Palestine statehood: More countries back two-state solution - what's keeping the dream a dream?
First France, then the United Kingdom, and now Canada: three of America's closest Western allies have recently voiced support for the idea of a Palestinian state, adding significant political heft to a movement already endorsed by more than 140 countries.
On paper, it sounds like a diplomatic shift. In reality, the goal of Palestinian statehood may be further away than ever.
Why now?
The recent declarations by France, Britain, and Canada stem from several motives:
Frustration with Israel's actions, especially in Gaza, where images of starving Palestinians have outraged many in the West.
Domestic political pressure, as citizens and lawmakers demand their governments take a stand.
A desire to reinvigorate peace efforts long stalled in the region.
Meanwhile, Palestinians have welcomed these moves as a major boost for their cause, but Israel has rejected them outright, calling recognition of a Palestinian state tantamount to "rewarding terrorism."
Where does the US stand?
These announcements have left the US looking increasingly isolated in its steadfast support for Israel. US President Trump, who has aspirations for a Middle East peace legacy, has grown frustrated with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — especially over starvation in Gaza, which Netanyahu denies.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Pirates Climb Aboard Cargo Ship - Watch What The Captain Did Next
Tips and Tricks
Undo
Trump wants Saudi Arabia to normalise ties with Israel as part of expanding the Abraham Accords, but Riyadh has made it clear: there will be no normalisation without an irreversible path to Palestinian statehood.
What's stopping it?
A lot. Here's why the dream of a Palestinian state remains just that — a dream:
1. No partner in power
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu flat-out rejects a two-state solution. He has described the idea of a Palestinian state as a "launch pad to annihilate Israel."
Even if Netanyahu were to waver, hardline ministers in his coalition have threatened to collapse the government over any hint of compromise.
2. Palestinian leadership vacuum
On the Palestinian side, things aren't any more stable. The Palestinian Authority, which governs parts of the West Bank, is seen as weak and out of touch. Meanwhile, Hamas, which controls Gaza, is internationally designated as a terrorist group.
So even if a state were created, who would run it? Who could actually deliver peace?
3. The geography just doesn't work anymore
The borders discussed in the 1990s Oslo Accords, based on 1967 lines with minor land swaps, are now more fantasy than framework.
Massive Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank has carved up Palestinian territory into disconnected fragments.
A contiguous, functioning Palestinian state under these conditions is nearly impossible.
Can Israel accept a Palestinian state?
The short answer: Not under Netanyahu's government.
Netanyahu has declared that a Palestinian state would serve as a 'launch pad to annihilate Israel.' Even more extreme members of his coalition openly oppose any Palestinian sovereignty and have threatened to collapse the government if Netanyahu shows signs of compromise.
Some cabinet members have even suggested starving Palestinians in Gaza rather than negotiating.
What does it all mean?
Recognition by France, the UK, and Canada is largely symbolic without Israel's agreement. In fact, it could even entrench Netanyahu further, allowing him to rally his base against what he will frame as unfair outside pressure.
But at the same time, Israel's growing international isolation — especially among its traditional Western allies — could build pressure on leaders like Trump to reconsider their unwavering support, potentially reshaping the diplomatic landscape.
The harsh reality
Despite global calls, a Palestinian state faces more roadblocks now than in past decades. If anything, the conflict and entrenched positions have made it harder to imagine such a state ever existing — let alone thriving.
The dream of Palestinian statehood continues to inspire hope — and trigger fierce debates. But right now, it's a dream suspended in diplomatic limbo, with no clear path, no consensus, and no timeline. The louder the world speaks, the more distant the solution seems.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
19 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Israel intercepts missile launched from Yemen
The Israeli military said early on Tuesday it intercepted a missile from Yemen after air raid sirens sounded in several areas across the country. A woman takes cover behind a car, which stopped at the side of a road, while sirens sound, in response to what the Israeli military reported was a missile launched from Yemen towards Israel that was intercepted, in Tel Aviv, Israel, July 29, 2025.(Reuters) The Iran-aligned Houthi group, which controls the most populous parts of Yemen, has been firing at Israel and attacking shipping lanes. Houthis have repeatedly said their attacks are an act of solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza. Most of the dozens of missiles and drones they have launched have been intercepted or fallen short. Israel has carried out a series of retaliatory strikes.
India.com
19 minutes ago
- India.com
Israel-Gaza War Puts Billion-Dollar IMEC Project At Risk; India-Saudi Strains Leave China Smiling – Why This Corridor Matters
New Delhi: The war in Gaza is not only claiming lives. It is dismantling billion-dollar plans stretching from India to Europe. Among them is the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), a flagship connectivity project backed by India, the United States, Saudi Arabia, the European Union and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The project had a grand vision. Announced during the G20 Summit in New Delhi in September 2023, the IMEC aimed to link India with Europe via the Middle East. A series of modern rail networks, ports, pipelines and digital infrastructure would form its spine. Israel was expected to play a central role as the corridor's critical junction. But war changed that. The fighting in Gaza has triggered diplomatic cold fronts across the Arab world. Hostage crises and hunger deaths have gripped global headlines. Behind the scenes, the IMEC blueprint is beginning to look fragile. Several conversations linked to the corridor's normalisation process have stopped. The air of political instability has raised new doubts. Investors are now cautious. Talks have lost momentum. Security concerns loom larger. Reports from Israeli media outlets such Ynet cite growing fears that the project may now face indefinite delays. The timing has worked in Beijing's favour. The IMEC was widely seen as a counter to China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), with its own web of global infrastructure alliances. A stalled IMEC is a strategic breather for China. It removes immediate competition from a rival corridor that was built to tilt trade flows away from Chinese influence. For India, in addition to being a transport network, the IMEC was a geopolitical leap. With 47 trillion dollars in combined GDP between its partners, it held the potential to upgrade India's role in global trade. The corridor also fit into New Delhi's broader push to develop digital public infrastructure, enhance green energy ties and open secure channels to Europe and the Americas. Though the dream has not died, it has dimmed. The longer the war in Gaza drags on, the harder it gets for IMEC stakeholders to keep the political will alive. Saudi Arabia's frustration over Israel's war posture is deepening. Strategic cohesion among partner countries is thinning. The risk of indefinite pause is no longer a whisper. Whether the IMEC becomes reality or remains a footnote in G20 speeches now depends on what unfolds on the ground in Gaza.
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Prohibitory orders likely ahead of PUCSC polls amid rising student violence
1 2 3 4 Chandigarh: With Panjab University likely to hold its PU Campus Students' Council (PUCSC) elections on Sept 4 or 5, the administration has started security preparations much earlier than usual. A meeting between the university and police officials, including the senior superintendent of police, is scheduled for Wednesday to discuss the imposition of prohibitory orders around Aug 15 — a first for PU student elections. The move comes amid concerns over rising student violence on and off campus. Nearly 100 police personnel have already been deployed for security, with three permanent checkpoints established near the Administrative Block, Ankur School, and University Institute of Legal Studies (UILS). Police are checking vehicles, enforcing barricading, and monitoring student movement to restrict entry of outsiders. "This time, deployment is not symbolic. We are actively checking for weapons and other suspicious items, especially during evening hours," said a senior police officer posted on campus. The strict measures follow a series of violent clashes involving student groups in PU and other city colleges. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Just a few days back, two FIRs were registered after rival groups clashed at GGDSD College in Sector 32. On April 28, SOPU factions fought at the PU Student Centre. On April 8, the Dalal camp and Joint Action Committee (JAC) clashed outside Boys Hostel No. 4. On March 28, PU student Aditya Thakur was murdered during a fest on the Sector 25 campus. In another case, on March 22, PUCSC joint secretary and others were booked following an ABVP-related brawl in Sector 15. Vice-chancellor Prof Renu Vig confirmed that the university has called the police meeting to finalise steps for ensuring peace. "Various student organisations have multiple factions and hence infighting. The past six months have seen many student groups clashing with each other," she said. PU authorities have also scheduled a meeting with all student parties for Tuesday. Dean student welfare Prof Amit Chauhan said the administration will also meet student leaders. "The aim is to ensure a peaceful environment during elections. We are concerned about outsider involvement and are considering all options, including prohibitory orders, though the matter is yet to be finalised," he said. Sources said the university is also planning stricter controls on vehicle entry and increased surveillance over the next few weeks. Security staff have been instructed to assist police in enforcing discipline across the campus. Police officials said that some student groups are being monitored for alleged connections to gangsters. "We are keeping tabs on movement, contacts, and past involvement of some leaders with criminal elements. This time we are taking proactive steps," said a police officer. With campaigning expected to begin in mid-August, university authorities say maintaining order is the top priority and students will have to operate within strict boundaries. BOX- A violent year March 22: PUCSC joint secretary among 10 booked in ABVP infighting, Sector 15 March 28: PU student Aditya Thakur murdered during a fest April 8: Dalal camp and JAC clash outside PU Boys Hostel 4 April 28: SOPU factions scuffle at PU Student Centre July 28 & 30: Two clashes between rival groups at GGDSD College, FIRs registered July 31: Drone reels, sticker convoys raise outsider entry concerns on PU campus
