Most NHS users in England affected by dysfunctional admin, report finds
Patients routinely have to chase up test results, receive appointment letters after their appointments and do not know when their treatment will occur because the NHS is so 'dysfunctional'.
That is the conclusion of research by two major patients' organisations and the King's Fund, which lays bare a host of problems with the way the health service interacts with it users.
Sixty-four percent of people in England who used the NHS or arranged care for someone else over the last year encountered a problem involving its administration or communication.
Patients were left frustrated by test results going missing, being unable to change or cancel appointments or having to pursue the results of a test, scan or X-ray.
Polling by Ipsos for Healthwatch England, National Voices and the King's Fund found that 52% of the public thought the NHS was good at communicating with patients, but 25% said it was poor.
The findings come as Keir Starmer claims that the NHS is making inroads into treatment waiting times by providing 2m extra appointments in his government's first few months in office – seven months ahead of schedule.
NHS England provided 2.2m more appointments for planned care – including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and diagnostic tests – between July and November last year than during the same period the year before. This will be highlighted in an appearance by Starmer on Monday intended to show that his administration has begun delivering on its key pledge of 'fixing the NHS'.
Among the 64% of the 1,888 adults polled who experienced a difficulty:
32% had to chase up the results of a test, scan or X-ray.
32% had not been told how long they would have to wait for their care or treatment.
23% were unaware of who to contact while they waited.
20% received an invitation to an appointment after the date had passed.
'Admin plays a crucial role in how patients experience health care, yet our research shows many patients find themselves in an admin doom loop, trapped by no-reply emails and unable to access the person or answers they need,' said Jacob Lant, the chief executive of National Voices.
People with long-term health conditions, those from ethnic minority backgrounds and poorer people are more likely to have a bad experience of their interaction with the NHS. For example, 75% of those with a chronic illness encountered a problem compared with 57% of those in good health.
Julia Cream, a King's Fund policy fellow and co-author of a report containing the survey results, said the findings 'lay bare the day-to-day dysfunction of an NHS that is too often not meeting people's needs and highlights the deep inequalities people experience when they are trying to access and engage with health services'.
Patients and carers interviewed for the report, called Lost in the System, described how the administrative issues they encountered led to them suffering stress, anxiety and other mental health issues. Negative experiences also encouraged a perception of waste in the NHS.
The vice-chair of the Royal College of GPs, Dr Victoria Tzortzio-Brown, said: 'These issues aren't the fault of hard-working administrative staff across the NHS, but a symptom of a system that's chronically overstretched and understaffed, relying on patchy out-of-date processes and digital infrastructure.'
GPs and their colleagues 'are often involved in chasing up test results, missing letters and appointments with our patients, adding to our bureaucratic workload at a time when need for our care is rocketing', she said.
In a separate survey, 19% of people thought their local hospital was not a safe place to be treated in.When asked why they thought their hospital was unsafe, 27% said a roof could fall in, 26% cited a rodent infestation and 20% said sewage or flooding could occur.
The findings emerged in research undertaken by the pollster Savanta for the Liberal Democrats among a representative sample of the UK adult population about the state of the NHS estate.
The party's health and social care spokesperson, Helen Morgan, said: 'It's shocking that so many patients no longer trust the buildings they rely on to get better, fearing the very walls they're treated in might crumble.
'People should only worry about their health not whether the roof will cave in on them.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Keir Starmer calls Israel's recent actions in Gaza ‘appalling and intolerable'
Keir Starmer has called Israel's recent actions in Gaza 'appalling, counterproductive and intolerable', as the government comes under mounting pressure to take stronger action after the killings of dozens of civilians at aid posts in recent days. The prime minister told MPs on Wednesday the UK was considering imposing sanctions on members of the Israeli government, but is so far resisting growing calls for a complete ban on arms sales and immediate recognition of Palestine. Starmer was speaking after several attacks on aid posts in recent days left dozens dead and hundreds more injured. The attacks prompted British aid charities to step up calls for urgent humanitarian and political action, and the head of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) described conditions in Gaza as 'worse than hell on earth'. With protests taking place outside the Commons and growing unease from MPs inside it, Starmer said: 'Israel's recent action is appalling and, in my view, counterproductive and intolerable.' He added: 'We will keep looking at further action, along with our allies, including sanctions, but let me be absolutely clear: we need to get back to a ceasefire, we need the hostages, who have been held for a very long time, to be released, and we desperately need more aid, at speed and at volume, into Gaza, because it is an appalling and intolerable situation.' The ICRC president, Mirjana Spoljaric, said what was happening in Gaza surpassed 'any acceptable legal, moral and humane standard' that 'humanity was failing' and that the Palestinian people had been 'stripped of human dignity'. Oxfam UK said conditions in Gaza had reached a 'level of inhumanity that is inconceivable in modern times'. It said there was a 'massive disconnect' between public despair at events in Gaza and what it called the 'complacency' of political leaders. Oxfam UK's chief executive, Halima Begum, said: 'It is beyond comprehension that aid distribution points should be turned into killing fields.' Foreign Office minister Hamish Falconer said later on Wednesday that if Israel did not cease 'the renewed military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete actions in this place'. He added: 'I will not say from the dispatch box today when that might be.' Falconer was confronted on Wednesday by angry MPs from multiple parties, demanding stronger British action on sanctions, weapons sales and Palestinian recognition. Dozens of Labour and Tory MPs have recently signed letters to the prime minister calling for Palestine to be recognised immediately but have not so far received a response. Paula Barker, the Labour backbencher, asked: 'What more evidence do we need to call this exactly what it is – a deliberate policy of annexation and genocide?' Kit Malthouse, the Conservative MP, said: 'We're all, frankly, getting a bit fed up with the theatrics in this chamber. And, if I'm honest with the minister, it feels like the whole house is being played. He shows up, he mouths the words full of condemnation and being appalled, and very occasionally, the government leaks out just enough sanctions, frankly, I'm afraid, to keep the Labour benches from open revolt.' Malthouse's Tory colleague Jeremy Wright added: 'I now believe it's necessary for the UK, hopefully, in conjunction with others, to recognise the state of Palestine. Why has it not yet?' Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour leader, successfully passed a bill calling for an independent inquiry into British involvement in Israeli military action in Gaza. The inquiry is unlikely ever to happen, however, because the government will not support a substantive vote that would enable one to be set up. While MPs were debating in the Commons chamber, dozens of protesters gathered outside, one of whom was arrested after an altercation with a police officer at the gates of parliament. Falconer confirmed to MPs the government is reconsidering its position on Palestinian statehood, and ministers are open to the idea of immediate recognition. Government sources said one option is to make an announcement at or after a UN conference later this month being hosted by France and Saudi Arabia to talk about a two-state solution. The government is keen to secure compromises in exchange, including an agreement by Hamas to leave Gaza entirely. On arms sales, ministers have already cancelled licences for many of the weapons Britain used to sell to Israel, saying it would only export 'defensive' arms in the future. The Guardian revealed last month that British companies had managed to export thousands of military items to Israel, including munitions. Meanwhile, ministers are fighting a legal case to be allowed to continue making spare parts for American-made F-35s, which are used by Israel but also many Nato allies. They argue that stopping such sales could harm other non-Israeli partners. The ICRG, which is in effect the guardian of the Geneva conventions governing the conduct of war, is carefully diplomatic in its dealings with warring parties and normally does not speak publicly about convention violations. However, Spoljaric told the BBC in an interview that Israel's current actions in Gaza amounted to a 'hollowing out' of international law and not enough was being done by to end the war, stop Palestinian suffering and release Israeli hostages. She highlighted the level of destruction and suffering in Gaza, and said the world was 'watching a people being entirely stripped of its dignity' and this 'should really shock our collective conscience'. She added: 'State leaders are under an obligation to act. I'm calling on them to do something, and to do more, and do what they can, Because it will reverberate, it will haunt them, it will reach their doorsteps.' On Tuesday the ICRC reported its Rafah field hospital in southern Gaza, which is close to an aid distribution site, received 184 patients in what it called a 'mass casualty influx.' It said 19 patients were dead on arrival, the majority with gunshot wounds. Eight more died of wounds.
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Male criminals can self-identify as women in mental health hospitals
NHS mental health hospitals are allowing male criminals to self-identify as women, NHS documents have revealed. Trusts in London are permitting transgender women to use female-only spaces despite acknowledging their presence as a 'risk to a particular gender' and potentially 'very distressing for other patients on a single-sex ward'. Campaigners have accused the NHS of endangering the welfare of the 'most vulnerable women' by allowing transgender women, who were born male, on female wards. A women's rights group used Freedom of Information (FoI) requests to obtain sex and gender policies at NHS mental health trusts in London. The recently disclosed documents found mental health trusts raising concerns over the guidance that forensic patients should use single-sex female spaces if they identified as women. Forensic patients are those referred to the NHS from court or prison for committing offences, or considered a potential risk to themselves or others because of a mental health disorder. Under the current NHS guidelines published in 2019, transgender people should be accommodated according to the way they dress, their name and pronouns, which 'may not always accord with the physical sex appearance of the chest or genitalia'. This also 'applies to toilet and bathing facilities', with the exception of pre-operative transgender people sharing open shower facilities. Policy at West London NHS Trust, which runs the high-security Broadmoor Hospital, abides by these guidelines, stating: 'A trans man or a trans woman must be admitted on to a ward in accordance with their presenting gender, if this is their preference.' It added: 'Patients should be addressed respectfully, using the pronouns of their acquired gender.' The trust cited an example of a transgender patient in a manic state getting undressed in front of women and revealing their genitals. It said: 'A patient with bipolar (who happens also to be trans) who is in a manic state and who does not have capacity may be disinhibited and at risk of disrobing in public. 'Depending on where they are in their transition, it may be more appropriate for them to be admitted to a ward that is in line with their birth gender … while they are acutely unwell and at risk of 'outing' themselves.' The policy document added: 'Once they have recovered and have regained capacity it would be essential to have a conversation with the patient around where they would be most comfortably accommodated, and to arrange a move to a ward in accordance with their correct gender.' Both trusts note that there may be circumstances where it is lawful to exclude a patient, transgender or otherwise, from a single-sex ward if it constitutes 'proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim' such as harm reduction. At Central and North Western London, a policy document said that 'further consideration may be needed as to how best to manage a trans individual' in some cases, such as when 'a sexually disinhibited pre-operative transsexual individual may be very distressing for other patients on a single-sex ward'. In such a 'rare occasion', the policy recommends the individual 'be transferred to a single room and consideration made to their temporary use of a disabled toilet should individual toilets not be available'. The trust said it 'respects an individual's right to self-identify as male or female ', and made clear that transgender women could access women's lavatories. The Equality and Human Rights Commission, the equalities watchdog, has issued interim guidance advising it should be 'compulsory' for workplaces to provide single-sex lavatories, though trans women should not be left with no facilities to use. The NHS is currently reviewing its guidelines on same-sex accommodation in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling on biological sex. Helen Joyce, director of advocacy at the human rights charity Sex Matters, said: 'It's deeply disturbing that the safety and welfare of some of the most vulnerable women in London – those in the care of state mental health services – are being so seriously compromised by NHS trusts. 'The Supreme Court judgment was crystal-clear that single-sex services must be run on the basis of biological sex. 'There is no excuse for a dangerous 'case-by-case' approach that deems some men safe to be housed in women's accommodation. 'These NHS trusts are missing the point: no male patient should ever be allowed in female accommodation under any circumstances. His claimed identity, history of sexual behaviour and whether he has had surgery to remove body parts are all irrelevant. So is the state of his mental and physical health. 'Safety and dignity of women' 'If health care managers cannot understand why this matters so much in mental health services, then they are not fit to run NHS trusts or to have female patients in their care.' A campaigner involved in the audit told The Times that it was 'scary to think' that the gender identity of violent criminals could 'override the safety and dignity of women'. They added: 'NHS trusts are playing Russian roulette with women's safety. The Supreme Court ruling clarified that single-sex spaces must be single sex, and it is vital that this is now enforced nationally across all hospitals.' An NHS spokesman said: 'The NHS is working through the implications of the Supreme Court ruling, and we absolutely recognise the need for revised guidance. It's important that we wait for the Equality and Human Rights Commission to publish its statutory guidance before final decisions about future policy are taken. 'In the meantime, we are working closely with Government to ensure we can provide updated guidance for the health service as soon as possible.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Mental health hospitals in charge of violent criminals allowing biologically male patients who 'self-identify' as women to be placed on female wards
Mental health hospitals in charge of violent criminals allow biologically male patients who 'self identify' as women to be placed on female wards. An audit of NHS mental health trusts in London found that they have policies which allow transgender people in single-sex spaces, according to The Times. Campaigners have hit out at the findings and warned that NHS trusts are 'playing Russian roulette with women's safety'. Sex and gender policies at mental health trusts in the capital were obtained by a women's rights group using freedom of information laws. Those audited cover hospitals including Broadmoor, a specialist psychiatric hospital which houses 'forensic patients', who are people detained in a mental health facility instead of prison. The research found that the trusts have policies which allow biological men to be placed in female spaces and wards if they identify as a woman. And hospitals acknowledged that some trans patients could pose a 'risk to a particular gender' or be 'sexually disinhibited' and 'very distressing for other patients on a single-sex ward'. South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust indicated that sometimes it may be appropriate to put transgender forensic patients on a ward in line with their biological sex 'while they are acutely unwell'. 'Once they have recovered and have regained capacity it would be essential to reassess the risk … and if safe and appropriate, to arrange a move to a ward in accordance with their correct gender,' its policy states. It also provided an example of a trans patient getting undressed in front of the opposite sex and revealing their genitals. 'Depending on where they are in their transition, it may be more appropriate for them to be admitted to a ward that is in line with their birth gender … while they are acutely unwell and at risk of 'outing' themselves,' the policy continues. Central and North Western London NHS Foundation Trust said it 'respects an individual's right to self-identify as male or female'. It added that trans women can access women's support groups and toilets but that in some cases 'further consideration may be needed as to how best to manage a trans individual'. 'A sexually disinhibited pre-operative transsexual individual may be very distressing for other patients on a single sex ward,' the trust said. And West London NHS Trust, in charge of Broadmoor Hospital which housed serial killers including the 'Yorkshire ripper' Peter Sutcliffe, said: 'Staff must use names, titles and hospital accommodation that the service user regards as appropriate.' Following the Supreme Court ruling that a woman is defined by biological sex under equality laws, the NHS is reviewing guidance on same sex accommodation. Its current guidelines, which were written in 2019, state that trans people should be accommodated based on how they identify. 'We have found examples of NHS trusts allowing forensic patients who were born male to self-identify as women,' a women's rights campaigner involved in the audit said. 'Forensic patients are those referred to the NHS from court or prison. They have been deemed a risk to themselves and others. 'They often have violent offending profiles. It is scary to think that their gender identity would override the safety and dignity of women. 'NHS Trusts are playing Russian roulette with women's safety. The Supreme Court ruling clarified that single-sex spaces must be single sex, and it is vital that this is now enforced nationally across all hospitals.' Helen Joyce, director of advocacy at women's rights charity Sex Matters, said: 'It's deeply disturbing that the safety and welfare of some of the most vulnerable women in London — those in the care of state mental health services — are being so seriously compromised by NHS trusts. 'The Supreme Court judgment was crystal-clear that single-sex services must be run on the basis of biological sex. There is no excuse for a dangerous 'case-by-case' approach that deems some men safe to be housed in women's accommodation. 'These NHS trusts are missing the point: no male patient should ever be allowed in female accommodation under any circumstances.' An NHS spokesman said: 'The NHS is working through the implications of the Supreme Court ruling, and we absolutely recognise the need for revised guidance. 'It's important that we wait for the Equality and Human Rights Commission to publish its statutory guidance before final decisions about future policy are taken. 'In the meantime, we are working closely with government to ensure we can provide updated guidance for the health service as soon as possible.'
