logo
A fight over marijuana ads in Mississippi hits the Supreme Court

A fight over marijuana ads in Mississippi hits the Supreme Court

USA Today05-05-2025

A fight over marijuana ads in Mississippi hits the Supreme Court The high court declined to take up a challenge to Mississippi's near-total ban on advertising medical marijuana.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Feds move to reclassify marijuana
On Thursday, the U.S. Justice Department formally moved to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug.
Fox - 10 Phoenix
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a challenge to Mississippi's near-total restriction on the advertising of medical marijuana.
Mississippi voters overwhelmingly approved medical marijuana in 2020, but the state tightly controls how the product can be promoted.
The owner of a cannabis dispensary argued that violates his free speech rights.
Clarence Cocroft, owner of Tru Source Medical Cannabis, wants to advertise on four billboards he owns. Advertising is needed, he said, because his dispensary is tucked away in an industrial park where people aren't likely to see it.
'If a business is legal, then the business owner has a First Amendment right to speak truthfully about his or her business,' Ari Bargil, an attorney with the Institute for Justice which represents Cocroft, said in a statement.
The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said no constitutional right exists because marijuana is still illegal under federal law.
The Biden administration moved to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug, but that effort has stalled. Even if the change goes through, it would still be a controlled substance and the federal government would need to decide when marijuana could be prescribed for medical purposes.
But only a handful of states have a complete prohibition on marijuana. And for years, the federal government has had various rules about not challenging state's more permissive laws.
That puts many dispensaries 'in First Amendment limbo,' Bargil argued.
Mississippi, which waived its right to respond to Cocroft's request that the Supreme Court hear his appeal, doesn't allow marijuana to be advertised through billboards, newspapers, television, social media or email lists.
Arkansas and Alabama likewise have similar restrictions, according to the Institute for Justice.
'An outright ban on all medical cannabis advertising,' said Katrin Marquez, another Institute for Justice attorney, 'serves no legitimate public purpose.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Canada's WSP Global to acquire UK's Ricardo for $490 million
Canada's WSP Global to acquire UK's Ricardo for $490 million

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Canada's WSP Global to acquire UK's Ricardo for $490 million

(Reuters) -Canada-based WSP Global said on Wednesday that it would acquire British environmental and engineering consulting firm Ricardo for about 363.1 million pounds ($489.6 million) including debt. Under the deal, Ricardo shareholders will receive 430 pence in cash per share, a 28.4% premium to its closing price on June 10. The British company had been under pressure from rival and investor Science Group , who had been pushing for a sale or breakup of Ricardo amid calls to oust Chairman Mark Clare and other directors, citing underperformance and structural inefficiencies. Science Group, Ricardo's second-largest investor with a 21.76% stake according to LSEG data, said on Wednesday it would sell a 20% stake to WSP for about 53.5 million pounds. ($1 = 0.7417 pounds) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Qantas shutters Jetstar Asia, blaming costs and competition
Qantas shutters Jetstar Asia, blaming costs and competition

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Qantas shutters Jetstar Asia, blaming costs and competition

STORY: Australia's Qantas is shutting down its Singapore-based budget airline, Jetstar Asia. That will mean up to 500 job losses, and see the carrier's fleet of Airbus jets redeployed to Australia and New Zealand. Qantas said Wednesday that rising costs and mounting competition had driven the move. Since the end of the pandemic, budget rivals like AirAsia and Scoot have ramped up services. That has driven competition up, and airfares down. Jetstar Group Chief Executive Stephanie Tully says Singapore's Changi Airport has also become a very expensive place to run an airline. It's been steadily raising charges to pay for investment. Tully says costs there have soared for fuel, airport fees, ground handling and security. She said Jetstar Asia had only been profitable in six of its 20 years, and was on track for another deficit this year. Now the airline will be shuttered at the end of July, with customers offered refunds or rebooking on other carriers where possible. The shutdown does not affect Qantas's other budget units - Jetstar Airways and Jetstar Japan. Shares in Qantas were down around 1.5% in afternoon trade following Wednesday's news. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments in Trump's bid to erase his hush money conviction

time35 minutes ago

A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments in Trump's bid to erase his hush money conviction

NEW YORK -- President Donald Trump's quest to erase his criminal conviction heads to a federal appeals court Wednesday. It's one way he's trying to get last year's hush money verdict overturned. A three-judge panel is set to hear arguments in Trump's long-running fight to get the New York case moved from state court to federal court, where he could then try to have the verdict thrown out on presidential immunity grounds. The Republican is asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene after a lower-court judge twice rejected the move. As part of the request, Trump wants the federal appeals court to seize control of the criminal case and then ultimately decide his appeal of the verdict, which is now pending in a state appellate court. The 2nd Circuit should 'determine once and for all that this unprecedented criminal prosecution of a former and current President of the United States belongs in federal court," Trump's lawyers wrote in a court filing. The Manhattan district attorney's office, which prosecuted Trump's case, wants it to stay in state court. Trump's Justice Department — now partly run by his former criminal defense lawyers — backs his bid to move the case to federal court. If Trump loses, he could go to the U.S. Supreme Court. Trump was convicted in May 2024 of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to conceal a hush money payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels, whose affair allegations threatened to upend his 2016 presidential campaign. Trump denies her claim and said he did nothing wrong. It was the only one of his four criminal cases to go to trial. Trump's lawyers first sought to move the case to federal court following his March 2023 indictment, arguing that federal officers including former presidents have the right to be tried in federal court for charges arising from 'conduct performed while in office.' Part of the criminal case involved checks he wrote while he was president. They tried again after his conviction, arguing that Trump's historic prosecution violated his constitutional rights and ran afoul of the Supreme Court's presidential immunity ruling, which was decided about a month after the hush money trial ended. The ruling reins in prosecutions of ex-presidents for official acts and restricts prosecutors in pointing to official acts as evidence that a president's unofficial actions were illegal. U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein denied both requests, ruling in part that Trump's conviction involved his personal life, not his work as president. In a four-page ruling, Hellerstein wrote that nothing about the high court's ruling affected his prior conclusion that hush money payments at issue in Trump's case 'were private, unofficial acts, outside the bounds of executive authority.' Trump's lawyers argue that prosecutors rushed to trial instead of waiting for the Supreme Court's presidential immunity decision, and that prosecutors erred by showing jurors evidence that should not have been allowed under the ruling, such as former White House staffers describing how Trump reacted to news coverage of the hush money deal and tweets he sent while president in 2018. Trump's former criminal defense lawyer Todd Blanche is now the deputy U.S. attorney general, the Justice Department's second-in-command. Another of his lawyers, Emil Bove, has a high-ranking Justice Department position. The trial judge, Juan M. Merchan, rejected Trump's requests to throw out the conviction on presidential immunity grounds and sentenced him on Jan. 10 to an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction intact but sparing him any punishment. Appearing by video at his sentencing, Trump called the case a 'political witch hunt,' 'a weaponization of government' and 'an embarrassment to New York.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store