Noem exposes the 'monsters' Democrat senator is fighting to protect in immigration battle
Van Hollen, a vocal critic of the Trump administration's illegal immigration raids, was part of a Maryland congressional delegation that was denied entry to inspect a Baltimore U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facility.
The lawmakers, which included Van Hollen and Sen. Angela Alsobrooks, and U.S. Reps. Glenn Ivey, Johnny Olzewski Jr., Sarah Elfreth and Kweisi Mfume, staged a sit-in upon being denied entry.
"President Trump lied to the American people when he said the Trump administration was simply going to focus on the worst of the worst," Van Hollen said outside the facility.
In response to the sit-in, Noem posted the image of four unidentified illegal immigrants arrested for various crimes, including rape, possession of child pornography, sexual abuse of a minor and murder.
"These are the monsters that @ChrisVanHollen is protecting over American victims," she wrote on X.
U.S. Rep. Johnny Olszewski, D, Md., who was part of Monday's delegation, said they were denied entry despite following the legal requirements to enter.
"Congress has a legal right to inspect ICE facilities," he wrote on social media. "Amid reports of inhumane conditions, this refusal is alarming. We won't stop fighting for accountability."
A post in response by the Department of Homeland Security accused the lawmaker of wanting a "photo op."
"Congressman, if you need a photo op with the violent criminal illegal aliens you are protecting—schedule a TOUR," the post states. "As for visits to detention facilities, requests should be made with sufficient time to prevent interference with the President's Article II authority to oversee executive department functions—a week is sufficient to ensure no intrusion on the President's constitutional authority. To protect the President's Article II authority, any request to shorten that time must be approved by the Secretary."
Van Hollen has come under heavy criticism for his advocacy for suspected gang member Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia.
Van Hollen was the first of several Democratic lawmakers to fly to visit Abrego Garcia after he was deported to a high-security prison in his home country, El Salvador, in March.
Abrego Garcia, 29, has been returned to the U.S. and is facing charges in a sealed federal indictment in Tennessee for alleged conspiracy to unlawfully transport illegal aliens for financial gain and unlawful transportation of illegal aliens.
Though many Democrats claim Abrego Garcia is an innocent man who was wrongly deported, the administration has pointed to considerable evidence that he is a member of the MS-13 gang. According to court records filed by his wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, he also allegedly physically abused her on multiple occasions.
"As I have repeatedly said, this is not about the man. It's about his constitutional rights, and the rights of all," Van Hollen told Fox News Digital in June about the case. "The administration will now have to make its case in the court of law, as it should have all along."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Entrepreneur
a minute ago
- Entrepreneur
America Needs a Bitcoin Reserve — Here's Why
The U.S. has released its most comprehensive digital-asset policy yet, the 160-page Crypto Playbook. The initiative holds promise and invites further discussion in the world of digital assets. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. On July 30, the U.S. released its most sweeping digital-asset policy framework to date: a 160‑page U.S. Crypto Playbook. While the report steers clear of new promises regarding a federal Bitcoin acquisition program, it renews attention on the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, first announced in March — an initiative that could reshape America's financial posture. The newly published Crypto Playbook is the most comprehensive digital asset policy guide the U.S. has ever produced. The report outlines strategic goals around stablecoin regulations, DeFi innovation, digital infrastructure, consumer protections and financial literacy. Highlights include endorsement of the bipartisan GENIUS Act, laying regulatory ground rules for crypto exchanges; clarification of jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC via the proposed Clarity Act; and recommendations for tax treatment of staking income, mining equipment depreciation, and wash-sale exemptions. But the most headline-grabbing omission? No fresh policy announcement regarding the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. Despite speculation, the Playbook simply restates the administration's March 6 directive to consolidate all seized Bitcoin into a national reserve, while remaining silent on future acquisitions. For many in the crypto community, the message is clear: the idea isn't dead, but it's still taking shape. Related: Why Not Owning Bitcoin is Making You Poor What we know about the reserve so far In March, an executive order directed U.S. agencies to begin aggregating all federally seized Bitcoin into a single account under the Department of the Treasury. The U.S. currently controls an estimated 200,000 BTC, mostly obtained through forfeitures linked to cybercrime and darknet operations. Rather than liquidating these holdings at auction (as has been common practice for years), the White House policy marks a significant pivot: treat Bitcoin like a sovereign asset, not a liability. While today's Playbook did not mention any direct purchases or operational updates, the crypto industry remains optimistic. As one policy advisor put it, "They've already laid the foundation. We're just waiting for them to build the house." According to a reporter present at the event, the Treasury Secretary emphasized the growing role of digital assets in global finance and outlined the administration's commitment to regulatory modernization. A key theme from his speech was the need to "reinforce dollar dominance through stablecoins and modernize banking regulations for digital assets." His comments reflect the administration's broader strategy, as outlined in the newly released U.S. Crypto Playbook, to position the United States as a global leader in blockchain innovation while safeguarding national financial stability. The event drew senior policymakers, industry leaders, and regulatory officials, many of whom welcomed the remarks as a turning point in the federal government's tone toward crypto. This affirmation of support marks a pivotal moment, suggesting that Washington sees the maturation of Bitcoin and stablecoins not as a threat to the dollar but as a tool to strengthen its role in a rapidly digitizing global economy. Related: Exploring Bitcoin As a Retirement Investment Avenue Why America needs a Bitcoin reserve At a time of rising geopolitical friction, debt uncertainty and de-dollarization efforts by global rivals, a Bitcoin strategic reserve offers the U.S. several vital advantages. Just as gold once anchored the monetary system, Bitcoin now serves as a decentralized, censorship-resistant store of value. A sovereign reserve positions the U.S. to weather inflation, monetary dilution and foreign central bank diversification. Nations like China and Russia have been quietly offloading U.S. Treasuries and accumulating gold. If a currency crisis or dollar liquidity shock ever emerged, a Bitcoin buffer could serve as a geopolitical hedge with instant global liquidity. America's dominance in technology is already being challenged by decentralized finance and token-based commerce. A strategic reserve signals leadership in digital capital formation, making the U.S. more attractive for Web3 entrepreneurs and fintech investment. While U.S. sanctions have long used the dollar as a weapon, adversaries are actively seeking alternatives. A Bitcoin reserve gives the U.S. a tool of resilience, rather than dependence on legacy systems vulnerable to fragmentation. By leveraging forfeited BTC from criminal seizures, the reserve grows without costing taxpayers a cent — a rare bipartisan win with massive asymmetric upside. In short, a Bitcoin reserve isn't about speculative gain. It's about future-proofing national strength. Related: A Bitcoin Hot Girl Summer — Will Bitcoin's Success Continue? Skepticism — and strategy — remain Of course, not everyone is on board. Economists have voiced concern that Bitcoin's volatility makes it an unstable strategic asset. A recent University of Chicago poll found that over 70% of economists do not believe such a reserve would reduce national economic risk. Global reaction has also been cautious. European and Asian officials have warned that a U.S. crypto reserve could destabilize existing foreign exchange reserves and provoke retaliatory monetary policies. And then there are the technical and ethical questions: Who controls the keys? Can sovereign actors manipulate Bitcoin? Should the reserve be disclosed in real time? The answers remain murky. What happens next Under the March order, agencies have until late September to deliver implementation frameworks to the Treasury. Legislative allies in Congress have already floated the BITCOIN Act, which would authorize a broader reserve and explore alternative funding strategies, potentially including gold-for-BTC swaps. Until then, the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve will remain more symbol than substance. But for crypto advocates, that symbol is growing heavier by the day.
Fast Company
a minute ago
- Fast Company
After the Paramount merger, could UFC stage a July 4th fight at the White House?
Hours after Paramount and UFC announced a billion-dollar rights deal, Dana White said he had yet to hear from his friend, President Donald Trump, on his thoughts about the fight company's new streaming home. That was fine with White. The UFC CEO was set to travel to Washington on Aug. 28 to meet with Trump and his daughter, Ivanka, to catch up and discuss logistics on the proposed Fourth of July fight card next year at the White House. Trump said last month he wanted to stage a UFC match on the White House grounds with upwards of 20,000 spectators to celebrate 250 years of American independence. 'It's absolutely going to happen,' White told The Associated Press. 'Think about that, the 250th birthday of the United States of America, the UFC will be on the White House south lawn live on CBS.' The idea of cage fights at the White House would have seemed improbable when the Fertitta brothers purchased UFC for $2 million in 2001 and put White in charge of the fledging fight promotion. White helped steer the company into a $4 billion sale in 2016 and broadcast rights deals with Fox and ESPN before landing owner TKO Group's richest one yet — a seven-year deal with Paramount starting in 2026 worth an average of $1.1 billion a year, with all cards on its streaming platform Paramount+ and select numbered events also set to simulcast on CBS. ESPN, Amazon and Netflix and other traditional sports broadcast players seemed more in play for UFC rights — White had previously hinted fights could air across different platforms — but Paramount was a serious contender from the start of the negotiating window. The Paramount and UFC deal came just days after Skydance and Paramount officially closed their $8 billion merger — kicking off the reign of a new entertainment giant after a contentious endeavor to get the transaction over the finish line. White said he was impressed with the vision Skydance CEO David Ellison had for the the global MMA leader early in contract talks and how those plans should blossom now that Ellison is chairman and CEO of Paramount. 'When you talk about Paramount, you talk about David Ellison, they're brilliant businessmen, very aggressive, risk takers,' White said. 'They're right up my alley. These are the kind of guys that I like to be in business with.' The $1.1 billion deals marks a notable jump from the roughly $550 million that ESPN paid each year for UFC coverage today. But UFC's new home on Paramount will simplify offerings for fans — with all content set to be available on Paramount+ (which currently costs between $7.99 and $12.99 a month), rather than various pay-per-view fees. Paramount also said it intends to explore UFC rights outside the U.S. 'as they become available in the future.' UFC matchmakers were set to meet this week to shape what White said would be a loaded debut Paramount card. The UFC boss noted it was still too early to discuss a potential main event for the White House fight night. 'This is a 1-of-1 event,' White said. There are still some moving parts to UFC broadcasts and other television programming it has its hands in as the company moves into the Paramount era. White said there are still moving parts to the deal and that includes potentially finding new homes for 'The Ultimate Fighter,' 'Road To UFC,' and 'Dana White's Contender Series.' It's not necessarily a given the traditional 10 p.m. start time for what were the pay-per-view events would stand, especially on nights cards will also air on CBS. 'We haven't figured that out yet but we will,' White said. And what about the sometimes-contentious issue of fighter pay? Some established fighters have clauses in their contracts that they earn more money the higher the buyrate on their cards. Again, most of those issues are to-be-determined as UFC and Paramount settle in to the new deal — with $1.1 billion headed the fight company's way. 'It will affect fighter pay, big time,' White said. 'From deal-to-deal, fighter pay has grown, too. Every time we win, everybody wins.' Boxer Jake Paul wrote on social media the dying PPV model — which was overpriced for fights as UFC saw a decline in buys because of missing star power in many main events — should give the fighters an increased idea of their worth. 'Every fighter in the UFC now has a clear picture of what the revenue is…no more PPV excuses,' Paul wrote. 'Get your worth boys and girls.' White also scoffed at the idea that the traditional PPV model is dead. There are still UFC cards on pay-per-view the rest of the year through the end of the ESPN contract and White and Saudi Arabia have teamed to launch a new boxing venture that starts next year and could use a PPV home. White, though, is part of the promotional team for the Canelo Álvarez and Terence Crawford fight in September in Las Vegas that airs on Netflix. 'It's definitely not run it's course,' White said. 'There were guys out there who were interested in pay-per-view and there were guys out there that weren't. Wherever we ended up, that's what we're going to roll with.' White said UFC archival footage 'kills it' in repeat views and those classic bouts also needed a new home once the ESPN deal expires. Just when it seems there's little left for UFC to conquer, White says, there's always more. Why stop at becoming the biggest fight game in the world? Why not rewrite the pecking order in popularity and riches and go for No. 1 in all sports? 'You have the NFL, the NBA, the UFC, and soccer globally,' White said. 'We're coming. We're coming for all of them.'
Associated Press
2 minutes ago
- Associated Press
South Africa dismisses U.S. human rights report as 'deeply flawed'
JOHANNESBURG (AP) — The South African government on Wednesday dismissed the U.S. State Department's latest assessment of the country's human rights conditions as 'inaccurate and deeply flawed.' The Trump administration this week released human rights reports for countries worldwide, including South Africa, asserting that the state of human rights in South Africa had 'significantly worsened' in 2024. It cited the unjust treatment of white Afrikaners after the signing of significant land reforms, which the Trump administration has claimed discriminate against the group that ruled the nation during the apartheid era. South Africa's Foreign Ministry expressed 'profound disappointment' with the report, saying its reliance on out of context information and discredited accounts was highly concerning.f The ministry highlighted that the United Nations had hailed the country's Land Expropriation Act as an important step in resolving racially unequal land ownership, underscoring the integrity of constitutional and human rights-based legislative processes. It added that the report was 'ironic' given the U.S exit from the U.N. Human Rights Council. 'This is particularly striking given the significant and documented concerns about human rights within the United States, including the treatment of refugees and breaches in due process by its own agencies, such as ICE,' the ministry said. South Africa's government also dismissed as inaccurate the report's claims that it 'did not take credible steps to investigate, prosecute and punish officials who committed human rights abuses, including inflammatory racial rhetoric against Afrikaners and other racial minorities, or violence against racial minorities.' The U.S. criticism of South Africa's domestic affairs is the latest in a series of tense diplomatic exchanges between the two countries since President Donald Trump was elected to a second term. During a state visit to the White House in May, Trump confronted President Cyril Ramaphosa with false claims that South Africa had been illegally occupying the farms of white Afrikaner farmers. The administration even speeded up the visa application processes for Afrikaners who wanted to relocate to the U.S as refugees. Along with suspending financial aid and imposing 30% tariffs on South Africa's exports to the U.S., Trump has denounced the country's stance on the Israel-Hamas conflict. South African Ambassador Ebrahim Rasool was expelled by the U.S. for his criticism of Trump, who has hinted that he may not attend the G20 summit of world leaders scheduled to take place in Johannesburg in November. The Afrikaans trade union Solidarieit, which was criticized by Ramaphosa over a recent visit to Washington, has announced new plans to visit the U.S. in September to meet with the Department of State and other parties to discuss abolishing racial-redress laws, reestablishing diplomatic ties, and creating a fair trade agreement between the two countries.
