
LGBT MP fears being ‘challenged' in toilets after Supreme Court ruling on gender
An LGBT MP has said she fears being confronted more often in women's spaces after the Supreme Court ruling on gender.
During a Lesbian Visibility Week debate in Westminster Hall, Kate Osborne told MPs that she is 'misgendered frequently', including in the House of Commons and when she was buying jeans last week.
'I suspect I will get challenged even more now when accessing facilities,' she warned on Thursday, after the justices' ruling on April 16 that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex'.
Baroness Falkner of Margravine, the Equality and Human Rights Commission's chairwoman, said following the ruling that 'single-sex services like changing rooms must be based on biological sex'.
Ms Osborne, the Labour MP for Jarrow and Gateshead East, said: 'Just last month as I got off the train at King's Cross, I was verbally abused by a man shouting at me that I'm obviously a lesbian, a sexual deviant, and I'm going to hell.
'I'm frequently misgendered and I do not mean occasionally – it's a weekly occurrence.
'In January, I was misgendered three times in one two-hour train journey. I've been misgendered by staff of this House, misgendered whilst buying some jeans last week.
'It's genuinely a frequent issue for me and a number of my lesbian friends.'
Turning to plans for 'guidance regarding the Supreme Court verdict', Ms Osborne continued: 'Actually, that decision will have a huge impact on my life and many other cis lesbians and indeed heterosexual women.
'I suspect I will get challenged even more now when accessing facilities, and whilst the impact on my life will be problematic, the impact on my trans siblings' lives is going to be significantly worse.'
Rachel Taylor, the Labour MP for North Warwickshire and Bedworth, had earlier intervened and said her 'first political activism' was campaigning against section 28 of the Local Government Act 1988, which banned town halls from 'promoting homosexuality' or teaching 'the acceptability of homosexuality' in schools.
She asked: 'It was that rhetoric and those comments that our relationships and our families were somehow pretend family relationships that were so hurtful, and does she agree with me that we need to safeguard now against the risks of the rhetoric about trans people, making the same sort of harm to them as it did to us in the 1980s?'
Ms Osborne said in response: 'We will always have 'T' as part of the LGBT community.'
On wider policies, Ms Osborne said she started the IVF process around 16 years ago but since then, the 'hurdles LGBT+ couples have to jump through have increased, with a fragmented NHS, meaning a postcode lottery in provision and the financial cost is significantly higher'.
She also warned that crimes against victims based on their sexual orientation or gender identity cannot be considered 'aggravated offences', in the same way as discrimination based on race or religion.
Labour MP Nadia Whittome described the Supreme Court's ruling as 'discriminatory' and said trans women face being 'at greater risk of violence' if they use facilities reserved for men.
The MP for Nottingham East continued: 'The last Labour government is often remembered as as time for progress for LGBTQ+ people, rightly, but just as rights can be won, they can also be lost.
'And this Labour Government risks being remembered as a period when things went backwards for our community.
'We've only been in Government for less than a year. It's possible to turn this ship around, but we must recognise that actions like the blanket ban on puberty blockers and barring trans women from women's spaces are dangerous steps in the wrong direction and take action to remedy them.'
Conservative shadow equalities minister Mims Davies said: 'For many women, a lesbian – of course, a same-sex attracted biological woman – should not feel the need for that identity to be subsumed amongst other identities.
'And I think all of us in this chamber today can be very clear that we support others and how they identify, and that is perfectly valid and it's important to not allow this to continue to be toxic or hateful, and for any lesbian to feel that they need to identify in any other way.'
Ms Davies said that 'women's rights and freedoms cannot and must not be eroded, but celebrated and protected, particularly as we approach the 100th anniversary of universal suffrage' in 2028.
Equalities minister Dame Nia Griffith said: 'To be seen, known and accepted for who we are truly is not just a privilege, it's a fundamental human need.'
She described prejudice against trans women as 'absolutely horrific, uncalled for, unjustified' and added: 'This Government is clear – trans people deserve safety, they deserve opportunity, they deserve respect.
'There remain protections in place for trans people to live free from discrimination and harassment, and have their acquired gender recognised. Trans people will still be protected on the basis of gender reassignment, a protected characteristic.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves to unveil Labour's spending plans on Wednesday
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is set to announce Labour 's spending plans on Wednesday, outlining funding until the next election in 2029, but experts warn nearly £5bn in cuts may be needed by 2028/29 to balance the books. The spending review will allocate billions to projects creating jobs and prosperity, with Reeves emphasising the plans are possible due to the stability she introduced. Analysis suggests unprotected departments like housing, policing, and culture could face real-terms cuts of nearly £5 billion by 2028/29, excluding recent commitments to restore winter fuel payments to pensioners. The Home Office is expected to bear the brunt of spending cuts, potentially impacting police numbers, despite being tasked with delivering key pledges. The Liberal Democrats criticised the potential spending squeeze, while the Tory shadow chancellor warned the spending review would lead to future taxes.


The Herald Scotland
30 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
The Jaws test: We're going to need a bigger boat for political sharks
But what do you know, the kid stayed on the picture, the shark scared the popcorn out of audiences, and the score by John Williams will live forever. The picture won three Oscars. It deserved double. Spielberg went on to his next project, a modest something or other about aliens, and the rest is probably being discussed on a podcast somewhere in the distant universe. The moral of the Jaws story is that things can be turned around. What earns brickbats one day can come up roses the next. There endeth the lesson, or so it seemed. As I watched the film again the other day, it occurred to me that Jaws had more to teach us about modern politics and those who swim in its waters. Let's be topical and start with Rachel Reeves. In the Commons today, just after PMQs, the Chancellor will deliver her spending review. Having U-turned on pensioners' winter fuel payments, Ms Reeves must hope that she can put some distance between herself and the worst decision of any government in its first months in office, far less a Labour one. But pensioners, and Labour MPs, have long memories. That was evident on the doorsteps of Hamilton, regardless of the eventual wafer-thin win. The subject will surface again if Ms Reeves comes for personal independence payments (PIP), a lifeline for so many disabled people. The U-turn on winter fuel could run into trouble. Paying the allowance to all, then clawing it back from some, is a plan that's fraught with difficulties. Ms Reeves will get through today, but she must know this is not over. The idea that she can go into the next election, however distant, as Chancellor, is ridiculous. Such is the ill feeling caused by scrapping the winter fuel payments, nothing less than her resignation will put it right. Even her boss knows that. So no, Ms Reeves. It might look calm out there, but it is not safe to go back in the water. Have a paddle close to shore, and get out at a time that suits you. Another takeaway from Jaws is that all politicians can be placed in one of two categories. The first lot are led by Mayor Larry Vaughn, played in the movie by Murray Hamilton. The elected leader of the fictional Amity Island is worried that the great white terrorising his shores is bad for business. Whatever it takes, he wants everyone back in the water on the 4th of July, having a good time. Warning him in the strongest possible terms against this is police chief Martin Brody (Roy Scheider). He wants to wait for the experts (Dreyfuss and Shaw's oceanographer Matt Hooper and Navy veteran Quint) to do their thing before he declares the sea safe. Boris Johnson is an obvious Mayor Vaughn. Donald Trump, Nigel Farage, JD Vance, every blowhard who ever appealed for common sense to prevail. Nicola Sturgeon and gender recognition reform is a Mayor Vaughn: wave after wave of supporters, sent to their doom. Her? Didn't even get the ends of her hair wet. John Swinney at the Hamilton by-election: it's only us and Reform out there, nothing to worry about. Total Mayor Vaughn. What of the police chief Brodys? Keir Starmer is one, even if he is clueless at reading the political weather. He will warn against going in the water initially, but then suddenly everything is fine, much like with the economy. Liberal Democrats, Greens - Brodys forever, though the latter cannot be trusted with making the arrangements to close the beach. Whatever the plan, it will cost three times as much and they will screw it up anyway. Robert Shaw, Roy Scheider, Richard Dreyfuss, in Jaws (1975) (Image: free) Moving on to Quint, the grizzled veteran who has seen some sights in his time as a shark hunter and has the 1000-yard stare to prove it. Jim Sillars and Alex Neil come to mind. Know-all Hooper is every young buck who has never had a job outside politics. There are too many of those to choose from. The shark? Take your pick. It could be a person (Putin the obvious choice) or an event (climate change catastrophe). Either way, it's coming, and it's not going to stop till you can see its dead black eyes. Not that this is any reason to change our ways any time soon. Goodness no, we have all the time in the world for that. Jaws had its US release on June 20, 1975. In the UK we had to wait till Boxing Day to see what the fuss was about. It was one of the first films I saw in the cinema and I love it still. The only regret is that it spread misinformation about sharks, even though the term 'fake news' did not exist then. Sharks don't hunt humans. They don't bear grudges. They are not 25 feet long. Spielberg himself told Desert Island Discs in 2022: 'I truly and to this day regret the decimation of the shark population because of the book and the film.' He's done his bit, alongside conservationists, to increase shark numbers. Things can turn out okay after all. If it has been a while since you last saw Jaws, it will be on ITV4 at 9.05pm on Friday, June 20. It's a special birthday screening, all welcome, especially current and former First Ministers. Alison Rowat is a Herald columnist and writer


STV News
41 minutes ago
- STV News
Chancellor to unveil £113bn spending plans focused on NHS, defence and schools
Chancellor Rachel Reeves will promise to 'invest in Britain's renewal' as she reveals her spending plans on Wednesday. The UK Government's spending review is expected to include a £113bn investment package, boosted by looser borrowing rules. Reeves will announce significant increases in funding for the NHS, defence and education, alongside changes to Treasury rules aimed at directing more investment outside London and the south-east of England. She will say the spending plans are 'possible only because of the stability I have introduced' since the October budget, adding the review will 'ensure renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, their jobs, their communities.' 'The priorities in this spending review are the priorities of working people,' Reeves is set to say. 'To invest in our country's security, health and economy so working people all over our country are better off.' The chancellor has already committed £15.6bn to public transport in England's city regions and £16.7bn for nuclear projects, including the Sizewell C plant in Suffolk. However, the review will impose tight spending limits on most departments outside health, defence and education. While the policing budget is expected to rise above inflation, this could come with cuts elsewhere in the Home Office. Ahead of the announcement, the Institute for Fiscal Studies warned that any NHS funding rise above 2.5% could mean real-terms cuts for other departments or tax increases in the autumn budget. Reeves has reaffirmed Labour's commitment to keeping income tax, national insurance and VAT rates unchanged. She will tell MPs on Wednesday: 'I have made my choices. In place of chaos, I choose stability. In place of decline, I choose investment. In place of retreat, I choose national renewal. 'These are my choices. These are this Government's choices. These are the British people's choices.' But the SNP has called on Reeves to 'abandon Labour Party austerity cuts and deliver urgent support to tackle soaring poverty and help families with the cost of living'. SNP Westminster Leader Stephen Flynn also said it was essential that Scotland finally gets its fair share of capital investment to boost economic growth and create jobs. He said: 'The real test of the UK spending review will be whether the Labour government abandons its devastating austerity cuts to disabled people, and finally takes the bold action needed to eradicate child poverty – or whether the Chancellor ploughs ahead with billions of pounds of cuts to hard-pressed households. 'This is a test of values. Voters were promised change but the cost of living is sky-high, poverty is soaring to record levels on Keir Starmer's watch – and Labour Party austerity cuts are making things even worse. 'Unless the chancellor changes course, more families will fall into deprivation and destitution as a direct result of Labour government failure. 'The chancellor must abandon Labour Party austerity cuts and deliver urgent support to tackle poverty and help families with the cost of living – and Scotland must not be treated as an afterthought when it comes to investment. 'It is essential that Scotland finally gets its fair share of capital investment to boost economic growth and create jobs. 'That means immediately funding vital Scottish energy projects, including Scottish carbon capture, instead of the Labour government constantly cutting and delaying projects in Scotland while pumping billions of pounds into the south of England. 'Time and again, the Labour government has blocked or cut funding for projects in Scotland. It cut £800m of funding for Edinburgh's supercomputer – and handed millions to Bristol's. 'It has delayed Scottish Carbon Capture while pumping billions into England's – and it broke its promise to save Grangemouth, while it set aside billions for steel in Scunthorpe. Scotland must get the investment it needs – and it must get it now.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country