logo
US deports criminals to African nation where political parties banned

US deports criminals to African nation where political parties banned

Glasgow Times16-07-2025
The US has already deported eight men to another African country, South Sudan, after the Supreme Court lifted restrictions on sending people to countries where they have no ties.
The South Sudanese government has declined to say where those men, also described as violent criminals, are after it took custody of them nearly two weeks ago.
In a late-night post on X, homeland security assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin said the men sent to Eswatini, who are citizens of Vietnam, Jamaica, Cuba, Yemen and Laos, had arrived on a plane but did not say when or where.
She said they were all convicted criminals and 'individuals so uniquely barbaric that their home countries refused to take them back'.
The men 'have been terrorising American communities' but were now 'off of American soil', McLaughlin claimed.
She said they had been convicted of crimes including murder and child rape and one was a 'confirmed' gang member. Her social media posts included mug shots of the men and what she said were their criminal records. They were not named.
Like in South Sudan, there was no immediate comment from Eswatini authorities over any deal to accept third-country deportees or what would happen to them in that country.
Civic groups there raised concerns over the secrecy from a government long accused of clamping down on human rights.
'There has been a notable lack of official communication from the Eswatini government regarding any agreement or understanding with the US to accept these deportees,' Ingiphile Dlamini, a spokesperson for the pro-democracy group SWALIMO, said in a statement sent to The Associated Press.
'This opacity makes it difficult for civic society to understand the implications.'
It was not clear if they were being held in a detention centre, what their legal status was or what Eswatini's plans were for the deported men, he said.
Eswatini, previously called Swaziland, is a country of about 1.2 million people between South Africa and Mozambique. It is one of the world's last remaining absolute monarchies and the last in Africa. King Mswati III has ruled by decree since 1986.
Political parties are effectively banned and pro-democracy groups have said for years that Mswati III has crushed political dissent, sometimes violently. Groups like SWALIMO have called for democratic reforms.
Pro-democracy protests erupted in Eswatini in 2021, when dozens were killed, allegedly by security forces. Eswatini authorities have been accused of conducting political assassinations of pro-democracy activists and imprisoning others.
Because Eswatini is a poor country with a relative lack of resources, it 'may face significant strain in accommodating and managing individuals with complex backgrounds, particularly those with serious criminal convictions', Mr Dlamini said.
While the US administration has hailed deportations as a victory for the safety and security of the American people, Mr Dlamini said his organization wanted to know the plans for the five men sent to Eswatini and 'any potential risks to the local population'.
The Trump administration has said it is seeking more deals with African nations to take deportees from the US.
Leaders from some of the five West African nations who met President Donald Trump at the White House last week said the issue of migration and their countries possibly taking deportees from the US was discussed.
Some nations have pushed back. Nigeria, which was not part of that White House summit, said it has rejected pressure from the US to take deportees who are citizens of other countries.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump weighs in on American Eagle's Sydney Sweeney ad controversy
Trump weighs in on American Eagle's Sydney Sweeney ad controversy

The Independent

time6 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump weighs in on American Eagle's Sydney Sweeney ad controversy

Donald Trump has given his take on actress Sydney Sweeney's controversial jeans advert for American Eagle. The advert, which featured the tagline: 'Sydney Sweeney has good genes', was slammed by some who have accused it of subtly promoting white supremacy and eugenics. Speaking to the press before embarking on Air Force One on Sunday (3 August), the US president said the ad was 'fantastic' after a reporter informed him that the 27-year-old actress is a registered Republican. 'Oh, now I love her ad,' he said, adding: 'You'd be surprised at how many people are Republicans', though admitted he did not think Sweeney would have voted red. 'If Sydney Sweeney is a registered Republican, I think her ad is fantastic.' On Saturday (2 August), it was revealed that the Euphoria actress has been a registered voter with the Republican Party in Florida since June 2024, according to public voting records.

Trump dismisses Charlamagne tha God after Lara Trump interview
Trump dismisses Charlamagne tha God after Lara Trump interview

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Trump dismisses Charlamagne tha God after Lara Trump interview

The response from Trump came just days after McKelvey floated Jon Stewart as possible 2028 presidential candidate after former Vice President Kamala Harris said she won't run for California governor, leaving the door open for a potential 2028 run. "I think that traditional conservatives are going to take the Republican Party back," McKelvey said during an interview with the president's daughter-in-law on her Fox News show, "My View with Lara Trump." "I think this Epstein thing is going to be a way for traditional conservatives to take their party back, I really do." "I think they know this is the issue that has gotten the base riled up," he said, referencing the disgraced financier who died by suicide in August 2019. "The MAGA base isn't letting this issue go, and for the first time, they know they can probably take the party back and not piss off the MAGA base." After the interview, in a Truth Social post, Trump praised his daughter-in-law, called her "amazing and talented," and called the show "a big ratings success." The president then called McKelvey a "sleezebag" and discounted his intellegence. "He's a Low IQ individual, has no idea what words are coming out of his mouth, and knows nothing about me or what I have done," Trump wrote. "Just ending 5 Wars, including a 31 year bloodbath between Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, where Seven Million people have died, and there was no end in sight." Trump went on to claim in the post that McKelvey did not know about a myriad of other topics, including India and Pakistan, Iran, the border or the economy. 'Change agent': Charlamagne tha God floats Jon Stewart as possible 2028 candidate What is Charlamagne tha God's first name? Born in Charleston South Carolina, Charlamagne tha God's real name is Lenard Larry McKelvey. Epstein revival continues: Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell quietly moved out of Florida federal prison Who is Charlamagne tha God? Charlamange tha God, 47, is an American TV radio host and presenter. He is a co-host of the nationally syndicated radio show, "The Breakfast Club," which discusses a variety of topics including pop culture, celebrity gossip and politics. The podcast had been downloaded more than 1 billion times as of early June, iHeartMedia and The Black Effect Podcast Network have reported. McKelvey is also co-host of the podcast "Brilliant Idiots" and has authored two books: "Black Privilege"and "Shook One." According to his website, McKelvey is slated to be inducted into the Radio Hall of Fame in October. What is 7-OH? Trump administration wants to products with it as 'an illicit substance' Who is Lara Trump? Lara Trump, 42, is married to the president's second son, Eric Trump. The Fox News host is also co-chair of the Republican National Committee. The president's daughter-in-law had been Trump's first choice for the U.S. Senate seat in North Carolina, where she was born. But late last month she opted out and endorsed Republican National Committee chair and former North Carolina GOP Chair Michael Whatley. After much consideration and heartfelt discussions with my family, friends, and supporters, I have decided not to pursue the United States Senate seat in North Carolina at this time. I am deeply grateful for the encouragement and support I have received from the people of my... — Lara Trump (@LaraLeaTrump) July 24, 2025 Trump also endorsed Whatley for the slot in a late July social media post. What did Trump say about Charlamange tha God? In his Truth Media post, the president questioned why McKelvey is "allowed to use the word 'GOD'" when describing himself. "Can anyone imagine the uproar there would be if I used that nickname?" Trump wrote in the post. The White House has previously shared a photo of the president dressed as a the pope on its official social media pages, sparking both outlash and glee. The photo was posted just days after Pope Francis died on Easter this year at age 88. Contributing: Phillip Bailey and Sudiksha Kochi Natalie Neysa Alund is a senior reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at nalund@ and follow her on X @nataliealund.

The Online Safety Act humiliates us all
The Online Safety Act humiliates us all

New Statesman​

time3 hours ago

  • New Statesman​

The Online Safety Act humiliates us all

Illustration by Gary Waters / Ikon Images Fear not, Britain is healing. Now you must risk having your identity being leaked if you want to watch porn. Our economy will lose no more precious dynamism to that wasteful outlet, and we will soon attain the highest sustained growth in the G7. Porn-mad illegal immigrants will reckon they are better off in pervy France. Lastly, of course, once our pent-up ranks inevitably take to robust exercise, our national security will be secured by a new breed of super-fit super-soldiers. Economic stability, secure borders, and national security – remember those? They were the new government's quite reasonable 'foundations'. Them fastened, Starmer was to pursue a happily honed briefcase of just five missions. The country needed to kickstart growth, future-proof the NHS, smash the class ceiling, make the streets safe and discover abundant clean energy. And so, if leadership is the art of prioritisation, it is unclear why Keir Starmer's party is spending so much energy on the Online Safety Act. As an exercise it does not appear to support any of the main goals. It seems only to have created unnecessary strain in national politics. At the time of writing, there are more than 450,000 people with doubts. That is how many signatories there are on the petition, 'Repeal the Online Safety Act' on Parliament's website. The petition is supported by both left and right, Nigel Farage and Owen Jones. The Act was meant to stop children seeing harmful content online. It demanded that websites verify users' ages and withhold sensitive content until they do so. Now, any adult who wants to watch porn must upload a driver's license, a scan of their face or another form of identification the site they wish to use. For too many adults, age requirements amount to a ban. The fear of extortion and humiliation are just too high. There is already a lucrative blackmail industry based around getting that information and extorting people with the threat of public release. A country with a rich population being forced to attach identifying information to their consumption will attract hackers from around the world. Data is also leaked for emotional, impulsive reasons. In 2015, vigilante hackers leaked the userbase of adultery arrangement website Ashley Madison. A similar story broke this week, with eerie advances in the tech. Tea was a site for American women to gossip about men. In revenge, hackers published an interactive map of America with a pin on the homes of every user, which shows their name and picture when you click it. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe And anyway, practically, the government cannot produce first-rate technological solutions. Most Brits older than ten will remember the way the government's home-made tracker app came out the box already creaking. So, most Brits older than ten will have about zero faith in the state's ability to outwit motivated hackers. Luckily, most Brits older than ten are also able to outwit the state themselves. After the Act came into force, the UK app stores' charts were all topped by virtual private network (VPN) apps. These apps, which anyone can use, allow users to spoof their location as if they were in another country, thereby sidestepping the government's measures. Secretary of State for science, innovation and technology Peter Kyle was reduced to asking people to follow his law and not download VPNs. Leadership is also the art of explanation. You must delineate a series of because-answers connecting decisions to the overall goals, and also to the everyday, personal interests of your electorate. If they raise doubts, you should explain why the decision makes sense. If you cannot, you should rethink the decision. The Navy Seal leadership manual I consulted for this piece said the worst thing you can do is tell your troops, in the manner of an exhausted parent, 'because I said so!' Its musclebound author apparently did not imagine he would need to caution against an even laster last resort: 'because if you don't, you support paedophiles.' And yet! The government could have treated its public as intelligent adults with whom it can reason. Instead, Kyle posted: 'If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators.' On Sky News the same day, he said 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' Starmer has admirable qualities, but he is also a moralising disciplinarian reflexively becoming more and more himself amid the troubles of a hard first year. Labour struggles, people get locked up for tweets. Labour struggles, people can't protest for Palestine. Labour struggles, people can't watch porn. Now, keeping children away from porn is as wise, if not wiser, than keeping them away from cigarettes. But even if we could enforce it, which we can't, this policy is not the way to do it. The government should withdraw the act and Kyle should apologise to Farage. Starmer, meanwhile, should stick to the strategy. [See more: Bonnie Blue has no limits] Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store