after meeting Unite members on the picket line outside a city council depot, Mr Kasab stressed that the dispute was about planned cuts to pay and not about workers looking for better pay and conditions.
Mr Kasab said: 'The council's announcement effectively means that they are looking at fire and rehire and that's one of the most abhorrent of employment practices.
'We were told previously that under a Labour government that that would be outlawed.
'We have now got a Labour government that said it would be outlawed and a Labour council who are now looking at implementing fire and rehire to bully these workers for the council to get its way, which is about cutting people's pay.
'That's absolutely appalling.'
Accusing the council of being dishonest by not referring to fire and rehire in its 'unhelpful' statement, the trade union official added that workers were determined to stay out on strike 'not just as a point of principle, not just because we have been out on strike for all this time already, but because what the council are looking to do simply cannot happen'.
The only way to resolve the dispute was through negotiation, said Mr Kasab, who claimed the council's statement gave false impression that there had been 'offer after offer' to settle the issues.
'The question to the council is how do redundancies and cuts to people's pay improve services,' Mr Kasab continued.
'And that's the question that John Cotton really has to answer now.'
Accusing the council of a 'shambolic' mishandling of the dispute, including a 'daft' attempt to negotiate via a statement to the media, Mr Kasab said of Mr Cotton: 'I think he really has to seriously consider his position.
'The way his council under his leadership has mishandled this dispute and with yesterday's appalling announcement, as a Labour councillor he really needs to be considering his position.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
2 minutes ago
- The Sun
Tech sec Peter Kyle should apologise for calling Farage a nonce-enabler – then make the move that WILL protect our kids
OUR wildly unpopular Government has decided to get down and dirty. Rather than come up with ideas to make our lives a bit bloody easier, it has resorted to disgusting smears against opponents. 8 8 The Onlife Safety Act — a genuinely awful piece of legislation — seeks to persuade hi-tech companies to be a bit more rigorous about who they show their porn and other nasty images to. It will not work. Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, has said as much. And he pledged to repeal the act if Reform wins the next election. Which is looking increasingly likely. This provoked Technology Secretary Peter Kyle to suggest that Farage was 'on the side of' Jimmy Savile. An insane accusation and one Kyle has refused to withdraw. Kyle's actual words were these: 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he would be perpetrating his crimes online — and Nigel Farage is saying that he is on their side, not the side of children.' What an odious comment — but it was repeated a little later by the dim-witted Transport Secretary, Heidi Alexander. So what Labour is saying, in short, is this: if you disagree with their stupid Onlife Safety Act, you're little better than a nonce. You're a nonce enabler. Nigel Farage was rightly furious. Here's the thing. The act is a disgrace. It hands the power to hi-tech companies and penalises the small online sites. And it will do little or nothing to stop kids getting hold of gruesome images. It will also erode freedom of speech. And increase censorship for adults. It is a chilling piece of legislation. And it has already been rubbished by both the Left, in The New Statesman, and the Right, in the Daily Telegraph. Tech Secretary left 'shocked to the core' after visiting crack team hunting down child abuse images There is, however, one failsafe way to make sure kids are safe from revolting images. Stop children having smartphones. Ban them from kids 16 years and younger. Something similar is to be tried in Australia, where under-16s will be banned from social media later this year. Labour says it is not going to do that. Peter Kyle has rejected the proposal. And you know why he's done that, don't you? It's because he, like the ludicrous Heidi Alexander, is a nonce enabler. He would actively help Jimmy Savile nonce the kids. There, how do you like that, Mr Kyle? That's what happens when you crawl into the political gutter. You meet horrible people like me. People who are prepared to stick the boot in and not worry. Nonce enablers People who will say stuff like this: if Kyle opposes my bill to ban smartphones from kids he is worse than Rosemary West and Hitler combined. And he probably hangs around infant schools with a bag of sherbet lemons and some puppies. You see, Kyle? It isn't only disgusting to make such accusations. It's also totally and utterly ludicrous. But it's particularly ludicrous and, indeed, hypocritical when it comes from Labour. Because the party is led by Sir Keir Starmer. And when Sir Keir Starmer was doing his previous job as Director of Public Prosecutions, it decided against charging Jimmy Savile. So you might have a point in saying that Starmer was 'on the side of' Jimmy Savile. Think again, Peter Kyle. Apologise to Farage and withdraw the comment. And when you've done that, withdraw the Online Safety Act. FEELING THE PINCH, CERYS? I'M sorry that the comedian Cerys Nelmes is upset. It's not nice to be upset. She's worried she may be put behind bars in Turkey for alleged shoplifting. Apparently, she left the Zara store in Istanbul having 'forgotten to pay' for an item. How refreshing it is that the Turks take apparent shoplifting seriously. And that Cerys could get three years in a prison like the one in Midnight Express. PM'S SO WRONG ON GAZA 8 IN promising to 'recognise' Palestine, Sir Keir Starmer has shed his very last vestige of principle. It is a wholly cosmetic exercise designed to appease the morons on his back benches. It will do nothing whatsoever to help the Palestinians. It offers not the slightest encouragement for the feral savages of Hamas to hand back the hostages. All it does is enrage the US and Israel. And what exactly is it that Starmer is pledging to recognise? The Hamas-governed Gaza Strip? But the Government has already proscribed Hamas as a terrorist organisation. There is, at present, no Palestinian state. Just chunks of territory ruled over by extremists. It is a truly shocking decision which will cause many, many problems down the line. CARMEN HAVE A GO THEN 8 SO, well done you tenacious Lionesses. They proved that they are incredibly difficult to beat. And also that they are not as useless at penalties as most of the other countries. I enjoyed the tournament, even if the quality of football was sometimes hilariously bad. It all works, though, if you don't keep comparing it with the men's game. It was also hugely pleasing to beat the Spanish. They are very bad losers and their petulant strop at Chloe Kelly cheered me up no end. A bit of grace in defeat wouldn't go amiss, senoritas. Meanwhile, my lot are away to Norwich next Saturday. The season is at last starting. And so Christmas can't be far away. A FOOL ENGLISH THERE were two stories which made me sit up this week. The first was that the average person now pays to the Government 57 per cent of their income in tax. This is all the result of hidden levies such as VAT, stamp duty, National Insurance, capital gains tax and a whole load of other stuff. There are 37 levies on top of income tax. We are now being taxed at the highest rate since the Second World War. And the other story? A picture of the breakfast buffet that illegal asylum seekers are provided with, at our expense, in one of their hotels. Would you like your eggs scrambled or poached, Asif? Coming right up. Along with bacon, sausage, hash browns, baked beans and black pudding. I couldn't see if they had mushrooms or not. Or waffles. If they're in Richmond upon Thames, by the way, they also get free membership of gyms to work off that full English. You wonder where our money goes? Here's an answer for you. MESSER 'N' MRS WE'RE moving house. I come home of an evening and see my wife licking the skirting boards clean. I can't find anything because it's all been hidden so that potential buyers think we don't have clutter. The final straw came at the weekend. Me and the dog were banished from the house 'for the foreseeable future'. That's because we make things messy. One of us drops fur all over the carpet and farts continually – and the dog's even worse. Houses always look good when nobody is in them. That's my wife's way of thinking. 'Nobody wants to look around a house when there's a lardy lummox lying on the sofa watching re-runs of Impossible.' I'll let you know when I'm allowed back in. I HAVE no idea where Tommy Robinson is. He has supposedly fled the country after allegedly punching a bloke at a Tube station. I have no idea if that's what he did. And still less about whatever it was that may have provoked him. But consider this. What chance do you think Robinson stood of a fair trial, for whatever he did or didn't do? They'd throw away the key, wouldn't they? WHAT proportion of muggings in London do you suppose are solved by the Old Bill? The answer is five per cent – or one in 20. Muggings are a serious crime. They make people afraid to go out of their homes. And muggers are encouraged because 95 per cent of them are going to get away with it. Don't you think it's time the Met Police started taking its duties seriously? And focused on solving serious crime? Instead of being obsessed with what people say to each other on social media?
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Scots MP branded 'despicable' over sickening insult to Israeli hostages in Gaza
A Scottish MP has been condemned for 'despicable' comments justifying Hamas holding innocent Israelis hostage as it's 'the only bargaining power' the terror group has left. Angus MacDonald provoked outrage after claiming if the terror group released the hostages they seized in 2023 then Israel would 'obliterate' Palestine. The Liberal Democrats are now facing calls to suspend the MP for his 'vile moral bankruptcy' about the innocent victims of Hamas. Anti-Semitism campaigners joined political opponents in condemning the remarks, made in response to one of his constituents on social media site Facebook. Mr MacDonald, who represents Inverness, Skye and West Ross-shire, last night refused to issue an apology to the families of innocent Israeli hostages and the Scottish Lib Dems defended the comments and claimed he was not justifying or defending hostage-taking. Sammy Stein, chairman of the Glasgow Friends of Israel group, said: 'I believe it is particularly despicable of Angus MacDonald MP to defend the right of Hamas, an internationally proscribed terrorist organisation, to kidnap and hold innocent Israelis, including women, kids, babies and the elderly, most of whom were kidnapped from their homes on October 7 MacDonald 'There is absolutely no doubt that if Hamas released the hostages, the fighting would stop. MacDonald is delusional if he believes that continuing to hold them would persuade Israel to agree to a ceasefire. 'As long as the fighting continues, more innocent civilians are likely to be killed. The reason Hamas is not releasing the hostages is that they want to see more civilians killed, thus provoking more criticism from the world against Israel. 'I would like to think that most reasonable and thoughtful people will see him for the fool he is.' Mr MacDonald, who was elected for the first time in last year's general election, had initially posted on Facebook about his support for the UK recognising Palestine as a separate state. When asked by one of his constituents, Facebook user Billy Rodgers, if he had written to Hamas to ask them to release the remaining hostages, Mr MacDonald replied: 'If they release the hostages then Israel will completely obliterate any of Palestine left, it's the only bargaining power they have left.' Mr Rodgers replied: 'So you support the use of hostages taking as a legitimate strategy. I know who I won't be voting for in the next election to serve as my local MP.' A spokesman for the Campaign Against Antisemitisim said: 'To refer to hostages as a 'bargaining chip' is vile moral bankruptcy. 'These are innocent human beings who were violently abducted amid the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. They have been held in inhumane, terrifying conditions for nearly two years. 'Dehumanising them in this way not only erases their suffering but also plays directly into the hands of their captors, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. The Liberal Democrats must suspend Angus MacDonald pending a full investigation.' Jamie Halcro Johnston, Conservative MSP for the Highlands and Islands region, said: 'It is astonishing and deplorable that Angus MacDonald is apparently trying to justify Hamas terrorists continuing to hold innocent Israelis hostage nearly two years on from the barbaric October 7 attack. 'His comments are not just grossly offensive, they're naïve. 'We all want to see an end to the awful scenes in the Middle East, particularly the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Gaza - and the release of all remaining hostages would strengthen the hand of international leaders in pushing for a permanent ceasefire.' The comments remained on Facebook last night after Mr MacDonald and the Scottish Liberal Democrats were approached by the Mail about them and he was asked whether he would apologise to the families of Israeli hostages. A Scottish Liberal Democrat spokesman said: 'Angus wasn't defending or justifying hostage taking - he was describing the widely accepted view that Hamas is very regrettably using the hostages as leverage against Israel. 'Angus and the Scottish Liberal Democrats have been completely clear that Hamas should release the hostages immediately and unconditionally - and that there is no place for the terror group in the future of Gaza. 'Angus has used his position as an MP to campaign for the release of the hostages, and has made clear, on the parliamentary record, his disgust at Hamas's treatment of the hostages.'
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Gesture politics will not end Gaza's agony
No country is more acutely aware of its history than Israel. And for good reason. Created as a permanent Jewish homeland after the horrors of the Nazi holocaust, it has constantly had to fight for survival against belligerent Arab neighbours. In 1948, 1967 and 1973, those neighbours tried to destroy it. They failed, but ever since there have been countless terrorist outrages and rocket attacks on Israeli civilians, many carried out by militant groups directed and funded by Iran. The UK has always sympathised with Israel's existential struggle and staunchly backed its right to self-defence. Until now. Sir Keir Starmer 's announcement that Britain will recognise Palestine as a sovereign state unless Israel 'ends the suffering in Gaza ' seriously undermines the Jewish state and gives succour to terrorists. The PM wants to put pressure on Israel to stop bombarding Gaza and commit to a future two-state solution. But how can there be a lasting ceasefire while Hamas is still holding up to 50 Israeli hostages? Their unconditional release – or return of their bodies – must surely come before any discussion of statehood. And what does a two-state solution mean in practice? What would be the boundaries of this new Palestinian state? What would prevent it being ruled by Islamist extremists like Hamas? What safeguards would Israel have against being attacked by it? None of this detail is addressed by Sir Keir. Released hostage Ilana Gritzewsky with photos of her boyfriend, Matan Zangauker, who is being held hostage by Hamas in the Gaza Strip The assumption is that Israel should retreat to its pre-1967 borders, giving up Gaza and the West Bank. But this ignores both history and present-day reality. Israel occupied these areas after the Six-Day War, because they are of vital strategic importance and could provide a launchpad for further enemy attacks. Handing them over to a potentially hostile government would still be a very real threat to Israeli national security. Furthermore, 600,000 Jewish settlers live in the West Bank, some of whom have been there more than half a century. Should they all be evicted? And if so, where to? Then there is East Jerusalem, also occupied in 1967 and housing the Old City and the Wailing Wall, Judaism's holiest site. It had previously been annexed (illegally) by Jordan, which expelled Jews, destroyed synagogues and restricted access to the holy places. What is to stop similar human rights abuses happening again? There are still 28 UN countries that don't even recognise Israel's right to exist. Like Hamas and Hezbollah, they favour a one-state solution – with no Jews. No one could fail to be moved by the plight of Gazans since Hamas launched its blitzkrieg of rape, slaughter and abduction on October 7, 2023. Israel has retaliated with extreme force – many would say too extreme – in its bid to eliminate the terror threat and free the remaining hostages. But recognising Palestinian statehood will do nothing to alleviate Gaza's agony. Indeed, it could prolong it, emboldening militants to carry on the struggle. It's obvious Sir Keir made this announcement to appease the large anti-Zionist faction within his party. In doing so he has alienated the only democracy in the Middle East, rewarded terrorism and made British Jews feel less safe. It's gesture politics of the most desperate kind from a Prime Minister who is clearly losing control of his party. Instead of showing courage and leadership, he has cravenly abandoned a longstanding ally in time of need.
