
Was Swinney sincere in response to child poverty campaign?
The sincerity of politicians is always called into question when real life issues like child poverty are focused on.
For John Swinney, there was extra pressure. In taking up the office of First Minister almost a year ago, he made his central mission the eradication of child poverty.
At the outset of The Herald's series, we could not have foreseen how the Scottish Government would respond, particularly after the campaign element – calling for the Scottish Child Payment to be increased to £40 per week – was unveiled.
An open letter setting out this ask was sent to the First Minister on Tuesday evening, backed by 23 of the country's biggest anti-poverty charities or organisations.
Under 24 hours later, the First Minister had responded, committing to 'going further' in the effort to combat the devastating levels of child poverty in the country.
It cannot be understated how swift a response this was – and evidenced the First Minister wanted to engage on the issue.
Of course, the call to increase the Scottish Child Payment was not specifically addressed in Mr Swinney's letter but it is clear the door is open for a discussion.
I sat down with the First Minister in Bute House on Friday, hours before he made the trip to Rome for the funeral of Pope Francis - a pontiff known for his work in helping the poor.
There, I saw the First Minister in a way I had never seen him before.
When we spoke of the hardship facing families in Scotland, he was visibly moved. I distinctly remember thinking that this was the reaction families wanted to see.
Politicians often offer buzzwords and soundbites to the media as a way to get around the difficult questions. The First Minister is no different. He is a skilled politician with decades of experience.
Read more from Unspun:
Has John Swinney's special summit in Glasgow backfired?
Time for NHS Fife to admit defeat in Sandie Peggie row?
Waiting on EHRC guidance creates dangerous limbo for trans people
Scottish Government's new policy programme faces big challenges
And yet here he was, probably the sincerest I have ever seen him. The First Minister reflected on how his perception of poverty had changed over the years, from witnessing how it impacted his classmates, to meeting school children in his capacity as education secretary.
It can only be a positive to have a political leader willing to engage on the big issues.
But if his sincerity is to matter to the 23 charities that worked with The Herald to call for change, there must be action to follow it.
He has angered charities claiming any further increases from £27.15 per week, for each child, could remove the incentive for parents to work.
The Herald has also written to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, calling for the two-child benefit cap to be abolished.
Sir Keir has not yet responded to the calls and Scotland minister Kirsty McNeill was unable to find the time to speak to us this week on the issue.
In his letter to The Herald, Mr Swinney said eradicating child poverty should be an effort across the political spectrum – and with a Holyrood election just a year away, it's time to see how sincere politicians are willing to be on this.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South Wales Guardian
33 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Winter fuel U-turn should have come a long time ago, Reeves told
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said on Monday that nine million pensioners will be in receipt of the payment this year after a cut was announced in the first weeks of the Labour Government last summer. The initial decision was met with heavy backlash and forced the Scottish Government to delay the implementation of its own devolved benefit. John Swinney's administration later announced a similar payment for pensioners which would be tapered and see those on the highest incomes receiving £100, compared to £305.10 for those on the least. Monday's announcement will result in cash being sent to the devolved administration at Holyrood, and Scottish Labour has urged the Government to increase its payments. But Scotland's Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said the decision was 'a betrayal' of pensioners. 'I welcome any extension of eligibility by the UK Government, but this is a U-turn the Chancellor should have made a long time ago,' she said. 'But there is still no detail about how the Chancellor intends to go about that. Unfortunately, it still sounds as if many pensioners will miss out.' Ms Somerville added that the Scottish Government had not been consulted on the decision and urged UK ministers to 'ensure the Scottish Government is fully appraised of the proposed changes as soon as possible'. 'The Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government wrote to the Chief Secretary to the Treasury last week to urge the UK Government to share its plans with us as quickly as possible, so that we can understand any implications for our own programmes and, crucially, our budget,' she said. Scottish Labour MSP Paul O'Kane said: 'The winter fuel payment is a devolved payment in Scotland and Scottish Labour has long been clear that we want to see it reinstated for the majority of pensioners up here – but despite their loud spin, the SNP voted against our attempts to do so. 'The SNP must not go ahead with plans that would rob poorer pensioners in order to fund payments for millionaires. 'The SNP must re-examine their own proposals in light of this game-changing announcement, ensure payments reach those most in need, and give a cast-iron guarantee that no struggling Scottish pensioners will be left out of pocket under their plans.' The Scottish Government's plans were initially to provide a universal payment to pensioners, but the proposals were scuppered by the Chancellor's announcement of the cut last summer, forcing ministers to create a different system for this winter.

Leader Live
33 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Winter fuel U-turn should have come a long time ago, Reeves told
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said on Monday that nine million pensioners will be in receipt of the payment this year after a cut was announced in the first weeks of the Labour Government last summer. The initial decision was met with heavy backlash and forced the Scottish Government to delay the implementation of its own devolved benefit. John Swinney's administration later announced a similar payment for pensioners which would be tapered and see those on the highest incomes receiving £100, compared to £305.10 for those on the least. Monday's announcement will result in cash being sent to the devolved administration at Holyrood, and Scottish Labour has urged the Government to increase its payments. But Scotland's Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said the decision was 'a betrayal' of pensioners. 'I welcome any extension of eligibility by the UK Government, but this is a U-turn the Chancellor should have made a long time ago,' she said. 'But there is still no detail about how the Chancellor intends to go about that. Unfortunately, it still sounds as if many pensioners will miss out.' Ms Somerville added that the Scottish Government had not been consulted on the decision and urged UK ministers to 'ensure the Scottish Government is fully appraised of the proposed changes as soon as possible'. 'The Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government wrote to the Chief Secretary to the Treasury last week to urge the UK Government to share its plans with us as quickly as possible, so that we can understand any implications for our own programmes and, crucially, our budget,' she said. Scottish Labour MSP Paul O'Kane said: 'The winter fuel payment is a devolved payment in Scotland and Scottish Labour has long been clear that we want to see it reinstated for the majority of pensioners up here – but despite their loud spin, the SNP voted against our attempts to do so. 'The SNP must not go ahead with plans that would rob poorer pensioners in order to fund payments for millionaires. 'The SNP must re-examine their own proposals in light of this game-changing announcement, ensure payments reach those most in need, and give a cast-iron guarantee that no struggling Scottish pensioners will be left out of pocket under their plans.' The Scottish Government's plans were initially to provide a universal payment to pensioners, but the proposals were scuppered by the Chancellor's announcement of the cut last summer, forcing ministers to create a different system for this winter.

The National
40 minutes ago
- The National
SNP urge Labour to abandon disability cuts after winter fuel U-turn
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said on Monday that nine million pensioners in England and Wales will be in receipt of the payment this year after a cut was announced in the first weeks of the Labour Government last summer. The initial decision was met with heavy backlash and forced the Scottish Government to delay the implementation of its own devolved benefit. John Swinney's administration later announced a similar payment for pensioners which would be tapered and see those on the highest incomes receiving £100, compared to £305.10 for those on the least. Monday's announcement will result in cash being sent to the devolved administration at Holyrood. But now, the SNP have pushed for a different approach on welfare reform, after the UK Government also announced a £5 billion cut to benefits earlier this year. 'The Chancellor must now abandon her devastating cuts to disabled people – and scrap the two-child benefit cap,' SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said. 'This screeching U-turn was inevitable and lessons must be learnt from the damaging mess the Labour Government caused by robbing pensioners of their winter fuel payments.' He added: 'It must be swiftly followed by an end to all Labour Party austerity cuts – scrapping the planned cuts to disability benefits and abolishing punitive welfare policies, including the Labour Government's two-child benefit cap and bedroom tax. 'At the spending review on Wednesday, the Labour Government must end its austerity cuts for good – and not impose even more cuts to families and public services.' Scottish Greens social security spokesperson Maggie Chapman, meanwhile, said: 'Cutting the Winter Fuel Payment was one of the first acts of this Labour government. Elected on a promise of 'change' they brought in sweeping austerity that harmed older people across the UK at a time when the cost of living remains sky high. The MSP added: 'There is no doubt that the damage has already been done, families will have lost loved ones, and illnesses will have been caused over the winter months because of the brutal decision by Rachel Reeves and the Labour Government. 'Labour's cutting of the Winter Fuel Payment, refusal to end the two-child benefit cap and regressive austerity measures are forcing people into poverty in Scotland and across the UK.' Chapman went on: "The reinstatement of the Winter Fuel Payment for some is a welcome move, but we must go further, the Labour government must end the two-child benefit cap which hits working class families the hardest, and they must reverse their cruel austerity policies. 'Poverty isn't inevitable; it's a political policy, a policy which Rachel Reeves has forced upon hundreds of thousands of people across the UK. If Keir Starmer has any shame, he would finally call an end to her disastrous time as Chancellor.'