HC dismisses plea for stay on merger of primary schools in Uttar Pradesh
A guardian on behalf of 51 students from Sitapur moved the high court against the merger, saying it violated their right to free and compulsory education. The petitioner said the merger will cause difficulties for those who will now have to travel farther to their new schools.
Additional advocate general Anuj Kudesia and chief standing counsel Shailendra Kumar Singh, who appeared for the government, justified the move saying some primary schools had zero and others less than 15 students.
The government said the merger of schools was in the larger interest of students. It added that there will better scope for students relocated from a school having a few pupils to one having 300 of them.
Senior advocate LP Mishra, who represented the petitioner, argued that the state government's June 16 order for the merger violated Article 21A of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to free and compulsory education for children aged 6 to 14 and a school within one km for a village with a population of 300.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
35 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Allahabad HC dismisses pleas challenging govt order on merger of primary schools
The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court on Monday dismissed petitions challenging a state government order that directed steps to be taken for the merger of government primary schools. The court had clubbed two petitions filed over the issue and reserved its order on Friday after completion of arguments. The petitions were filed against the government's June 16 order, issued by the Additional Chief Secretary, Basic Shiksha Department, directing merger of government schools under the supervision and control of the basic shiksha adhikaris (BSAs). The petitioners had also challenged a June 24 follow-up order, issuing a list of 105 schools for the purpose of merger. 'It is essential to add a word with regard to the National Education Policy, 2020, which includes various issues including the pairing of the schools. The policy in itself is laudible and prescriptions have been given with regard to the steps to be taken to ensure that education is imparted at the initial level to all the citizens and the children of the country. There being no material to the contrary in respect of guidelines of pairing in the policy of 2020, which can be said to be arbitrary or in violation of Article 21A of the Constitution and finding the impugned Government Orders to be in furtherance of the said objective, no interference is called for. Present petitions lack merit and are accordingly dismissed,' read the judgment passed by Justice Pankaj Bhatia. The bench added, 'The obligation cast upon the State shall be scrupulously followed and the State is bound to ensure that no child is left out because of any action taken by the State. It will be the duty of the Basic Shiksha Adhikari to ensure that no child is left out for being educated and all steps as are necessary shall be taken as and when required in accordance with law.' In the order, the court observed that it was important to notice that the Central government had issued the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, prescribing various measures in the interest of students and for improving the infrastructure of primary schools. Various government orders have been issued, forming committees for implementation of the guidelines issued in the NEP 2020, the bench said. The court noted, 'Although not cited or argued by either of the parties, Rule 4(3) has some seminal importance as the local authority has been saddled with a responsibility of identifying a neighbourhood school where the children can be admitted and such information is to be made public; the school as referred would be a school as defined under Section 2(n) of the RTE Act, thus, on a conjoint reading of Rule 4(1), Rule 4(2) and Rule 4(3), what transpires is that it is the duty of the State Government to establish schools as far as practical at a distance which is closest to the habitation, and if the same is not possible, to ensure that the children are provided facilities such as transportation etc., and for identification of a school which may be available in the neighbourhood in case the State Government cannot establish school, which would also include school other than the school established by the Government as is the mandate of Section 2(n) read with Section 12 of the RTE Act. Any other interpretation of Rule 4(1) would do violation to the statutory rule keeping in view the considerations of a large State such as the State of Uttar Pradesh with regard to availability of land and other resources and keeping in view the fiscal health of the State concerned.' It added, 'Thus, on a complete analysis of Rule 4(1), Rule 4(2) & Rule 4(3) read conjointly, it is clear that the State Government is bound to establish school on the nearest possible place from a habitation and in the absence thereof, it is obliged to ensure transportation facilities etc., and in conjunction thereof identifying the neighbourhood schools, whether they are government schools or otherwise.'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Modi-Shah puppeteering CG to exploit resources: Kharge
1 2 3 Raipur: Launching a sharp attack on Union home minister Amit Shah and the BJP govt at centre and state, the All India Congress Committee president Mallikarjun Kharge said that Shah's repeated visits to the state are aimed at exploiting coal, forests and other resources. Kharge further accused the state's BJP govt of acting as a puppet of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Shah. He was addressing the 'Kisan, Jawan, Samvidhan' public rally at Raipur on Monday despite heavy rain. Criticising the centre's resource policy, Kharge said, "Why is Amit Shah visiting Chhattisgarh so often — is it his home? The CM here dances to their tunes. This is an insult to Chhattisgarh's self-respect. Shah is here not to meet people but to exploit our resources — coal, iron ore, forests." Kharge further accused the Modi-Shah of misusing central agencies like ED and the income tax department, "Our leaders, workers, even the CM were harassed. But the people of Chhattisgarh know the truth. No matter how many times Modi, Shah or their disciples come, Chhattisgarh will not bow before them," he thundered. Reminiscing about the Feb 2023 Maha Adhiveshan held in Raipur under his presidency, Kharge said, "You re-elected me as Congress President here, and from Raipur, our slogan of social justice echoed across the nation and shattered the arrogance of the Modi govt in 2024." He mocked BJP's '400 paar' claim, asking, "Where did it vanish?" and pointed out that the Modi govt is surviving only with the support of allies. "Modi is not running a majority govt; he is walking on two borrowed legs," he quipped. "Now they want to remove 'secularism' and 'socialism' from the Constitution... I dare them to delete it — the entire nation will rise in protest." Kharge emphasised. He added that the Congress govt protected people's and tribal rights but their schemes were shut by the BJP. He also accused the BJP govt of cheating youth and farmers. "Where are Modi's promises now? Rs 15 lakh in accounts, doubling MSP? Modi is the 'Jhutho ka Sardar' (King of Lies). He questioned the rising debt under BJP rule. "In 2024-25 alone, they borrowed thousands of crores. Is this for development or to advertise Modi and Shah?" Kharge criticised the expansion of liquor outlets in the state, and the unavailability of essential fertilisers like DAP and urea. Taking on Modi's silence on global and national issues, Kharge said, "He didn't attend all-party meetings, and hasn't visited Manipur even once while people are dying. Yet, he tours foreign nations." Referencing Trump's repeated claims about mediating India-Pakistan ceasefire issues, Kharge added, "PM Modi stayed silent even after Trump made those claims 16 times. That's shameful." He vowed to raise these issues in Parliament's monsoon session beginning July 21. Kharge also warned, "Modi sarkar (govt) is reducing voters in Bihar by 2 crore ahead of assembly elections. But their time is coming. If the country and Constitution are safe, only then are we safe."
United News of India
2 hours ago
- United News of India
SC to hear pleas against Bihar voter list revision on July 10
New Delhi, July 7 (UNI) The Supreme Court on Monday said it will consider on July 10 the pleas challenging the validity of the Election Commission's decision to conduct a comprehensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. A part-time working bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Joymalya Bagchi allowed the plea of senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the petitioners, for an urgent hearing in the matter, and said the court will consider the matter on Thursday. Assembly elections are due in Bihar in November. Before that, questions are being raised on the Election Commission's decision to carry out a special and thorough revision of the electoral rolls. Apart from various political parties, NGOs have been openly protesting citing practical difficulties, including the stipulated time for the revision. They say that this could deprive a large number of voters of their franchise. Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Mahua Moitra, Rashtriya Janata Dal MP Manoj Kumar Jha, NGOs - Association for Democratic Reforms, PUCL and social activist Yogendra Yadav, among others, have filed separate petitions in the apex court challenging the validity of the Election Commission's June 24, 2025 decision. The petitioners claimed that the move was in violation of provisions of Articles 14, 19, 21, 325 and 326 of the Constitution as well as Rule 21A of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 and Registration of Voters Rules, 1960. He argued that if this order was not set aside, millions of voters could be arbitrarily and without due process deprived of electing their representatives. This can disrupt free and fair elections and democracy in the country, which are part of the basic structure of the Constitution, he added. UNI GNK PRS
