Netanyahu Drops Nominee for Spy Chief After Backlash
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel backed away from his nominee for the head of Israel's domestic intelligence service on Tuesday after conservative allies attacked him for criticizing President Trump and Israeli media reported that he had protested judicial overhauls pushed by Mr. Netanyahu's government.
Mr. Netanyahu had backed Eli Sharvit, a former commander of Israel's navy, to lead the Shin Bet intelligence agency after he dismissed his predecessor, Ronen Bar, a decision that prompted protests. But the Israeli leader dropped Mr. Sharvit a day after the Monday announcement after a backlash from the right, partly because he had written a column two months ago criticizing Mr. Trump for rolling back policies to fight climate change.
Mr. Netanyahu's office said that he had met with Mr. Sharvit to inform him that he would pursue other candidates for the job, without specifying a reason. As the country's domestic security agency, The Shin Bet plays a key role in the war in Gaza and Israel's decades-long occupation of the West Bank.
Mr. Netanyahu removed Mr. Bar from the post last month, saying he could no longer trust him. Critics called the move an attempt by Mr. Netanyahu to purge dissenting views from the top ranks of Israel's security establishment and the decision prompted protests.
Under Mr. Bar's direction, the Shin Bet has been involved in investigating some of Mr. Netanyahu's aides' ties with Qatar. Israel's Supreme Court is scheduled to hear petitions against Mr. Bar's removal by next week, and Israeli legal experts say it may reverse Mr. Netanyahu's decision.
Mr. Netanyahu's left-wing and centrist opponents had feared that he would try to tighten his grip over the agency by appointing a close adviser. But many hailed Mr. Sharvit, who retired from the military in 2021, as an experienced and capable soldier.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
17 minutes ago
- New York Times
Why Israel May Be Considering an Attack on Iran
Israel has long envisioned a military attack on Iran's nuclear enrichment sites in an attempt to halt what it considers an existential threat. But any such military strike would risk igniting a major conflict that could draw in the United States. Many in the Middle East are now wondering whether that moment has arrived, as tensions between the two countries rise. On Wednesday, The New York Times reported that officials in the United States and Europe believed that Israel seemed to be gearing up for a potential strike, even as Trump administration is seeking a deal with Tehran to curb its nuclear program. The following day, the International Atomic Energy Agency declared that Iran was not complying with its nuclear nonproliferation obligations — the first such censure in two decades. It is unclear how extensive an attack Israel is considering. But the United States has withdrawn diplomats from the region over concerns about the attack and any Iranian retaliation. Many experts say Israel would struggle to destroy Iran's main nuclear facilities without American military support. And it is unclear if the heightened tensions were the result of saber-rattling as both sides seek leverage in the negotiations. Here's what we know. Why might Israel attack now? Iran's nuclear program has advanced considerably over the past decade, analysts say. Iran is on the brink of being able to manufacture enough nuclear material to fuel 10 nuclear weapons, although producing a usable bomb would likely take many more months. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Israel considering striking Iran — without US support — after nuclear talks stall: report
Israel is reportedly considering striking Iran in the coming days — without US support — after high-stakes nuclear negotiations between Washington and Tehran appeared to have stalled. The Jewish state is weighing whether to take military action even as the Trump administration awaits a formal response from Iran to its proposed framework for a nuclear deal, NBC reported Thursday, citing multiple sources. Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps commander Hossein Salami warned that any retaliation to any Israeli aggression would be 'more forceful and destructive' than in past offensives. Advertisement 3 Iranian demonstrators burn a representation of the Israeli flag. AP 3 Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressing assembly. Israel is reportedly considering striking Iran in the coming days. AFP via Getty Images The country's President Masoud Pezeshkian vowed, too, that Iran would rebuild its nuclear facilities if they are eliminated by the Israelis. 3 Israel is reportedly considering the strikes against Iran without the support from the US. Shutterstock Advertisement 'It is not the case that if they destroy our facilities with bombs, everything will be lost,' Pezeshkian told state media. 'These capabilities exist in our minds, and therefore, whatever they do, we will rebuild again.' With Post wires
New York Times
21 minutes ago
- New York Times
How the 2020 George Floyd Protests Are Haunting Democrats in 2025
Five years ago, as grief and anger over George Floyd's murder ignited national protests, top Democrats joined the demonstrations, called for cutting police budgets and, in a ham-fisted effort at solidarity, even knelt in kente cloth at the Capitol. Now, as President Trump spoils for a fight by sending unwanted troops to Los Angeles to stamp out protests and help with immigration raids, Democrats scarred by recent elections have a starkly different message for demonstrators: Don't play into his hands. Five years after the 2020 racial justice movement prompted a wave of cultural changes and then an enduring political backlash, many Democrats are signaling that they now recognize how skillful Republicans can be in using scenes of unrest — whether limited or widespread, accurate or not — to cast liberal lawmakers as tolerant of lawlessness. 'Many of the 2020 protests played out in ways that Democrats did not see and they did not foresee,' said former Senator Doug Jones of Alabama, a Democrat who lost his re-election bid that year. At the time, he said, some did not grasp that 'once you got to a certain critical mass of protesters, that some bad things were going to happen.' 'I think they do now,' said Mr. Jones, who stressed that Mr. Trump was needlessly escalating tensions. 'I also think that they appreciate the fact that any violence is one, is uncalled-for, it needs to be prosecuted. But it's also playing into the narrative of Donald Trump.' So far, the demonstrations now — relatively small, scattered and generally peaceful — bear little resemblance to the mass protests of 2020, which in some cases devolved into destructive riots. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
