MKR stars facing assault charges named
Two former My Kitchen Rules stars who were facing a raft of charges can be identified for the first time, after the woman pleaded guilty to kicking, spitting on and hitting children.
Claudean Bernadette Uamaki-Mu and Anthony Michael Mu could only be named as two Channel 7 personalities during their initial appearances at Richlands Magistrates Court, due to a sweeping non-publication order handed down in 2023.
But the pair – who appeared on the Channel 7 reality cooking show in 2023 – can now be named due to Uamaki-Mu, 54, pleading guilty to six charges of common assault on Wednesday.
She walked free from court with a 12-month good behaviour bond and $1000 recognisance, and no conviction recorded. Claudean Bernadette Uamaki-Mu pleaded guilty at Richlands Magistrates Court on Wednesday to six common assault charges. NewsWire / John Gass Credit: News Corp Australia
The couple were surrounded by family supporters, who pushed past waiting media as they exited court.
Wednesday's proceedings began at 9am but a lengthy delay occurred due to police attempting to amend some of Uamaki-Mu's charges.
After case conferencing which lasted through the lunch break, police prosecutor Sergeant Tom Wirawan said only six common assault charges Uamaki-Mu was facing would proceed to a plea.
Other charges were withdrawn.
Additional chairs were required to accommodate reporters due to family members packing out the courtroom. Anthony Michael Mu is due to stand trial in Richlands Magistrates Court in May. NewsWire / John Gass Credit: News Corp Australia, NewsWire / John Gass
Acting Magistrate Michael Quinn noted some details involved pulling the hair of a child and hitting the child on the back of the head with a hairbrush.
'On another occasion there was spitting on the child,' Mr Quinn said.
'On another, there was a lesser assault of throwing a plastic Tupperware container and hitting the back of the child's head.'
The court was told there was another incident where a child was kicked in the stomach and pulled up by the hair.
'There was another, involving grabbing a child and throwing (the child) into the bedroom wall,' he said.
'Another … involved pulling the child to the ground and poking the child in the face with your finger.'
Mr Quinn called the charges 'extremely serious' and emphasised how the protection of children was paramount.
Uamaki-Mu had no criminal history, the court was told.
Sergeant Wirawan said he would normally ask for a suspended prison term but noted the woman's early plea and that she had avoided complainants needing to give evidence at trial.
He asked for a 'hefty' fine to be issued.
Defence barrister Simon Lewis said his client suffered from depression and anxiety and had been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. The court was told Uamaki-Mu's common assault charges involved her hitting, kicking and 'spitting on' children on diverse dates over, which occurred over various dates over 2006, 2010, 2011 and 2021. NewsWire / John Gass Credit: News Corp Australia
She was seeing a medical professional to address her longstanding psychiatric issues, Mr Lewis said, who told the court the behaviour was consistent with 'losses of control'.
Mr Lewis said Uamaki-Mu had endured public shaming due to the offences.
'In my submission, there would seem to be little utility in imposing a fine for something (where) … the majority of offending that happened some ago,' Mr Lewis said.
Magistrate Quinn accepted Uamaki-Mu was remorseful and was receiving ongoing treatment to address her mental health issues.
While Wednesday's proceedings close a chapter in a protracted case that has staggered through the magistrates court for more than a year, it is not the end for both Uamaki-Mu and Mu's court cases.
Uamaki-Mu is still due to stand trial in the District Court on 12 charges, including unlawful assault occasioning actual bodily harm, indecent treatment and rape, following a committal hearing in January.
Mu is also due to stand trial in the Magistrates Court in May.
He is facing eight counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm (two while in company), two counts of common assault and one count of observations in breach of privacy.
During January's committal hearing, Magistrate Stuart Shearer repeatedly raised concerns with the admissibility of certain statements and noted some relied on 'hearsay'.
Sergeant Wirawan's request to amend some of the 'duplicitous' charges were refused.
'I'm not amending your charges to fix your case,' Mr Shearer said.
He proceeded to dismiss dozens of Uamaki-Mu's charges one by one, variously noting there were 'no particulars' or evidence to support each charge or that it was duplicitous with another charge.
Domestic Violence helplines
news.com.au mental health helplines
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
43 minutes ago
- Perth Now
‘Warning': Uni to pay back 5k staff $8m
Griffith University has signed a deal committing to repay underpaid staff more than $8m, becoming the sixth university to do so since 2022. Since 2015, the university underpaid 5457 staff across all of its six campuses, including academics, support and fitness workers – one who was underpaid as much as $92,400. It has signed an enforceable undertaking with the Fair Work Ombudsman, meaning it will be required to repay $8.34m including interest and superannuation. It is the sixth university to enter such a deal with Fair Work following The University of Melbourne, which last year agreed to pay back a mammoth $72m after a decade of wage theft. Since 2022, it has been a Fair Work priority to crack down on systemic underpayments in the university sector, with Latrobe University, The University of Sydney, the University of Technology Sydney, the University of Newcastle and Charles Sturt University all signing similar agreements. Individual underpayments ranged as high as $92,400. NewsWire/ Richard Gosling Credit: News Corp Australia Fair Work Ombudsman Anna Booth commended Griffith University for self-reporting its breaches and its co-operation with the ombudsman's investigation. 'The matter serves as a warning of the significant long-running problems that can result from an employer failing to have appropriate checks and balances to ensure workplace compliance,' said Ms Booth. 'We expect universities to meet their legal obligations under their own enterprise agreements and underlying awards.' Griffith's failed to pay staff for activities including academic tutorials, subject co-ordination, and proper research assistant rates. Fitness employees were not paid split shift or meal allowances and progression between pay bands had been incorrectly paid. While the underpaid staff were located across all of the university's campuses, the majority were Brisbane-based. The cause of the issue was chalked up to insufficient training and data collection, non-existent payroll and data review processes, a lack of automation, and deficiencies in payroll systems. Underpayment has been cracked down on in higher education. NewsWire / Nicholas Eagar Credit: NewsWire Under the agreement the university will also establish a new internal body to better consult between management, employees and the education union. 'Improving universities' workplace compliance is a priority for the Fair Work Ombudsman,' Ms Booth said. 'We look forward to working with the leadership teams at universities nationally to assist them to do the sustained, smart work required to ensure full compliance with workplace laws.'
Perth Now
5 hours ago
- Perth Now
Mushroom cook denies ‘wild goose chase' claim
Alleged triple-murderer Erin Patterson has denied she led health authorities on a 'wild goose chase' as they probed the mushroom poisoning of her four lunch guests. Ms Patterson returned to the witness box at her Supreme Court trial in Morwell this week for her second week of giving evidence. The 50-year-old is facing trial after pleading not guilty to the murder of three of her husband's family members and the attempted murder of a fourth. Simon Patterson's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and aunt, Heather Wilkinson, died after eating a meal at Ms Patterson's home on July 29, 2023, in the country Victorian town of Leongatha. Ms Patterson has pleaded not guilty, telling the jury she did not intend to harm anyone. Brooke Grebert-Craig. Credit: Supplied Heather's husband, Ian Wilkinson survived after spending about a month and a half in hospital. Prosecutors allege Ms Patterson deliberately poisoned the guests with death cap mushrooms while her defence argues it was a tragic accident. Giving evidence last week, Ms Patterson maintained she used dried mushrooms in the deadly lunch which she had bought from an Asian grocer in Melbourne's east in about April 2023. She told the court she initially planned to use them in a pasta dish, but decided they would be too overpowering and stored them in a Tupperware container in her pantry. She said she now believes she may have added foraged wild mushrooms to that container. Ms Patterson's estranged husband Simon Patterson. NewsWire / David Geraghty Credit: News Corp Australia Facing questions from Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC on Wednesday, Ms Patterson was asked if she was worried about them being too strong for the beef Wellington. 'No, I didn't think that. I thought it was the perfect dish for them,' she responded. Dr Rogers went on to probe the exchange Ms Patterson had with Department of Health officer Sally Ann Atkinson about the Asian grocer. Dr Nanette Rogers is leading the prosecution for the Crown. NewsWire/Ian Currie Credit: News Corp Australia Ms Atkinson gave evidence she communicated with Ms Patterson over several days in earlier August amid a public health probe into the poisoning. Text messages and calls between the pair showed the public health officer attempting to narrow down the location of the store. Dr Rogers suggested Ms Patterson was 'very familiar' with the area, owning a home in Mount Waverley and having previously worked for Monash City Council. The accused woman disputed this, but did say she was familiar with the adjoining areas of Glen Waverley, Oakleigh and Clayton. Dr Rogers suggested Ms Patterson was 'deliberately vague' about the location of the Asian grocer because it was a lie. 'Incorrect,' Ms Patterson responded. 'I was doing my best to remember when it happened, but I think I was clear at all times that I didn't have a memory of the actual purchase.' The trial, now in its seventh week, continues.
Perth Now
19 hours ago
- Perth Now
Man‘s ‘really stupid' Sydney Harbour stunt
A man who climbed up the ropes of a cruise ship on Sydney Harbour in a self-proclaimed 'really stupid' stunt has been fined $4000. George Frederick Carr, 29, climbed up the ropes of the Carnival Adventure cruise ship at the overseas passenger terminal at The Rocks in Sydney on May 17. George Carr climbed up the ropes of the Carnival Adventure cruise ship at The Rocks in Sydney last month. 9 News Credit: News Corp Australia Video of Carr's bizarre climb was widely shared on social media last month, capturing him hanging upside down as he made his way up the ropes. However his adventure was short-lived, with police called to the scene about 3pm. Mr Carr was arrested following the incident. Tiktok Credit: News Corp Australia Footage showed a police boat below as the man stood on the ropes before he was lowered down and escorted away by officers. Carr pleaded guilty in Downing Centre Local Court on Wednesday morning to charges of enter cleared zone when not screened and cleared, and enter landside and waterside restricted zones when not authorised. Magistrate Elizabeth Bushby had to take a moment to look up the unusual offences before sentencing. 'I'm gonna have to look this up because this is not an event that commonly comes before court,' she said. Representing himself, Carr then told the court that he'd climbed the rope to do a 'stunt', believing the cruise ship was bound for Europe when it was due to depart on a nine-day round trip to the Great Barrier Reef. 'I just thought I'd climb the rope and get in through the latch,' Carr told the court. 'But I didn't get inside the boat and they lowered the rope and they caught me.' He told Ms Bushby that he had been 'really stupid'. He said he was 'really stupid'. Christian Gilles / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia However, Ms Bushby told him the offences were 'more than a stunt', with the clear zones of the harbour in place to protect the community and species in the area. She also pointed to the large number of resources that were taken up trying to 'prevent (Mr Carr) from following through with (his) plan'. Carr was fined $4000 for the 'stunt'. Christian Gilles / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia Ms Bushby accepted that it was a 'spontaneous' offence, but it's nature was 'unexplained'. Emphasising the importance of deterring others from committing similar offences, Ms Bushby handed down two $1250 fines for each of the two charges related to entering a cleared zone and entering a landside restricted zone. A further $1500 fine was also handed down for the charge relating to entering the waterside restricted zone. Ms Bushby told the court that the third offence was 'objectively more serious' than the others. 'That matter is an objectively more serious example of the offences in your conduct when you were in that zone and the resources that were taken up,' she told the court.
