Netanyahu Drops Nominee for Spy Chief After Backlash
Mr. Netanyahu had backed Eli Sharvit, a former commander of Israel's navy, to lead the Shin Bet intelligence agency after he dismissed his predecessor, Ronen Bar, a decision that prompted protests. But the Israeli leader dropped Mr. Sharvit a day after the Monday announcement after a backlash from the right, partly because he had written a column two months ago criticizing Mr. Trump for rolling back policies to fight climate change.
Mr. Netanyahu's office said that he had met with Mr. Sharvit to inform him that he would pursue other candidates for the job, without specifying a reason. As the country's domestic security agency, The Shin Bet plays a key role in the war in Gaza and Israel's decades-long occupation of the West Bank.
Mr. Netanyahu removed Mr. Bar from the post last month, saying he could no longer trust him. Critics called the move an attempt by Mr. Netanyahu to purge dissenting views from the top ranks of Israel's security establishment and the decision prompted protests.
Under Mr. Bar's direction, the Shin Bet has been involved in investigating some of Mr. Netanyahu's aides' ties with Qatar. Israel's Supreme Court is scheduled to hear petitions against Mr. Bar's removal by next week, and Israeli legal experts say it may reverse Mr. Netanyahu's decision.
Mr. Netanyahu's left-wing and centrist opponents had feared that he would try to tighten his grip over the agency by appointing a close adviser. But many hailed Mr. Sharvit, who retired from the military in 2021, as an experienced and capable soldier.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Thanks to Gaza, It's Now Kosher to Criticize Israel
A demonstrator displays her hands painted in red to depict blood during an anti-government protest outside the Israeli Ministry of Defense headquarters in Tel Aviv on Aug. 2, 2025. | Jack Guez/AFP via Getty Images Daniel W. Drezner is academic dean and distinguished professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. He is the author of Drezner's World . Earlier this month I attended an open town hall for my congressman, Jake Auchincloss of Massachusetts. Since he's a moderate Democrat in a district that has been reliably Democrat for some time now, I expected that the bulk of the questions Auchincloss would receive would be variations of 'Why aren't you fighting Trump harder?' Indeed, Auchincloss' opening remarks were typical Democratic talking points including defending the Constitution, reinvigorating the Democratic Party and getting America talking again. While some constituent questions revolved around those topics as well, they were not the primary subject. The most common question from one of the most heavily Jewish congressional districts in the country was some variation of, 'What are you going to do about the starvation in Gaza?' Auchincloss is not the only representative to face angry questions about Gaza at his town halls. Furthermore, the responses to Auchincloss' stilted, minimalist answers (starvation is bad; being pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian should not be mutually contradictory; Hamas has a singular responsibility to end the conflict) indicated that while there were some supporters of the current Israeli government in the audience, they were badly outnumbered by critics of Israel — and U.S. support for Israel.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Arab, Islamic countries condemn Netanyahu's ‘Greater Israel' remark
A coalition of Arab and Muslim nations has condemned 'in the strongest terms' statements made by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu regarding his vision for a 'Greater Israel'. When interviewer Sharon Gal with the Israeli i24NEWS channel asked Netanyahu if he subscribed to a 'vision' for a 'Greater Israel', Netanyahu said 'absolutely'. Asked during the interview aired on Tuesday if he felt connected to the 'Greater Israel' vision, Netanyahu said: 'Very much.' The 'Greater Israel' concept supported by ultranationalist Israelis is understood to refer to an expansionist vision that lays claim to the occupied West Bank, Gaza, parts of Lebanon, Syria, Egypt and Jordan. 'These statements represent a grave disregard for, and a blatant and dangerous violation of, the rules of international law and the foundations of stable international relations,' said a joint statement by a coalition of 31 Arab and Islamic countries and the Arab League. 'They also constitute a direct threat to Arab national security, to the sovereignty of states, and to regional and international peace and security,' the statement released on Friday said. The signatories of the statement included the secretaries-general of the League of Arab States, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation and the Gulf Cooperation Arab and Islamic nations also condemned Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich's announcement on Thursday to push ahead with settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank. The statement said the move is 'a blatant violation of international law and a flagrant assault on the inalienable right of the Palestinian people to realise their independent, sovereign state on the lines of June 4, 1967, with Occupied Jerusalem as its capital'. The statement added that Israel has no sovereignty over occupied Palestinian territory. Smotrich said he would approve thousands of housing units in a long-delayed illegal settlement project in the West Bank, saying the move 'buries the idea of a Palestinian state'. Last September, the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) overwhelmingly adopted a resolution calling on Israel to end its illegal occupation of the Palestinian territories within 12 months. The resolution backed an advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) – the UN's top court – which found that Israel's presence in the Palestinian territories is unlawful and must end. In January 2024, the ICJ said Israel was 'plausibly committing genocide'. The top UN court has yet to announce its verdict in the case brought by South and Smotrich made the remarks during Israel's devastating 22-month war on Gaza, which has killed at least 61,827 people and wounded 155,275 people in the enclave. Last week, Israel's Security Cabinet approved Netanyahu's plan to fully occupy Gaza City, and in Tuesday's interview, Netanyahu also revived calls to 'allow' Palestinians to leave Gaza, telling i24NEWS: 'We are not pushing them out, but we are allowing them to leave.' Campaigners said Netanyahu's use of the word 'leave' was a euphemism for the ethnic cleansing of Gaza – home to 2.1 million people, most of whom are refugees and their descendants from the 1948 Nakba when more than 700,000 Palestinians were forced to flee from what became the state of Israel. Past calls to resettle people from Gaza outside the war-battered territory, including from United States President Donald Trump, have sparked fears of forced displacement among Palestinians and condemnation from the international community. In their statement on Saturday, the Islamic countries reiterated their 'rejection and condemnation of Israel's crimes of aggression, genocide, and ethnic cleansing' in Gaza and highlighted the need for a ceasefire in the enclave while 'ensuring unconditional access to humanitarian aid to halt the systematic starvation policy used by Israel as a weapon of genocide'. They also reaffirmed their 'complete and absolute rejection of the displacement of the Palestinian people in any form and under any pretext' and called on the international community to pressure Israel to halt its aggression and fully withdraw from the Gaza Strip. Solve the daily Crossword
Epoch Times
4 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Raising Costs to Nuclear Proliferators
Israeli and U.S. military strikes in June have raised the cost to Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons. Proliferators must now weigh military risks along with political and financial costs. Iran may be a special case; it has invested so much that it may try to restart its nuclear arms effort. Other potential nuclear rogues may be more deterred.
