Allahabad HC upholds Naima Khatoon's posting as AMU V-C
The Allahabad High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging Prof. Naima Khatoon's appointment as the Vice-Chancellor of Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) on Saturday. The Division Bench comprising Justices Ashwani Kumar Mishra and Donadi Ramesh upheld that the procedure laid down in the AMU Act, statutes, and regulations was duly followed.
In one of the petitions, petitioner Prof. Mujahid Beg had alleged irregularities in the appointment process, which favoured a particular candidate.
The HC acknowledged that while Prof. Khatoon's husband, Prof. Mohd. Gulrez, had chaired meetings of the Executive Council and the University Court as acting Vice-Chancellor, his role was limited and did not vitiate the multilayered, democratic process of selection.
According to a press statement released by the university, the HC recognised that the final discretion to appoint the V-C was with the visitor of the University — the President of India — and no allegations of malafide were established at that level. The judgment emphasised that Prof. Khatoon's merit and qualifications were undisputed and her appointment, as approved by the highest constitutional authority, deserves respect and recognition.
Prof. Khatoon made history in April 2024 by becoming the first woman appointed as the Vice-Chancellor in the university's 100-plus-year history. She described the verdict as 'not just a personal vindication' but a strong reaffirmation of institutional processes and democratic values in the higher education system. 'Let this judgment inspire confidence among all stakeholders and reaffirm our shared mission to uphold the university's legacy of knowledge, justice, and progress,' she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
6 hours ago
- Economic Times
Bengaluru Stampede Case: HC permits Govt to submit status report in sealed cover, posts hearing to June 12
The Karnataka High Court allowed the state government to submit a sealed status report regarding the Chinnaswamy stadium stampede. This decision came amidst concerns that public disclosure could influence the judicial inquiry and bail hearings. The court will hear the case on June 12. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday permitted the state government to submit a status report into the June 4 stampede outside Chinnaswamy stadium in Bengaluru in a sealed cover accepting a request from the government that making its content public might influence judicial enquiry as well as the ongoing hearing on the bail petitions.A division bench of acting chief justice V Kameshwar Rao and Justice CM Joshi will now hear the case on June 12, Thursday. The HC has taken up suo motu cognizance of the ghastly stampede caused during the RCB's victory celebrations after winning the 2025 IPL final that led to an unprecedented stampede killing 11 people and injuring scores of others. Quite a few public-spirited people have moved the high court seeking justice in the Shashi Kiran Shetty, appearing for the government, mentioned the likelihood of the persons arrested in connection with the case using the status report in the bail petitions, and its influence on the judicial SR Krishna Kumar at the high court posted for Wednesday the bail petition from RCB's marketing head Nikhil Sosale in connection with the stampede counsel questioned why his client, and three others associated with the DNA Entertainment Network, had been singled out in the case. The police, on June 6, arrested DNA Vice president Sunil Mathew, operations manager Kiran Kumar S and another employee Shamant NP Mavinakere along with Sosale. They have also challenged their counsel said the arrests were made only because Chief Minister Siddaramaiah ordered the arrests and not because the investigations required their arrest. Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty urged the court to hear the matter on Wednesday as he needed time to come back with a response.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Bengaluru Stampede Case: HC permits Govt to submit status report in sealed cover, posts hearing to June 12
The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday permitted the state government to submit a status report into the June 4 stampede outside Chinnaswamy stadium in Bengaluru in a sealed cover accepting a request from the government that making its content public might influence judicial enquiry as well as the ongoing hearing on the bail petitions. A division bench of acting chief justice V Kameshwar Rao and Justice CM Joshi will now hear the case on June 12, Thursday. The HC has taken up suo motu cognizance of the ghastly stampede caused during the RCB's victory celebrations after winning the 2025 IPL final that led to an unprecedented stampede killing 11 people and injuring scores of others. Quite a few public-spirited people have moved the high court seeking justice in the case. AG Shashi Kiran Shetty, appearing for the government, mentioned the likelihood of the persons arrested in connection with the case using the status report in the bail petitions, and its influence on the judicial enquiry. BAIL PETITION Justice SR Krishna Kumar at the high court posted for Wednesday the bail petition from RCB's marketing head Nikhil Sosale in connection with the stampede case. His counsel questioned why his client, and three others associated with the DNA Entertainment Network, had been singled out in the case. The police, on June 6, arrested DNA Vice president Sunil Mathew, operations manager Kiran Kumar S and another employee Shamant NP Mavinakere along with Sosale. They have also challenged their arrest. Live Events Sosale's counsel said the arrests were made only because Chief Minister Siddaramaiah ordered the arrests and not because the investigations required their arrest. Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty urged the court to hear the matter on Wednesday as he needed time to come back with a response.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
In Bahraich, Adityanath slams 'glorification' of Salar Masood
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on Tuesday opposed the glorification of Salar Masood , revered as a warrior-saint from 11th century, saying the punishment given to the "foreign invader" after being captured "guaranteed him a place in hell according to Islam". He was speaking on the occasion of the inauguration of a statue of Maharaja Suheldev and the launching of 384 development projects worth Rs 1,243 crore in Bahraich . Maharaja Suheldev, an icon of the Rajbhar community, had defeated and killed Ghaznavid general Ghazi Saiyyad Salar Masood in a battle on the banks of the Chittora Lake in Bahraich in 1033 AD. "I had said on the soil of Bahraich that glorification of foreign invaders should be stopped and that the national heroes must be honoured. And 1,000 years ago, such a tale of courage and bravery was written by Maharaja Suheldev on this very soil of Bahraich," he said. Adityanath said that it was Prime Minister Narendra Modi 's instruction that national heroes should be honoured. Live Events "History may have done injustice to him (Maharaja Suheldev), but this double-engine government will not allow it," he said. Referring to the battle in Chittora, Adityanath said, "To stop the barbaric foreign invader who moved from Ghazni along with his 3-lakh-strong army to loot India, Maharaja Suheldev led the resistance from Mathura to Bahraich... By the time the invader reached (here), half of his army had already perished." "When he (Masood) reached Chittora, Maharaja Suheldev had 20,000 to 25,000 bravehearts while there were 1.5 lakh warriors with Salar Masood. "But, these 20,000 to 25,000 bravehearts killed them ruthlessly. Evil Salar Masood was caught alive and he was given such punishment that it guaranteed him a place in hell according to Islam ('Dusht Salar Masood yehaan zindaa pakra liya gayaa, aur ussko sazaa bhi aisee hui ki jo Islam ke anusaar jahannum mein jaane kee guarantee deta hai')." The remarks come in the backdrop of the controversy over the Bahraich district administration denying permission for the annual 'Jeth Mela', which was traditionally held at the dargah of Salar Masood from May 15 to June 15 and drew lakhs of pilgrims. In an official statement, the administration on May 3 cited the prevailing atmosphere of public anger following incidents like the Pahalgam attack and Sambhal violence and concerns surrounding the amended Waqf Act as the reasons. The Allahabad High Court had on May 17 declined to grant permission for organising the annual fair at the dargah. However, in its order, the court's Lucknow bench allowed rituals and other related routine activities at the dargah. "There should be no events in the name of foreign invaders... If the main event of Bahraich is organised, it will be in the name of Maharaja Suheldev ji, it will be in the name of Balark Rishi, it will be in the name of Adishakti Maa Pateshwari Devi," Adityanath said on Tuesday. Attacking the previous governments led by the Samajwadi Party and others, the chief minister questioned why Suheldev was "not honoured" after independence. "They were afraid to anger their Muslim vote bank and were worried that their appeasement politics would fail. That is why they did not speak a word against the foreign invaders," Adityanath said. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
