New lawsuit seeks to force return of collected tariffs following court ruling
A new lawsuit filed in the U.S. Court of International Trade seeks to force the Trump administration to return tariffs it collected under the president's 'Liberation Day' announcement now that the court has ruled them unlawful.
Chapter1 LLC, a Las Vegas-based skincare start-up, said it paid nearly $23,000 under the challenged tariffs when it imported a custom machine to mix its serum and toner products from China.
The suit says the company's owner, 25-year-old Ali Shaubzada, ordered the machine in the fall, using most of his savings and business lines of credit. It arrived in the U.S. earlier this month, with the duties outpacing the roughly $16,000 cost of the machine itself.
'To pay for this unexpectedly large bill, Ali had to take out a personal loan,' the complaint reads.
The class-action suit seeks to recover Chapter1's tariff payment and the billions in payments made by businesses across the country following Trump's announcements.
'Hundreds of thousands of other American businesses have exactly the same claim, based on exactly the same legal theory, against the United States: Each importer has a claim against the United States for repayment of the tariffs it paid,' the lawsuit states.
Chapter1 is represented by Gerstein Harrow.
The Hill has reached out to the Justice Department for comment.
The suit, filed Thursday, comes a day after the trade court invalidated the bulk of Trump's tariffs.
The three-judge panel unanimously ruled that the administration's broad interpretation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a federal law that authorizes the president to impose necessary economic sanctions during a national emergency, is unconstitutional.
Trump previously cited trade deficits as emergency justification to impose his 'Liberation Day' tariffs, which imposed a 10 percent rate on all imports and higher, reciprocal tariffs on dozens of U.S. trading partners. Wednesday's ruling also blocked Trump's IEEPA tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China dating back to February that pointed to an influx of fentanyl coming across the border.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit temporarily lifted the order on Thursday but is expected to issue a new ruling after receiving written arguments from the parties in the coming days.
Separately, a federal district judge in the nation's capital blocked Trump's use of IEEPA in response to another lawsuit.
The administration has appealed that ruling, too. But the judge provided two weeks before his order goes into effect, meaning that no court injunction is currently blocking any of Trump's tariffs, for now.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Need to Improve Visibility of Asian Americans: Chen
The White House is planning wider sanctions on China's tech sector with new regulations targeting subsidiaries of Chinese companies. This came shortly after President Trump commented that Beijing violated a tariff agreement without giving any specifics. The escalating US-China tensions that the discourse of Asian American, Pacific Islander identity, safety, and economic opportunity has become all the more urgent. The Asian American Foundation CEO Norman Chen has more on the story. Sign in to access your portfolio
Business Journals
26 minutes ago
- Business Journals
Is a long-term hedge fund strategy possible in this market?
There has never been so much brinkmanship from a U.S. administration in modern times. The first month of executive orders has produced a cyclone of speculation and a great deal of action and reaction. The U.S. recently enacted tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China. Within one day, the first two were paused. Such moves have injected a great deal of volatility into markets. Conflicting business policies continue to add to the uncertainty and volatility. How can hedge fund managers hold to a medium- to long-term strategy in a world where so much is uncertain? In this article, we look at how fund managers have been preparing and will continue to respond by lowering their beta exposure. The current state of hedge fund activity Hedge funds began the year divesting from equities. This culminated in a selloff the Friday before the new tariffs where hedge funds 'sold nine of 11 sectors in the S&P,' reported Bloomberg. The most-sold groups included: Consumer discretionary Industrials Financials Energy Communication services Information technology Meanwhile, retail investors bet the opposite. As fund managers sold stocks, retail investors poured $2.1 billion into equities. The market dropped upon news of the tariffs, though less than expected. Futures fell — the Nasdaq composite, 2.35%, and the S&P, 1.7%. It is clear everyone is reading the room differently and holds a wide variety of views on the long-term health of the U.S. economy. On the one hand, JP Morgan Chase announced that it expected tariffs to lower U.S. growth by 0.5%-1% and raise inflation by that same amount. On the other, a Feb. 3 Gallup poll found consumers buoyant. Sixty-one percent expect stocks to rise in value, the most since Gallup began including that question in 2001. Yet, is it worth asking how useful projections, even when given sweeping tariffs, can be paused the next day? What is the long-term effect of those partnerships? Reuters asked fund managers why they were not more aggressive in the administration's first few weeks. Several said they were hesitant to 'get sucked in,' which appears to be trumping the fear of missing out. Many are hedging and investing in bonds and treasuries. "Either inflation comes down and you get hit on margins, or it doesn't, and the Fed hits you because it doesn't cut (rates)," Matt Smith, investment director at Ruffer LLP told Reuters. "We are at our lowest equity weight." Hedge funds have been readying for this market Hedge funds prepared for this presidency with their highest borrowing levels since 2010. They expect the dollar to continue to rise and protectionist policies to have some upsides for the U.S. economy. They also expect to benefit from the Trump administration's promise to maintain lower taxes — notably, corporate taxes and the capital gains tax, via extension of the expiring 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) – though the administration's proposal on taxing of carried interest is not a favorable one for fund managers. Hedge funds are adjusting their strategies in four ways: Reducing their beta exposure As they say, predictions are difficult, especially about the future. Right now, it feels even more fraught. As tariffs and the president's 60+ executive orders (and counting) show, we can likely expect many quick policy decisions and reversals without warning. In response, Reuters reports that hedge fund managers are reducing the portion of their portfolio dedicated to beta investments to between 15%-5%, down from an average of 20%. Managers want less exposure to technology stocks Tariffs aside, stock market routs like the one that followed news of China's AI DeepSeek have managers on edge. As DeepSeek panic spread, the chipmaker Nvidia shed $600 billion in market cap. Since the industry has shifted to AI models, fortunes seem to rise and fall faster. Managers want less exposure to emerging markets The administration's protectionist policies seem certain to favor the dollar at the expense of our trading partners. They also favor reshoring operations. This makes it difficult to gauge the long-term value of foreign investments, even if they may be more attractive. Managers are bullish on alternative investments Fifty-six percent of hedge funds now have multiple managers and more capacity to shift into alternative investment strategies. For example, real estate and healthcare – from our conversations, hedge fund managers feel all the protectionist policies and declining trade make real estate and healthcare better investments. Consider the implications of new investment strategies As hedge funds shift their investing strategies, there may be a learning curve for firms entering new territory. Managers newly entering commercial real estate will find that the standard capital stack has changed over the past few years, and mezzanine debt is preferred over equity. There also may be new tax consequences to consider. For example, municipal bonds are taxed federally unless they are tax-free, in which case they are probably still subject to state and local taxation. Citrin Cooperman's hedge fund professionals are here to support you each step of the way. If you would like to discuss your allocation strategy and the accounting and tax implications of those holdings, please contact Alexander Reyes, partner and financial services industry practice leader, at areyes@ or James Catalano, partner, at jcatalano@ Citrin Cooperman is one of the nation's largest professional services firms. Since 1979, we've steadily built our business by helping middle market companies and high net worth individuals find practical, actionable solutions to help them meet their short-term needs and long-term objectives. Our clients span a diverse array of industry and business sectors and find sustainable growth through utilizing our menu of comprehensive personal and professional services. Citrin Cooperman & Company, LLP, a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services and Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC, which provides business advisory and non-attest services, operate as an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA's Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations, and professional standards. For more information, please visit "Citrin Cooperman" is the brand under which Citrin Cooperman & Company, LLP, a licensed independent CPA firm, and Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC serve clients' business needs. The two firms operate as separate legal entities in an alternative practice structure. The entities of Citrin Cooperman & Company, LLP and Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC are independent member firms of the Moore North America, Inc. (MNA) Association, which is itself a regional member of Moore Global Network Limited (MGNL). All the firms associated with MNA are independently owned and managed entities. Their membership in, or association with, MNA should not be construed as constituting or implying any partnership between them.
Business Journals
28 minutes ago
- Business Journals
Domestic vs. international: The trade-offs in mass timber suppliers
Mass timber continues to gain traction in the United States for its sustainability, strength and aesthetic appeal. According to industry leading resource WoodWorks, 2,427 multi-family, commercial or institutional mass timber projects were in progress or built as of March 2025 in the United States. In just the last four years, Texas saw a 168% increase in the amount of mass timber projects either in design, construction or completed. As mass timber developments in Texas increase in popularity, owners and contractors face a critical decision: whether to source the material domestically or internationally. The decision isn't as simple as price — although it is a big factor. There are other points to consider when selecting your mass timber provider. Analyzing domestic manufacturers With threats of tariffs and rising material costs, builders might feel inclined to source mass timber from domestic providers. According to Forisk, an industry research and consulting firm, there are 38 mass timber production facilities across the United States and Canada —24 of which can produce cross-laminated timber (CLT). Nearly 51% of those facilities are located in the Northwest region of the United States. U.S.-based manufacturers offer clear advantages in logistics and responsiveness. Shorter lead times and lower transportation costs often play a critical role in keeping projects on schedule and under budget. Domestic suppliers are also more attuned to U.S. building codes and sustainability certifications such as LEED, reducing compliance risks. In fast-paced markets like DFW, domestic sourcing can improve project agility and save substantial costs. However, this sometimes comes at the expense of the quality of the wood and the species availability. With mass timber, a more recent trend domestically, manufacturers may provide limited capacity for larger sizes and complicated connections. expand Analyzing international manufacturers Mass timber construction is significantly more popular and has been more widely adopted in European counties and Canada than in the United States. That is why international suppliers, particularly from Europe and Canada, often bring decades of experience and advanced production capabilities. Countries like Austria, Germany and Finland lead the world in mass timber manufacturing, offering highly standardized, precision-milled wood. International suppliers often provide premium wood selections and can potentially offer competitive pricing due to economies of scale, despite higher shipping costs. However, longer lead times and complex logistics pose a potential threat to project timelines. Additionally, verifying sustainability claims and code compliance may require extra due diligence. Tariff impacts New tariffs that may be placed on imported goods, coupled with existing duties on lumber imports, caused many international manufacturers to increase the cost of goods for American buyers. While the tariffs are designed with the intent of benefitting U.S. manufacturing long-term, domestic lumber suppliers may feel the demand impact in the short term. Domestic manufacturers currently face higher material expenses, which may limit some suppliers' ability to invest in modernized equipment. A lack of efficient equipment could result in a struggle to achieve the economies of scale international competitors achieve. Additionally, domestic manufacturing may fall further behind international suppliers in terms of technology and overall manufacturing efficiency. Conclusion As the demand for mass timber continues to rise across the United States, builders and developers are faced with the important decision of whether to source material domestically or internationally. Each option presents unique advantages and trade-offs, and project owners must weigh the factors in accordance with their project goals. McCownGordon's Dallas team consists of leading mass timber builders with experience working with both domestic and international suppliers. Our team of experts can help you navigate the complexities of the mass timber supply chain and ultimately help you find the right supplier to reach your project goals. McCownGordon Construction is recognized as one of the nation's largest construction managers. Focused on core values of integrity, relationships and performance, McCownGordon commits to building collaborative partnerships and specializes in construction management, design-build, sustainable construction and general contracting. With strong experience and expertise in a variety of market sectors, the company is 100% employee-owned and was named a top 25 Fortune 2023 Best Construction Company to Work For. More information about McCownGordon is available at
