Allahabad HC upholds Naima Khatoon's posting as AMU V-C
The Allahabad High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging Prof. Naima Khatoon's appointment as the Vice-Chancellor of Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) on Saturday. The Division Bench comprising Justices Ashwani Kumar Mishra and Donadi Ramesh upheld that the procedure laid down in the AMU Act, statutes, and regulations was duly followed.
In one of the petitions, petitioner Prof. Mujahid Beg had alleged irregularities in the appointment process, which favoured a particular candidate.
The HC acknowledged that while Prof. Khatoon's husband, Prof. Mohd. Gulrez, had chaired meetings of the Executive Council and the University Court as acting Vice-Chancellor, his role was limited and did not vitiate the multilayered, democratic process of selection.
According to a press statement released by the university, the HC recognised that the final discretion to appoint the V-C was with the visitor of the University — the President of India — and no allegations of malafide were established at that level. The judgment emphasised that Prof. Khatoon's merit and qualifications were undisputed and her appointment, as approved by the highest constitutional authority, deserves respect and recognition.
Prof. Khatoon made history in April 2024 by becoming the first woman appointed as the Vice-Chancellor in the university's 100-plus-year history. She described the verdict as 'not just a personal vindication' but a strong reaffirmation of institutional processes and democratic values in the higher education system. 'Let this judgment inspire confidence among all stakeholders and reaffirm our shared mission to uphold the university's legacy of knowledge, justice, and progress,' she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
3 hours ago
- Hans India
Allahabad HC grants interim anticipatory bail to Lucknow University prof booked over post on Pahalgam attack
The Allahabad High Court on Monday granted interim anticipatory bail to Dr Madri Kakoti, an Assistant Professor in the Linguistics Department of Lucknow University, who was booked by the Uttar Pradesh Police for her social media post reportedly concerning the deadly terror Pahalgam attack. KaKoti approached the Allahabad High Court after a court in Lucknow rejected her anticipatory bail plea in connection with the FIR registered against her under Sections 197(1), 353 (2), 196(1) (a) 352, 302, 152 of the Bhartiya Nyay Samhita (B.N.S) and Section 69A of the I.T. Act. She apprehended her arrest for the reason that an offence invoked in the FIR by the police is cognizable and is punishable up to life imprisonment, and the police are making every endeavour to arrest the applicant in the instant case. In her anticipatory bail plea, Kakoti contended that although the offence was registered on the basis of an alleged online post, the same has not even been mentioned or reproduced in the FIR, adding that the omission raised "serious questions about the legality and fairness of the registration of the FIR". "The FIR fails to mention even a single actual quote or post, despite the allegation resting entirely on the applicant's digital expressions," said Kakoti's plea. In her tweet, Kakoti allegedly said: "Shooting someone after asking about their religion is terrorism. Lynching someone after asking about their religion, firing them from their job after asking about their religion, not giving them a house after asking about their religion, bulldozing a house after asking about their religion, etc. is also terrorism. Recognize the real terrorist." The complainant, an office bearer of the RSS-affiliated Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), alleged that the varsity professor, through her social media account (@ms_medusssa), made anti-national and communally inflammatory remarks following the terrorist incident in J&K's Pahalgam.
New Indian Express
4 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Mahakumbh stampede: Allahabad HC slams UP government over delayed compensation; seeks full report
LUCKNOW: The Allahabad High Court has strongly criticised the Uttar Pradesh government for not extending compensation to the families of those who died in the Mahakumbh stampede on January 29, 2025. While hearing a petition on Saturday, the vacation bench of Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Justice Sandeep Jain said the government's attitude was 'unstable' and 'indifferent to the suffering of citizens.' The judges were responding to a petition filed by Uday Pratap Singh. The court asked the state government to submit full details of the deaths, injured patients, and medical staff involved in the treatment of stampede victims. It also ordered the government to explain what steps were taken to compensate the victim families. The court reminded the state government that it worked as a trustee of the people and must show sensitivity in such cases. It said the government should be more responsible and transparent in helping the victims and their families. It may be recalled that the stampede had taken place just around midnight on January 29, ahead of the Amrit Snan of Mauni Amavasya. The state government admitted that 30 people died and had announced a compensation of Rs 25 lakh each to the dependents of the deceased. However, the compensation has still not been given to the affected families.
New Indian Express
5 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Allahabad HC grants bail to Lucknow University professor over her remarks on Pahalgam attack
LUCKNOW: The Allahabad High Court on Monday granted interim anticipatory bail to Madri Kakoti, an assistant professor in the linguistics department of Lucknow University over her remarks on the Pahalgam terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir. A single judge bench, of Justice Rajeev Singh, granted relief to Kakoti in the FIR filed against her at the Hasanganj police station in Lucknow based on a complaint by Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) leader Jatin Shukla in April, this year. In his complaint, Shukla accused Kakoti of targeting India's unity, integrity, and sovereignty through posts on her X (formerly Twitter) handle. He in his complaint alleged that Kakoti frequently used terms such as 'saffron terrorists' on her platforms and added that some of her posts had reportedly been shared by Pakistani media channels. Kakoti was subsequently booked for several offences, including endangering the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India. The April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam claimed 26 lives and left 17 others injured. In the wake of the attack, several states—including Assam—launched crackdowns on individuals accused of making statements perceived as pro-Pakistan.
